I am using trim function in my select query. But still I am getting white space in my output. because of this, I am getting the error "value too large for column... " when I load the data into a table through sqlloader.
define APPName="&1"
set heading off;
set verify off;
set newpage 0
set feedback off;
set rtrimspool on;
set termout off;
set pagesize 40000;
[code].....
1. When querying the "alert_log" table I created from the alert log using the script below, 2 new files were created ALERT_LOG_30499.bad and ALERT_LOG_30499.log.
The ALERT_LOG_30499.log. contains this error message:
error processing column MSG in row 2910 for datafile /u02/damistst/admin/bdump/alert_damistst.log
ORA-12899: value too large for column MSG (actual: 82, maximum: 80)
the ALERT_LOG_30499.bad , so far, only contains datafile resize information. The datafiles have plenty of space and there is plenty of space on the San slice the datafiles reside.
2. then each time I recreate the table and increased the increased the varchar2 size, the "actual" size will also increase in the log file.
error processing column MSG in row 2910 for datafile /u02/damistst/admin/bdump/alert_damistst.log ORA-12899: value too large for column MSG (actual: 92, maximum: 90)
3. When I increased the varchar2 size to 120+ it gave me this error message:
[oracle@tds_dw bdump]$ cat ALERT_LOG_30715.log
LOG file opened at 03/09/11 14:46:20
Field Definitions for table ALERT_LOG
Record format DELIMITED BY NEWLINE
Data in file has same endianness as the platform
Rows with all null fields are accepted
Fields in Data Source:
MSG CHAR (255)
Terminated by ","
Trim whitespace same as SQL Loader
TABLE DDL:
create table
alert_log ( msg varchar2(80) )
organization external (
type oracle_loader
default directory BDUMP
access parameters (
records delimited by newline
)
location('alert_damistst.log')
)
reject limit 1000;
**** QUESTION
I can still query the alert_log table in sqlplus, but those log and bad files are generated, is this an issue?
example of a piece of the results from " select * from alert_log; "
MSG
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 5254 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 1 seq# 5254 mem# 0: /tds_oradata/redo01a.log
Current log# 1 seq# 5254 mem# 1: /u02/damistst/REDO_LOGS/redo01b.log
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log
Checkpoint not complete
Current log# 1 seq# 5254 mem# 0: /tds_oradata/redo01a.log
Current log# 1 seq# 5254 mem# 1: /u02/damistst/REDO_LOGS/redo01b.log
Wed Mar 9 14:33:09 2011
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 5255 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 2 seq# 5255 mem# 0: /tds_oradata/redo02a.log
Current log# 2 seq# 5255 mem# 1: /u02/damistst/REDO_LOGS/redo02b.log
13076 rows selected.
I want to add column to table which has huge amount of data and fill with data from another table. What is the best way to do it? Is it faster to use CTAS instead of ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN?
View 2 Replies View Related I have encountered some problems in SQL I want to create a table with a bunch of prepared data. For ease of use, I choose to generate a SQL file which contains all the sql clauses used to create the table and insert the data. So all the data can only be inserted to a table using sql clause.
My questions:
1) If data of a column is large (for example, 1 M text), how to insert it using SQL, is there a piecewise method.
2) And how can I insert BLOB data using SQL clause.
What I what is to enclose all the operations in a single SQL file, and when the table is needed, just execute this SQL file.
While creating the external Table, i am getting error.
ORA-12899: value too large for column PRC_REC_TYPE (actual: 2, maximum: 1)
But while checking the CSV file, i found that prc_rec_type is having one 1 length value. I am uploading the csv file also.
-- Create table
create table ET_PGIT_POL_RISK_COVER
(
prc_pol_no VARCHAR2(60),
prc_end_no_idx VARCHAR2(22),
prc_sec_code VARCHAR2(12),
prc_risk_id VARCHAR2(12),
prc_smi_code VARCHAR2(12),
[code].....
What is the first term in the Fibonacci sequence to contain 1000 digits?
DECLARE
f_num INTEGER;
n_num INTEGER;
h_num INTEGER;
[code]...
why I am getting this error?? Is there any problem in my code??
How many types of pl/sql value or numeric errors are there and when occurs.Like as follows
1.ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small
2.ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: number precision too large
I am having problem in inserting a long file (80000 B) into CLOB cloumn in oracle database 10g.
ERROR at line 23:
ORA-06550: line 23, column 1:
PLS-00172: string literal too long
I am calling the oracle stored procedure through unix shell script as fallows.
