Based on same salary i need to retrieve data like below whose hire date should be within a week (7days). The table may have 200000 records.
empno Hiredate salary
1234 03-JUN-10 3000
1354 21-MAY-10 3000
1834 01-JUL-10 3000
1954 08-JUL-10 3000
,I have a queryIn my query iam passing parameters using IN clause.The parameters contains in two tablesfor ex..select a.deptno, b.deptnofrom dept1 a, dept2 bwhere a.deptno = b.deptnoand NVL (a.deptno, b.deptno) in (10, 20, 30,.....) is this correct way to use NVL like this.i have a deptno consists in both the tables. How can i use this condition.
View 4 Replies View RelatedGiven two tables in a 1:N relationship, I want to retrieve, for each parent row, any child row which either satisfies some condition cond1 or, if no child rows matching cond1 exist, which satisfies another condition cond2.
I can easily write such a query using NOT EXISTS, but I am forced to repeat the condition cond1. This is inconvenient, as the repeated condition is quite long (involving other tables as well), and I would like to write it only once.
For example (using the HR schema included in Oracle 10g XE): I want to retrieve, for each department, all the "new" employees (hired after a certain date) or, if no "new" employees exist, the department manager.
SELECT d.department_id,
d.department_name,
d.manager_id,
e.employee_id,
e.first_name,
e.last_name,
[code].....
I have a table with around 80 columns. All i need is to select first 40 columns.
Is there any way to select first 40 columns without giving all the 40 Column Names in select clause.
I am asking about the best way in SQL for the following case:
CREATE TABLE TRY_A (A NUMBER, B NUMBER);
INSERT ALL
INTO TRY_A VALUES (1,0)
INTO TRY_A VALUES (1,1)
INTO TRY_A VALUES (1,2)
INTO TRY_A VALUES (2,0)
[code].......
I need to learn the best way to select all A values where B is never 0. So if the needed result for the above example is:
A
--------------
3
5
As column B was never 0 with column A = 3 or 5.
I have been trying to find out how to write the following query:
Suppose the following table:
ID seq
24 1
24 2
24 3
67 1
67 2
67 3
67 4
67 5
13 1
13 2
I would like to retrieve the rows for every different ID with its max value. For one ID that would be:
select * from TABLE where seq in(
select max(seq) from TABLE where id=24)
How can i do this for all the rows??
I got a requirement to check if a particular range of values are present , if few values missing then have to add null for the values. This has to be a SQL statement.
table 1 :
fiscal_month_id, value1, value2
2010100028482848
2010110025712709.5
2010120027452721.3
2011010026052692.25
2011020026382681.4
2011030030992751
2011040027662753.14
2011050029732780.625
This is the table. the fiscal month id denotes that the values is from month Oct(20101000) to May (20110500). The fiscal year cycle for me is from OCT to SEP. Hence when we select this table, the select should retreive the below data
fiscal_month_id, value1, value2
2010100028482848
2010110025712709.5
2010120027452721.3
2011010026052692.25
[code].....
How to do this in a select statement ?
This fiscal_month_ID is actual from another table where all time level information are kept.
I have a requirement of getting different column value for every select clause. my selection is so much freequent. For example.. 10 Select statement /second.
But when if I am running more than select in a second its is showing the same record which is last dequeue.and also tried with RANDOM(). how to get different value for every statement which is running in single point of time.
I want to use a sequence to populate a field for my insert statement. Should be simple right?
So here is an example
insert into sometable ( seq, else)
select
myseq.nextval
,somethingelse
from sometable@dblink
where somethingelse = 10
now if i remove my sequence call for nextval it correctly uses the where clause but when I use the sequence in the select statement it is ignoring the where clause completely. I've never had this issue before...is this because i'm using a dblink now?
I'm using toad 10 on oracle 11g in multi-schema environment.
We have and Upper and a Lower function.Is there any function or way in which I can issue a select while ignoring the case(like IgNoReCaSe) in a where clause? I don't want to use like
select * from emp where upper(job)= upper('dba');
or
select * from emp where lower(job)= lower('dba');
I just want to know if there is any way in which I could do it without using upper and lower.
I need to know if it is possible to hide one or more of the columns in my SELECT statement as I only need them in there where clause.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have some issues in passing array values to IN clause.
