joining the Order table with the Asset table or the Order table with CX_ACTION table to Can i get reference on this .
select x.x_msisdn,
x.x_product_name,
x.x_action,
x.x_status_outcome,
a.recovered_dt,
x.x_amount,
[code].....
Shouldn't they produce the same output?
SELECT c1.c_no, c1.c_name, c1.city
FROM customers c1 LEFT OUTER JOIN customers c2 ON (c1.city = c2.city AND c1.c_name<>c2.c_name); SELECT c1.c_no, c1.c_name, c1.city
FROM customers c1 RIGHT OUTER JOIN customers c2 ON (c1.city = c2.city AND c1.c_name<>c2.c_name);
We have a table for reports. If user A submits a report ...and say the sequence # is 242. When this report goes to Admin ...he submits this request then in same table we add another row with say sequence # 245. THEN we update column called 'Asctd ID' for 242 and add 245 in there. and then update Asctd ID for 245 and add 242 in there.
(This table has many fields, one of which is report Name field)
Now i am running a query like this...
SELECT b.JOB_ID, a.DESC, TO_CHAR(a.CREATE_DATE,'MM/DD/YYYY'),
DECODE(a.DLVRY_TYPE,'','PDF',a.DLVRY_TYPE), DECODE(a.FLG,'','N/A',
a.FLG), ((TO_DATE(a.CREATE_DATE,'DD-MON-YY')) + 21) -
TO_DATE(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YY'), c.STATUS_DESC, a.SIZE_NUM,
b.PRVDR_ID, a.asctd_id, d.NM
FROM REQUEST_DIM a, PROVIDER_DIM b, STATUS_DIM c, DIM d
WHERE a.FLAG = 'P' and RTRIM(a.RPT_RQST_USER_ID) = 'TEST02' AND a.RPT_RQST_TYPE = 'D'
AND a.RPT_RQST_ACTIVE_IND = 'A' and a.asctd_id is not null and a.RPT_RQST_ID = b.RPT_RQST_ID
and b.JOB_ID = c.JOB_ID and b.PRVDR_ID = d.PRVDR_ID
AND c.CREATE_DT = (SELECT MAX(d.CREATE_DT)
FROM STATUS_DIM d
WHERE d.RPT_RQST_ID = b.RPT_RQST_ID and d.JOB_ID = b.JOB_ID )
ORDER BY a.RPT_RQST_ID, a.CREATE_DATE
Now this query is run by the admin (job 245) ...it returns a bunch of stuff and also the name of the report that the admin gave this. But when admin sees this we want to be able to displace the report name that user A gave it (asctd ID 242). so the row 245 HAS a asctd ID 242. and there is a row 242 from which we can get the name easily. But i dont know if this is possible in ONE QUERY??
Basically, i was asked to join Table 1 and Table 2 together in oracle. I have been given the values of Table 1. For example, Depot_ID has value of DEP01, DEP02, DEP02 etc. Therefore, I have to create table 2 with those attributes given below. But the attribute name of the Table 2 is Depot_No which is different.
My question: Is it correct to give the same values of Depot_ID in Table 1 to Depot_No in Table 2, such as, DEP01, DEP02, DEP02?
How to join those two tables below:
Table 1:
Depot_ID
Address
Location
Table 2:
Product_ID
Depot_No
Quantity
Aisle
Bay
I create a second "DATE_PAIRS" table, and join a few subqueries. It works with conditions (ID=1), but scanning the whole table (2+ million records) is abysmal.
Table:
ID Date Price
---------------------
1 2010/1/1 100
1 2010/1/2 125
1 2010/1/5 115
2 2010/1/1 115
2 2010/1/2 105
2 2010/1/5 125
I'd like to return
ID Date1 Date2 Price1 Price2
--------------------------------
1 2010/1/1 2010/1/2 100 125
1 2010/1/2 2010/1/5 125 115
etc ..
I have two tables. The first contains all Segment information within Oracle i.e;
Table 1
Segment Description Flex_Value
1 North 1234
1 South 1235
1 East 1236
2 Car C001
2 Boat B001
and the second table contains financial data, but only the segment code;
Table 2
Date Segment1 Segment2 Value
01/01/11 1234 C001 10,000
02/01/11 1235 C001 10,000
what I want to return is some of the columns within table two as well as additional columns for the segment descriptions.