#!/bin/ksh
cd /usr/home/dfusr/backup
i=`cat pe_proxy_master_2160.Thu.log | sed "s/'/''/g"`
sqlplus username/password@db 1> temp.log <<!
DECLARE
BEGIN
Write_Text_To_CLOB(1,'$i');
COMMIT;
END;
/
The file pe_proxy_master_2160.Thu.log is about 50000 B.
My Stored Procedure is fallows
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE Write_Text_To_CLOB (
p_id IN NUMBER
, p_clob IN VARCHAR2
)
IS
[code]....
I also tried with ojdbc5.jar and ojdbc14.jar files in class path.
i am exporting / importing from 10.2.0.4.0 to 11.2.0.3.0 but while doing import some of rows are rejected ...
IMP-00019: row rejected due to ORACLE error 12899
IMP-00003: ORACLE error 12899 encountered
ORA-12899: value too large for column XXXX (actual: 51, maximum: 50)
Column 1 264
Column 2 123432
Column 3
Column 4 7
[code]....
having looked at data in source system i cant see see character "Â" in the column 11 i think this is what causing issue !!why is oracle adding this character to this field ? how can i fix this ? without having to modify table in new system to allow more characters?
I dont know where was the mistake, getting column ambiguously defined error
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE FLXUSER.testgg
AS
BEGIN
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
BEGIN
[code]....
I have a scenario where I need to update field in report_input table.It has bind variables in it which will be prompted while running the query.I see that QUERY_VALUE field that need to be updated has length of VARCHAR2(3000).
desc report_input
Name Null Type
----------------- -------- --------------
QUERY_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(64)
QUERY_VALUE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3000)
[code]....
I am trying to run the below query to extract the outline data from v$sql_plan(querying other_xml column), but i get the below error...this works perfectly fine on 10.2.0.4 + version...but on 10.2.0.2 and and 10.2.0.1 i get the below error... how to fix it ?
SQL> @sql_hint
Enter value for sql_id: d15cdr0zt3vtp
Enter value for child_no: 0
extractvalue(value(d), '/hint') as outline_hints
*
ERROR at line 2:
ORA-00904: "D": invalid identifier
the query is taken from below...[URL]....
select
extractvalue(value(d), '/hint') as outline_hints
from
xmltable('/*/outline_data/hint'
passing (
[code]...
I've set up a query that creates 2 columns 'UVLCredit' and 'UVLDebit' and what I'm trying to do is subtract the 'UVLDebit' column from the 'UVLCredit' column and have the resulting value show up in a column called 'UVLTotal.
I'm multiplying 1 column times another to create a new column called UVLCredit, and then doing it again (with a different column) to create a 2nd new column called UVLDebit...the last thing I'm trying to do is to take the results of the 1st new column and subtract the results of the 2nd newly created column to create a 3rd new column called UVLTotal. The error states that the 'UVLDebit' column is an invalid identifier.
See code below....
CODESELECT
T.PO_RELEASE_NBR, T.PO_LINE_STATUS, T.FACILITY,
TI.STATUS_DATE, TI.QTY_ORDERED_UP,
TI.PO_UNIT_PRICE, TI.QTY_REC_TOTAL_UP, TI.QTY_INVOICED_UP,
[b]sum(TI.PO_UNIT_PRICE) * (TI.QTY_REC_TOTAL_UP) as "UVLCredit",
sum(TI.PO_UNIT_PRICE) * (TI.QTY_INVOICED_UP) as "UVLDebit",
[code]........
I am getting ORA-00918: column ambiguously defined error when running the below SQL query. I am gettig this error at the last line of code where v1.objectid=v2.parent_object_id
I have not written this query so i find difficult to debug it. Also i am not that well verse with SQL
select distinct v1.UNIQUE_DOC_NAME,v1.UNIQUE_DOC_NAME_1,v1.vendor_object_name,v1.display_name,v1.document_description,
[Code].....
i have a varchar2 column containing string values that can be converted to date i.e. ('31-JUL-11') and that column also contains text strings in it. i.e. ('Some string data...')
records whose column value can be converted to date are extractable via where clause (i.e. those rows are associated with some fix number / flag)
now when i try to use to_date function i get the error that
" ORA-01858 a non-numeric character was found where a numeric was expected "
in sql i have added a where clause to only pick rows with flag, but even then it gives the error.
using a subquery in the from clause eliminates the error, but when i create it in a view it again gives the same error.
I am trying to load the data from .csv file into the table using SQL Loader.
