SQL & PL/SQL :: Comparison Function And Sql Statement
Apr 3, 2011
When we create sql and some pieces of sql are implemented as oracle function. and we run this sql only once every day. I read article that function after first run located in cache. This part of cache ( with function ), is it really consume one oracle resources? Or it will be erased after while.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION is_overdue (due_date IN DATE,paid_date IN DATE) RETURN BOOLEAN IS days_between NUMBER (2) := due_date - paid_date; BEGIN [code]......
When i try using this compilation, i am getting error for this program:
SQL> begin 2 dbms_output.put_line(is_overdue('07-nov-1987','01-aug-2012')); 3 end; 4 / dbms_output.put_line(is_overdue('07-nov-1987','01-aug-2012')); * ERROR at line 2: ORA-06550: line 2, column 7: PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'PUT_LINE' ORA-06550: line 2, column 7: PL/SQL: Statement ignored
To get output for this program? Show me how to compile.
Can we call a function within decode statement. I am able to do the same for simple example function . But In my actual procedure it's giving the error message . Are there any restrictions to call function with in decode statement?
I am trying to use decode function in sql and inside decode function can I use select statement ?
here is my sql
select we.wf_entity_id, decode(object_type_id, 1, select audit_number from ea_audit_general where sys_audit_id=object_id 2,'test', object_type_id ) from wf_entity we where
[code]....
see this
decode(object_type_id, 1, select audit_number from ea_audit_general where sys_audit_id=object_id 2,'test', object_type_id )
I am trying to search a way to get the SQL statement that caused an exception withing an oracle function. I tried:
SELECT sql_text from v$session ses, v$sql sql where sql.sql_id = ses.prev_sql_id and ses.sid = sys_context('userenv','SID') AND ROWNUM = 1;
but this doesn't always return the last statement that the function has executed. if needed i can send the complete script for the function and its tables and stored procedures for testing.
I am getting a (PL/SQL: ORA-00903: invalid table name) compile error in a procedure using a merge statement. I have seen many examples using this technique and am at a loss as to why I can't compile.
the pipelined function is:
FUNCTION f_crcli_pipe(pi_source_data IN sys_refcursor, pi_limit_size IN PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT pkg_crcli_variables.c_cursor_limit_def) RETURN CRCLI_AA PIPELINED PARALLEL_ENABLE(PARTITION pi_source_data BY ANY) IS
[code].....
the error is pointing to the TABLE function in the USING clause of the merge statement.
In the below SQL, I am calling a function "listagg_nm(deptno)", and function is to get all the employee name for a particular department with comma separated
output is: ------------------------------------------------- DEPTNO SAL LISTAGG_NM(DEPTNO) 10 5000 KING,CLARK,MILLER 10 1300 KING,CLARK,MILLER 10 2450 KING,CLARK,MILLER 20 2975 JONES,SCOTT,FORD,SMITH,ADAMS
[code]....
below are the code
select deptno,sal,listagg_nm(deptno) from emp order by deptno; FUNCTION listagg_nm (p_deptno NUMBER) RETURN CLOB IS v_str CLOB;
[code]....
My doubt/question is for every row in the SQL the function is being called. t means that for 1st row deptno=10, the function is called and return all concatenated name for department 10, then again for 2nd row deptno=10, it again do the same, similarly for all other department.
Can we avoid this, I mean, if function is already returned a concatenated string of ename for deptno=10, then in the next function call it will checks if it is for same department (i.e. deptno=10) then the function will not go into for loop and it will directly return the concatenated string of ename for deptno=10 which we already done for the first row and so on for other department number ( something like storing the value in variable. Is it possible to achive this and does this is good for performance as we are not going into loop inside the function to return the concatenated string of ename for the same deptno everytime ( I have to return more than 10000 char., so i used clob in function and similarly the numbers of row return by SQL is more than 1000)and also how to code this, I tried but unable to achive.
I have an issue with rather complicated function.Basically it is using DBMS_SQL to execute a very long statement with many parameters (~6000 of them) and binding them with DBMS_SQL.BIND_VARIABLE. Variables are called :1,:2,...,:6000.