Below is an extract of what I have put together, and it does return what I need, but I'm sure there is a much more efficient way of creating the query;
SELECT
b.DATE,
b.SEGMENT1,
b.SEGMENT2,
b.SEGMENT3,
b.SEGMENT4,
b.SEGMENT5,
[code].....
I have below tables,
describe rpthead
Name Null Type
--------------------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
RPTDATE NOT NULL DATE
RPTD_BY NOT NULL VARCHAR2(25)
PRODUCT_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
describe rptbody
Name Null Type
------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
LINENO NOT NULL NUMBER
COMMENTS VARCHAR2(240)
UPD_DATE DATE
The fact is that we store some header in RPTHEAD and store real data in RPTBODY, the question is that if I use below SQL to query all data for a 'PRODUCT_ID'.
SELECT t0.LINENO, t0.COMMENTS, t0.RPTNO, t0.UPD_DATE
FROM RPTBODY t0 , RPTHEAD rpthead
WHERE
(
t0.RPTNO = rpthead.RPTNO
AND
t0.UPD_DATE>=to_date('1970/01/01 00:00:00','YYYY/MM/DD hh24:mi:ss')
AND
rpthead.PRODUCT_ID IN ('4647')
)
I do not want to have 'ORDER by' clause since data set is too large, the sorting takes long time, is there any way to get the result rows in the order sorted by RPTNO? We have the index for RPTNO on RPTBODY.
based on a provided list of key values, joining the collected list against a source table to retrieve additional information related to the key. In this simple example, the procedure accepts a list of employee numbers. The goal is to print a list of names associated with those numbers.
The method is to materialize the list of employee numbers as rows and join those rows to a source table to get the names. I have used BULK COLLECT. Why we cannot cast PLSQL tables using a type defined in the procedure's specification (why the type needs to exist as an object before we can cast it, like this:
SELECT * FROM TABLE ( CAST ( SOME_FUNCTION(&some parameter) AS SOME_TYPE ) );
here is my demo SQL, which you should be able to execute against the SCOTT schema without any change
declare
type employee_numbers is table of emp.empno%type index by binary_integer;
type employee_names is table of emp.ename%type index by binary_integer;
type employees_record is record (empno employee_numbers, person_name employee_names);
records employees_record;
[code]...
I have the following four tables with the following structures Table A
ColA1 ColA2 ColA3 ColA4 ColA5 AA 100 CC DD EE
Table B
ColB1 ColB2 ColB3 ColB4 ColB5 AA 100 40452 A9 CDE
when these two tables were joined like the following:
Select colA1,ColA2, ColA3, ColA4, ColB3,ColB4, ColB5 from table A Left outer join (select ColB3, ColB4, ColB5 from table B where colB3 = (select max(colB3) from table B ) on (colA1 = colB1 and ColA2 = col B2)
Now i have to join the next table C with table B
Table C structure is
ColD1 ColD2 ColD3 Desc1 A9 Executive Desc1 A7 Engineer
I have the common column such as ColD2 and colB4 to get the Col D3
how do i join the existing query + join between table b and table c?
I know the only way to guarantee a specific sort order result when querying table is by using the order by clause. However, I have an issue where I do not have access to the code for the web user interface of a very lightly used interface (has two users). In that user interface is a drop down box that is populated by a table - one table. The drop down box is populated by the query "select [column name] from [table name]". Right now there are 400+ rows in that table total, so it's small but not having the items ordered is a pain.
I would like to alter something on the db side so the result of "select [column name] from [table name]" is an ordering by the column descending. I don't want the sort order to be the same for all queries (including joins and all) just want to control the order for that one query. It is Oracle9i.
