we apply partitioning concept on a table which don't have any primary key ?
I just want to add one more field as primary key with some sequence generated values while partitioning ? Is it possible ?
I have problem to transfer data in non partitioning table to partitioning table.
I have non partitioning table and i create new table partitioning that have same column and type like in non partitioning. So how can i transfer data from table in non partitioning to table in partitioning?
How to partition a table which is already having data.I have a STUDENT table along with following fields which is having million of rows.
studentid name class Gender
Now I want to partition this table based on gender MALE and FEMALE.
I have a partitioned table with 1 lakh records
if i disable the partition feature im my database will it affect my table data.
an existing normal table be converted to a partitioned table without recreating the table or truncating/reloaded data?
View 4 Replies View RelatedOracle 10.2.0.4
I partitioned a source table of around 100 million rows (62GB) in DEV server. The target database was created new. It was range partioned on a date column as follows:
PARTITION BY RANGE (ENTRY_DATE_TIME)
(
PARTITION ppre2012 values less than (TO_DATE('01/01/2012','DD/MM/YYYY')) TABLESPACE WST_LRG_D,
PARTITION p2012 values less than (TO_DATE('01/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY')) TABLESPACE WST_LRG_D,
PARTITION p2013 values less than (TO_DATE('01/01/2014','DD/MM/YYYY')) TABLESPACE WST_LRG_D,
PARTITION p2014 values less than (MAXVALUE) TABLESPACE WST_LRG_D
)
That is yearly basis. Anything before 2012 went to ppre2012, then p2012, p2013 and so forth. There is 20 million rows in p2012. and around 75 million rows in ppre2012. We needed both the source (un-partitioned) and target (partitioned) tables in DEv for comparision. The queries are normally on the current year partition. Just to state taht I am a developer and don't have full visibility to the production instance.
Now that our tests are complete, we would like to promote this in production. Obviously in production we would not not need both source and target tables. In all probability this will be performed over a weekend window. Therefore I would like to suggest the following .
1) use expdp to export source table
2) drop the source table
3) create a new source table "partitioned" with no indexes
4) use impdp to get data back into table
5) create global index (it is a unique index to enforce uniquness) and the rest of indexes as local
6) perform dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'SOURCE', cascade=>true). This takes around 2 hours in dev
My point is that whether importing 100 million rows will not cause issues with undo segments. Can we import data say first to the current partition p2012 (20 million rows) first.
If a Interval Partitioning can be created on a table for every fortnight ? db version is 11g.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI recently started working with legacy code and noticed that some huge tables (5 years worth of data, don't have more details on me right now but can post later if needed) are partitioned based on time sequence number column while majority of queries are done based on time (different column). Queries performance is degrading and I'd like to try to modify partitioning and run some tests to evaluate performance improvement.
My only concern is with so much live data I have to come up with solution on how to switch partitioning with the least impact on applications running 24 x 7. Something you have done in the same situation and it worked?
I am trying to partition an existing table through DBMS_REDEFNITION. Following are the steps that I have taken and the error I have got.
1. Creating a table to be partitioned.
CREATE TABLE SO33070_ORIGINAL
(
SERIAL_ID NUMBER(15,0),
INSERTED_TIME DATE DEFAULT SYSDATE,
PRIMARY KEY (SERIAL_ID)
);
Success
2. Checking if the table can be partitioned
DECLARE
v_name VARCHAR2(256);
BEGIN
SELECT sys_context('userenv', 'current_user') INTO v_name FROM dual;
DBMS_REDEFINITION.CAN_REDEF_TABLE(v_name, 'SO33070_ORIGINAL', dbms_redefinition.CONS_USE_ROWID);
END;
Success
3. Creating a duplicate table
CREATE TABLE SO33070_NEW
(
SERIAL_ID NUMBER(15,0),
INSERTED_TIME DATE DEFAULT SYSDATE
)
PARTITION BY RANGE ("INSERTED_TIME") INTERVAL (NUMTODSINTERVAL(1,'DAY'))
(
PARTITION "p1_1" VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2012-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
)
Success
4. Starting the redefnition process
EXEC DBMS_REDEFINITION.START_REDEF_TABLE( uname => 'CDS_USER', orig_table => 'SO33070_ORIGINAL', int_table => 'SO33070_NEW', col_mapping => '', options_flag => DBMS_REDEFINITION.CONS_USE_ROWID);
Success
5. Copying the dependents
DECLARE
num_errors NUMBER;
BEGIN
DBMS_REDEFINITION.COPY_TABLE_DEPENDENTS(
uname => 'CDS_USER',
orig_table=>'SO33070_ORIGINAL',
[code]....
