I am having one table Employee. Employee table having 50 records. I want to fetch 5 records every timeone the query is executed. But it should be like below.
1-5 records
6-10 records
11-15 records
16-20 records
46-50 records
I have written the following PL/SQL block logic tofetch the records from the emp table and compare the records with emp_10 table to perform insert if the records are newelse to perform update the existed records in the emp_10 table.
DECLARE CURSOR tranche_balance_cur IS SELECT empno, ename, sal,
[code]...
Execution scenario 1:
I have commented insert and update statements in that case I got the following out put.
Inserted Records4 Updated Records10
As per the logic it's giving the correct output because the cursor is fetching 14 records in that already 10 records are existed in emp_10 tableand 4 are new records.so that it's showing the count for inserted records as 10 and updated records as 4.
Execution scenario 2: I have uncommented insert and update statements in that case I got the following out put.
Inserted Records13 Updated Records1
As per the logic it's not giving the correct output.
I tried with using TRIM function in the comparision logic to avoid spaces.
TRIM(emp_10.empno) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.empno) AND TRIM(emp_10.ename) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.ename) AND TRIM(emp_10.sal) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.sal) AND TRIM(emp_10.deptno) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.deptno)
/* Formatted on 2013/08/11 18:46 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */ CREATE PROCEDURE p_get_name ( p_empno IN OUT NUMBER, p_name OUT VARCHAR2, p_err OUT NUMBER [code].......
Note:- I want to print ename and salary of emp using empno as a input but i dont want to declare extra variable for salary , i want to print salary using empno but when i execute this procedure. It gives value of empno in salary. Don't Know Why , how can i print salary of emp using empno as input without declaring extra variable for salary.
Now my problem is we should fetch the data based on the below rules
If an OID contains 2 IOIDs for which there is a NEW and DISCO status attached, then fetch the 2 records If an OID has only 1 of these status, then ignore the same If an OID has none of the 2 status, then ignore the same.
The select statement retrieves records well when executed at SQL promt.
But the same records are not displayed in this procedure by fetch from cursor.
The last message in the procedure 'completed' is also displayed.
create or replace procedure disp_rec(vid IN varchar2, vfeat IN number) is cursor c1 is select gid, listagg(vindex, ',') within group (order by tid) idx from ridrecords where idarpt=vid and feattype=vfeat group by gid; type vg is table of number; type vi is table of varchar2(3500);
I have 3 tables, Emp(Emp_id,emp_name),dept(dept_no,dept_name),emp_dept(emp_id,dept_no). Emp tabl ehas some 20 employes id who belongs to different departments.There are few employee who belongs to multiple departments as well. I want to fetch records of emp_id, emp_name, dept_no in the following format.
I have a big database, I want to retrieve its records in several tries; first I use "select * from dbname where rownum <1000" but for 2'th try how can I get next 1000 records but not previous records?
I got a issue with a query to fetch records between two dates for fixed timings
Date From 29-09-2011 to 04-10-2011 Time From 00:00:00hrs to 08:00:00hrs
I tried the below queries, it doesnt work select a.detectorid,sum(b.totalvolume),a.updatetime,a.averagespeed from traffic_data a left outer join volume_data b on a.traffic_id=b.traffic_data_id where pollinterval=1 and detectorid=�AIDC_0154� and updatetime between to_date(�29-aug-2011:00:00:00�,�DD-MON-YYYY:HH24:MI:SS�)
I need to fech parent records only when no child record with status 'N' exists. There are only two possible values for status column of child table 'Y' / 'N'.
Below are table structures and insert statements for data.
CREATE TABLE MASTER ( COL1 NUMBER,
[Code]....
COMMIT;Query I framed is below
select * from master where exists (select null from child where child.col2 = master.col1 group by child.col2 having count(distinct col3) =1 )
Output in above case would be 3 as for 1 there's one record with status as 'N' and for 2 there's no child record. I am on 10g.
I have made a travel booking system which comprises of 3 forms
1)Travel Booking form 2)Reservation Form 3)Cancellation Form
Under one booking number i can add multiple users in which they can have there multiple travels.
Users can cancel there individual travels under a prescribe booking number which on doing the Cancel flag turns to 'Y'.
What i want is, If a user is cancelling his/her travel under any booking number then while retriving the records in Travel Booking form, the travels which are cancelled should not be in enable mode.
For one user there can be 4 travels out of which 2 are cancelled, how can i track only those records whoes cancel flag is set to Y. some logic to find it out. Else can i use :system.cursor_record. If yes, How to use it for this system.
I have to implement a functionality in my application. I have an employee table and each employee does a transaction which is stored in a transaction table.
The functionality that I have to implement is that if an employee does not perform any transaction for a period of 2 years then updated the employee and set him inactive.
Employee Table ============== create table empoyee ( empno number, sal number) insert into employee(empno,sal) values (1, 200);
[code]...
If we make any update in Employee table for his/her salary, before update, that record should be inserted into EmployeeHist table and history will continue to build. Employee Table should have only current salary.If we change sal for emplyee # 1 from 200 to 800 then original current record in employee table will be inserted into employeehist table like
We need some transformation rules on Source employee table which comes from SAP and want to load in Target table.Basic idea is we need to calculate time when position was not held by sub owner so . . . Etc
I have employee interface table something like this.
emp_idemp_name Job_title supervisor_name 1AJ Engineer BJ 2CK Analyst ND 3BJ Manager TR 5TR VP IT JD 6ND S Manager MD 7MD VP Telecom SK 8SK VP Eng JR
I want to idenitfy the VP for each employee. The logic I have to apply is check for hte supervisor of each employee to see if the supervisor has designation starting with 'VP'. If no, I have check the supervisor of the supervisor and so on. I tried using a recursive query using connect_by_root but in the above example for employee ND it lists the VP as both MD and SK. I need it to show on MD who is the lower in the hierarchy.
I am a Java person but since my app uses the Oracle DB I am to do this task.
I'm trying to create a trigger so that whenever a record in the Employee table is deleted, a trigger will automatically delete corresponding records in the Job History table, then the Employee record is archived to EmployeeArchive before it is deleted. It compiles but with warnings. Here's what I've got.
FRM-40501: ORACLE error: unable to reserve record for update or delete.
ORA-24374: define not done before fetch or execute and fetch
My master-detail form has single canvas. For both blocks, master and detail, two tables joined together in each. One table to be updated, second table has some info for reference (query only).
I am getting these errors when in detail block the item from LOV is selected for existing record. This does not happen for new record inserted in detail block.
I want to write a SELECT query on the data which are collected in a PLSQL table which is having 4 columns.
Looping through all the records in the PLSQL table will not get my requirement. Because I need to group the data based on two columns and need to fetch the count of groups.
I am trying to update records in the target table based on the records coming in from source. For instance, if the incoming record is present in the target table I would update them in the target else I would simply insert. I have over one million records in my source while my target has 46 million records. The target table is partitioned based on calendar key. I implement this whole logic using Informatica. Looking at the informatica session log I find that the informatica code is perfectly fine but its in the update part it takes long time (more than 5 days to update one million records). find the TARGET TABLE query and the UPDATE query as below.
TARGET TABLE: CREATE TABLE OPERATIONS.DENIAL_REGRET_FACT ( CALENDAR_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL, DAY_TIME_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL, SITE_KEY NUMBER NOT NULL, RESERVATION_AGENT_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL, LOSS_CODE VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL, PROP_ID VARCHAR2(5) NOT NULL, [code].....