I have the following table:
CREATE TABLE test_A(member_id NUMBER(2) PRIMARY KEY, MEMBER_name VARCHAR2(20), MEMBER_parent NUMBER(2) DEFAULT NULL);
INSERT ALL
INTO test_A VALUES (1, 'mem1', NULL)
INTO test_A VALUES (2, 'mem2', NULL)
INTO test_A VALUES (3, 'mem3', NULL)
INTO test_A VALUES (4, 'mem4', 1)
INTO test_A VALUES (5, 'mem5', 1)
[code]....
As the actual data is huge, I need to know the best (least expensive) way to select each parent and then all its direct child ordered by member_id the output should look like:
1mem1(null)
4mem41
5mem51
6mem61
2mem2(null)
7mem72
8mem82
10mem102
3mem3(null)
9mem93
11mem113
How to find the tables starting with smallest size and vice versa in schema level and database level?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI would like to reorganize a table inorder of primary key but I'm not sure if I'm expecting the right thing from dbms_redefinition package.
I am working on oracle 9i 9.2.0.8
I have the following table :
SELECT * from SCOTT.TESTTABLE
ID REF
---------- ----------
1 FF
2 BB
3 CC
4 DD
8 EE
6 ZZ
7 YY
5 GG
when I use the CODEexec dbms_redefinition.start_redef_table('SCOTT', 'TESTTABLE', 'TESTTABLE2', 'id id, ref ref', dbms_redefinition.cons_use_pk);
Would the newly created scott.testtable be created in order of primary key (ID) thus a select * from scott.testtable will give me an ordered result?
When I do the test, the table before and after the redefinition is exactly the same so why use the CONS_USE_PK if it doesn't order the table by primary key?
i need to write a query in order to receive a new table.
select table_name,col1, null col2
from
(SELECT b.table_name, b.col1 col1, a.CountPrimaryKeys
from
(SELECT user_constraints.table_name,
COUNT(user_cons_columns.column_name) CountPrimaryKeys
[code].......
I have data that i am sorting, the data is mostly numeric (format of XXX-1234). is there any way to have my query sort xxx-1000 AFTER xxx-999? right now i am thinking i will have to create a separate sort order column on my table.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a table as below:-
CREATE TABLE TEST_EMP_WIP
(
EMP VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
WIP NUMBER,
MAX_SEQUENCE NUMBER
)
[Code]....
EMP WIP MAX_SEQUENCE RANK
002 2 2 1
003 1 4 2
005 3 5 3
010 1 4
011 1 5
I have to find the next EMP whose MAX_SQUENCE needs to be updated with a sequence. In this case the next would be '010' I fetched the EMP who falls after the max value of the column max_sequence in order of EMPCODE.
select emp_next from (
SELECT emp,max_sequence, LEAD(emp, 1, 0) OVER (ORDER BY emp) AS emp_next
from test_emp_wip where wip > 0 )
where max_sequence=(select max(max_sequence) from test_emp_wip where wip > 0)
EMP_NEXT
010
After sometime, the record would look like :-
EMP WIP MAX_SEQUENCE RANK
002 2 2 1
003 1 4 2
005 3 5 3
010 1 6 4
011 1 7 5
Now the next update should be done to the EMP '002' in cyclic manner.
tell me a way to do this. I can insert new columns if needed in table for calculation.
my simplified database schema is:
Order
OrderID
Status
OrderItems
OrderID
EAN
Amount
Store
EAN
Amount
now,I need trigger that will on updating table Order and changing status to "GoodsReceived" increase amounts in Store according to values in OrderItems.
create or replace trigger order_received_trigger
before update
on Order
for each row
begin
if (:old.status=4 and :new.status=1) then
/*
select ean, sum(amount)
from OrderItems
where OrderID=:old.OrderID
group by ean;
*/
end if;
end;
but now i dont know how to apply that select on table Store.
share documents and details to create asset on any topic on Oracle 10g. Also I need to write white paper on Oracle 10g .
View 1 Replies View Relatedinvalid asset . . . press f9 to see list of values
The above message appears on the item when I call lov.
Which step in the following plan is the first step of execution
I reckon it is "TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE"
Is that correct?
In the "Predicate Information (identified by operation id):"
section the predicates - access and filter for the step "TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES" are displayed first
Isn't there any relation between the order of execution steps and the order in which predicates are displayed?