I have a big table in which we load about 37M recrods. We have informatica ETL which Loads the data in bulk Mode and creats index after completion. The data load takes about 1Hr and Index Creation takes about 1/2 hr. In total it takes about 90 to 95 Mnts.
Now I thought if Partition and Load paralley, It will improve perfromance. We did 4 partition and and each Partition about 9M records. The data load in Bulk mode is completing in 25 Mnts. Again When I am creating index over it, It is taking about 40 Mnts. and in Total Load time is 65 Mnts.
Is there way I can better performance to complete the load in 1/2 hr ?
At moment we use range-hash partitioning of a large dimension table (dimension model warehouse) table with 2 levels - range partitioned on columns only available at bottom level of hierarchy - date and issue_id.
Result is a partition with null value - assume would get a null partition in large fact table if was partitioned with reference to the large dimension.Large fact table similarly partitioned date range-hash local bitmap indexes
Suggested to use would get automatic partition-wise joins if used reference partitioningWould have thought would get that with range-hash on both dimension.
Database Version : DB : Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit ProductionOS : HP-UX nduhi18 B.11.31 U ia64 1022072414 unlimited-user licenseAPP : SAP - ERP I have to RANGE partition on UPDATED_ON or PROFILE either one table which is having below
structure : Name Null? Type
-------------------- -------- --------------------------------
MANDT NOT NULL VARCHAR2(9) MR_ID NOT NULL VARCHAR2(60) PROFILE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(54) REGISTER_ID NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30) INTERVAL_DATE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(24) AGGR_CONSUMPTION NOT NULL NUMBER(21,6) MDM_VERS_NO NOT NULL VARCHAR2(9) MDP_UPDATE_DATE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(24) MDP_UPDATE_TIME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(18) NMI_CONFIG NOT NULL VARCHAR2(120) NMI_CONFIG_FLAG NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3) MDM_DATA_STRM_ID NOT NULL VARCHAR2(6) NSRD NOT NULL VARCHAR2
[Code]....
As per my knowledge, RANGE is better suited for DATE or NUMBER. and INTERVAL partition is possible on DATE or NUMBEr . Column PROFILEIts is of VARCHAR2 datatype. I know still I can partition as Oracle internally convert varchar2 to number while inserting data. But INTERVAL is not possible. How to RANGE partition on PROFILE ? Column CREATED_ON :It is of NUMBER with decimal
primary key constraint on transaction_dtl_bk is affecting the insertion of next correct rows.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE NP_DB.san_po_nt_wnpg_1 (
dt DATE
)
IS
v_sql_error VARCHAR2 (100); -- added by sanjiv
v_sqlcode VARCHAR2 (100); ---- added by sanjiv added by sanjiv
[code]...
if a table contains two columns and both are part of the primary key of that table (Kind of obvoius).
should i opt for a index organized tbale in this case ?Or should i opt for another running sequential colum which would serve as a primary key of this table and define the actual two columns of the system as unique keys.
there is a drawback if a most of the tables of a database contain composite primary keys?
Whats the command to show the name of the primary key in a table using oracle sql plus?
View 1 Replies View Relatedhow to add a primary key into the oracle table but how do i add a partial primary key?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to copy the changed and deleted data in an other table. I have searched this site ,asktom and other sites also. I found the following solution from asktom website. But it gives me the changed columns data only and i need the primary key with changed data and deleted rows also.
DROP TABLE emp;
CREATE TABLE emp AS (SELECT * FROM scott.emp);
CREATE TABLE audit_table
[Code].....
Is is required to check the number of rows updated in a table when the primary key of the table is used in the filter criteria of the update statement? As I know,by default it will update only one record. But if it happens to be an important transaction table and only one record is required to be updated, then is it the best practice to use the 'SQL%ROWCOUNT' check in the query, even if the update query is using primary key in filter clause.
Example:Consider Trans table with trans_id as primary key. Then:
Update Trans
set trans_status='pass'
where trans_id=123;
I know this will update only one record. But what is the best practice? Shall I use 'SQL%ROWCOUNT' after this update to double check whether the record is updated or not?
Is it possible to apply primary key on table having some duplicate record?I can do this by deleting duplicate record, But I don't want to delete exisitng data.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI would like to reorganize a table inorder of primary key but I'm not sure if I'm expecting the right thing from dbms_redefinition package.
