begin
for i in 1..10000 loop
update table1
set col1= col1+1
where type =1;
commit;
end loop;
end;
My question is, if a strored procedure contains the script above and the said procedure will be invoked by two or more sessions at the same time. Does it mean that the 1st session will lock the related rows and other sessions will have to wait for loop in session one to finish?
we know we can see lock mode held in session can be analysed using LM column in v$lock.But i confused in seeing LM column it all shows in numbers from 0 to 6.
eg
0,'None(0)',
1,'Null(1)',
2,'Row Share(2)',
3,'Row Exclu(3)',
4,'Share(4)',
5,'Share Row Ex(5)',
6,'Exclusive(6)')
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE IND_MONITOR(P_tab VARCHAR2)
is
type ind_table is table of varchar2(20);
p_ind ind_table;
v_sql varchar2(2000);
begin
select index_name bulk collect into P_Ind from user_indexes where table_name=upper(P_tab);
for i in 1..p_ind.count loop
v_sql :='alter index '||p_ind(i)|| ' monitoring usage'
execute immediate v_sql using p_ind(i);
end loop;
end;
can i use forall instead of 'for loop ..end loop'
I was pretty sure that every TX lock needs TM lock (at least one). But now on my 9.2.0.8 I can see:
SQL> select * from v$lock where type <> 'MR';
ADDR KADDR SID TY ID1 ID2 LMODE REQUEST CTIME BLOCK
---------------- ---------------- ---------- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
070000026525D648 070000026525D668 4 RT 1 0 6 0 6551105 0
070000026525D3E8 070000026525D408 5 XR 4 0 1 0 6551108 0
070000026525D6E0 070000026525D700 6 TS 2 1 3 0 6551103 0
0700000267173060 07000002671731D8 36 TX 524304 1532490 6 0 2952 0
0700000266EC07F0 0700000266EC0968 63 TX 655400 1550373 6 0 3750 0
0700000266EC0E78 0700000266EC0FF0 65 TX 720899 1461986 6 0 3711 0
0700000265FB6638 0700000265FB67B0 79 TX 327689 1556563 6 0 3825 0
0700000266EDEA08 0700000266EDEB80 85 TX 786469 1365502 6 0 3461 0
0700000266F52498 0700000266F52610 101 TX 196609 1556026 6 0 3850 0
0700000266EDDD10 0700000266EDDE88 126 TX 1114150 1344174 6 0 1474 0
0700000266F517A0 0700000266F51918 137 TX 589849 1605371 6 0 6345 0
07000002671554B8 0700000267155630 207 TX 262156 1529066 6 0 3826 0
07000002670E13B8 07000002670E1530 238 TX 917504 1391304 6 0 66 0
0700000266D094A8 0700000266D094D0 238 TM 194337 0 2 0 35 0
0700000266D093D8 0700000266D09400 238 TM 43802 0 2 0 35 0
0700000266D09308 0700000266D09330 238 TM 7387 0 2 0 35 0
0700000266D09238 0700000266D09260 238 TM 7374 0 2 0 35 0
0700000266D09168 0700000266D09190 238 TM 7380 0 3 0 35 0
0700000266D09098 0700000266D090C0 238 TM 7228 0 3 0 66 0
0700000266F51E28 0700000266F51FA0 261 TX 393224 1563714 6 0 4586 0
So whats can cause this, I can see that TX locks are mostly from JDBC connection from Application server .
In my current project, I am handling an Oracle database with version 10.2.0.3. I analyzed the AWR report for the past month abd saw the following wait events consistently:
CPU time - 45.6% (% Total Call Time)
db file sequential read - 30.6% (% Total Call Time)
enq: TX - row lock contention - 18.8 % (% Total Call Time)
I have uploaded the report for your reference.What should be my approach to troubleshoot this?
Attached File(s)
awr_report.html ( 382.28K )
Number of downloads: 6
how one can lock a particular row in a table.for example i have a employee table in which 50 records. now i want to lock only 10 records of the employee table.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a transaction table with some custom properties and two status columns. There are 2 different applications(.Net and Pl/SQL Procedure) using the table. Both the process run parallel and fetch records one by one, perform some calculation and update the status column.
-.Net updates - Extraction_status
-Pl/SQL updates - Ingestion_status
There are likely more chances that both applications will fetch the sane record and try to update the same row. This will cause a lock. Can i use row level lock before update by each application? Or is there any other methods/process in which this can be handled. ?
i have application where user logs and perform manipulation operation such as insert and update on database table.some time its possible that same user login twice, i just want to hold one session until and unless dml operation perform by another session gets complete.how to accomplish this in database level .
