We have and Upper and a Lower function.Is there any function or way in which I can issue a select while ignoring the case(like IgNoReCaSe) in a where clause? I don't want to use like
select * from emp where upper(job)= upper('dba');
or
select * from emp where lower(job)= lower('dba');
I just want to know if there is any way in which I could do it without using upper and lower.
Depending on which month the user is running this select the TAG_YEAR needs to be calculated differently. I have a feeling that I'm over thinking it.
SELECT DOG_MASTER.DOG_MASTER_ID,
DOG_NAME,
TAG_YEAR,
TAG_NUMBER AS PREVIOUSTAGNUMBER,
ISSUE_DATE
FROM DOG_OWNER
[code].......
select empno,ename,deptno,employee_status from emp,dept where emp.deptno=dept.deptno and
( employee_status in(Case employee_status when {?Status}=1 then 'A'
when {?Status}= 2 then 'T'
When {?Status}= 3 then 'A'||','||'T'))
OR ( end_date >= {?START_DATE}
AND end_date <= {?END_DATE}
)
)
Since when i pass employee_status as input 1 it have given me 4 records. When I pass employee_status as input 2 it have given me 3 records. When I pass employee_status as input 3 it should give me 4 records + 3 records=7 records.
4 records for employee_status 'A'
3 RECORDS for employee_status 'T'
7 records for employee_status 'A' AND 'T'
How I should write a query to get 7 records.
I am facing a problem while retrieving data from table using DECODE/CASE.
Table: PARAM_MSTR
MIN_VALMAX_VALPARAM_CODE DESCRIPTION DATATYPE
AB1000 HARD PARAMETERTEXT
CN1000 SOFT PARAMETERTEXT
0501001 CRYSTAL PARAMETERNUMBER
512001001 STONE PARAMETERNUMBER
Now I want to get the parameter description based upon the PARAM_CODE and a value passed which should be in range of MIN_VAL and MAX_VAL. Means when I pass PARAM_CODE=1000 and :parameter=A, then it should check the DATATYPE of the PARAM_CODE, in our case it is 'TEXT' so it should check the passed value between MIN_VAL and MAX_VAL like
:parameter BETWEEN MIN_VAL AND MAX_VAL and should return 'HARD PARAMETER'.
If I pass PARAM_CODE=1001, then the DATA_TYPE is 'NUMBER', so it will check the :parameter value as Number.
Like :parameter BETWEEN to_number(MIN_VAL) AND to_number(MAX_VAL)
For example:
PARAM_CODE :parametr Result
1000 A HARD PARAMETER
1000 C SOFT PARAMETER
1000 P NULL
1001 25 CRYSTAL PARAMETER
1001 99 STONE PARAMETER
1001 201 NULL
I have written a query using DECODE and CASE statement but it is not working properly.
SELECT * FROM param_mstr WHERE PARAM_CODE=1000 AND :parameter BETWEEN DECODE(DATATYPE,'NUMBER',CAST(MIN_VAL as NUMBER),MIN_VAL)AND DECODE(DATATYPE,'NUMBER',CAST(MAX_VAL as NUMBER),MAX_VAL)
is there a possible to use a case statement in insert clause?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHow to use CASE stmt in WHERE clause?
View 3 Replies View Related The query has a case statement in the where clause so that results can be filtered. If I pass "ut" for sso_id then the query returns 21 rows. If I remove the case statement and hard code "a.sso_id like lower('ut'||'%')" then the query returns 41 rows. The query should be returning 41 rows all the time.
Problem:
When passing "ut" as an SSOID parameter to the Procedure the query returns 21 rows.Taking the query and hard coding "a.sso_id like lower('ut'||'%')" the query returns 41 rows.
Result:
query should be returning 41 rows when "ut" is passed an an SSOID parameter.
Returns 21 rows
procedure SSO (SSOID in varchar2 default null,
Name in varchar2 default null,
Campus in varchar2 default null,
Department in varchar2 default null,
[code]...
Returns 41 rows
open Results for
select a.sso_id,
(a.name_last||', '||a.name_first) as name,
b.site,
[code]...
Test Data
CREATE TABLE ID
(
SSO_ID VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
NAME_FIRST VARCHAR2(100 BYTE),
NAME_LAST VARCHAR2(100 BYTE),
[code]...
Test Data
CREATE TABLE NT
(
LOWER_NT_ID VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
DEPARTMENT VARCHAR2(100 BYTE),
[code]....
I am trying to use the following case statement in my where clause. My problem here is, I get no rows.
tab1.col1 =
case
when (tab1.col1 = 'VAR') and (tab1.col2 is null or tab1.col2 >= tab2.datecol) then
tab1.col1
else
null
end
i tried the following update on one table:
update siebel.s_contact
set marital_stat_cd =
case
when (marital_stat_cd = 'Casado') then 'Married'
when (marital_stat_cd = 'Solteiro') then 'Single'
when (marital_stat_cd = 'Divorciado') then 'Divorced'
end
As you can see i forgot the else, so my update is wrong.
I thought i could rollback the update issuing the rollback statement, but when i have issue the rollback, the i query the table to confirm that the update was rollbacked and for my suprise the update is commited.
I didn�t issue the commit statement after the update and i confirmed that the auto-commit feature to worksheets is disabled, so i don�t understand whit the update was commited.
Want to filter a data using CASE statement in WHERE clause for the following scenario.
Need to Filter tb1.fallback_keyword if the fallback_flag is "Y' or 'N' and pg_number is null.Else no partial search of keyword.
where CASE WHEN (fallback_flg = 'Y' OR fallback_flg = 'N') and (pg_number is NULL )
THEN tb1.fallback_keyword = SUBSTR(key_word,1, INSTR(key_word,'#',-2))
ELSE (tb1.keyword = key_word ) AND (tb1.keyword like regexp_replace(key_word, '[*]+', '%'))
END
Is it possible within a CASE statement to put conditions on the date range that I want to pull? IE: am versus pm. The query has to pull specific time ranges for an AM run versus a PM run.
.....
FROM
table
WHERE
CASE
WHEN TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'AM') = 'AM'
THEN table.date BETWEEN TRUNC(SYSDATE) AND SYSDATE
ELSE table.date BETWEEN TRUNC(SYSDATE+12/24) AND SYSDATE
I have a table with around 80 columns. All i need is to select first 40 columns.
Is there any way to select first 40 columns without giving all the 40 Column Names in select clause.
Can we use select statement in case statment for an update?
Example
UPDATE x SET field = CASE WHEN
(SELECT field1
FROM Y
WHERE field3 = x.field3
IS NOT NULL
THEN 'B'
ELSE 'C'
where cny# = 112160
I have the following tables:
create table lookups (code varchar2(20), amount number);
insert into lookups values ('Rent' , 500);
insert into lookups values ('Breakpoint' , 10);
create table products (id number, cost number, year varchar2(4));
insert into products values (1, 1000, '2011');
insert into products values (1, 2000, '2011');
insert into products values (2, 100, '2011');
insert into products values (3, 50, '2011');
commit;
I want to write a query which lists the IDs and the sum(cost), and a Y/N indicator which is set to 'Y' IF sum(cost) > ( (lookups.rent value) * (100 - lookups.breakpoint value))/100
I have written this query:
SELECT id,
sum(cost)cost,
year,
CASE
WHEN cost >
((SELECT amount
[code]....... ORDER BY id;
This returns
ID COST YEAR YN
--------- ---------- ---- -
1 1000 2011 Y
1 2000 2011 Y
2 100 2011 N
3 50 2011 N
The YN is correct, but it needs to sum the amounts. So there should only be one row for id1 = 3000.e.g.
