I need to create a materialized view with a clob column based on a varchar2 column of a table.This is because in the mv the clob column data gets appended one after another.
View 2 Replies
My DBA gave me a table with only one date column say Table1.Date. Its in the format of Date and say it is = 7/23/2012.
Now i have to create my own Reporting View(which is used for reporting) based on that date column like below:
It should be a column with values in the following format =
2012-07
2012-06
2012-05 etc....upto
2010-01
So i started out my creating like this:
select
to_char(Table1.Date,'yyyy-mm')
from Table1
Union
[Code]....
.and so on till i get 2010-01.
there has to be a better way to do this.
I have to change the datatype of a column from CLOB to varchar2, without changing the order of the columns. The table has no data.
I could find any other way other than dropping the CLOB columns and then adding new columns with varchar2 datatype. But this changes the order of the columns in the table.
I need to create a composite unique index on varchar2, number and CLOB column. I haven't used such index before that have the CLOB column indexing. I found the below link related to CLOB indexing...
[URL]......
Links from where I can get related info. Also I would like to know the impact of such index on performance. I have to store and process around 50 million records in such a way, will it be beneficial to use this index?
I have a Materialized view based on 2 views. I modified one column in both the views.Do i need to refresh the Materialized view.
E.g. :
In view1 and view2 i changed column like this
nvl(test.no,'n/a') testdata --changed
nvl(test.id,'n/a') testdata --original
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MV_test
NOCACHE
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
NOPARALLEL
BUILD IMMEDIATE
[code].........
is it possible to base a Materialized View on results returned from a stored procedure?If not, do you see any other way except of filling a table with data from the stored procedure and then basing the MV on it?
View 4 Replies View RelatedHow to create index on materialized view which is refreshed daily basis.
View 3 Replies View Relatedhow to create materialized view on partition table?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are using Oracle 10g rel 2. The replication is setup on 1 server which is in City A, and the snapshot server is in City B.
City A .
Create materialized view log on table-a
with primary key
including new values.
City B database.
Create user test_rep identified by test
grant connect, resource, create any materialized view , table, view , procedure to test_rep.
Create materialized view city-A_db_MV
refresh fast
select * from cityA.Tablea@city-Adb
When i select from city-A_db_MV, it showed the complete table-A of city-A database.
Now if we make any changes to City-A table at the Master site, will it be propagated automatically to the MV site.
I guess we need to create jobs to push / or refresh fast .. isnt it. But exactly how to do it is a question.
Secondly if we make a replication group at Master site at city-A db, how do we refresh that Group and how to monitor whether it is refreshing on time or not? do we need to see the jobs every now and then.
but still a lot of questions unanswered, even though i had read the documents earlier.
1-The MView was created without identifying that after what interval it will be fast refreshed.
2- How to Manually refresh it. Does it support On Commit, I think it is not.
3- Where should be we make a group and then add the table to that group and refresh that group.
Should this group belongs to the Master Site or to MV site?
i am trying to create materialized view but it give me insufficient privilege i give it all grant and i run it from sys it give the same.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have to create a materialized view for a table which does not have index on any field.
While creating a Mview i am getting an error "TABLE DOES NOT HAVE THE PRIMARY KEY CONSTRAINT".
application developers do not want to create an index on the base table onto which MView is to be created.
is there any way to create a materialised view for the table without index, or is it necessary to have the index on the base table before creating MView on it.
How I can create a Materialized View without having any data in it.
For e.g.
I create a Materialialized View based on a View.
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW test_mv
REFRESH FORCE ON DEMAND
AS
SELECT * FROM test_view
In the above case the data fetched by the view test_view gets stored in the Materialized View test_mv. Suppose I want materialized view test_mv to get created with all the columns of test_view but not the data. I will refresh the materialized view test_mv later for data as and when required.
What shall I do for immidiate formation of materialized view test_mv without data.
1.As we can create materialized view for accessing data from other schema but same database. will it be effective or it will act as a normal view.
2.Will materialized views can be created in Fast mode for the above scenario?
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW Matview1
NOLOGGING
NOCACHE
NOPARALLEL
REFRESH COMPLETE ON DEMAND
START WITH sysdate
NEXT sysdate + 1
WITH ROWID
ENABLE QUERY REWRITE AS
select Query;
if i run select query it works fine .. also the user has create materialized view and query rewrite privs .. not sure why i am getting insufficient privileges error still ..