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am unable to compile my package because of a lock being held on it . Let me provide the details for better clarity .
select * from dba_ddl_locks where session_id=111 and owner='RAHUL';
session_id owner name type mode_held mode_requested
111 RAHUL RAHUL_PKG BODY NULL None
111 RAHUL RAHUL_PKG Table/Procedure/Type NULL NoneThe session details of the session id 111 is as below
select sid,serial#,user#,username,command,status,process,sql_exec_start from v$session where sid=122
sid serial# user# username command status process SQL_EXEC_START
111 3558 222 RAHUL 47 KILLED 4420 13-DEC-12 02.00.00 AM
The strange this is that we have tried killing this session and the status above even shows ' 'KILLED', stilll the dba_ddl_locks is showing the lock details on the package RAHUL_PKG and we are unable to compile the package (the locking session is running since 13-Dec-2012 ) and we are unable to kill that . Also , is it like if i have executed a package that is referencing some other package then we wont be able to compile the referenced package until and unless the dependent package has completed its execution ??
In my trace file am getting the following error, I understand this is due to the row level deadlock between two sessions accessing the same rows in a table.
*** 2011-08-17 20:22:27.969
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a deadlock due to user error in the design of an application or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following information may aid in determining the deadlock:
Deadlock graph:
---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
TX-016e0017-0001e10f 75 2370 X 153 2269 X
TX-0217000f-00009247 153 2269 X 75 2370 X
session 2370: DID 0001-004B-0015DCCEsession 2269: DID 0001-0099-000FB698
session 2269: DID 0001-0099-000FB698session 2370: DID 0001-004B-0015DCCE
Rows waited on:
Session 2370: obj - rowid = 000329C9 - AAAynJAAIAAEkVIAAG
(dictionary objn - 207305, file - 8, block - 1197384, slot - 6)
Session 2269: obj - rowid = 000329F2 - AAAynyAARAAEhMBAAA
(dictionary objn - 207346, file - 17, block - 1184513, slot - 0)
----- Information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
Session 2269:
sid: 2269 ser: 36409 audsid: 563917587 user: 107/PICKLE flags: 0x8000041
pid: 153 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 27324
image: oracle@snokhup4000
client details:
O/S info: user: appsrv, term: , ospid: 1234
machine: snokhup255 program:
current SQL:
DELETE FROM moderation_queue WHERE parent_id =:1 AND submission_type =:2 AND site_id IN ( select site_id from sites where personna_id= 1 )
----- End of information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
Information for THIS session:
----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=5rywrxc0mpcc1) -----
delete from shadow_users where user_id=:1 and personna_id=:2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
how to overcome or avoid the rowlevel deadlock.
How to Release Lock on table ? ( without killing session )
create table x ( a number);
insert into x(a) values (1);
Lets lock table.
declare
cursor c is select * from x for update;
begin
open c ;
end;
[code]....
In the past, we setup a standby database on our production server. My OS is HPUX, Oracle 10g and my database is in archive mod. We are no longer using the standby database method. My problem now is that one of my tablespace (/oradata/tn/rd2_temp 20gb) became 100% full on my production system. In trying to provide more space, I removed one of the standby redo logs. Instead of using ALTER database, I just did a rm from the OS. As I said earlier my STANDBY DB is inoperatable.
When I tried to drop the tablespace(/oradata/tn/rd2_temp it is 20gb), I am getting an oracle error (ora-19528 redo logs being cleared may need access to files). Im also getting and INSTANCE LOCK on ARC4. The rd2_temp tablespace is now offline. If I get rid of rd2_temp, I will be able to gain more space back to /oradata/tn.
My database is still up and working okay.
I have a scenario where lock statements in mysql need to be converted to oracle. how to convert them.
LOCK TABLES `ABC` WRITE;
UNLOCK TABLES;
I have a situation where I need to check if a row in the table locked i.e (Select for Update with NO WAIT applied on it). If yes go fetch the next row .
View 4 Replies View RelatedHow can one lock a table manually?
View 7 Replies View RelatedWhile i am trying to execute below mentioned query i am facing "DEADLOCK FOUND WHEN TRYING TO GET LOCK" error.
UPDATE PLAN
SET PLAN_PMS_BLOCK_ID =''
WHERE PLAN_PMS_BLOCK_ID<>''
AND PLAN_PMS_BLOCK_ID NOT BETWEEN '0' AND '9'
AND PLAN_PMS_BLOCK_ID NOT BETWEEN 'A' AND 'Z'
AND PLAN_PMS_BLOCK_ID NOT IN('-')
AND LENGTH(PLAN_PMS_BLOCK_ID )=1;
We are using the following statement to obtain a row lock in a table in the database(ORACLE 10G), SELECT * FROM {TABLE_NAME} WHERE ID = 1 for update and if we succeed grabbing the row lock we will continue to issue a update statement every 30 seconds to preserve the lock as far as possible. here is the update statement to preserve the lock,
UPDATE {TABLE_NAME} SET time = ? WHERE ID = 1.
As you see more longer we keep holding the row lock , more update statements are submitted in the pending transaction. In normal case our application can grab the exclusive row lock and works for a long time,however sometimes a connection reset exception is thrown and our application will close the connection(I assume the pending transaction will be rolled back by the database) and exit the JVM. Since other applications will keep trying to grab the same row lock to become the master role, we expect one of them can succeed but they are all failed because the database has not released the row lock as expected. how and when the row lock can get released in our use case?
