I was reading a tutorial for analytical function and i found something like this
sum(princial) keep(dense_rank first order by d_date) over partition by (userid, alias, sec_id, flow, p_date)
How to translate this into simple queries / subquery? i am aware that analytical function are faster but i would like to know how this can translate to using query without analytical function.
I'm posting below test case in which I'm not able to understand output for LAST_VALUE function. I'm expecting maximum value for the salary in a department. Because I'm partitioning by department and ordering a partition as assending so being last value it should give me maximum value within a partition i.e. department in this case.
CREATE TABLE EMP_MST
(
EMP_ID NUMBER(5),
EMP_NAME VARCHAR2(30),
CONSTRAINT PK_EMP_MST PRIMARY KEY(EMP_ID)
[code]...
Is there any way to apply the restriction on analytical functions, just like WHERE and HAVING .AS we know that we can apply the restriction on table by using WHERE and grouping functions by using HAVING clause .
For Ex: Departments wise count including all employees record :
SQL> select count(*) over(partition by deptno) dept_Count, ce.*
2 from scott.emp ce
3 order by deptno, job;
DEPT_COUNT EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL COMM DEPTNO
---------- ----- ---------- --------- ----- ----------- --------- --------- ------
3 7934 MILLER CLERK 7782 1/23/1982 1300.00 10
3 7782 CLARK MANAGER 7839 6/9/1981 2450.00 10
3 7839 KING PRESIDENT 11/17/1981 5000.00 10
5 7788 SCOTT ANALYST 7566 4/19/1987 3000.00 20
[code]....
Here is the test-table creation script:
CREATE TABLE TEST1 (AGG_DATE DATE, COL1 NUMBER(9), COL2 NUMBER(9), COL3 NUMBER(9));
Here is the test-data population script:
insert into TEST1 (AGG_DATE, COL1, COL2, COL3)
values (to_date('01-01-2012', 'dd-mm-yyyy'), 1, 1, 1);
[code]....
The problem is when I wrote an analytical query, it is giving the BEGIN_DATE and END_DATE by taking all the partition values together and so instead of the values above, it is creating an answer as follows:
Wrong Dataset
BEGIN_DATEEND_DATECOL1COL2COL3
1/1/20121/8/2012111
1/1/20121/8/2012111
1/1/20121/8/2012111
1/1/20121/8/2012111
1/4/20121/11/2012222
1/4/20121/11/2012222
[code]....
Only the last row is correct. What can I do to get the right answer as I know am falling short? Here is my current query:
SELECT MIN(AGG_DATE) OVER(PARTITION BY COL1, COL2, COL3) BEGIN_DATE,
MAX(AGG_DATE) OVER(PARTITION BY COL1, COL2, COL3) END_DATE,
COL1,
COL2,
COL3
FROM TEST1;
I have simplified this for ease of understanding. I have a Data column and a Month_ID column like this:
Values Month_ID
--------- -------------------------------------------------------
AAA 1
BBB 2
I split this out to values per year like this
Value_2011 Value_2012 Month_ID
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
AAA 1
BBB 2
Now i am trying to get the max(Value_2011) keep (dense_rank Last order by Month_ID) but i get a NULL. I can understand its because the Month_ID accomodates all years but i only need it to look at Month_ID for 2011 and return me the last dense_rank value, how can i achieve this?
I tried a couple of different methods like Last_Value() but i have group by in my original statement and i think analytical functions dont like GROUP by if they are not part of it. How can i achieve this?
I need to calculate the sum of values over a period of exactly one month (including the current row). Now if I use a windowing clause of "range between interval '1' month preceding and current row", the total period length is 1 month plus one day (being the day in the current record).
Basically, I want to sum over a period starting at "add_months(startdate, -1) + 1" up until startdate of each row.
drop table window_tst;
create table window_tst
( id number primary key
[Code]....
So instead of having 01-feb going back to 01-jan, it should only include 02-jan till 01-feb
I could of course recalculate the period length back to a number of days for each row, but that is not really what I would prefer, as it would make the code rather unreadable.
I need to calcaulate the salary avarage for three days prior, leaving the current row. That should happen to every row moving back words.I have given all the details.
create table Employee(
ID VARCHAR2(4 BYTE) NOT NULL,
name varchar(20),
Start_Date DATE,
Salary Number(8,2),
mv_avg number(8,2)
[code]....
