How To Reorganize A Table In-order Of Primary Key
Jul 13, 2010
I would like to reorganize a table inorder of primary key but I'm not sure if I'm expecting the right thing from dbms_redefinition package.
I am working on oracle 9i 9.2.0.8
I have the following table :
SELECT * from SCOTT.TESTTABLE
ID REF
---------- ----------
1 FF
2 BB
3 CC
4 DD
8 EE
6 ZZ
7 YY
5 GG
when I use the CODEexec dbms_redefinition.start_redef_table('SCOTT', 'TESTTABLE', 'TESTTABLE2', 'id id, ref ref', dbms_redefinition.cons_use_pk);
Would the newly created scott.testtable be created in order of primary key (ID) thus a select * from scott.testtable will give me an ordered result?
When I do the test, the table before and after the redefinition is exactly the same so why use the CONS_USE_PK if it doesn't order the table by primary key?
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 26, 2012
how to reorganize a table ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2012
We deleted millions of records from a table.
1.Is it necessary to reorganize a table and index after the deletion of records from table ? Because i see some change in table size after table and index reorganization.
2.Will re org table and index improve the database performance ?
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2009
I have to reorganize one table that related to several other tables. The reorg is too slow when it runs on this table. I would like to create one image of the table and synch it with the original one in real time. So when I run the reorg, I will use the image table that does not constrained by indexes and other objects. Once the reorg is done, I would like to rename the table. how could I do the replication in real time?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2011
I have below tables,
describe rpthead
Name Null Type
--------------------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
RPTDATE NOT NULL DATE
RPTD_BY NOT NULL VARCHAR2(25)
PRODUCT_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
describe rptbody
Name Null Type
------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
LINENO NOT NULL NUMBER
COMMENTS VARCHAR2(240)
UPD_DATE DATE
The fact is that we store some header in RPTHEAD and store real data in RPTBODY, the question is that if I use below SQL to query all data for a 'PRODUCT_ID'.
SELECT t0.LINENO, t0.COMMENTS, t0.RPTNO, t0.UPD_DATE
FROM RPTBODY t0 , RPTHEAD rpthead
WHERE
(
t0.RPTNO = rpthead.RPTNO
AND
t0.UPD_DATE>=to_date('1970/01/01 00:00:00','YYYY/MM/DD hh24:mi:ss')
AND
rpthead.PRODUCT_ID IN ('4647')
)
I do not want to have 'ORDER by' clause since data set is too large, the sorting takes long time, is there any way to get the result rows in the order sorted by RPTNO? We have the index for RPTNO on RPTBODY.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2012
I have been given the task to modify our company's Apex from 4.1 to 4.2. The upgrade has been completed; in addition, the current UI, blue and tan has been updated to BlueJay. I have noticed the structure of the page gets shuffled as well as contents within modules. What would be the best way to "re-organize" my pages.
- Would it be easy for me modify the page, if so how do I do this. The settings look identical, so what would I change ?
- Do I recreate the entire page from scratch ?
View 15 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2012
primary key constraint on transaction_dtl_bk is affecting the insertion of next correct rows.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE NP_DB.san_po_nt_wnpg_1 (
dt DATE
)
IS
v_sql_error VARCHAR2 (100); -- added by sanjiv
v_sqlcode VARCHAR2 (100); ---- added by sanjiv added by sanjiv
[code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2013
joining the Order table with the Asset table or the Order table with CX_ACTION table to Can i get reference on this .
select x.x_msisdn,
x.x_product_name,
x.x_action,
x.x_status_outcome,
a.recovered_dt,
x.x_amount,
[code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2011
if a table contains two columns and both are part of the primary key of that table (Kind of obvoius).
should i opt for a index organized tbale in this case ?Or should i opt for another running sequential colum which would serve as a primary key of this table and define the actual two columns of the system as unique keys.
there is a drawback if a most of the tables of a database contain composite primary keys?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2012
Which step in the following plan is the first step of execution
I reckon it is "TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE"
Is that correct?
In the "Predicate Information (identified by operation id):"
section the predicates - access and filter for the step "TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES" are displayed first
Isn't there any relation between the order of execution steps and the order in which predicates are displayed?
