PL/SQL :: Created Partition And Parallel Degree 4 On Table A

Oct 10, 2012

I have table A with size 120 Million and two more tables are of size 2 Million on Table B and less than 1 Million size on table C.I had created Partition and Parallel degree 4 on the table A. Created table B with Parallel degree 2 and Created table C with NOPARALLEL.

My query is using above tables with joins and inserting into table D using HINT /*+ APPEND NOLOGGING*/I had executed the explain on the above criteria the cost is showing 20767.

Later created Tables A,B and C with NOPARALLEL. Applied HINT on Table D /*+ APPEND NOLOGGING*/ and als applied HINT /*+ PARALLEL(A, 4) PARALLEL(B C, 2) on select query which uses to insert into Table D.

My question which is best practice on PARALLEL degree creation at table level or query level:

a) Creating table with Paralle (degree 4)
b) Applying HINT /*+ PARALLEL (TABLE A , 4) */ at query level

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Find Degree For Parallel DML

Feb 12, 2013

I am inserting 50 million records into a table MAIL_LOG. I am using the hint /*+ append parallel (MAIL_LOG, 12) */. But for my table degree is 1.

SELECT table_name, degree
FROM user_tables
WHERE table_name = 'MAIL_LOG';

I have following clarifications.
1) What degree I should use.
2) On what basis I have to give the degree.
3) Have we use constant degree all the times.
4) How to check my insert statement is using parallel degree.
5) How to find the degree at session level.

View 24 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Query Regarding Parallel Hint Degree?

Jan 3, 2012

I have been told that i should use multiple's of 4 as degree in the parallel hint to get maximum performance, so i am wondering is it true? that i should always use multiples of 4 or i can use any number inside the parallel hint.

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Parallel Degree Proportionate To Number Of CPUs Used During Execution

Nov 30, 2011

In my recent performance improvement tasks I was experimenting with Parallel hints. I have been getting good results with them, however the question arises "How is Parallel degree proportionate to number of CPUs used during execution?

/*+ parallel(emp_tab,8) */
Oracle Version: Oracle 10g
OS : UNIX
Client OS: Windows XP
V$PARAMETER VARIABLES as follows:
Total CPUs available: 10
No of CPUs per core: 2
Max parallel : 100
Min Parallel : 5

Question 1: So how do I map the degree of 8 with CPUs. I believe that degree of 8 does not mean its going to use 8 CPUs. If so, how do I prove it. I tried SQL_TRACE and cpu comes 0. And I believe its not the CPU count.

Question2: How do I know how many CPUs were used to execute a SQL query ?

View 9 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Parallel Operations Not Executing With Expected Degree

Apr 2, 2012

I am executing a sql statement which is doing FTS in parallel mode The server has 8 cpus and threads_per_cpu is 2

The v$sql shows PX_SERVERS_EXECUTIONS as 8

select PX_SERVERS_EXECUTIONS, sql_text from v$sql where sql_id='0q0nk5117yth2'
8, select /*+ full(a) parallel(a)....

however the px_sessions shows 17 sessions (16 parallel session + 1 parent session (where sid = qcsid) Now in px_sessions, these 16 parallel session are divided in 2 server sets 1 and 2 and values for degree and required degree are 8 and 16 respectively

However, all the time, only 8 sessions which belong to server set = 1, were active though its state was waiting with event "PX Deq Credit: send blkd"

The other session which belong to server set = 2 were never active and always had waint event ='PX Deq: Execution Msg'

what could be the reason that 16 parallel session could not be started though I am the only person using the server, there aren't any batch jobs, dbms_jobs,even archivelogs (not a prod system)?

Note that paralel_max_servers setting is 16

Another issue being the duing start of the query approximately 100-115 blocks were read for the query (checked from longops) however after 60-70% blocks are read the number of blocks read / seconds falls down to 10-20 blocks / second across all parallel sessions.