I am passing a String Array from Java to PL\SQL and want to use the Array values in the IN CLAUSE of Select Query
cust_array is the Array
search_id VARCHAR2(1000);
search_id := '';
FOR j IN 1 .. cust_array.count
LOOP
IF (j != 1) THEN
search_id := search_id || ''',''' || cust_array(j) || ''';
ELSE
search_id := search_id || '''' || cust_array(j) || '''';
END IF;
END LOOP;
trying to form a string of below form: search_id '3211335201','3211335209','3211335279','3211335509'
and use the string search_id in the IN clause of the search Query select * from DPP_EMP where empl in (search_id)
but the query does not returns any result
When I try to hardcode the values in the query as below, its returing 4 rows
select * from DPP_EMP where empl in ('3211335201','3211335209','3211335279','3211335509')
How to achieve this (String to the IN clause) or is there a better way of passing the Array values to the IN clause
I'm using pivot query feature of oracle 11g and came across a strange situation where i need to pass a "select statement" in a "in clause" of pivot query.
SQL> CREATE TABLE TEST1
2 (
3 UIN NUMBER(8) NOT NULL,
4 TESTING_ID NUMBER(4),
5 PFA_RESULT VARCHAR2(30 BYTE)
6 );
[code]....
I have tried with pivot xml but it not giving desired output in sql*plus session.It is giving unreadable output.
select * from
(select uin,testing_id,pfa_result from test1)
pivot xml (max(pfa_result) as result
for (testing_id) in (select distinct testing_id from test1));
[code]....
Here actually i want to use "select distinct id from test1" instead of "in (11,12,13,14,15)". Because i don't know how many id's will be there and of which values. e.g. 11 or 21 or 25.
Is there a way to define a SELECT clause once and reuse it in many other queries?
I have many procedures with same SELECT statement and I'm trying to find a way to not have to write out the SELECT clause in every function or procedure. Same question applies to FROM, WHERE, etc clauses.
currently i m going through some dumps for my OCA-11g prep.I came across one sentence :A view cannot have an ORDER BY clause in the SELECT statement.well this statement is false and the explanation given was :
Query operations containing ORDER BY clause are also permitted, so long as the ORDER BY clause appears outside the parentheses.
The following is an example of what I mean: CREATE VIEW my_view AS (SELECT*FROM emp) ORDER BYempno.
but when i tried running the query like this :CREATE VIEW my_view AS SELECT*FROM emp ORDER BYempno ,it worked w/o giving parentheses.
high number of executions of specific types of queries which is using only rownum clause. For exam.
select ani, rowid from tbl_smschat_upuor where rownum<=:"SYS_B_0";
DB is having high number of executions of these type of queries and these when I m checking the execution plan for the same type of queries it is accessing the full table scan.
======================execution plan for above query
1000 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 91289622
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[code]....
I have created domain indexes on text columns of a materialised view to use "contains" clause when searching for data. The select query with "contains" clause does not return any records, however I was able to retrive data using via regular query using a like search.
-> will exec ctx_ddl.sync_index('index_name')'resolve my problem?
-> since the view is a materialized view, how can i make sure that the latest data added are also picked up?
The below sql is giving different number of result sets while adding further columns in select clause.i.e After adding the columns 4,5,6 in the below query its giving different number of result set.In this case the result set count would be 5.
Before adding the columns 4,5,6,the result set count was 11.
SELECT PAYMENT_METHOD_MAP.NETTINGGROUP_ID,
PAYMENT_METHOD_MAP.CREDITPAYMENTMETHOD_CD,
PAYMENT_METHOD_MAP.DEBITPAYMENTMETHOD_CD,
PAYMENT_METHOD_MAP.AGENT_ID,
SETTLEMENT.NETTINGGROUP_ID,
SETTLEMENT.SETTLEMENTDATE
[code]....
Is there a save exceptions clause or an equivalent for an Insert as select* statement ?
How do I trap the errors in the below statement -
INSERT INTO copy_emp
SELECT * FROM emp;
Is it an all or nothing scenario ?
I am trying to create a tabular form based on a SQL query, that has a query-based select list with a where clause that references a column in the originating SQL query.
The situation is, I have a table that stores client_id, source_id and build_id, lets call it client_source. I have a second table, build_source, that contains source_id and build_id, with a one to many relationship between the two (source_id of 1 could have build_id of 1-7).
Using a tabular form, I want to select the corresponding build_id to be used in client_source, but the select list must only contain the build_id's for that rows particular source_id.
Here is an example of the SQL source of my tabular form;
select
s.ROWID,
s.CLIENT_ID,
s.SOURCE_ID,
APEX_ITEM.SELECT_LIST_FROM_QUERY(1, s.BUILD_ID,
'select b.build_id display, b.build_id return from
build_source b where b.source_id = s.SOURCE_ID ') lst
from client_source s
... what I am trying to achieve is that the source_id fields in bold match. When the query is built this way I get an 'invalid identifier' Oracle error on s.SOURCE_ID at runtime.