I keep getting an ora-04020: deadlock detected while trying to lock object XDB. SDNRB..The statement I'm trying to issue is:
REVOKE execute on abc."descript_T" FROM PUBLIC;
I am not able to find a solution for this besides the fact of trying the operation again at a later time.I did, but get the same error every single time.
I have to find out the cause of a lock where a particular session with some serial no is causing a TX level lock for certain duration.
View 17 Replies View RelatedI am getting the Oracle Database error "ORA-00069 cannot acquire lock -- table locks disabled for string" in a stored proc. According to some sites I looked at, it says the Cause is "A command was issued that tried to lock the table indicated in the message. Examples of commands that can lock tables are: LOCK TABLE, ALTER TABLE ... ADD (...), and so on.". And the Action they suggest is "Use the ALTER TABLE ... ENABLE TABLE LOCK command, and retry the command".
I am not doing either a lock table or alter table command in my procedure, so what else could be causing this?
we can easily find out the locks which are currently active session.
Is any other way to find out locks on particular date and time using data dictionary?
For example, we have to find whether TT_objects occured the lock or not on ON yesterday.
@ the end of the day means After date changes i need to populate the new row in Some of my tables with the previous date values with the new date.. In that time some other Transaction will Occur on those tables so we need to lock all the tables in that time..Even i tried by doing the Exclusive lock on the tables...
execute immediate 'LOCK TABLE CTR_SALES IN EXCLUSIVE MODE NOWAIT';
execute immediate 'LOCK TABLE CTR_STK_ASSIGN IN EXCLUSIVE MODE NOWAIT';
And how to run this function @ 12:00 in the midnight by scheduling.... And 1 more thing how to pick the recent (Transaction) row on that table. I tried from the rowid it's not working
modify this script to show the table name, rowidwhich is locked?
In addtion,output of script below. In particular, I am trying to understand if there anyactive locks.
set pagesize 85
col username format a10
col osuser format a15
col sid format 9999
[code]...
I'm not a DBA, nor do i play one on TV.
Is there a way to only temporarily lock an account after so many bad logins? I'm being told by my DBA that there is not, and I'm just shocked that Oracle wouldn't build in that functionality.
I am using Oracle 11g in my Windows machine. I wrote a multithreaded program that will be inserting into Oracle database so I was getting this exception before-
ORA-12519: TNS:no appropriate service handler found
So after going through various article on the internet. I found that the solution for above exception is to increase the number of processes- So I followed the below thing and it works fine for me after that.
cmd>sqlplus / as sysdba
sqlplus>alter system set processes=300 scope=spfile;
sqlplus>shut immediate;
sqlplus>startup
Now after some more time, I increased the processes to something like below
alter system set processes=1000000 scope=spfile;
And since then whenever I am starting up my Oracle database, it is giving me this exception below and it is happening since one day.
ORA-10997: another startup/shutdown operation of this instance inprogress
ORA-09968: unable to lock file
I want to read 1 table. If the date is less than today, I want to update 4 other tables. I only want to do this update once a day.
While the 4 other tables are being updated, I want the other web users to pause for the update while this procedure runs.
Is there a better way to do this?
Here is what I have:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE TEST_TODAY2 AS
-- to create the table
-- create table test_today(updated_date date);
-- insert into test_today(updated_date) values (sysdate-1);
-- select * from test_today;
cursor daily_update_cur is
select updated_date from test_today
for update of updated_date;
[Code]...
Please use {noformat}{noformat} tags before and after your code as described in the FAQ: {message:id=9360002}.
I've corrected it this time for you.
i am using 10.2.0.1.0 version of oracle.
I have gathered frequency histogram manually on one of my column of a table to provide more information to optimizer for better calculation of cardinality.
Now i have my weekend job runs for gathering stats on schema level with method_opt as 'For all column size repeat'. But i don't want the stats of above column to be overridden by the stats job. I don't want to lock the statistics of whole table, but i just want to lock the column level stats for this table.
I'm using SAP ECC6.0, Oracle 10G, HPUX B11.23.Recently I had performed database restoration from my backup tape. However, during the process of bringing up the Oracle and SAP database, I observed that there could be some archive logs went missing. I had tried to check them from my backup tape, but could not find it.
In short, now my SAP database is up and running, but I'm having another problem when I executed a "CheckDB" job in DB13. The job is unable to complete successfully
DB13 job log:
30.08.2010 19:44:40 Job started
30.08.2010 19:44:40 Step 001 started (program RSDBAJOB, variant &0000000000061, user ID BASIS)
30.08.2010 19:44:40 Execute logical command BRCONNECT On host drqaecc
30.08.2010 19:44:40 Parameters: -u / -jid CHECK20100830194440 -c -f check
[code]...
Can we lock data in global temporary table?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to fetch data from a table but it takes time and give such an error:
SQL> Select * from adm_users;
Select * from adm_users
*
ERROR at line 1:
[Code]....