We are using the following statement to obtain a row lock in a table in the database(ORACLE 10G), SELECT * FROM {TABLE_NAME} WHERE ID = 1 for update and if we succeed grabbing the row lock we will continue to issue a update statement every 30 seconds to preserve the lock as far as possible. here is the update statement to preserve the lock,
UPDATE {TABLE_NAME} SET time = ? WHERE ID = 1.
As you see more longer we keep holding the row lock , more update statements are submitted in the pending transaction. In normal case our application can grab the exclusive row lock and works for a long time,however sometimes a connection reset exception is thrown and our application will close the connection(I assume the pending transaction will be rolled back by the database) and exit the JVM. Since other applications will keep trying to grab the same row lock to become the master role, we expect one of them can succeed but they are all failed because the database has not released the row lock as expected. how and when the row lock can get released in our use case?
we know we can see lock mode held in session can be analysed using LM column in v$lock.But i confused in seeing LM column it all shows in numbers from 0 to 6.
how one can lock a particular row in a table.for example i have a employee table in which 50 records. now i want to lock only 10 records of the employee table.
I want to read 1 table. If the date is less than today, I want to update 4 other tables. I only want to do this update once a day.
While the 4 other tables are being updated, I want the other web users to pause for the update while this procedure runs.
Is there a better way to do this?
Here is what I have:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE TEST_TODAY2 AS -- to create the table -- create table test_today(updated_date date); -- insert into test_today(updated_date) values (sysdate-1); -- select * from test_today; cursor daily_update_cur is select updated_date from test_today for update of updated_date;
[Code]...
Please use {noformat}{noformat} tags before and after your code as described in the FAQ: {message:id=9360002}.
I am using the Oracle 10g and I have question related to "for Update" clause.We have the data warehouse db, so no foreign key constraint between parent and child.We process the data files every hour, the condition is If we find the row in parent table then we go and look into child tables and perform insertion (if no corresponding record is present) or updation (if one corresponding record is present) in the child table.
The problem is If I run the two process simultaneously for the same kind of data, and if no record is present in the child table then it create the duplicate in child table.My question is if I use FOR Update clause while selecting the data in parent table will it lock the child table for any insertion or updation?
Ex- We have employee table for employee 1
In my data files I have the row for employee 1, so when I run the select query on employee table I found 1 row.The I look the child table "Salary" as there is no record for emp_id =1 in this table I insert the record for this
Emp_id Salary 1 500
The problem is if both the process run at same time then I get duplicate rows in child table
Emp_id Salary 1 500 1 500
we do not want the duplicate row insertion. Can I lock the child table during first process run
I've heard that this statement causes a table lock but cant find any information on this.if it is so, is it a write lock or also a read lock of the table?
I ran into an issue in a project where a function is recreating an index-organized table by doing:Table Structure:
CREATE TABLE table_iot( ...) ORGANIZATION INDEX OVERFLOW ...;
Recreate Steps:
1) Populate global temporary staging table (gtt) with data -- where gtt is staging for target index-organized table (iot) 2) Lock the target index-organized table (iot) 3) Copy old iot data to gtt -- gtt now contains old and new data 4) Create new index-organized table (iot2) from gtt -- iot2 now contains old and new data
[code]...
Because index-organized tables are primarily stored in a B-tree index, you can encounter fragmentation as a consequence of incremental updates. However, you can use the ALTER TABLE...MOVE statement to rebuild the index and reduce this fragmentation.The following statement rebuilds the index-organized table admin_docindex:
CODECREATE TABLESPACE my_ts DATAFILE 'C:\Oracle\oradata\db\my_ts.dbf' SIZE 5M EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL UNIFORM SIZE 128K; ALTER DATABASE DATAFILE 'C:\Oracle\oradata\db\my_ts.dbf' AUTOEXTEND ON;
Its was sucessfully created and my_ts.dbf file has 5MB
charging with data...
