I have a table TP having following data (Dashes used for space as i am unable to have proper alignment)
ID1-----TOT
1 ------- 5
2 ------- 7
I need a query that repeat the records depending on the field TP.TOT
e.g.
ID1 -----TOT
1 ------- 5
1 ------- 5
1 ------- 5
1 ------- 5
1 ------- 5
2 ------- 7
2 ------- 7
2 ------- 7
2 ------- 7
2 ------- 7
2 ------- 7
2 ------- 7
I have 2 blocks named emp,emp1 those are DB's Blocks and empno, ename, sal in EMP block and sal, sum(sal) are in EMP1 block, i set the property for sum is summarized block is: EMP1 and item is SAL, i want display sum(sal), but not display when i click execute query.
View 5 Replies View Related Let's say that we have an order entry app and the price and quantity items are already populated. We now want to show the user the extended price (the product of the first two items). the extended price would automatically display after both the quantity and price items are entered. I'm assuming that would require some kind of client-side processing. I imagine server-side processing is simpler, so I'll lean in that direction. I'm sure we've all seen web sites that require you to click a button for the order totals to be updated. I'm okay with that approach, but I haven't quite put all of the pieces together. Here's what I came up with.
A region button was added to trigger the updating of the extended price. The button's "Action When Button Clicked" is to submit the page. Under "Page Processing", a process was created to do the calculation with the recipient of the product being a page item. From debug code in the procedure, I can see that the item containing the extended price was, indeed, modified. But the new value doesn't display in the field and the Session window shows that the value of the item didn't change.
I must be missing something. The debug code says the item value was updated. The Session window says it wasn't updated. What gives? What did I do wrong and what needs to be done to correct this?
I am trying to write an sql which shows the running total for records which has duplicate.
sample rows:
col1 col2 col3
1 A 2
1 A 2
1 A 2
1 B 3
1 B 3
1 C 5
1 D 2
1 D 2o
p required:
col1 col2 col3 cumulative_tot
1 A 2 2
1 A 2 2
1 A 2 2
1 B 3 5
1 B 3 5
1 C 5 10
1 D 2 12
1 D 2 12
DECLARE
l_query VARCHAR2(4000);
TYPE cursor_type IS REF CURSOR;
[Code].....
How can I get the total number of rows returned by the query?
I want to be able to check omething like c1.ROWS = 0
how to store total no of updated rows (number) in a variable after executing an updation query using script
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a big problem in the underlying devices that ASM disk groups depends on. We have SAN disks (EMC DMX) presented to us as /dev/sda, /dev/sdb, etc.These disks have actually multipath setup. For example, - /dev/emcpowera has two different paths as:
1./dev/sda
2./dev/sdp
We were using the direct path /dev/sda to format the disk (as fdisk /dev/sda), and then used oracleasm to create disks (oracleasm createdisk ASMDISKDATA0 /dev/sda1). Then, ASM disk groups were created with those lables (volumes), and then database was created using the ASM disk groups.
Now our platform folks are telling us that we should use the multipath /dev/emcpowera instead of direct path /dev/sda as the direct path is not guaranteed across reboot.
So the questions are:
1.Is there a way to re-link the disk group to asm disk to the multipath devices (/dev/emcpowera1 instead of /dev/sda1)?
2.Is this even an issue for ASM? If the /dev/sda fails after reboot, can Oracle ASM automatically discover the other path /dev/sdp to the physical EMC disk?