Create Materialized view with Refresh on commit example. with create Log file example.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to create materialized view, successfully create logs for all the tables involved.
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON tbJournal
WITH ROWID, SEQUENCE (tabid, companyid, storelocid, tabstatus, linetype)
INCLUDING NEW VALUES;
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON TBTABS
WITH ROWID, SEQUENCE (TSTAMP, COMPANYID, NUMGUESTS, POSITIONID, STORELOCID, TABSSTATUS)
INCLUDING NEW VALUES;
[code]....
The result is ora-12015: cannot create a fast refresh materialized view from a complex query
It does work fine if I remove
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM tbJournal J
WHERE j.tabstatus NOT BETWEEN -6 AND -4
AND j.linetype = 1
AND T.tabid = J.tabid
AND T.companyid = J.companyid
AND T.storelocid = J.storelocid)
from the where clause
I have an issue in materialized view which has got one of the null able column and query on this column taking approximately 2 mins where as other indexed columns takes less than 10 sec.
Here is the summary
SQL> Select Count (1), Count (VAT_NO) From Mv_customer;
COUNT(1) COUNT(VAT_NO)
---------------------------------
2893561 1516
If an index is created on VAT_NO will that improve the performance. What kind of index can be created considering very less number of records has got VAT_NO
I have one hirarchical query which return the parent to child hirarch level data. it has 11 level child data. i want to create column based on number of child in hirarchy. though i know it is 11 but it can change also.Is there any way i can create the column dynamically
ORG_UNITCOST_CENTERORG_UNIT_NAMEPARENT_ORG_UNITLLSYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(ORG_UNIT,'/')
500171960000022000Managing Director - LUL500169965/00000001/50000001/50017588/50016996/50017196
500018370000021241FSO500171966/00000001/50000001/50017588/50016996/50017196/50001837
502894940000021241Knowledge Management500018377/00000001/50000001/50017588/50016996/50017196/50001837/50289494
508014980000021241Finance500018377/00000001/50000001/50017588/50016996/50017196/50001837/50801498
I have table with values :
PROV_IDMEASURE_IDPERCENTAGE
Z0000221P114 45
Z0000135P115 68
For the column all possible values are ( P102,P101,P103 etc toP124). I want to create a view ( if possible ) from the above with data output as :
PROV_ID P101 P102 P103 ............................P124
z000234 23 45 60 72
basically this view has columns based on the previous tables column ( MEASURE_ID) values and the values will be corresponding value in column Percentage.
in our application we are using clob column instead of varchar2 because varchar2 does not allow more that 4000 chars, so Using clob allows to put data of any length, will it cause performance issues ? we have this column in almost in all tables .
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow to convert a varchar2 column to CLOB when there is a thousands of records in it.
View 15 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to insert CLOB to varchar2 from one DB to another using database link but failed.
INSERT INTO tmp_std_master@aapsbhx.iss.soton.ac.uk
(student_id, title, first_name, middle_name, surname, hus_id,
date_of_birth, email_address, prog_desc --- varchar2 (100)
)
SELECT DISTINCT c.ref1 student_id, c.title, c.firstname firstname,
[code]....
I have to Insert data from one table to another table. First table contains some clob datatype columns and second table have carchar2 datatype.
Below are the structures of both tables;
SQL> DESC TBL_MAINSQL> DESC TBL_MAIN2
Name Type Name Type
----------------------------- ----------------------------------------- --------------
TXT_FEIN_NUMBER VARCHAR2(9) TXT_FEIN_NUMBER VARCHAR2(9)
TXT_QUOTE_NUMBER VARCHAR2(12)TXT_QUOTE_NUMBER VARCHAR2(12)
TXT_POLICY_NUMBER VARCHAR2(12)TXT_POLICY_NUMBER VARCHAR2(12)
TXT_AGENT_CODE VARCHAR2(10)TXT_AGENT_CODE VARCHAR2(10)
[code]....
The Table contains 5000 records. how to convert CLOB to VARCHAR2.
I used DBMS_LOB.SUBSTR but I received BUFFER TO SMALL ERROR.