The table has the following schema:
src_id : number,
dest_id : number,
range: intsys.interval_typ --- > a type containing (lower,upper)
payload : varchar2(100)
The loader.ctl file is :
load data
infile *
append
into table sb_packet
fields terminated by "," optionally enclosed by ' " '
(src_id,dest_id,range,payload)
BEGINDATA
3,32,intsys.interval_typ(10043,142703),"misc data"
When I use the following this ctl file to transfer the data, i get the following error:
SQL*Loader-418: Bad datafile datatype for column RANGE
I'm getting an error as follows .
create table asgnd_agent_bak as (Select * from ASGND_AGENT a, SCN s
where
a.CNTCT_KEY = s.CNTCT_KEY and a.SCN_NUM=s.SCN_NUM
and a.ACTVTY_DT = to_date('03/17/2013','mm/dd/yyyy')
and s.SCN_OPEN_DT = to_date('03/15/2013','mm/dd/yyyy')
and a.SRC_SYS_DESC = 'FACET');
create table asgnd_agent_bak as (Select * from ASGND_AGENT a, SCN s
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00957: duplicate column name
SQL> create table t51(t5 NUMBER(25,8));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t51 values (100000000000000000.00000);
insert into t51 values (100000000000000000.00000)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allowed for this column
why this query is not raising an error:
select memberid, mi.typeid, emailaddress
from memberdata@prod_db m
join memberitems@prod_db mi on m.memberid = mi.memberid;
These are the tables:
SQL> desc memberdata@prod_db
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
MEMBERID NUMBER
EMAILADDRESS VARCHAR2(50)
ADDRESS1 VARCHAR2(50)
SQL> desc memberitems
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
MEMBERID NUMBER
ITEMID NUMBER
Shouldn't we raise an 'ambiguous column' error on memberid?
I'm working on a Java Web Application
(User input(jsp)<-->Controller<----->DAO<----->Database) project where the user submits certain fields (partyId, DocId, cbrxPath, cbrValue, nodeId, TRANSLATION_Class and so on)and they are saved in 3 different tables (Party_Document_Node table, Routing and Routing_Node table).
Here's the portion of the DAO code below where the problem is:
public class AssociationsDAOOracleImpl implements AssociationsDAO {
private static final String PARTIES_WITH_ASSOCIATIONS = " Select distinct(party_id) from PARTY_DOCUMENT ORDER BY 1";
private static final String ASSOCIATION_FETCH_QUERY = " Select PARTY_ID, DOCUMENT_ID, NODE_ID, APPLICATION_CONTEXT_XPATH, DOCUMENT_LOGGING FROM PARTY_DOCUMENT_NODE WHERE PARTY_ID = ? ORDER BY PARTY_ID ";
private static final String ROUTING_FETCH_QUERY = " Select CONTENT_ROUTING_PATH FROM ROUTING WHERE PARTY_ID = ? AND DOCUMENT_ID =? ORDER BY PARTY_ID ";
private static final String ROUTINGNODE_FETCH_QUERY = " Select CONTENT_ROUTING_VALUE, TRANSLATION_CLASS FROM ROUTING_NODE WHERE PARTY_ID = ? AND DOCUMENT_ID =? AND NODE_ID =? ORDER BY PARTY_ID ";
private static final String CONTEXT_FETCH_QUERY = " Select CONTEXT_VALUE, CONTEXT_INSTANCE, CONTEXT_KEY FROM APPLICATION_CONTEXT where party_id = ? and document_id = ? and node_id = ? ";
private static final String NODEID_FETCH_QUERY = " Select NODE_ID FROM PARTY_DOCUMENT_NODE WHERE PARTY_ID = ? AND DOCUMENT_ID =? AND NODE_ID =? ORDER BY PARTY_ID ";
[code]....
I have written this code below in Disco Admin 10g but get Ora-00918 column ambiguously defined error even though I have used alias in the table name.
Select
porh.segment1
,Porh.creation_date
,Porh.last_update_date
,porh.closed_code
,porh.authorization_status
,porh.description
,porh.note_to_authorizer
,porh.cancel_flag
,porh.enabled_flag
,porl.line_num
[code]....
I am having issue with IMPDP on ORACLE VIRTUAL COLUMNS.I am having following table with Virtual column defined with Not null. Expdp is fine without any issue.
DDL :
------
CREATE TABLE alert_hist
(
alertky INTEGER NOT NULL,
alertcreatedttm TIMESTAMP(6) DEFAULT systimestamp NOT NULL,
alertcreatedt DATE GENERATED ALWAYS AS (To_date(Trunc("alertcreatedttm"))) VIRTUAL NOT NULL
When I do the import (IMPDP) it got failed with the following error.