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 538700484
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2364 | 14 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2313 | 13 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2281 | 12 (9)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 2255 | 11 (10)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 175 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 12 | 612 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES | 43 | 5332 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | VIEW PUSHED PREDICATE | | 1 | 2080 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 154 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 103 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE | 1 | 32 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_BBS_1 | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DAILY_CHECK | 1 | 71 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_SEARCH | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_IAM_SR_NO | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 32 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2007
Whats the command to show the name of the primary key in a table using oracle sql plus?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
we apply partitioning concept on a table which don't have any primary key ?
I just want to add one more field as primary key with some sequence generated values while partitioning ? Is it possible ?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2010
I know the only way to guarantee a specific sort order result when querying table is by using the order by clause. However, I have an issue where I do not have access to the code for the web user interface of a very lightly used interface (has two users). In that user interface is a drop down box that is populated by a table - one table. The drop down box is populated by the query "select [column name] from [table name]". Right now there are 400+ rows in that table total, so it's small but not having the items ordered is a pain.
I would like to alter something on the db side so the result of "select [column name] from [table name]" is an ordering by the column descending. I don't want the sort order to be the same for all queries (including joins and all) just want to control the order for that one query. It is Oracle9i.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2012
I have the following table:
CREATE TABLE test_A(member_id NUMBER(2) PRIMARY KEY, MEMBER_name VARCHAR2(20), MEMBER_parent NUMBER(2) DEFAULT NULL);
INSERT ALL
INTO test_A VALUES (1, 'mem1', NULL)
INTO test_A VALUES (2, 'mem2', NULL)
INTO test_A VALUES (3, 'mem3', NULL)
INTO test_A VALUES (4, 'mem4', 1)
INTO test_A VALUES (5, 'mem5', 1)
[code]....
As the actual data is huge, I need to know the best (least expensive) way to select each parent and then all its direct child ordered by member_id the output should look like:
1mem1(null)
4mem41
5mem51
6mem61
2mem2(null)
7mem72
8mem82
10mem102
3mem3(null)
9mem93
11mem113
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2012
How to find the tables starting with smallest size and vice versa in schema level and database level?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2006
how to add a primary key into the oracle table but how do i add a partial primary key?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2013
I need to copy the changed and deleted data in an other table. I have searched this site ,asktom and other sites also. I found the following solution from asktom website. But it gives me the changed columns data only and i need the primary key with changed data and deleted rows also.
DROP TABLE emp;
CREATE TABLE emp AS (SELECT * FROM scott.emp);
CREATE TABLE audit_table
[Code].....
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2012
Is is required to check the number of rows updated in a table when the primary key of the table is used in the filter criteria of the update statement? As I know,by default it will update only one record. But if it happens to be an important transaction table and only one record is required to be updated, then is it the best practice to use the 'SQL%ROWCOUNT' check in the query, even if the update query is using primary key in filter clause.
Example:Consider Trans table with trans_id as primary key. Then:
Update Trans
set trans_status='pass'
where trans_id=123;
I know this will update only one record. But what is the best practice? Shall I use 'SQL%ROWCOUNT' after this update to double check whether the record is updated or not?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2010
Is it possible to apply primary key on table having some duplicate record?I can do this by deleting duplicate record, But I don't want to delete exisitng data.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2012
i need to write a query in order to receive a new table.
select table_name,col1, null col2
from
(SELECT b.table_name, b.col1 col1, a.CountPrimaryKeys
from
(SELECT user_constraints.table_name,
COUNT(user_cons_columns.column_name) CountPrimaryKeys
[code].......
View 21 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2010
I have normal tables with hugh Data and would like to increase the performace by following means:
1) Add a new column in each table. Say this column Name is IS_LIVE. This new column have only two value 1 ( LIVE ) OR 0 ( NOT LIVE ).
2) Change the normal tables to Partitioned table. There would be only two partitioned in all the table. The partitioned key column would be IS_LIVE and both partitioend recrods would be in two different tablespace.
3) Added a POLICY function to these partitioned table to Always add a Query Predicate of '1' to all queuries.