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Make Partition Of Table Which Is Already Created

Sep 21, 2011

I want to make partition of table which is already created and has huge amount of Data I have done indexing already

my structure are as follows
EMPLOYEE CHAR(10),
MONTH_YEAR NUMBER (6),
TYPE CHAR (1),
SALARY_CODE CHAR (5),
AMOUNT NUMBER (16,2)

Indexing on Employee,Month,Salary_Code

How can I do partitioning on this table.

View 1 Replies View Related

Created Another Instance On Single Machine - Possible To Run Both Parallel

Feb 20, 2013

i have created an another instance on a single machine i got error when starting up a new one - error starting up database in exclusive mode so i shutdown older database instance , to start new one now is it possible to run both instance parallel?

View 11 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Parallel Index With Non-partitioned No-parallel Table?

Apr 30, 2012

If we have not set parallel degree for a table then we can ( try to ) force parallel execution on a table using a parallel hint Does this 'parallelism' works on the index search in the query as well?

In which situations non-parallel non-partitioned table but parallel index (degree>2) will facilitate a query?

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Partition Truncation Parallel?

Dec 15, 2011

I have to truncate two partitions from the same table parallelly at a time.

ALTER TABLE tablename TRUNCATE PARTITION partitioname1;
ALTER TABLE tablename TRUNCATE PARTITION partitioname2;

Huge data is present in each partition.is this possible, means it does not lock table for another alter truncate partition statement?

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Possible To Build Index Partition In Parallel

Jul 8, 2010

Is it possible to build index partition in parallel?I tried following command

alter index <index_name> rebuild partition <partition name> online parallel 5;

It executed without complaining, but want to know if index partitions can be build in parallel?

View 3 Replies View Related

Created Partition - Usage?

Nov 9, 2012

I have one table and I created partition month wise. I also creates index on that table. How can I check whether parition will be used when I query that table? In explain plan I can see PARTITION RANGE as ALL. Is it using the partition?

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How To Assure Partition Table Is Better Than Non-partition Table

Mar 25, 2011

I think that performance better partition table than non-partition table. How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table at SELECT operation?

I have compare a specific query EXPLAIN PLAN at partition table and non-partition table. both tables data is same. Is it true way or not?

View 11 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Select Partition Table With Non-partition Key Condition?

Jun 26, 2010

I have a table that partitioned into six partitions. each partitions placed in different table space and every two table space placed it on a different hardisk

when I will do query select with the non-partition keys condition, how the search process ? whether the sequence (scan sequentially from partition 1 to partition 6) or partition in a hardisk is accessed at the same time with other partition in other hardisk. ( in the image, partition 1,4 accessed at the same time with partition 2,5 and 3,6)

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Alter Table To Create Partition On Non-partition Table?

Jun 19, 2012

Can i alter the table to create partition on non partition table, i have tried and could not create it. Do we have some other means to do it as this is the live table and cannot drop them else will lose the data.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Add Range Sub-Partition To Hash Partition Table

Jan 2, 2013

Can I add range sub partition to a hash partition table. Example like this.

CREATE TABLE test
(
test_id VARCHAR2(10 ) ,
test_TYPE VARCHAR2(5) ,
CREATE_DATE date
)
partition by hash (test_id, test_type)
Partitions 3
SUBPARTITION BY RANGE (CREATE_DATE);

When Tried, I am getting syntax error as invalid option.

View 8 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Adding A New Partition To Existing Partition Table

Jun 14, 2011

i want to create a new partition for version 2

existing table is as below

create table test
(
name varchar2(100),
version NUMBER(12)
)

[Code]....

View 15 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Partitioned Table - Inserted Partition Key Does Not Map To Any Partition

Jul 10, 2012

I have two tables in which one is partitioned table with the following details.

CREATE TABLE "SCOTT"."TBL_MITTAL"
("ACCOUNT_NAME" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
"BILL_NO" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
"BILL_DATE" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
"CLI" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
"ANI" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),

[code].....

When I am trying to insert record from tbl_mittal into tbl_temp table. I am facing "ORA-14400: inserted partition key does not map to any partition" error

SQL> insert into tbl_temp select * from tbl_mittal;
insert into tbl_temp select * from tbl_mittal
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14400: inserted partition key does not map to any partition

AS tbl_mittal is having hugh number of records so I am providing only few rows from tbl_mittal table as test data.