I am working on oracle 9i 9.2.0.8
I have the following table :
SELECT * from SCOTT.TESTTABLE
ID REF
---------- ----------
1 FF
2 BB
3 CC
4 DD
8 EE
6 ZZ
7 YY
5 GG
when I use the CODEexec dbms_redefinition.start_redef_table('SCOTT', 'TESTTABLE', 'TESTTABLE2', 'id id, ref ref', dbms_redefinition.cons_use_pk);
Would the newly created scott.testtable be created in order of primary key (ID) thus a select * from scott.testtable will give me an ordered result?
When I do the test, the table before and after the redefinition is exactly the same so why use the CONS_USE_PK if it doesn't order the table by primary key?
I have normal tables with hugh Data and would like to increase the performace by following means:
1) Add a new column in each table. Say this column Name is IS_LIVE. This new column have only two value 1 ( LIVE ) OR 0 ( NOT LIVE ).
2) Change the normal tables to Partitioned table. There would be only two partitioned in all the table. The partitioned key column would be IS_LIVE and both partitioend recrods would be in two different tablespace.
3) Added a POLICY function to these partitioned table to Always add a Query Predicate of '1' to all queuries.
I am interested to know that what kind of Indexes ( Global Or local ) would be suitable for these kind of Design.Is there any use of having Local index on IS_LIVE.Please note that Primary Key doesnot have this new column in it.
I have an employee table which has a primary key and a self referencing foreign key, as shown here
create table employee (
id not null,
name not null,
department not null,
supervisor_id not null
,constraint constraint_1 primary key (id)
,constraint constraint_2 foreign key (supervisor_id) references employee (id));
Now if i make the primary key composite, as shown below -
create table employee (
id not null,
name not null,
department not null,
supervisor_id not null
,constraint constraint_1 primary key (id, name)
,constraint constraint_2 foreign key (supervisor_id) references employee (id));
Oracle is throwing the following error -
ORA-02270: no matching unique or primary key for this column-list
How can this error be fixed without changing the composite primary key?
I've a staging table STG_TABLEA which has a primary key discount_seq_no.
I am creating a pl/sql procedure to populate a primary key (discount_seq_no) with a database sequence. The intent is to keep this populated with next value incrementing by 1.
I am using Oracle 11.2.0.2 version.
I've put together the below code, not sure on next steps...
BEGIN
UPDATE STG_TABLEA
SET A.DISCOUNT_SEQ_NO = "INSERT A SEQUENCE HERE AND KEEP INCREMENTING the seq value by 1
COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS
THEN
RAISE;
END;
I have to create primary key using local on a partitioned table.
Since the table is huge it has to be done parallel. Following stmt is giving error
alter table XYZ add CONSTRAINT PKN_XYZ PRIMARY KEY (ID,LogDtTm)
USING INDEX LOCAL parallel 25 INITRANS 5 TABLESPACE OLTP_IDX_TS ;
I am trying to create snapshot using the following script but I am getting the error
ERROR at line 22:ORA-12014: table 'CDA_FUNCTION' does not contain a primary key constraint
SQL> CREATE SNAPSHOT MEDA.cda_function
PCTFREE 10
PCTUSED 40
MAXTRANS 255
TABLESPACE users
STORAGE (
INITIAL 40960
[code]....
I check in dba_constraint data dictionary table for the constraints in the table CDA_FUNCTION.it is showing as follows
owner constraint_name constraint_type table_name search_condition status deferrable deferred validated generated
WEDA SYS_C0032310 C CDA_FUNCTION (LONG) ENABLED NOT DEFERRABLE IMMEDIATE VALIDATED GENERATED NAME
WEDA SYS_
which data dictionary should i choose to see the foreign key and primary key of table
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a partioned table that has close to 2 billion rows and a PK of all columns. Becuase of time constrains my APP team wants the PK disabled while they pump into hundreds of thousands of rows with a batch process.
Now I am finding when I enable the PK its eating up close to close to 200GB of temp space.
Is there something I can do to reduce the amount of temp space being used?
i'm new to oracle environment.how can i specify NONCLUSTERD INDEX on Primary cloumn during table creation.By default it will create clusterd index but i need non-clusterd index on it.
I'm using following stmt to create normal primary constarint during table creation,
CONSTRAINT PKFORM_PROPS PRIMARY KEY (FORM_PROPS_PK) USING INDEX TABLESPACE DB123_INDEX
how can i change the above query, so that it should create NONCLUSTERED INDEX on Primary key column.
I have created table as below
create table emp_temp as select * from emp;
the table is created, but the constraints are not copied. Is there any way to copy all the constraints.
is there any query to find number of primary keys present in a table.
View 13 Replies View Related