I am interested to know that what kind of Indexes ( Global Or local ) would be suitable for these kind of Design.Is there any use of having Local index on IS_LIVE.Please note that Primary Key doesnot have this new column in it.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2012
I have an employee table which has a primary key and a self referencing foreign key, as shown here
create table employee (
id not null,
name not null,
department not null,
supervisor_id not null
,constraint constraint_1 primary key (id)
,constraint constraint_2 foreign key (supervisor_id) references employee (id));
Now if i make the primary key composite, as shown below -
create table employee (
id not null,
name not null,
department not null,
supervisor_id not null
,constraint constraint_1 primary key (id, name)
,constraint constraint_2 foreign key (supervisor_id) references employee (id));
Oracle is throwing the following error -
ORA-02270: no matching unique or primary key for this column-list
How can this error be fixed without changing the composite primary key?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2012
I've a staging table STG_TABLEA which has a primary key discount_seq_no.
I am creating a pl/sql procedure to populate a primary key (discount_seq_no) with a database sequence. The intent is to keep this populated with next value incrementing by 1.
I am using Oracle 11.2.0.2 version.
I've put together the below code, not sure on next steps...
BEGIN
UPDATE STG_TABLEA
SET A.DISCOUNT_SEQ_NO = "INSERT A SEQUENCE HERE AND KEEP INCREMENTING the seq value by 1
COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS
THEN
RAISE;
END;
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2012
I have to create primary key using local on a partitioned table.
Since the table is huge it has to be done parallel. Following stmt is giving error
alter table XYZ add CONSTRAINT PKN_XYZ PRIMARY KEY (ID,LogDtTm)
USING INDEX LOCAL parallel 25 INITRANS 5 TABLESPACE OLTP_IDX_TS ;
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2010
I am trying to create snapshot using the following script but I am getting the error
ERROR at line 22:ORA-12014: table 'CDA_FUNCTION' does not contain a primary key constraint
SQL> CREATE SNAPSHOT MEDA.cda_function
PCTFREE 10
PCTUSED 40
MAXTRANS 255
TABLESPACE users
STORAGE (
INITIAL 40960
[code]....
I check in dba_constraint data dictionary table for the constraints in the table CDA_FUNCTION.it is showing as follows
owner constraint_name constraint_type table_name search_condition status deferrable deferred validated generated
WEDA SYS_C0032310 C CDA_FUNCTION (LONG) ENABLED NOT DEFERRABLE IMMEDIATE VALIDATED GENERATED NAME
WEDA SYS_
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2013
which data dictionary should i choose to see the foreign key and primary key of table
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2012
I have a partioned table that has close to 2 billion rows and a PK of all columns. Becuase of time constrains my APP team wants the PK disabled while they pump into hundreds of thousands of rows with a batch process.
Now I am finding when I enable the PK its eating up close to close to 200GB of temp space.
Is there something I can do to reduce the amount of temp space being used?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2006
I have data that i am sorting, the data is mostly numeric (format of XXX-1234). is there any way to have my query sort xxx-1000 AFTER xxx-999? right now i am thinking i will have to create a separate sort order column on my table.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2010
I have a table as below:-
CREATE TABLE TEST_EMP_WIP
(
EMP VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
WIP NUMBER,
MAX_SEQUENCE NUMBER
)
[Code]....
EMP WIP MAX_SEQUENCE RANK
002 2 2 1
003 1 4 2
005 3 5 3
010 1 4
011 1 5
I have to find the next EMP whose MAX_SQUENCE needs to be updated with a sequence. In this case the next would be '010' I fetched the EMP who falls after the max value of the column max_sequence in order of EMPCODE.
select emp_next from (
SELECT emp,max_sequence, LEAD(emp, 1, 0) OVER (ORDER BY emp) AS emp_next
from test_emp_wip where wip > 0 )
where max_sequence=(select max(max_sequence) from test_emp_wip where wip > 0)
EMP_NEXT
010
After sometime, the record would look like :-
EMP WIP MAX_SEQUENCE RANK
002 2 2 1
003 1 4 2
005 3 5 3
010 1 6 4
011 1 7 5
Now the next update should be done to the EMP '002' in cyclic manner.
tell me a way to do this. I can insert new columns if needed in table for calculation.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 23, 2010
i'm new to oracle environment.how can i specify NONCLUSTERD INDEX on Primary cloumn during table creation.By default it will create clusterd index but i need non-clusterd index on it.
I'm using following stmt to create normal primary constarint during table creation,
CONSTRAINT PKFORM_PROPS PRIMARY KEY (FORM_PROPS_PK) USING INDEX TABLESPACE DB123_INDEX
how can i change the above query, so that it should create NONCLUSTERED INDEX on Primary key column.
View 5 Replies
View Related