I ave a few fields in my flat file which might be a CLOB (not sure how the source is storing the data - need to check on that.) I am trying to load this data into my table column which is a varchar2(4000) . I am able to insert most of the data but few records are rejected because of Field too long error....
While debugging the problm I manually copied the field from flatfile and inserted into my table - bingo it worked. (The field was not more than 1000 bytes - only a few lines of information ) My question: When a field is not more than 1000 bytes why couldnt it get inserted as a varchar2?
Note : I cannot make the table column as CLOB because the problem is not with just one column - I have 10 fields which have this problem . So its not advisable to have 10 CLOB fields in the table......
I have specified OPTIONS (BINDSIZE=256000,READSIZE=256000,ROWS=1)
CREATE TABLE DAN_DATES
(ID VARCHAR2(12),
YEAR VARCHAR2(,
TERM VARCHAR2(,
START_DATE VARCHAR2(12))
INSERT INTO DAN_DATES (ID,YEAR,TERM,START_DATE) VALUES ('1','2012','1201',to_date('20120227','YYYYMMDD'));
INSERT INTO DAN_DATES (ID,YEAR,TERM,START_DATE) VALUES ('1','2012','1201',to_date('20120626','YYYYMMDD'));
INSERT INTO DAN_DATES (ID,YEAR,TERM,START_DATE) VALUES ('2','2011','1101',to_date('20110226','YYYYMMDD'));
INSERT INTO DAN_DATES (ID,YEAR,TERM,START_DATE) VALUES ('2','2011','1101',to_date('20110725','YYYYMMDD'));
INSERT INTO DAN_DATES (ID,YEAR,TERM,START_DATE) VALUES ('2','2012','1201',to_date('20120227','YYYYMMDD'));
Want to take the Start_Date for that year, CREATE A NEW COLUMN and place that START_DATE (which is row 1 for the year (min)) in it. So for ID 1 TERM is 1201 and 1202 BUT we want the top start date (earliest start date) and CREATE a clumn (NEW_START_DATE) and place that date in there wherever year is 2012.
I want to get
IDYEARTERMSTART_DATEMIN_DATE
12012120127-Feb-1227-Feb-12
12012120126-Jun-1227-Feb-12
22011110126-Feb-1126-Feb-11
22011110125-Jul-1126-Feb-11
22011110126-Sep-1126-Feb-11
22012120227-Feb-1227-Feb-12
i am fairly new in the oracle arena, but what would cause a statement such as
ALTER TABLE TEST_TABLE MODIFY text_field1 varchar2(100) DEFAULT 'testval' NULL
to change a column's type from VARCHAR2(100) to VARCHAR2(100 byte)? i found a few mentions of the 100 byte concept online but nothing that jumped out at me.
I am working on a simple form which will get the user to fetch required columns of employee master.
For that i have created a form which will display the column names and select option. When user clicks on query, the form will display the selected columns in a block. After going thru if required the user can download it to excel.
As of now I do not have filtering option. For this I thought of creating view based on the selection and then fetch records from the view and display it in form.
To achieve this I would like to know How I create or replace a view dynamically based on values selected. I remember doing this sort of thing long back, but could not recollect it.
I did a search on this topic and did see the ASK TOM response that storing all varchar2 fields as (2000) or what not is a bad idea based on an array fetch that developers may use etc. However I'm not sure that applies to my specific question, and the other examples he gave certainly didn't apply. So I'll pose the question a different way:
Question #1: Is there, for example, a performance difference between setting a field as varchar(2000) and varchar(25) if I was just running a native SQL query using a front end tool like TOAD?
Question #2: If I also need to index that field, will it take longer to index a varchar(2000) field than a varchar(25) field, assuming the same data is in both fields?
I need to partition a existing table based on varchar2 field (which is actaully date value but storing as character in the table). Using below statement for creating table, but getting error.
create table TST_CUST_ARC
(
interact_id NUMBER(10),
extrn_id VARCHAR2(38),
src_cd VARCHAR2(25),
full_nm VARCHAR2(45),
run_control_date VARCHAR2(13)
[code]....
Getting error : ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
can we change the existing materialized view to normal view? if yes how?
View 2 Replies View Related