I want to use Analytical function instead of group by clause for below query..
select
CASE
WHEN ADMT.SOURCESYSTEM ='CLU'
THEN COUNT(ADMT.TOTAL_COUNT)*5
ELSE COUNT(ADMT.TOTAL_COUNT)
END TOTAL_COUNT
from ESMARTABC.ABC_DRVR_MFAILS_TMP ADMT
group by ADMT.SOURCESYSTEM
can we use distinct keyword with the count and sum analytical functions?
View 5 Replies View RelatedMy table has two date columns EFF_DT which is the start date and TERM_DT is the end date. The EFF_DT of the next record should be the next date of the TERM_DT record.
My table looks like this.
Input Table:
-----------
CK_IDPI_IDEFF_DT TERM_DT
Mem1ABC1-Jan-1331-Mar-13
Mem1ABC1-Apr-1331-May-13
Mem1ABC1-Jun-1330-Sep-13
Mem1ABC15-Oct-1331-Dec-13
Mem1ABC1-Jan-1431-Mar-14
Mem1XYZ1-Apr-1430-Jun-14
Mem1XYZ1-Jul-1431-Dec-14
Expected Output:
----------------
CK_IDPI_IDEFF_DT TERM_DT
Mem1ABC1-Jan-1330-Sep-13
Mem1ABC15-Oct-1331-Mar-14
Mem1XYZ1-Apr-1431-Dec-14
In the fourth record, the effective date should be 1-Oct-13 which is the next date to the last TERM_DT 30-Sep-13.As the is the break in the date, the output should show 15-Oct-13 sa the second start date.
Note: Refer to the PI_ID columns, there is a break in the date for the sale PI_ID 'ABC'.
Here I am trying to generate a pseudo column, so that the table with the pseudo column looks like as shown below. and I can use first_value and LAST_value by partitioning on the pseudo column to get the desired output.
1) CNT_VAL is the pseudo column:
-----------------------------
CK_IDPI_IDEFF_DT TERM_DT CNT_VAL
Mem1ABC1-Jan-1331-Mar-131
Mem1ABC1-Apr-1331-May-131
Mem1ABC1-Jun-1330-Sep-131
[code].....
My Query :
----------
I not getting the desired output here as the value in pseudo column is 3.
select CK_ID, PI_ID,EFF_DT,TERM_DT,
(case
when case_CONT - LAG(case_CONT,1) over (ORDER BY EFF_DT) = 0 then to_char(case_CONT)
when case_CONT - LAG(case_CONT,1) over (ORDER BY EFF_DT) <> 0 then to_char(LAG(case_CONT,1) over (ORDER BY EFF_DT) + 1)
else to_char(nvl(case_CONT,0))
[code].....
Scripts:
--------------------
Create table lead_test(
CK_ID varchar2(10),
PI_IDvarchar2(10),
EFF_DTDate,
TERM_DT date);
[code].....
We've got a query which returns one row, but uses an IN statement. The IN statement links to more than one row in the subquery. When we use a combination of DISTINCT and an ANALYTICAL sum, the sum total is multiplied by the number of rows in the sub query. Remove the DISTINCT and we get a single value.
A simplified example of the problem is below.
I can't see how a query which returns a single row then returns multiple values with the addition of a DISTINCT. Removing the analytical sum also provides a single row, but we need this in the actual query we're running. So it seems to be some combination of DISTINCT, ANALYTICAL SUM and IN query is causing multiple values to be returned.
CREATE TABLE go_test_distinct1
(gtd_value NUMBER);
-- Three identical values
-- To replicate the three identical values returned by
[code].....
I have a table which has the attached data.
Sample data is here
LOGON_DATE NUMBER_OF_LOGINS
11/28/2010 02:00:001
11/28/2010 03:00:001
11/28/2010 04:00:002
11/28/2010 06:00:004
11/28/2010 07:00:002
11/28/2010 08:00:003
11/28/2010 09:00:006
[Code] ........
I am trying to do a report like this.
Date PeakUsersBetween6AMand6PM AVGUsersBetween6AMand6PM PeakUsersBetween6PMand6AM AVGUsersBetween6PMand6AM
Output should be
11/28/2010 25 11 49 27
11/29/2010...
