Step 1: Increased Physical Memory on one Node from 32 G to 48 G. Step 1 Impact : DB was running same as before Step 2 : Increased SGA from 12 G to 15 G. Step2 Impact : DB was running same as before for 1 day next day one reporting job was hanging. Step 3 : Increased DB_CACHE_SIZE from 5G to 7G. Step 3 Impact : Over all CPU Utilization was high and no effect on reporting job. Step 4 : Decreased DB_CACHE_SIZE from 7 G to 5 G. Step 4 Impact : CPU Utilization came down little bit but no effect on reporting job.
Now our main concern is why CPU Utilization is going high. Because same thing we did last time and we got positive results.
One of my MOD_PLSQL based Oracle APEX Application is running on the web. I have almost 1000 web users to access the Application where at least 250-300 users are always on line. In Oracle EM web interface When run ADDM I see suggestions "Investigate the cause of SQL*Net more data to client" or something like this. and I am getting complains about poor server response. Here are my configuration of the system:
Database Server Host: DBServer (Oracle Database 10.2.0.3) HTTP Server Host: OraHTTP (Oracle Companion CD 10g)
DADS.conf HTTP Server configuration MOD_PLSQL database access for web clients.
How can I increase database connection performance?
NAME TYPE VALUE ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------ lock_sga boolean FALSE pre_page_sga boolean FALSE sga_max_size big integer 1152M sga_target big integer 0
[code]....
in scenario above, the database do not using ASMM, and spfile If I wan to increase db_cache_size parameter, do i need to rebounce instance?
We have a table emp_details with 23772889 records. Our requirement is to increase few of the columns size in the table emp_details. We are following the below alter statement which is taking around 2 hours of time.
We are just but new oracle 10g(10.1.2.0.2) Database and application server ( form and report server ).have installed application server on window server 2003.
it will running ,but it is used lots of memory.so the performance decrease when user increase.
NAME TYPE VALUE ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------ undo_management string AUTO undo_retention integer 96000 undo_tablespace string undo
Following are the details in AWR report (00:00 til 01:00 of 21-Apr-2013) .... not thet the error was produced at 00:42
Undo Segment Summary DB/Inst: DBCPY/dbcpy01 Snaps: 18853-18854 -> Min/Max TR (mins) - Min and Max Tuned Retention (minutes) -> STO - Snapshot Too Old count, OOS - Out of Space count -> Undo segment block stats: -> uS - unexpired Stolen, your - unexpired Released, uU - unexpired reUsed
[code]....
Undo Advisor information taken 'now' is as following
SQL> select dbms_undo_adv.longest_query(sysdate-2,sysdate) from dual; DBMS_UNDO_ADV.LONGEST_QUERY(SYSDATE-2,SYSDATE) ---------------------------------------------- 379650 SQL> select dbms_undo_adv.required_retention from dual;
[code]....
In above situation what should be my first choice (assuming increasing space is not an issue) - increase undo tablespace or increase undo retention?
If latter is the choice then what should be the value? Because as I understand present 96000 value is taken as lower limit and because of auto tuning the actual value (TUNED_UNDORETENTION) being used was 345600 In that case shall I set it to something > max(maxquerylen) i.e 379,650 + X?Or I shall increase the undo tablespace size?
From Undo Advisor output it looks to me that even if I increase the undo retention to 379650 current undo size will be able to support it (may be at the expense of DMLs)Is that right?
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | b | 1 | 23 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | a | 300 | 14700 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - How do i optimize it best?
1 million rows average row length 200 bytes 50 columns and this update statement UPDATE mytable SET varchar2_4000_column = replace(replace(replace...300 times)
It looks at every row in the table (no WHERE clause) and does these 300 replace operations on this column for each row. Each replace replaces with a null so effectively it is removing strings. Much of the time these strings are not in the column.
This update statement takes 25 minutes and it is 98% CPU and 2% USER_IO time.
I figure that is what is taking all the time since it is a CPU bound statement. if rows in this table are persistent over time then tag rows with a flag to show which ones have already been processed and skip these next time around.
I need to get create_user_id for different sale_location_id.Also create_user_id field will be having different values.This is part of my big query.I need to add this stmt in that.So taken that part and figuring it out.
create table it(sale_location_id number,create_user_id varchar2(10)); table IT created. insert into it values(1,'ISRA') 1 rows inserted. insert into it values(2,'USFA') 1 rows inserted.
select a.sale_location_id,decode(a.sale_location_id,1,a.create_user_id like 'IS%',a.create_user_id like 'U%') create_user_id from it a
given error as:
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis 00907. 00000 - "missing right parenthesis"
I have a table in SQL , I am creating a column Of name in it , i want to restrict user to enter name in Capital only ,and i want to create this at table level . I tried Check Operator but failed .
1) Can we set a different symbol other than '' for escape operator. 2) If yes, how to see the current escape operator symbol. 3) How to find out the below name with escape operator?
I have a requirement in SQL that I have to number each row. Hence I thought of using ROWNUM. But the sql query I'm using uses UNION operator. Hence I used like this
select a,b,rownum as 'field1' from table1 union select c,d,1 as 'field1' from table2
Query - SELECT * FROM sysadm.ps_tmtl_post_vw a WHERE a.month_prepared_for = 'JUNE,2012' AND a.ca_status = 'P5 CUST GO AHEAD'
[code]...
When I try for the SQL-Tuning sets its throws error that
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SECTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - The optimizer could not merge the view at line ID 2 of the execution plan. The optimizer cannot merge a view that contains a set operator.
I read earlier forum where it says that optimizer unable to interpret the conditions like order by etc etc.Now there is one view which is getting used in the query when I did select * from vw it took more than 16 hrs to complete. (bad view).
Attached File(s)
exec_plan.txt ( 2.06MB ) Number of downloads: 1 view_def.txt ( 14.12K ) Number of downloads: 2
Want to understand difference between Concat function and "||" operator. I am getting the same result for both. Below is the test case for your reference.
Select 'H '||' S' From Dual; --Output H S
Select Concat('H ',' S') A From Dual; --Output H S
Select Length('H '||' S') A From Dual; --Output 6
Select Length(Concat('H ',' S')) A From Dual; --Output 6
I want to link to blocks using description as there is no relation , for example i have two tables with one field in common called description, and i want to link this field in two tables using like operator.
create table item ( item_code varchar2(12),item_name varchar2(30)); insert into item VALUES('A','HEA160'); insert into item VALUES('B','HEA180'); create table stk (sl_item varchar2(12),sl_desc varchar2(30),sl_qty number); insert into stk VALUES ('X','HEA160X1000',12); insert into stk VALUES ('X','HEA160X2000',4); insert into stk VALUES ('Y','HEA180X3000',10);
Suppose i click on item block item_desc with value on HEA160 all the items similar to that should appear in stk block like 'HEA160X1000' ,'HEA160X2000' , if i click on 'HEA180' on item then 'HEA180X3000' it should come.