ACCOUNT_NAMEBILL_NOBILL_DATECLIANICHARGE_START_DATEDURFROM_LOCATIONTO_LOCATIONINVOICE_IDCIRCLE
10000010357423128271095119301-Feb-111723006000931488182328-JAN-11 11.30.54.000000000 AM59.04CHANDIGARHJAIPUR271095119
10000011844187128348720198715-Jun-121409470011825531896615-MAY-12 09.10.36.000000000 AM28.03CHANDIGARHBANTWAL348720198
10000011844187128348720198715-Jun-121409470011825531927115-MAY-12 09.10.41.000000000 AM38.32CHANDIGARHBANTWAL348720198
10000011844187128348720198715-Jun-121409470011825531933015-MAY-12 09.10.46.000000000 AM28.81CHANDIGARHBANTWAL348720198
10000011844187128348720198715-Jun-121409470011825531930215-MAY-12 09.10.53.000000000 AM28.96CHANDIGARHBANTWAL348720198

[code].....

I also tried to upload the same data using sqlldr.

sqlldr log file contents is as follows:

Total logical records skipped: 0
Total logical records read: 1857532
Total logical records rejected: 801092
Total logical records discarded: 37

[code].....

So some sqlldr bad file contents is as follows.

100000118441871,283487201987,15-JUN-12,1723958000,9355115251,10-JUN-12 05.56.05.000000 PM,36.99,CHANDIGARH,AMBALA,348720198,,
100000118441871,283487201987,15-JUN-12,1723958000,7520533825,10-JUN-12 05.56.14.000000 PM,44.12,CHANDIGARH,AGRA,348720198,,
100000118441871,283487201987,15-JUN-12,1723958000,9356452151,10-JUN-12 05.56.17.000000 PM,116.83,CHANDIGARH,JALANDHAR,348720198,,
100000118441871,283487201987,15-JUN-12,1723958000,9331223048,10-JUN-12 05.56.21.000000 PM,28.33,CHANDIGARH,KOLKATA,348720198,,
100000118441871,283487201987,15-JUN-12,1723958000,7827927893,10-JUN-12 05.56.24.000000 PM,3384.33,CHANDIGARH,DELHI,348720198,,

[code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Partition Size In A Partition Table

Jun 8, 2011

How to find the size pf a partition in a partition table?I guess we need to query views like dba_tab_partitions but I am not very sure. will running dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('schema_name,'table_name,'partition_name')

View 3 Replies View Related

Index With Degree More Than 1

Jul 29, 2010

There is an index with degree 16 on a rac env. The base table has no degree. The table and index are not partitioned. Does the degree of index only affect index DDL (alter, rebuild etc)? Any effects on query (PQ)?

View 4 Replies View Related

Parallel Insert In Subpartitioned Table

Dec 29, 2010

At work we have a linux server with Oracle 10.2.0.5 g, and we have the need, to save time, to use parallel process launched in background (&) or (at now).

The table that we are going to insert is partitioned for date and subpartitioned for name of file_source, and we are having a lot of problem with this.

Our DBA staff say that is impossible to work in this way but for me, after ten year of oracle-work, sounds strange , sure may be that we don'r use really really correctly this procedure but i suppose that Oracle is able to recevie 20 ask of insert on the same table.

The situation is that we usede this procedure in other server and it's work but the answer of our DBA-staff is that we have less data storage and so on. In the end some times this proceduers have a low time of execution and some times no, this goes out of my ability to find out the problem.

We have a DWH with STAGING AREA, ODS Level, DDS Level and DM Level, the Staing area is paritionend for file_source, the ODS Area is partitioned by range (date) and subpartitioned for name (file_source), the DDS area is partitioned by range(date) and subpartitioned for Origin system(that include all the file_source) and the DM area is only partitioned by date.

So the most big problems that we meet are between the Staging are and ODS area, and between the Ods area and the DDS Area, the most important thing is that this table (DDS) is a monster of near 500.000.000 of rows (ITr of data) but we look only at the date to elaborate.