ID COST YEAR YN
--------- ---------- ---- -
1 3000 2011 Y
2 100 2011 N
3 50 2011 N
I am not sure how to do this. Or is there a better way of doing this than using CASE.
select GAM.FORACID,
SOL.SOL_DESC,
GAM.ACCT_NAME,
LHT.LIM_SANCT_DATE,
LHT.SANCT_LIM,
to_char( GAM.CLR_BAL_AMT,'9,99,999.99'),
[code]...
i am getting error like this
ERROR at line 9:
ORA-00911: invalid character
I would like to know, if there is a solution under 10g for something like this
select case when "C" = 1
then
(select 1,2,3,4,5 from dual)
else
(select 6,7,8,9,0 from dual)
end
from dual,
(select 1 "C" from dual)
What I really need is the full result of (select 1,2,3,4,5 from dual) or (select 6,7,8,9,0 from dual) if a condition as a result of a different sql-statement is true or false. It doesn't matter if the solution uses "case when" or anything else.
I want to count the batch records using BATCH_ID with CASE statement ,for that i am using below query but its not working ,
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM <TABLENAME> WHERE VNBATCH_ID=CASE WHEN #SDC <10 AND #PERIOD >=10 THEN
0||#SDC||#PERIOD||#BATCH_ID
WHEN #SDC <10 AND #PERIOD <10 THEN
0||#SDC||0||#PERIOD||#BATCH_ID
WHEN #SDC >=10 AND #PERIOD <10 THEN
#SDC||0||#PERIOD||#BATCH_ID
ELSE
#SDC||#PERIOD||#BATCH_ID
END
Based on same salary i need to retrieve data like below whose hire date should be within a week (7days). The table may have 200000 records.
empno Hiredate salary
1234 03-JUN-10 3000
1354 21-MAY-10 3000
1834 01-JUL-10 3000
1954 08-JUL-10 3000
I have a requirement of getting different column value for every select clause. my selection is so much freequent. For example.. 10 Select statement /second.
But when if I am running more than select in a second its is showing the same record which is last dequeue.and also tried with RANDOM(). how to get different value for every statement which is running in single point of time.
I want to use a sequence to populate a field for my insert statement. Should be simple right?
So here is an example
insert into sometable ( seq, else)
select
myseq.nextval
,somethingelse
from sometable@dblink
where somethingelse = 10
now if i remove my sequence call for nextval it correctly uses the where clause but when I use the sequence in the select statement it is ignoring the where clause completely. I've never had this issue before...is this because i'm using a dblink now?
I'm using toad 10 on oracle 11g in multi-schema environment.
I need to know if it is possible to hide one or more of the columns in my SELECT statement as I only need them in there where clause.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have some issues in passing array values to IN clause.
I am passing a String Array from Java to PL\SQL and want to use the Array values in the IN CLAUSE of Select Query
cust_array is the Array
search_id VARCHAR2(1000);
search_id := '';
FOR j IN 1 .. cust_array.count
LOOP
IF (j != 1) THEN
search_id := search_id || ''',''' || cust_array(j) || ''';
ELSE
search_id := search_id || '''' || cust_array(j) || '''';
END IF;
END LOOP;
trying to form a string of below form: search_id '3211335201','3211335209','3211335279','3211335509'
and use the string search_id in the IN clause of the search Query select * from DPP_EMP where empl in (search_id)
but the query does not returns any result
When I try to hardcode the values in the query as below, its returing 4 rows
select * from DPP_EMP where empl in ('3211335201','3211335209','3211335279','3211335509')
How to achieve this (String to the IN clause) or is there a better way of passing the Array values to the IN clause
I'm using pivot query feature of oracle 11g and came across a strange situation where i need to pass a "select statement" in a "in clause" of pivot query.
SQL> CREATE TABLE TEST1
2 (
3 UIN NUMBER(8) NOT NULL,
4 TESTING_ID NUMBER(4),
5 PFA_RESULT VARCHAR2(30 BYTE)
6 );
[code]....