somehow cannot understand why index is not used
in Oracle Database 11g Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
1. Included only indexed column and got a perfect plan
explain plan for2 select s.x_cnt
3 from reported_summary s
4 where s.x_cnt>0;
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2674489506
-------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Cost (%CPU)|
-------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 306 (8)|
|* 1 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| S_NUI01 | 306 (8)|
-------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - filter("s"."x_CNT">0)
2. Included some other column and got TABLE ACCESS FULL
explain plan for2 select s.x_cnt,s.ru_id
3 from reported_summary s
4 where s.x_cnt>0;
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2142873335
---------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Cost (%CPU)|
---------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 2421 (3)|
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| REPORTED_SUMMARY | 2421 (3)|
---------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - filter("s"."x_CNT">0)
3. Included all other columns and got TABLE ACCESS FULL as well explain plan for2 select s.x_cnt,s.* 3 from reported_summary s 4 where s.x_cnt>0;
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2142873335
---------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Cost (%CPU)|
---------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 2421 (3)|
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| REPORTED_SUMMARY | 2421 (3)|
---------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - filter("s"."x_CNT">0)
select the rows from a table with the same particular field in PL/SQL. Actually I don't want to write two loops one inserted into another.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have been using With for many queries for readability. This most recent query seemed to be taking a bit longer to run and I didn't think much of it until a colleague showed me their version (totally different sql statement) which ran faster, but seemed more complicated and had more lines of code. I noticed that the other version did not use with. I moved the sql of the with into the join and the query ran faster dropping from 30 seconds to 798 msecs. The question is am I sacrificing speed for readability by using With, or it really depends on the overall sql statement.
Here is the query using WITH:
with prev as
(
select person_uid, id, name, academic_period,
case when enrolled_ind = 'Y' and registered_ind = 'N' and student_status = 'AS' then 0 else 1 end as enreg_stat,
[Code]....
I want to create a SELECT, that shall give back only a special amount of rows, depending on the sum of one of the selected fields.
At first a code sample of the complete selection:
SELECT DISTINCT mnr, ktxt,
(SELECT Sum(meng_4)FROM reldb d1 WHERE d1.mnr=d.mnr)qty
FROM reldb d
WHERE mnr IN (SELECT mnr FROM relac WHERE Lower(rlnr) NOT LIKE 'platte geprägt%')
AND saext='M'
ORDER BY qty DESC,ktxt;
This selection produces some lines of output (in my case i.e. like 300). What I want to see is only that much lines that the condition 'sum of all items listed below meng_4<=sum of all items meng_4 of the whole selection * 0.9' is fulfilled.
So, if the whole selection produces a total of 10000 as sum for all items meng_4, I want to see only that amount of rows that sums a total of at least 9000 for all items meng_4.
I hope, this specification is exactly enough to understand my intent.
1. Can I do this in a query?
2. If yes, what would this query look like?
generate the number of rows based on table field.
Sample code is given below.
CREATE TABLE T
(
docno VARCHAR2(10),
CODE VARCHAR2(8),
QTY NUMBER(3)
)
LOGGING
I have a query that produces around 11 fields, and one of which is a multi-delimited field and the other 10 are dimension fields. I would like to split that field into several rows, and have the other 10 fields just repeated for each one. Here is an example of the data in the 11th field :
Column 11
34^56^78,59
There are two delimiters in the field, a carat and a comma. This field is used to reference document numbers that are needed to be sent in. The carat represents the word "Or" and the comma represents the word "And". I would like to have the output of each field to be a repeat of the 10 dimension fields, plus 3 new fields. The first new field would be the document number, the second new field would be the position within the original delimited field(1, 2, 3, etc.) , and the last field would be one of three logic words :First (if it is the first value), Or (if the value followed a carat), And (If the value followed a comma). Example of the output from the above value would be :
Column 11 Column 12 Column 13
34_______ 1_______ First
56_______ 2_______ Or
78_______ 3_______ Or
59_______ 4_______ And
Any thoughts on this? I have found a few solutions online on how to break up the delimited field into rows, but never with multiple delimiters or with extra logic for the added fields.
I need to list a count of rows where a DATE field is not null and group those counts by day.
Here's my sql so far...
SELECT
COUNT(DQ_DISTRBTN_DATE) as DQR_DIST,
DQ_DISTRBTN_DATE as DIST_DATE
from
ETL_PROCESS.BATCH
group by
DQ_DISTRBTN_DATE;
Because DQ_DISTRBTN_DATE contains time, how do I modify to achieve the desired result?
How can I compare two rows from the same table and show the field and the difference?
