Text :: Make Part After AND Not Match Already Matched First Part?
Nov 2, 2012
I have a table of addresses where the indexed column consists of the city, an optional area name, the street name and the street number. For example 'Stockholm Drottninggatan 2'.
The users must enter the full city name and the beginning of the street name. So if the user wants to find all the addresses of both the streets Stockrosvägen and Stockbergsvägen which are in Stockholm, the query would look something like this:
Select * From AddressSearch
Where Contains(AddressSearch.Address, 'Stockholm AND Stock%') > 0;
But this will select all the addresses of Stockholm. Is there a way to make the part after the AND not match the already matched first part?
I have 3 pages: - Classes: a Classic Report that shows a list of classes and summarises attendance- Class Attendance Report: An Interactive Report that shows a row for each student that attended a class- Attendance Add / Edit Form On the Classes page, the Date value is a Link which passes a filter in the URL to the Class Attendance Report, showing only students who attended the class held on this date On the Class Attendance Report, I want to have a Region Button that, when clicked, goes to the Attendance Add / Edit Form and the Class Date field on this form is automatically populated with the same date value as was being used for the filter on the Interactive Report on the Class Attendance Report Page. So, I click on the Class Date link for 2013-11-01, this takes me to the Class Attendance Report and filters for students who have been already entered as attending on 2013-11-01. If I click on the "Add Attendance" button, it goes to the Attendance Add / Edit form and the Class Date is automatically set to 2013-11-01. I assume I need to do this via a Dynamic Action that runs when the "Add Attendance" button on the Class Attendance Report page is clicked?
I want to convert the time part of each rows to number of second in different column. so for the 1st rows it is 09:18:00.000 that means 9hour and 18 min = 9*60*60+18*60.
I started one packaged procedure in plsql developer yesterday..thats being run from yesterday...I wanted to know what part of the query that is being run now from the procedure.
I need to insert Data into a table based on particular condition, So I'm using an Insert select as follows:
INSERT INTO error_table (error_code,cust_id,customer_name,error_message ) SELECT '34', cust_id,customer_name, 'Missing xxx' FROM customers WHERE cust_id = cur_cust.cust.id AND ( NOT EXISTS ( Select .....) -- control 1 OR (EXISTS ( Select .....) --control 2 OR (NOT EXISTS ( Select .....) -- control 3
I have around 10 controls. I want these controls to run conditionally..I was wondering if this can be done using a decode based on some variable outside the query.
I want the query to run like this:
if A then execute control 1: AND ( NOT EXISTS ( Select .....)
If B then execute control 2: AND ( OR EXISTS ( Select .....)
I have written one program that inserts one field in table item_master based on existing field,for eg, its like old field is 'HEB240x240x10x17x13000mm, S 275 JR' - and i want to replace the 5 digits before mm i.e 13000 needs to be replaced by 6000 or 4000 based on generated values and the new item will be like 'HEB240x240x10x17x6000mm, S 275 JR' or 'HEB240x240x10x17x4000mm, S 275 JR'.
i am working on sql server developer in on of the organization. i got requirement from client that migration part from oracle 6i forms to oracle 10g and i got existing forms backup from client that is have .fmb, .mmb, .rdf and some of libraries having .pll files, but am new to oracle which form need to open from form builder first?
i tried to open .fmb file given database connection also but it is showing some libraries are missing. what should be the solution for my problem.
i'm trying to import data to QUANTUM "oracle database" from Oracle database import assistant using OCDia.exe with SQL statement below and i'm getting this error message "Part Number and manufacturer combination must be unique"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROCEDURE ACE_LISTPRICE_LEADTIME (P_IMP NUMBER) IS C DIA_RL_PKG.CURSOR_TYPE ;
select * from testing Quote: ID NAME REDATA -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- 1 ABC,DEF,GHI,LKJ 000001 2 MNC,GHI,CTF 000002
2 rows selected
select * from testing where name like ('GHI,TCF');
now my output should be as above because GHI is common in both the names.if any of the where condition string matches the Name field then I need that record to be retrieved.
SQL> SELECT distinct a.legacy_product_code FROM im_polprdmap_pukka a where a.new_product_code like '%GIFT%'; LEGACY_PRODUCT_CODE ------------------- GIFT25 GFTPF21NP GIFT21/H GIFT21//
[code]...
I need to calculate a field taking the numeric part of the above filed.How can i write this?