I am using analytical function to do this, It throws an error range cannot be used for dates.
what is the purpose of over and partition by keywords in analytical functions
View 3 Replies View Relatedhow to delete duplicated records from a table without using row_id. I found the duplicated rows from a table using Analytical Function. But i could not use the Analytical function in the where condition.
My table(tab2) Structure is
DEPTNODEPT_NAMEEMPIDSEXID1
107jadf 1F1
40asdf 55
10purchase 2M2
10sales 3M3
30HR 4F4
I found the Duplicate Record by using the query
with a as
(select deptno,dept_name,empid,sex,id1,row_number()over(partition by deptno order by deptno) rnum from tab2)
select * from a where rnum >1
how to delete duplicate record .
I am having a table with 5 lakhs transactions. I want to fetch the last balance for a particular date. So i have have returned a query like below.
SELECT curr_balance
FROM transaction_details
WHERE acct_num = '10'
[Code]...
This has to be executed for incrementing of 12 months to find the last balance for each particular month. But this query is having more cpu cost, 12 times it is taking huge time. how to remodify athe above query to get the results in faster way using analytical query. Whether this can be broken into two part in PL/SQL to achive the performance. ?
i have employee table i want to update salary with all employee 5 percent
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a database containing the following after entering the following sql command
SELECT TITLES.TITLE_ID AS TITLE_ID, (PRICE * SALES),
TITLES.ROYALTY_RATE AS ROYALTLY_RATE,
AUTHOR_TITLES.ROYALTY_SHARE AS ROYALTY_SHARE,
AUTHORS.FNAME AS FNAME, AUTHORS.LNAME AS LNAME
FROM TITLES, AUTHOR_TITLES, AUTHORS
WHERE TITLES.TITLE_ID = AUTHOR_TITLES.TITLE_ID
AND AUTHORS.AU_ID = AUTHOR_TITLES.AU_ID
TIT (PRICE*SALES) ROYALTLY_RATE ROYALTY_SHARE FNAME LNAME
--- ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------- ---------------
T01 12446,34 ,05 1 Sarah Buchman
T02 190841,7 ,06 1 Sarah Buchman
T03 1025396,65 ,07 1 Christian Kells
T04 168882,99 ,08 ,6 Hallie Hull
T04 168882,99 ,08 ,4 Klee Hull
T05 1400008 ,09 1 Klee Hull
T06 225834 ,08 1 Wendy Heydemark
T07 35929790 ,11 ,5 Wendy Heydemark
T07 35929790 ,11 ,5 Klee Hull
T08 40950 ,04 1 Kellsey
T09 69750 ,05 1 Kellsey
TIT (PRICE*SALES) ROYALTLY_RATE ROYALTY_SHARE FNAME LNAME
--- ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------- ---------------
T10 1 Wendy Heydemark
T11 752042,77 ,07 ,3 Hallie Hull
T11 752042,77 ,07 ,3 Klee Hull
T11 752042,77 ,07 ,4 Kellsey
T12 1299012,99 ,09 1 Wendy Heydemark
T13 313905,33 ,06 1 Sarah Buchman
17 rows selected.
What I need to do is create a subquery and use Aggregation to list the author receiving the greatest royalties on revenue. so i used the command to get the royalties
SELECT TITLES.TITLE_ID AS TITLE_ID, (PRICE * SALES),
AUTHORS.FNAME AS FNAME, AUTHORS.LNAME AS LNAME,
((PRICE * SALES) * TITLES.ROYALTY_RATE * AUTHOR_TITLES.ROYALTY_SHARE) AS ROYALTIES
FROM TITLES, AUTHOR_TITLES, AUTHORS
WHERE TITLES.TITLE_ID = AUTHOR_TITLES.TITLE_ID
AND AUTHORS.AU_ID = AUTHOR_TITLES.AU_ID
TIT (PRICE*SALES) FNAME LNAME ROYALTIES
--- ------------- --------------- --------------- ----------
T01 12446,34 Sarah Buchman 622,317
T02 190841,7 Sarah Buchman 11450,502
T03 1025396,65 Christian Kells 71777,7655
T04 168882,99 Hallie Hull 8106,38352
T04 168882,99 Klee Hull 5404,25568
T05 1400008 Klee Hull 126000,72
T06 225834 Wendy Heydemark 18066,72
T07 35929790 Wendy Heydemark 1976138,45
T07 35929790 Klee Hull 1976138,45
T08 40950 Kellsey 1638
T09 69750 Kellsey 3487,5
TIT (PRICE*SALES) FNAME LNAME ROYALTIES
--- ------------- --------------- --------------- ----------
T10 Wendy Heydemark
T11 752042,77 Hallie Hull 15792,8982
T11 752042,77 Klee Hull 15792,8982
T11 752042,77 Kellsey 21057,1976
T12 1299012,99 Wendy Heydemark 116911,169
T13 313905,33 Sarah Buchman 18834,3198
17 rows selected.
So how do I add up the royalties values associated with each author and find the max? for example I add klee hulls's royalties from each book and get 2,123,336.32(doing it by hand on calculator) what is the sql to find the max royalties for each author? P.S the answer should be KLEE HULL with 2,123,336.32
I am returning the ORA-01427 after running the query below. why I am returning the error and how to address it.
select b.value , b.name, p.value ......
(case when p.value <> 'G2' then null else (select c.oldvalue from ad_changelog c
where c.record_id = b.c_bpartner_id and c.ad_table_id = 291
and c.ad_column_id = 4216 ) end) as oldtradeName
from c_bpartner b, zz_receipt r, zz_recp_alloc a, m_product p, ad_user us
where a.c_bpartner_id = b.c_bpartner_id
and a.zz_receipt_id = r.zz_receipt_id
and us.ad_user_id = r.createdby
and p.m_product_id = a.m_product_id
Just trying to update a table in which the sales amount is inserted when the sales amount is null.
I have
UPDATE ph2_customer_temp
SET sales_amount = (
SELECT sl.sales_amount
FROM PH2_CUSTOMER_TEMP pct
join
sales_limit sl
on substr(pct.site_code,1,2) = sl.state
where pct.credit_limit is null )
restricting a subquery's results to the first record. If I use the following:
SELECT WU.DISCREP, M.PART, M.ETA
FROM DB.MICAP M
LEFT JOIN DB.WRITEUPS WU ON M.WRITEUPID=WU.WRITEUPID
LEFT JOIN DB.WUC WUC ON WU.WUCID=WUC.WUCID
WHERE (WU.AIRCRAFTID=205) AND (WU.CORRECTED=0)
ORDER BY WU.PACER DESC, WUC.WUCCODE
I get
-------------------------------------------------------
#5 GEN KICKED OFFLINECABLE02-MAR-08
#5 IDG HARNESS REQUIRES WIREWIRE24-MAY-08
#1 GEN WENT OFFLINECABLE02-MAR-08
AERIAL REFUEL DOORS W/N OPENLINEAR DEL29-SEP-07
AERIAL REFUEL DOORS W/N OPENCHECK VLV30-SEP-07
WEATHER RADAR TILT KNOB HASRADAR COMP05-OCT-07
But I need the highlighted line eliminated. I've tried DISTINCT subqueries in the WHERE M.WRITEUPID IN (SELECT DISTINCT... various experiments with joins, etc.
I can't seem to wrap my head around this problem I'm having with a query. I need to update all rows in my ps_ntsr_gf_stufile tables with the concatenated values from the ps_classes_tbl table where a.CLASS_NBR = b.CLASS_NBR. I tried to limit it to emplid from the ps_stdnt_enrl table but no luck.
UPDATE ps_ntsr_gf_stufile a
SET a.CLASS_NAME = (SELECT CONCAT('SUBJECT', 'CATALOG_NBR')
FROM PS_CLASS_TBL b
WHERE a.CLASS_NBR = b.CLASS_NBR
AND a.STRM = '1118'
AND a.INSTITUTION = 'NT752')
WHERE a.EMPLID IN (SELECT distinct EMPLID FROM PS_STDNT_ENRL);
I'm still getting the ORA-01427 error.
I'm facing an issue "ORA-00904". Below is the test case. Both the queries are different. I'm only focussed to find out the reason.
CREATE TABLE ACCT
(
ACCTNBR NUMBER(10)
) ;
[Code].....
In first query I'm able to refer to table alias A but in second query I'm not able to refer it. The only difference is that in second query I've not used outer table at second level. Is it the desired behaviour?
/* (SELECT A.TOTAL_ALLOCATED_AMT FROM CLS_ALLOCATION_HDR@LAMS_PROD A WHERE A.APPROVAL_DATE BETWEEN BCTH.TRAN_FROM_DATE AND BCTH.TRAN_TO_DATE
AND A.CUSTOMER_ID=BCTH.CUSTOMER_ID AND ALLOCATION_ID IN (SELECT ALLOCATION_ID FROM CLS_ALLOCATION_DTL@LAMS_PROD B WHERE ENTITY_TYPE='REC' AND
B.ALLOCATION_ID=A.ALLOCATION_ID AND ENTITY_ID IN (SELECT RECEIPT_NO FROM CLS_RECEIPT_DTL@LAMS_PROD C WHERE B.ENTITY_ID=C.RECEIPT_NO AND
RECEIPT_STATUS='A'))AND ALLOCATION_STATUS='A')*/
when i am trying to run this query i am getting an error'single row subquery returns more than one row'.
My problem : I Wrote a package(a function), this function just return a varchar2 , but in this function I wrote a cursor , when I call this function in this manner :
SELECT secu.u_menu_id,
secu.menu_id,
menu.prompt,
secu.u_type,
secu.u_id,
[code]....
SQL return : Ora-01427 Single-row subquery returns more than one row
Yes , in this function it has cursor that more than one row. But I let this function return varchar2 ,
I have written the below sql select loc,(select ename from emp where emp.deptno = dept.deptno) from dept
It results in the below error.
[Error] Execution (1: 13): ORA-01427: single-row subquery returns more than one row
I have modified the SQL and got the required output
select em.ename,dep.loc
from
(select loc,deptno from dept) dep ,
(select ename,deptno from emp) em
where dep.deptno=em.deptno(+)
I have written the below sql to fetch all loc for emp which got executed
SELECT ENAME, (SELECT LOC FROM DEPT WHERE DEPT.DEPTNO=EMP.DEPTNO) LOC
FROM EMP
But as i need all locations irrespective of any emp in the locaton so i tried to put emp side (+) which resulted in error.
I read in a book that you can't use subquery in an insert statement . E.g:
1)insert into dates (date_col) values (select sysdate fom dual) but when i tried using subquery like this:
2)insert into regions values ((select max(region_id)+1 from regions), 'Oce');
This query worked but 1st query didnt.From my assumptions if we try inserting values in table with the subqueries for a particular column as in 1st query , it will throw error but not while inserting values in all columns as in 2nd query.
The table creation and Data insertion script is attached with the message.Basically I want to sort all the data based on the order by clause and then remove duplicates from the TSKID column and get distinct TSKIDs in the same order.I have below query to sort data:
SELECT *
FROM piwingetworkitems_vd
ORDER BY profilepriority,
authdptpriority,
returnpriority ASC,
priority DESC,
effdate,
tskid
But when I add a DISTINCT to the query, it does some kind of random sort and doesn't return the data as per above ORDER BY query and ignoring the SORT order.
SELECT DISTINCT tskid
FROM (SELECT *
FROM piwingetworkitems_vd
ORDER BY profilepriority,
authdptpriority,
returnpriority ASC,
priority DESC,
effdate,
tskid)
Is there any way to select the DISTINCT taskids ordered as per requirements?
A SINGLE SQL QUERY...
i have tried with no luck!!
consider this sample table:
NAME GENDER MARRIED
---------------------------
AAA M Y
BBB M N
CCC M Y
DDD F Y
EEE F Y
FFF M N
OUTPUT SHOULD BE:
GENDER TOTAL MARRIED
------------------------
MALE 4 2
FEMALE 2 2
TOTAL 6 4
Managed to confuse myself significantly. I essentially want to write a query to determine when two counts are the same using a subquery.
Eg:
R(x,y)
Select count(x)
from R
group by x;
Then I want to run another query to determine which x's have the same count value and output these corresponding x's.
Can we use a subquery after the update keyword??
For example
UPDATE ( Select col1 from test)
set col1='x';
In short can we replace the table name after an update and use a select statement instead??