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 538700484
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2364 | 14 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2313 | 13 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2281 | 12 (9)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 2255 | 11 (10)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 175 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 12 | 612 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES | 43 | 5332 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | VIEW PUSHED PREDICATE | | 1 | 2080 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 154 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 103 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE | 1 | 32 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_BBS_1 | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DAILY_CHECK | 1 | 71 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_SEARCH | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_IAM_SR_NO | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 32 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
can we link a table that contains a foreign key with a sequence table? i have a table that has a sequence bookid and i want to link this table to another table that contains a foreign key of bookid.can i link this two table and how?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a table (promo_custom) with following colimns (id, id_promo, button_promo, button_submit, css, user, date) and other table (promo_buttons) with following columns (id, id_design, name, url, username, date) .
Columns promo_custom.button_promo and promo_custom.button_submit are foreign keys (references promo_buttons.id).
I want to create a view showing table promo_custom but instead of columns button_promo and button_submit I would like to show the column url of them.
I have two tables
Tab1 columns c1,c2,c3 data as
t1r1c1,t1r1c2,t1r1c3
t1r2c1,t1r2c2,t1r2c3
t1r3c1,t1r3c2,t1r3c3
Tab2 columns c1,c2,c4 data as
t1r1c1,t1r1c2,t2r1c3
i want to get results like below
t1r1c1,t1r1c2,t1r1c3_t1r2c3_t1r3c3
join columns will be c1 and c2 columns.
I tried to split the query into 2 parts , the outcome is fine but when ever i merge them ( include other table fields ) . The result is 3X3 rows .. it should be just 3 rows
The First Query ( Is running fine , 3 Rows returned )
SELECT
WORKORDER.WONUM,
WORKORDER.ESTSERVCOST,
WPM.ITEMNUM,
WPM.ITEMQTY,
[code]......
The Second Query ( Is running fine also, 3 Rows returned )
SELECT
WORKORDER.WONUM,
WORKORDER.ESTSERVCOST,
WP.DESCRIPTION,
WP.LINECOST
FROM WORKORDER , WPSERVICE WP
WHERE PARENT IS NULL
AND WORKORDER.WONUM = WP.WONUM
AND WORKORDER.WONUM = :WO
The problem occurs when i try to merge both these queries , as the result shows 9 rows ..
SELECT
WORKORDER.WONUM,
WORKORDER.ESTSERVCOST,
WPM.ITEMNUM,
WPM.ITEMQTY,
[code]......
We have two tables tab1 and tab2 same structures and empid and id are keys.
We need to query for records that doesnt exist in tab2 and exist in tab1 based on keys above and then insert into t2.And also we have a date column in tab1...
if we have two records..that match empid and id and if dates are different we have to take one record with the least date like min(Date) and insert that one record in to tab2.
I have a table called test_renames that has two columns(new_name and old_name) and one row with the following values
NEW_NAME OLD_NAME
DRUG10 DRUG1
I have another table called SH0 that has 10,000 rows and the column of interest is called ITEM1. ITEM 1 contains the following distinct drug names:
DRUG1,DRUG2,DRUG3,DRUG4,DRUG5
Each DRUG has multiple rows associated with it.
I need to only update rows for DRUG1 and set the name from DRUG1 to DRUG10 for all rows where ITEM1 is DRUG1.
However I need to write this update statement by joining with the values in the test_renames table that contains the NEW_NAME and the OLD_NAME.
DRUG1 has 2,000 rows associated with it. The following SQL statement gives me 2,000 rows
(SELECT NVL(CHG.NEW_NAME, SH.ITEM1)
FROM test_renames CHG,sh0 sh
WHERE UPPER(SH.ITEM1) = UPPER(CHG.OLD_NAME)
AND UPPER(SH.ITEM1) IN (SELECT UPPER(OLD_NAME) from test_renames))
However when I run the following update statement, it appears that the SQL query updates all the 10,000 rows in the table instead of just touching the 2,000 rows for DRUG1. It does change all the rows for DRUG1 to DRUG10, but all the other ITEM1 values become null. What I need from the update statement is only chnage the rows for DRUG1 to DRUG10 and leave the other rows that I associated with DRUG2, DRUG3 etc. Here is my update statement.