I have tried with pivot xml but it not giving desired output in sql*plus session.It is giving unreadable output.
select * from
(select uin,testing_id,pfa_result from test1)
pivot xml (max(pfa_result) as result
for (testing_id) in (select distinct testing_id from test1));
[code]....
Here actually i want to use "select distinct id from test1" instead of "in (11,12,13,14,15)". Because i don't know how many id's will be there and of which values. e.g. 11 or 21 or 25.
Is there a way to define a SELECT clause once and reuse it in many other queries?
I have many procedures with same SELECT statement and I'm trying to find a way to not have to write out the SELECT clause in every function or procedure. Same question applies to FROM, WHERE, etc clauses.
currently i m going through some dumps for my OCA-11g prep.I came across one sentence :A view cannot have an ORDER BY clause in the SELECT statement.well this statement is false and the explanation given was :
Query operations containing ORDER BY clause are also permitted, so long as the ORDER BY clause appears outside the parentheses.
The following is an example of what I mean: CREATE VIEW my_view AS (SELECT*FROM emp) ORDER BYempno.
but when i tried running the query like this :CREATE VIEW my_view AS SELECT*FROM emp ORDER BYempno ,it worked w/o giving parentheses.
high number of executions of specific types of queries which is using only rownum clause. For exam.
select ani, rowid from tbl_smschat_upuor where rownum<=:"SYS_B_0";
DB is having high number of executions of these type of queries and these when I m checking the execution plan for the same type of queries it is accessing the full table scan.
======================execution plan for above query
1000 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 91289622
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[code]....
I have created domain indexes on text columns of a materialised view to use "contains" clause when searching for data. The select query with "contains" clause does not return any records, however I was able to retrive data using via regular query using a like search.
-> will exec ctx_ddl.sync_index('index_name')'resolve my problem?
-> since the view is a materialized view, how can i make sure that the latest data added are also picked up?
The below sql is giving different number of result sets while adding further columns in select clause.i.e After adding the columns 4,5,6 in the below query its giving different number of result set.In this case the result set count would be 5.
Before adding the columns 4,5,6,the result set count was 11.
SELECT PAYMENT_METHOD_MAP.NETTINGGROUP_ID,
PAYMENT_METHOD_MAP.CREDITPAYMENTMETHOD_CD,
PAYMENT_METHOD_MAP.DEBITPAYMENTMETHOD_CD,
PAYMENT_METHOD_MAP.AGENT_ID,
SETTLEMENT.NETTINGGROUP_ID,
SETTLEMENT.SETTLEMENTDATE
[code]....
Is there a save exceptions clause or an equivalent for an Insert as select* statement ?
How do I trap the errors in the below statement -
INSERT INTO copy_emp
SELECT * FROM emp;
Is it an all or nothing scenario ?
I am trying to create a tabular form based on a SQL query, that has a query-based select list with a where clause that references a column in the originating SQL query.
The situation is, I have a table that stores client_id, source_id and build_id, lets call it client_source. I have a second table, build_source, that contains source_id and build_id, with a one to many relationship between the two (source_id of 1 could have build_id of 1-7).
Using a tabular form, I want to select the corresponding build_id to be used in client_source, but the select list must only contain the build_id's for that rows particular source_id.
Here is an example of the SQL source of my tabular form;
select
s.ROWID,
s.CLIENT_ID,
s.SOURCE_ID,
APEX_ITEM.SELECT_LIST_FROM_QUERY(1, s.BUILD_ID,
'select b.build_id display, b.build_id return from
build_source b where b.source_id = s.SOURCE_ID ') lst
from client_source s
... what I am trying to achieve is that the source_id fields in bold match. When the query is built this way I get an 'invalid identifier' Oracle error on s.SOURCE_ID at runtime.
Is there some special tags that need to be used to reference the outside column?I am running on Application Express 4.1.0.00.32, on a Oracle 10g release 10.2.0.4.0 database.