I have a column where I have time stamp with date and time(8-May-10 10:20:55 Am) from that i will get only time(10:20:55 Am)[query for this mentioned below] Now i need to append the time to current date and insert into a Timestamps column only .
so my result should be 17-May-11 10:20:55 Am(Assuming current Date is 17-May-11) . I tried search it by i found a way in sql server by using DataAdd and DataDiff .
query to get the time is:select to_char(to_date('11-MAY-11 05.00.00 PM', 'DD-Mon-YY HH:MI:SSAM'),'HH24:MI:SS') "Time Now" from dual
There is a readonly user on our reporting server. Developers want to use global temporary tables with this user. I don't want the user to have permissions other than readonly.I can grant the user CREATE TABLE privilege and did not grant quota on any permanent tablespace, therefore user would not be unable to create permanent tables but still should be able to create global temporary tables.
Question is would a user with such permissions still be able to utilize temp tables as part of a scheduled job?
I am trying to create a silent install as part of a batch file that does other things after. I'm running into the following issues
1) I need the batch file to wait until the install is done to continue. Trouble is that running setup with a response file opens up a new windows to run the install. I tried the wait command but doesn't work right either 2) Same issue with DBCA and a response file.
Any way to run the silent installs and have the batch file wait until the install is done and then continue? The less user intervention required, the better.
For our customer we have build a custom login page. The form we currently made has de following items:
- Username - Password - Select list for selecting the task type
When the customer enters his username, automatically the select list of the task type will be refreshed to get only the task type where the customer has the rights to do it. This part works...It can occur that a customer has only one task type (which is default) then we want to hide the select list. This part doesn't work
We used APEX version 4.1.1.What we did is:
- One action item to refresh the selection list (works) - One action item to hide the selection list by starting the application (works) - One action item to show the selection list only when the selection list has more than one result. For this part we used the conditional part of the action item (Function returning a boolean).
In the query (inside the function) we want to use the entered username, looking into the application in the session state I saw the correct username, but for some reason the function cannot use this entered username, it becomes empty. When I use a hardcoded username the code works.
Why I cannot use a username into the conditional part of the Action Item.
When I see the apex dashboard in the IE or google chrome, part of screen goes missing.Last part of dashboard doesn't come but it works fine in Mozilla Firefox.What should I do? Is there some settings I need to do in IE.I am using the IE version 9.0 for 64 bit.
if it is possible to include 'data' files as part of the Application Export process. Up till now I've only been able to include supporting object files which will recreate a table structure but not the data records - I've been creating the latter outside of APEX.
A computation after submit pl/sql function process to trim off the first part of the string (CQ..) within the list manager values. Support for example the list manager contains values such as
The computation process should trim off the first part(CQ..) and should return the list manager value as SAMPLE1..TEST1SAMPLE2..TEST2SAMPLE1..TEST2 Oracle APEX 4.0.2 is the version and Oracle 10g r2 is the database.
I have to date field in detail part of master detail Form. In detail part i have field of From_date and To_date. I want when i go to next record in detail part ,,,from date is initiaze by previous to date+1....eg.like
1.record: From date=01-jan-2011, To_date=10-jan-2011 2.Record: From_date = 11-jan-2011;
I have Attached calender to two feild...and calender is the different block... In Detail block when_record_instance i handled the;; From date=previous to-date +1;
but when i double click the feild calender is open and when_new_record trigger is fired agian. calender called ...the when_new_record is not callled .....
When I try to extract the date tag value from XML data, the time stored in 20120602153021 format i.e., YYYYMMDD24HHMISS format. The following statement extracts only date as 02-JUN-12 however do not extract the time part.
If I try the same in SQLplus with to_date it works however fails in PL/SQL.
XML data: <?xml version="1.0"?> <RECORD> <REGTIMESTAMP>20120601130010</REGTIMESTAMP> </RECORD>
PL/SQL Extract:
CURSOR c_xml_record IS SELECT extract(value(d), '//ACTIVATIONTS/text()').getStringVal() AS REGTIMESTAMP, FROM t_xml_data x, [code].......
if a table contains two columns and both are part of the primary key of that table (Kind of obvoius).
should i opt for a index organized tbale in this case ?Or should i opt for another running sequential colum which would serve as a primary key of this table and define the actual two columns of the system as unique keys.
there is a drawback if a most of the tables of a database contain composite primary keys?