Example:
select ename, job, mgr, hiredate, sal, deptno
from EMP t
where t.empno = 7782
or t.empno = 7788
ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL DEPTNO
1 CLARK MANAGER 7839 6/9/1981 2450.00 10
2 SCOTT ANALYST 7566 6/9/1981 3000.00 20
My report comparing fields should be:
FIELD BASE COMPARE DIFFERENCE
ENAME CLARK SCOTT --
JOB MANAGER ANALYST --
MGR 7839 7566 --
SAL 2450 3000 550 --(Show difference only for numbers)
DEPTNO 10 20 --
I know how to select the last N sets of rows, using DENSE_RANK - where multiple rows have the same timestamp but I want to only select those rows which do NOT have the top 2 unique timestamps.
i.e.:
SELECT *
FROM ( SELECT DENSE_RANK() OVER (ORDER BY myTimestamp DESC) DENSE_RANK, HISTORYID, USER_ID, myTimestamp, STATUS, FROM TXN_HIST)
WHERE DENSE_RANK > 2 order by myTimestamp DESC, HISTORYID, USER_ID;
But how do I DELETE these same rows?
I Want to make a query to select finished goods product in sales having product code greater than 280 but i have face a problem that order by is not working because products column have character code as well as number. how to sort that column.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI try to find out how export data from table to Excel file format and save the result to BLOB field in some other table.I know how to download report from Page by submit, but I need to process data and instead of returning result to user as Excel file - save it in BLOB.
Also I found implementation on JAVA for the issue but actually I wanna study out - Is it possible to resolve this issue by PL/SQL and APEX API methods?
In my page, I have two items(type Popup LOV): P2_APP and P2_MOD and I've created two LOVs for each item. What I want is that when I select one value in first LOV in second LOV I'll get data that is related with select value in first LOV.
My table logic in database is ok, and select statements are alright.
I think that select statement in second LOV is not fetching data from first LOV item:
select MOD_NAME as display_value, MOD_CODE as return_value
from MODS
where APPLICATION= *:P2_APP* <-------- this is first LOV item with data previously selected
order by 1
I'm running a query like the below but now i would like to make the last line actually say Grand Total. Instead of just total.
SELECT decode (grouping (farinva_invh_Code),0,null,'Total') farinva_invh_Code,
--decode ( grouping (amt),0,null,'GrantTotal')Grant_Total,
farinva_invh_Code,
spriden_id,
--spriden_last_name "last Name"
[Code]....
Even though i am using COL1 CHAR(500) NULLIF COL1=BLANKS, then also i am getting same error for those columns.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI have a table where i need to update one field values based on another field of the same table , simply as it is.I have done this using one select all check box , on clicking that all check boxes of item_trans table will get selected , then i will un select some of check box and then using one button, i will update the value of the fields which are checked only.
I have put the sample code but when i am updating its taking long time and hanging.I am also attaching the form based on the test case provided.
--tables with insert statement
create table item_trans (trans_item varchar2(12),trans_qty number,trans_act_qty number)
insert into item_trans(TRANS_ITEM,TRANS_QTY,TRANS_ACT_QTY) VALUES ('TREE1',40,NULL);
insert into item_trans(TRANS_ITEM,TRANS_QTY,TRANS_ACT_QTY) VALUES ('TREE2',20,NULL);
insert into item_trans(TRANS_ITEM,TRANS_QTY,TRANS_ACT_QTY) VALUES ('TREE3',20,NULL);
--i want to set the value of trans_Act_qty as trans_qty
--i create one dummy or test block to keep the select all check box. for that table test script is
CREATE TABLE TEST
(
C VARCHAR2(2000 BYTE),
B NUMBER,
A NUMBER
);
insert into test (C,B,A) values ('A',1,1);
--code written in select all check box which is created on test.block.
BEGIN
GO_BLOCK('item_trans');
FIRST_RECORD;
LOOP
:M_END_YN := :M_END_ALL;
[code].......
--code written in M_END_YN ( actual check boxes where i will uncheck).
IF :M_END_YN = 'N' THEN
:M_END_ALL := 'N';
END IF;
--code written on button to update those values which are checked.
BEGIN
GO_BLOCK('item_trans');
FIRST_RECORD;
LOOP
IF :M_END_YN = 'Y' THEN
[code]......
I am New to Apex. Im using Apex Version 4.2.
I have a tab named APPROPRIATIONS it has 10 fields. Among which is PROJECT NUMBER, AUTHORIZAION DATE (CALENDER TYPE POPUP), And FUNDS CHECK FLAG.
The Scenario is depending upon PROJECT NUMBER the Fields are Populated including FUNDS CHECK FLAG .
But the AUTHORIZAION DATE is a MANDATORY field has to be filled by User
The Requirement is to make AUTHORIZAION DATE as MANDATORY only when the FUNDS CHECK FLAG is *"BLANK "* or *“Y”*
If the FUNDS CHECK FLAG is *“N”* then the AUTHORIZAION DATE to be made OPTIONAL.
I need to update a field with the 1st 9 characters of another field in the same record.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a table called Customer_Type with following fields
Customer_type ,Active_date, Inactive_date
regular,11/01/2011
daily,11/04/2011
monthly,11/05/2011/11/11/2011
Tbale 2:Customer
Customer_name,Customer_type,Customer_Inactive_date
John,regular,
James,monthly,
Jake,daily,
Jill,monthly
What i wnat is to update the Customer_inactive_date with the Incative_date field from Customer_type based on their Customer_type... So james and Jill would have their rows updated in this scneario ..How can i achive this in pl/Sql
I have teh code using merge function..I want something in traditional old fashion..
The sql statements are below
CREATE TABLE CUSTOMER_TYPE
(
type_code VARCHAR2(10),
[Code]....
My example: I'm given an Allowance throughout the week. It happens to be 10 dollars but it can vary from day to day.I can create a running total with SUM(Amt) Over etc...This is the CUMUL column in the example below.
On certain days I've spent different percentages of the allowance. (The SPENT Column which is a field in the database)I can't manage to create the AMTLEFT column in the example below.The AmtLeft column seems to be a kind of running total that 'refers to itself' so this is where I'm stumped.
Week,Day,Amt,Cumul,Spent,AmtLeft
1,Mon,10,10,0%,10
1,Tue,10,20,50%,10
1,Wed,10,30,0%,20
1,Thu,10,40,0%,30
[code]...
My imaginary SQL would look something like at this point (if I have it right):
SELECT Week, Day, Amt, Sum(Amt) Over (Partition By Week, Order By Day) AS Cumul, Spent FROM AllowancesTable
How to get the last column AmtLeft?
I'm trying to Rank Username based on the Total Sum of amount waived but I want to avoid Ranking the Overall Total at the bottom, plus I dont want them in Ranking order, I want the order to stay the same as it currently is.
SELECT DECODE(GROUPING(USERNAME),1,'TOTAL',0,UPPER(USERNAME)) as "USERNAME",
SUM(CASE WHEN TO_CHAR(DATE_PROCESSED,'MON') = 'JAN' THEN AMOUNT_WAIVED ELSE 0 END) AS JAN,
SUM(CASE WHEN TO_CHAR(DATE_PROCESSED,'MON') = 'FEB' THEN AMOUNT_WAIVED ELSE 0 END) AS FEB,
[code]....
I would like to give back to the our application user a page of results for a given query along with the total result count, something like: "Showing 1-25 of 650 total results".
Currently I am doing this by submitting a second query:
select count(*) from (<previous query criteria>)
Is there a better performing approach I could be using?
I am writing a report that breaks on the first 4 fields. That part is working fine. I also want a count for each Group (the 4 fields), and a grand total. Since I want to break on all 4 fields as if they are one combined field, I made a concatenated column (called Break_key) and had the report total on that.
I was surprised when the count appeared at the top of each group, rather than at the bottom. The grand total is at the very bottom of the report, as I would have thought. How can I get the sub-totals at the bottom, rather than the top?
Report Builder 9.0.4.0.33
My query:
select distinct
fs.FUNDING_SOURCE ,
lpad(l.circuit, 2, '0') circuit,
l.DEPARTMENT ,
l.REIMB_TYPE ,
p.POSITION_NO ,
decode (p.position_type, 'F', 'Full', 'S', 'Shared') position_type ,
ph.phasein,
[Code]....
Is there any data dictionary table to get the object grants for total objects in the database?
Using DBA_TAB_PRIVS, i get object grants for tables only. But i'm looking for remaining objects also. The list of remaining objects is below.
view, or materialized view
Sequence
Procedure, function, or package
User-defined type
Synonym for any of the preceding items
Directory, library, operator, or indextype
Java source, class, or resource
provide me the other data dictionary tables for querying.