UPDATE SH0 SH
SET ITEM1 = (SELECT NVL(CHG.NEW_NAME, SH.ITEM1)
FROM test_renames CHG
WHERE UPPER(SH.ITEM1) = UPPER(CHG.OLD_NAME)
AND UPPER(SH.ITEM1) IN (SELECT UPPER(OLD_NAME) from test_renames))
This update statement touches all 10,000 rows. I am looking to update only the relevant 2,000 rows for DRUG1.
I have two tables A and B
CREATE TABLE A(EMP_ID NUMBER, EMP_NAME VARCHAR2(100))
CREATE TABLE B(EMP_ID NUMBER, EMP_ATT1 VARCHAR2(10), EMP_ATT2 VARCHAR2(10))
INSERT INTO A VALUES(1, 'ONE');
INSERT INTO A VALUES(2, 'TWO');
INSERT INTO A VALUES(3, 'THREE');
[Code]....
This query returns all the matching row of A and B
SELECT A.EMP_ID, A.EMP_NAME, B.EMP_ATT1, B.EMP_ATT2
FROM A
INNER JOIN B ON A.EMP_ID=B.EMP_ID
The output for this shows:
EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_ATT1 EMP_ATT2
1 ONE 1ATT1 1ATT2
2 TWO 2ATT1 2ATT2
2 TWO 2ATT1.1 2ATT2.1
3 THREE 3ATT1 3ATT2
The requirement is to avoid duplicate rows even if matched:
EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_ATT1 EMP_ATT2
1 ONE 1ATT1 1ATT2
2 TWO 2ATT1 2ATT2
3 THREE 3ATT1 3ATT2
joining this query instead of using the left join. Reason is want to show the score column in a different place and also do not want to show the second IPS column that is used in the joined query.
Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Product
select * from
(
select i.ips,
p.project_name,
p.project_segment,p.location,p.project_exec_model,
p.project_exec_model||' - '||p.project_config pmodel,
one.score schedule,two.score cost,three.score execution,four.score commercial,
nvl(one.score,0)+nvl(two.score,0)+nvl(three.score,0)+nvl(four.score,0) as total,
[code]....
consider the following
WITH table1 AS
(
SELECT 345 id, To_Date('1/31/2010', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 123 cid, 'test' txt FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 345 id, To_Date('2/1/2010', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 121 cid, 'test2' txt FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 345 id, To_Date('2/2/2010', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 112 cid, 'test3' txt FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 345 id, To_Date('2/3/2010', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 162 cid, 'test4' txt FROM dual UNION ALL
[code]..
i want to output the following:
{code}
IDDT CIDTXT
3451/31/2010123test6
3452/1/2010121test2
3452/2/2010112test3
[code]....
as you can see, i want to join both tables (table1 and ov_dates) and take dt from ov_dates table look it up in table1 and thengrap ov_dt and looking up in table1 and copy values of one row to the other.
for example, in ov_dates i have 3/31 dt and 4/7 ov dt. i will look for 3/31 and 4/7 row in table 1 and copy columns values from 4/7 to 3/31you can see that cid for 3/31 stay the same (since i dont want to replace the value) but txt value was replace with value from 4/7
another examplein ov_dates we have 1/31 dt and 2/5. so i go into table1 get 1/31 and 2/5 row and copy values from 2/5 into 1/31/ as you can see the txt column value for 1/31 becametest6 since it was taking from 2/5. the same thing for the rest ofdata
i am trying to left join a selection of two or more tables. what i have found, and solved part of my problem, is that oracle left joins only the last table in the select statement ...
i.e : select * from A, B left join C on C.id = A.id wouldn't work because left join applies to B and not A.
but as my queries grow i need to make something as follows :
select * from A, B
left join C on (C.ID_A = A.ID and C.ID_B = B.ID)
[... evantually more left joins as the preceding one may go here]
this query works for DB2 but Oracle claims that "A"."ID" is an invalid identifier, while the B.ID is recognized since it's the last table stated before the "LEFT JOIN" keyword.