Is there some special tags that need to be used to reference the outside column?I am running on Application Express 4.1.0.00.32, on a Oracle 10g release 10.2.0.4.0 database.
I have a table that partitioned into six partitions. each partitions placed in different table space and every two table space placed it on a different hardisk
when I will do query select with the non-partition keys condition, how the search process ? whether the sequence (scan sequentially from partition 1 to partition 6) or partition in a hardisk is accessed at the same time with other partition in other hardisk. ( in the image, partition 1,4 accessed at the same time with partition 2,5 and 3,6)
In the following merge statement in the USINg clause...I am using a select stament of one schema WEDB.But that same select statement should take data from 30 schemeas and then check the condition below condition
ON(source.DNO = target.DNO
AND source.BNO=target.BNO);
I thought that using UNIONALL for select statement of the schemas as below.
SELECT
DNO,
BNO,
c2,
c3,
c4,
c5,
c6,
c7
[code]....
can we use something like this
"select ... order by emp from emp"
what is to be done? so that this qurey runs. no co-related subquery to be used.
i want to select dynamic column names in my select statement in my function.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI M USING APEX 4.1 AND CREATED SELECT LIST ON PAGE, I WANT TO SHOW MIN VALUE OF THE SELECT LIST FOR THAT I WROTE IN THAT SELECT LIST PROPERTIES UNDER DEFAULT TAG MIN; AND CHOOSE PL/SQL EXPRESSION BUT ITS GIVING ERROR "Error computing item default value for page item P1_PRODUCT."
BUT IF I HARDCORE THE VALUE CONTAINING IN MY DATA LIKE PRODUCT ID = 1, I HARDCODED IN DEFAULT VALUE 1 AND SELECT PL/SQL EXPRESSION IT WORKS.
BUT ITS NOT DONE LIKE THIS I WANT TO SELECT BY DEFAULT MIN VALUE OF THE SELECT LIST, SO THAT THE DATA SHOULD BE DISPLAYED ACCORDING TO THAT.
THE EXACT REQUIREMENT IS TO ENTER THE SELECT LIST DEFAULT VALUE IN SESSION SO THAT DATA IS TO BE DISPLAYED.
Why Blind select is better than Conditional select Statement?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have EMPLOYEE table that have 3 records with EMP_ID 1, 2, 3. Now I want to run below query
select emp_id from employee where emp_id in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
It will return only 3 records but i want those records also which is not available in employee table. Is this possible without using another table or creating another table. Actually I don't have enough privileges to create table.
& want output like below
EMP_ID
1
2
3
4 Not Found
5 Not Found
Here emp_id 4, 5 is not available in employee table, but query should return those value also with comments like "Not Found"
I need to check somewhere in the code as " Check the variable with in 20 varaiables , if not excute somes statements"
Example
a1=20,a2=30,a3=40......a20=200; (Like this way i have 20 varaibles with values)
v1=150;
if( v1<>a1 AND V1<> a2 AND V1 <> a3...... AND V1<>20)
execute some insert block;
End if;
But it's writting very diffcult as i need to compare with 20 varaiables.Was there any alternative sloution like taking some VARRAY and checking in IF condition like v1 NOT IN(Va) (Where 'Va' is like VARRAY)
I am facing an issue in union clause
Below is my query Issue faced is that based on union I want to limit the result and does not want second query to give duplicate result as both queries deal with same table
SELECT TAB1.ID, TAB1.CRNCY_CODE, TAB2.SCHEME_CODE, DECODE( 'INFENG',CAST( '' AS VARCHAR(20)),
NVL(TAB2.ALT1_SCHEME_DESC,TAB2.SCHEME_DESC),TAB2.SCHEME_DESC),
TAB1.SUB_HEAD_CODE, DECODE( 'INFENG' ,CAST( '' AS VARCHAR(20)),NVL(TAB1.ALT1_SUB_HEAD_DESC ,
TAB1.SUB_HEAD_DESC),TAB1.SUB_HEAD_DESC)
[code]...
select null ID,null crncy_code,TAB2.SCHEME_CODE ,
NVL(TAB2.ALT1_SCHEME_DESC,TAB2.SCHEME_DESC),TAB2.SCHEME_DESC,null SUB_HEAD_CODE from TAB2 where TAB2.SCHEME_TYPE ='SCHEME1';
[CODE]
i have small requirement
case when type=1 then max(col2) else end
case when type=2 then max(col2) else end
i wanted to have difference 2 timestamp
type(datatype- numeric)
col2(datatype-timestamp)
all it should be in one select condition