When this arguments set is too large - I am receiving error "ORA-00939: too many arguments for function".
Currently I am thinking about dividing the query into subqueries and executing them all with performance decrease.
WHILE EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM tblOrgChart WHERE fxOrgID = v_chrTempKeyDept ) LOOP v_intDept := CAST(v_chrTempKeyDept AS NUMBER) + 1 ; v_chrTempKeyDept := LPAD('',3 - LENGTH(CAST(v_intDept AS VARCHAR2)),'0') || CAST(v_intDept AS VARCHAR2) ; END LOOP;
Error: PLS-00204: function or pseudo-column 'EXISTS' may be used inside a SQL statement only
How to call a function with a row type return in an Oracle select statement.
For e.g. :
If I had this function with a rowtype return: ------------------------------ create function abc return xyz%rowtype is rec xyz%rowtype; begin select * into rec from xyz where col1 = n; return rec; end; -------------------------------- How could I use this in a select clause, as there is a multi column return by the function ?
Currently I am working on conversion project. We want to verify the both applications updated database values are same or not.
if you run same transaction in both application values are updated in the database. I want compare both database tables, its updated same values in table or any mismatch in the table, is there any tools available right now to compare the two rows values in same tables.
Select to_char(to_date('10-02-2006 10:30:00 AM', 'DD-MM-YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 'HH:MI:SS AM') as a1, to_char(to_date('10-02-2006 01:30:00 PM', 'DD-MM-YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 'HH:MI:SS AM') as a2, Case when to_char(to_date('10-02-2006 10:30:00 AM', 'DD-MM-YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 'HH:MI:SS AM') >
[code]...
from the above query i was expecting value '2' but its returning '1'. As I am using TO_CHAR its trying to compare characters. Is there a way, to compare times alone like less than, greater than?
I need to populate a table based on the results of comparing sets of data. I decided to do this using MULTISET EXCEPT, but having created the structure, do not know whether it is actually possible, and if so, what syntax to use.
I have created:
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE NUMBER_TBL IS TABLE OF NUMBER; /
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE PACKAGE_OPTION_GROUP_OBJ AS OBJECT( ID NUMBER, benefits NUMBER_TBL ) /
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE PACKAGE_OPTION_GROUP_TBL AS table of PACKAGE_OPTION_GROUP_OBJ /
I am expecting the result to be something like: ***comparisonTable*** GROUP_ID : 123 BENEFITS : 165 BENEFITS : 167 ---------------------------
However, I don't know if this is possible and if so, what the syntax would be.
At a later stage, I will need to compare the benefits between selectedTable and groupTable, where the GroupID's match, which is why I have the tables structured in this way.
I ran SPA for SQL workload of around 94 SQLs.In comparison report that is generated by SPA, there is a metrics "Top 94 SQL Sorted by Absolute Value of Change Impact on the Workload".
In this metrics there is a column "Impact on Workload". This column hold a value in percentage.how this is calculated by SPA. What formula is used by SPA to calculate "Impact on Workload".
I am trying to compare the ranges of low pair and high pair,if they are within the range then source_conn_id should remain same,else it should be updated to null,which i had written it in else block.How can I implement the IF block and what to write in that block so that source_conn_id can remain the same.
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE fp_complements_src(p_id varchar2,ftr_con_id varchar2) 2 AS 3 BEGIN 4 FOR i IN(SELECT SOURCE_CONN_ID,LOW_PAIR,HIGH_PAIR FROM COMP_TEMP1 WHERE SOURCE_CONN_ID=ftr_con_id)
Provide details about performance comparison between Oracle Sun Sparc 10 and IBM P7 server running oracle 11gR2 for OLTP system.
I know that licensing wise Sun will be much cheaper but i want to know other aspects such as performance, storage, transaction per second. Basically on a nut shell which server to buy for our OLTP system.
Oracle Server 11g on HP-UX Oracle Client on Windows
I am using swingbench tool to generate load on DB and using OLTP like benchmark i am comparing the performance of plain data and encrypted data.
I have created two different database. one for tde and other for plain. I have populated same number of rows in both databases. Then i start running the benchmark and i use SAR to collect disk I/O's, VSAR to CPU usage.
From the sar report it seems that,
Oracle plain has faster transactions, it uses minimum CPU. But when look in tot the Reads/Writes TDE has lower than the plain.
If TDE needs to encrypt the data to store in the disks it should occupy more space than the plain data. Then the I/O should be more in TDE..
Note: Bcz the DB parameters are same, number of rows in the tables are same. File system and its block size are same. I will run the swingbench seperately for both the databases.
I am attaching the excel sheet for sar results. Let me know if you need more information
My primary objective was to compare objects in schemas in two different databases and find out the differences, Execute DDL's in the database where objects are missing and syn schemas in two different databases.
So I need to compare schemas in databases. Which tool will be user friendly to make a comparison of database objects existing in schemas in two different databases.
I'd like to see if I can get a list of pro and cons between Toad and SQL Developer for comparing schemas pros and cons. How to make a comparison. I have some idea on using TOAD but was not familiar with SQL Developer.
Below is my requirement:-
Connect to Source Connect to Target Compare schemas with different object types Find out differences Generate DDL's for the missing objects or for the objects in difference report Run them in missing instace(Source/Target) Make sure both are in sync.
Could it be that it's impossible to change the date format in the default_where clause?
The table column PROPOSAL_END in the database that I want to compare with, is in Format DD.MM.YYYY.
I tried:
set_block_property('Tours' , default_where, 'Number_of_places > 0 AND PROPOSAL_END <= ' || to_char(to_date(sydate,'DD.MM.YYYY'))); set_block_property('Tours' , default_where, 'Number_of_places > 0 AND PROPOSAL_END <= ' || to_char([-- A date item with the intial value $$date$$ the output is in Fomat DD.MM.YYYY by default --])); set_block_property('Tours' , default_where, 'Number_of_places > 0 AND PROPOSAL_END <= ' || to_char(to_date([-- A date item with the intial value $$date$$ the output is in Fomat DD.MM.YYYY by default --],'DD.MM.YYYY')));
It all does dot matter. Every time the generated select-statement shows the format DD-MMM-YY. How can I change that?
I have a below requirement to compare the development and production objects.if any association_type or association_role are not exists in production then i need to return a message like "the Type Object found in Development,but not Production"
Below is the tree structure
development ProcessingSite(Association type1) TreatingSite(role1) MoodedActivity(role2) MaterialName(role3)
production ProcessingSite(Association type1) TreatingSite(role1) MaterialName(role2)
Processing Site is an association_type and it is having 3 association_roles. we can observe same association_type in the production, but Mooded Activity(association_role) is not available. in this case we need to return "Type Object found in Development,but not Production".
We have migrated database data from physical servers to virtual servers. i want to ensure all database parameters are set correctly in both physical and vblock servers. My question is what are all the parameters need to check and compare in both servers to ensure database from both servers ( physical/vblock ) are in sync.
I have written one program with dynamic SQL and piece of code is follows.
sql_stmt := 'SELECT '||CBID(i)||',BID,'||CBEID(i)||',''NA'',''NA'',''NA'' FROM DIM_ORGNISATION WHERE BID in(select PARENT_B_ID from ORG_DIM_LOD where CHILD_B_ID ='||CBID(i)||') and to_Date(start_Date,''DD/MM/YYYY'') = TO_DATE ( trunc('||Cstart_date_type(i)||'),''DD-MON-YY'',''NLS_DATE_LANGUAGE=ENGLISH'')'; EXECUTE IMMEDIATE sql_stmt BULK COLLECT INTO tempBID, tempSBD, tempLBD, tempL3BD, tempL4BD, tempSABD And ,
when i'm executing dynamic SQL gives the error as follows.
ORA-00904: "JAN": invalid identifierORA-06512: at "LWNER.SHY_CREATE_MAPING", line 184ORA-06512: at line 2
when displaying with using
DBMS_OUTPUT DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Cstart_date_type(i)'||Cstart_date_type(i)||)); It's diaplaying it as "01-JAN-70".