. . imported "TESTSCHEMA"."VALART" 359.1 KB 4536 rows
ORA-31693: Table data object "TESTSCHEMA"."ALERT_HIST" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
ORA-39097: Data Pump job encountered unexpected error -1
After that I dropped the Virtual Not null column and recreated that column with Nullable.
DDL :
-----
alter table alert_hist drop column alertcreatedt;
alter table alert_hist add alertcreatedt DATE GENERATED ALWAYS AS (To_date(Trunc("alertcreatedttm"))) VIRTUAL;
After that I took the expdp and impdp , it went fine with out any issue.
I keep getting the "ORA-01401:inserted value too large for column". No biggie - I've dealt with this multiple times before (but obviously not enough in this instance).
The data being entered is a SINGLE digit number - a number like 1, 2 or 3 - nothing fancy, just a plain straight everyday single digit number. The field in question is / was set as field type "Integer". Now, there is no set field size for integers! - not in Oracle anyway. Since it wasn't happy, I decided I'll try field types of 'Number' and also "Varchar2" set to 10 bytes. I have deleted the column from the table and re-created it as well.
Here's the even more puzzling bit: I can INSERT data into this field, BUT I can not UPDATE the field with the exact same data. The data is being inserted from a csv file. The same exact csv file used to insert works, but the same data in the same file will not update only that particular column.
If I delete the specific column data from the csv file, all goes through fine. If I hard code the update for the field (eg SET field2 = '1' or even SET field2 = ' ') it still doesn't work. So I know it is not the csv file that is causing problems. I deleted all data from the csv file except the field in question - still no luck.
So after eliminating:
1. The field type
2. The field length
3. The data being inserted
4. The external source of the data
What else could possibly be the problem?
I HAVE DECLARED A VARIABLE
VAR1 VARCHAR2(20000);
BUT STILL WHEN I ASSIGN SOME STRINGS TO THAT VARIABLE I GET "VALUE TOO LARGE" MESSAGE. WHAT SHOULD I DO?
I have a 27 million row table in the following format:
MEDCLM_MTH_SUM_KEY PRIMARY_DIAG_CD DIAG_CD2 DIAG_CD3 DIAG_CD4 DIAG_CD5 DIAG_CD6 DIAG_CD7 DIAG_CD8 DIAG_CD9 DIAG_CD10
2212990780 5552 78907 53170 5368
2231127242 V5481 7812 71595 4019 2761 2859 496 V4364 30501
I need to unpivot this data to get it to look like this:
MEDCLM_MTH_SUM_KEY DIAG_CD_LEVEL DIAG_CD
2212990780 PRIMARY_DIAG_CD 5552
2212990780 DIAG_CD2 78907
2212990780 DIAG_CD3 53170
[code]...
I was wondering if there was a quicker, more efficient way to do this.
I need to add a new column to a very large table, and update it with 'N'. (this is similar as specifying default 'N'). I'm using Oracle 9i. Which is the best method regarding to speed, to update this column on entire table? The table contains ~30 millions of records. I've read that parallel DML (here UPDATE) does not work on unpartitioned tables. My table is not partitioned. If i specify:
update /*+ full(p) parallel(p,10) */ my_table p set p.my_column = 'N';
This, i think will not speed up the operation on 9i. Our business does not accept to use CREATE TABLE AS SELECT, then renaming table and recreating all indexes and so on.
I'm trying to identify what PL/SQL or the exact code that's is causing massive UGA consumption. How can I identify it?
View 5 Replies View RelatedCan an undo tablespace be too large and actually hurt performance? I have seen a system with a dedicated 1 TB drive for undo tablespace (no guarantee) with an undo_retention of 7 days. Would this hurt performance? What about setting an undo_retention of 24 hours with no guarantee? The only mention I could find online said that it would not hurt performance but I wanted to double check. You would think that Oracle does not care if it deletes the undo at 15 minutes or if it deletes the undo at a later date such as 7 days later and the performance should stay the same.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have oracle 11gr2 database on linux os. It's total sga size is 500mb only. Now, if uses wants read the 1gb of data from database, then there is no sufficient memory in buffer cache. so how it will works. the transaction will get successful or it will fail.And i have another doubt, does oracle can read the data from memory only or it can also read directly from disk.
View 11 Replies View Relatedthe large data FOR UPDATE in table column ?
claimClob clob:=claim; -- claim large data
v_buf varchar2(1000);
amount binary_integer:=1000;
position binary_integer:=1;
[Code]....
why the FOR UPDATE don't do nothing ?