CODEcreate table big_table tablespace my_ts as select * from dba_objects; select * from big_table; begin for i in 1..10 loop insert into big_table select * from dba_objects; end loop; end;
Now the my_ts.dbf file has 90MB
Now I want drop this table: CODEdrop table big_table purge;
And my tablespace file still has 90MB.
I already tried to restart the database but doesn't works...
assuption is that when we truncate the partition it immediatly release the allocatd storage.i have just tested the scenario , but still i can see that table size is same even after truncating the partition( which have around 25% of the data)
alter table test truncate partition t1p3 update indexes ;
OR
alter table test truncate partition t1p3 drop storage update indexes ; to see the table size:
SELECT owner, table_name, TRUNC(sum(bytes) / 1024 / 1024) Meg FROM (SELECT segment_name table_name, owner, bytes FROM dba_segments WHERE segment_type = 'TABLE' UNION ALL [code]...
am trying to downgrade my oracle database 10g release 10.2.0.2.0 to 10.2.0.1.0the reason for this is that i had to copy /oracle_home/bin utilities from 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.2 because of this most utilities like rman,dbca were not working.
i think i need to downgrade my oracle database 10g release to 10.2.0.1.0 right?i read some oracle documentations of database downgrade instruciting me to
>take full backup of oracle DB >ORACLE_HOME/bin/emctl stop dbconsole SQL> STARTUP DOWNGRADE DROP USER sysman CASCADE; >SQL> SPOOL downgrade.log
Share 11g Release 2 Grid infrastructure and RAC installation experience on Sun SPARC. Any documentation which provide complete information from server setup to database setup.
Ours is Oracle 11.2.0.2.0 Db 4 instances RAC on Unix AIX OS.Since long we are facing problem that CPU utilization reached 100% and reboot is required alteast once or twice a month.On seeing the Events Logs we find that the Event "CURSOR PIN S WAIT FOR X" is consuming a lot of waits.
On analyzing i came to know that we are firing same query from Application 15 to 20 lack times for which a lot of Mutex keeps spining for getting Shared Mode and consumes a large amount of CPU.
we need to find the key pressed action and key release action on Oracle form 10g. On key pressed (i.e. key-up, key-down, key-page-up and key- page-down) the event will be fired and as soon as the user release the key, the event will be stop.
As current situation, we have one form which contains the database blocks. As per search condition, all the data populated in Database block, there are 1000 and more records. Now user going use any of key (i.e. key-up, key-down, key-page-up and key-page-down) as he pressed key ( say Key- down) it scrolled down but as soon as he release the key, the event is not stopped. its going on going down then stop.
Is it possible, as user release the key scrolling will stopped at same time ?
I am new to this forum. I want to install XE 11g Release 2 in windows 7 64 bit. Can I intall 'Oracle Database Express Edition 11g Release 2 for Windows x32' or is there is 64bit version?
Tried to use the yum command "yum install gcc" but get the following error. Error: cannot find a valid baseurl for repo:update
I think this is due to the "CentOS-Base.repo" file, which I've tried to update by changing the mirror URL's but no success.Then tried to find the rpms online ([URL]...
I want to upgrade all the Oracle 10g Release (10.2.0)master sites (bi-directional) databases to Oracle 11g Release (latest). In fact, we are using bi-directional oracle streams and snapshot replication, it means capture,propagate and apply process is running.
I know how to use database links in various forms, but I've been trying to think through how the authentication works for a connected user link in 11g. If I create the link like this,create public database link using 'orcl';then any user can use the link, provided they have an identical username/password in the two databases. With pre-11g passwords, it was understandable: the password was salted with the username, so the hash of the password would be the same in both databases, and I assumed that the logon through the link used some sort of IDENTIFIED BY VALUES mechanism. But in 11g, the salt will different in the two databases. So the hash will be different. And of course Oracle never stores the actual password. So I don't see how the authentication works.
why we seem to be unable to report against the ap invoice hold release date using Discoverer in Oracle 11.5.10? the person who wrote our current report used a decode statement to look at the last update date of the release lookup code to create a release date, but i am trying to recreate this in a different tool (Qlikview) and just wanted to understand why we seem to be unable to report on the field as is!