The solution is clear, divide this table in two, one online and one of storage as usually and correctly a normal situation require, but unfortunatly is a situation that we Erhedit from an old system and at the moment is not approoved the change request on this site.

The really strange thing is that sometimes work and some times not, without understand the cause of this. My opinion on this is that the DB is not correctly configured but the System Staff say that everything is correct and there are no problem. My first problem is to understand, if possible, wich is the limit of this way to operate, can i insert in a subpartition in the same time with twenty parallel process that write on same partition and different subpartition? Is correct to act in this way to save time about the data-load or better doing it one by one? On my experience i realized that Oracle can manage(is his work) a lot of request in the same time, but in this DB that we are using i continue to see problems that sounds like if we are usuing a tool that is not working in the correct way...

May be we went beyond some limit but in the end are less then 5.000.000 records per day that we move i think that a DWH have to support more than this...

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Multiple Parallel Queries Against Table

Jun 23, 2011

I would like to know the following.

If multiple queries are run in parallel(at the same time) against a table or a set of tables (query referencing multiple tables), does it reduce the performance.

In other words is Oracle capable of reading (selecting from) the same table multiple times in parllel.

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Assure Partition Table Is Better Than Non-partition Table

Mar 25, 2011

I think that performance better partition table than non-partition table. How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table at SELECT operation?

I have compare a specific query EXPLAIN PLAN at partition table and non-partition table. both tables data is same. Is it true way or not?

View 2 Replies View Related

Server Administration :: Find When Database Role Created And Who Has Created?

Feb 14, 2013

Is there a way to find when was a database role created and who has created?

View 5 Replies View Related

REFRESH GROUP Is Automatically Created When A Materialized View Is Created?

Aug 17, 2012

tell me if a REFRESH GROUP is automatically created when a materialized view is created?

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Parallel In Pipe-lined Table Function Not Working?

Feb 1, 2011

'Oracle fast parallel data unload into ASCII file(s)' in this blog: URL....I have compiled the code and created the objects and the directory in my DB...But when I execute :

SELECT *
FROM TABLE(
DATA_UNLOAD(
CURSOR(
SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(A, 2, 1) */
TABLE_NAME || '|' ||
COLUMN_NAME || '|' ||
DATA_TYPE
FROM MYTABLE A
[code]....

It is supposed to return 2 rows (because of parallel execution), but it just returns 1..Do I have to do something special in order to make parallel pipelined function work

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Add Partition To Table Without Partition?

May 5, 2011

I am trying to add partition to table without partition

with following code

ALTER TABLE ACC_LOC1_TAB
ADD PARTITION testpart BY RANGE (ALT_AUTHDT)
(PARTITION UPTO_2010 values less than (31-mar-2010),
PARTITION APR_JUN_10 VALUES less than (30-JUN-2010),
PARTITION JUL_SEP_10 VALUES less than (30-SEP-2010),
PARTITION OCT_DEC_10 VALUES less than (31-DEC-2010),
PARTITION JAN_MAR_11 VALUES less than (31-MAR-2011))

it will raise error ora-14020

View 4 Replies View Related

Partition A Non-Partition Table In 11.2.0.1

Feb 21, 2013

I am using Oracle 11.2.0.1 Oracle Database.I have a table with 10 Million records and it's a Non Partitioned Table.

1) I would like to partition the table (with partition by range ) without creating new table . I should do it in the existing table itself (not sure DBMS_ REDEFINITION is the only option ) (or) can i use alter table ...?

2) Add one partition which will have data for the unspecified range.

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Dropping Sub-partition / Range-partition And List Sub-partition

May 28, 2010

i have table with range partition and list sub-partition..can i add one more list sub-partition if it is not possible , i have to drop first sub-partition.

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Know Index Is Created On Table Or Not

Jun 30, 2011

how to know weather procedure is working or not in a database ..

how to know index is created on table or not.

View 2 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: How Many Foreign Key Can Be Created On Table

May 3, 2013

in a table how many foreign keys can we create.

View 10 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved