I'm getting some problem in my project. I've taken my form fields in tabular way. I also have the ID with auto-increment system there. I want that when user moves towards the 2nd row for inserting new record then the 1st record would be committed.
I'm getting my bank-id from database and making +1 increment and made that bank-id text box into display box.
When running my form then it is increasing one like this :
database record
BKID-00001
and with one increment it is showing this in my form display field of 1st row in tabular form.
BKID-00002
but when I moves towards the 2nd row it doesn't commits the form and gives the BANK-ID AS "BKID-00002" again like the above row.
I have a master detail form based on two tables and i want to save the record automatically when the user exits the last field.how i can do it.which trigger is appropriate and what is the code.
i made this loop to commit the same item but depend on the count of suppliers to set the same item every time to different supplier . but the problem this code commit only the first sypplier but not any othere one ..
code : { key - commit - trigger } declare var_record_count number ; VAR_p_request number; begin var_record_count:= get_block_property('control',CURRENT_RECORD);
I have a form reading record information from a flat file and inserting data into a number of varied tables. At the end of file (last line read) the form issues a commit to make all inserts/updates permanent.
There is a record that disappears in particular and this everytime I re-run the test. I mean than in Debug mode, I find it in the right table everytime I query that table until the moment the commit is issued in the code - which is definitely the opposite of what should happen. I understand that for some reason a rollback happens for that record (others are ok after the commit) but my point is that if for some constraint reasons, the record did not qualify, an error should have popped up right from the Insert that added that record, right? Then How comes I find it in the table up until the moment of the commit ?? ...is the deferrable constraint property a clue for digging further?
How Can We Stop to insert Data if Master Block have the record and detail block have no record but commit command applied i want that commit command can not be work if detail block have no record
I'm trying to change the attributes on a display where the info is gathered via a routine that fills the data block with info. I've searched and tried using 'set item instance property' in several places within the data block using different triggers but still doesn't work.
No errors are encountered or shown. Attributes aren't changed based on a small test condition.
1. i want to create form for student's attendance.
2. for this purpose i create a form . and create 2 Data Blocks 1. Non Database Data Block (layout type: form) 2. Database Data Block (layout type: Tabular)
3. in Non Database Data Block i add 3 Items.. on the basis of i get the records from database and show them into my into my 2nd Data Block...
4. my problem is this that how can i get records from database and show them into my forms and then save thats records into my table by using Database Datablock.
I have a form with 3 blocks in our oracle application. Block1 is a single record block. Block2 and block 3 are multi record blocks with no of records 5. Block1 and block2 are in same canvas1 of a window1. Block3 is in canvas2 of window2. There is a relation between block1 and block2. Another relation with block2 and block3 is also available.
Now my issues is while creating a record, first i entered the data in block1 (which is a single record block). Then i entered data in five rows of second block. Then i entered data in block3(multi record block) by pressing the button in block2 (each button for each row). But before saving the entire form, when i checked the data in block3 by pressing the button of first record of block2, screen shows empty.
Code in button of block2 is as follows
show_window(WIN2'); Go_block('BLOCK3');
Code in button of block3 is as follows
hide_window('WIN2'); go_block('BLOCK2');
If post; is included in block3 button. then problem we will be solved. But we don't want to use post; as it lock the table.
is there any possibility or hint to avoid updating record if columns do not change? For example, I have UPDATE:
UPDATE MY_TABLE SET COLUMN_A = 'ABC' WHERE COLUMN_B = 12
if the value in COLUMN_A is 'ABC' I do not want to do this update. Of course I can add in WHERE 'AND COLUMN_A<>'ABC' but when I am updating a lot of columns it will be annoying
I have data block that has hundreds of records. On a screen I display 20 records at a time. On that same screen I have "find badge" function where user types badge/employee id and presses a button to find the record in a data block. I have no problem finding the records in a list and pointing the curser to appropriate record. My question is (which is a user request) if the badge/employee id is found to make that record to be the first record in a list.
SQL> update t set a = 1 where b = 2; -- must have redo record 2 rows updated. SQL> rollback;
the above redo record that uncommit changed must be written from redo buffer to the online redo logfile. why Oracle write the redo record that uncommit changed to the online redo logfile ? when it will be used?
I developed a form in forms9i, at the time of data entering form is not showing any ERROR messages or SAVE RECORD message and when I press exit button it is asking "DO YOU WANT TO SAVE THE CHANGES YOU HAVE MADE".
I have checked my PRIMARY KEY field and there is no mistake and value is populating at PRE INSERT.
I am calling a child form from a parent form.It works perfectly if the parent form is adding records and while entering records when i press the button to call the child form, the whole things work perfectly according to plan.
The problem begins when i run execute query command in the parent form and then call child form then it does not "commit_form". So this is my problem that child form does not work perfectly when parent form is being called in execute_query procedure.
My working:
1) I read in the documentation that When parent form status is query_only then child will also have the same mode regardless of the parameter given in call_form.So i checked the :SYSTEM.FORM_STATUS of both the parents and child form,it shows "CHANGED" hence this point is covered. (dont know how come the parent form is in changed status but at least it is doing my work)
2) I further read and found that Commit_form procedure make the :SYSTEM.FORM_STATUS as QUERY. Here i am facing problem as in child form when i make changes and press commit form. Then before commit_form and after commit_form the :SYSTEM.FORM_STATUS results in "CHANGED".You can see this in the following code which i have written in save button.
message(:SYSTEM.CURRENT_FORM || ' a ' ||:SYSTEM.FORM_STATUS); pause; commit_form; message(:SYSTEM.CURRENT_FORM || ' b ' ||:SYSTEM.FORM_STATUS); pause; IF Form_Success THEN Commit; IF :System.Form_Status <> 'QUERY' THEN Message('Error prevented Commit'); RAISE Form_Trigger_Failure; END IF; else message('FAIL'); END IF; exit_form;
then at last exit_form module shows that" i have unsaved data in the form" save Yes-No-Cancel?
I have a problem with key-commit trigger. I have written some validations and computations criteria on the block level (lines level). Actually there are a number of loops involved in it.
Problem is that the computations are performed twice. (may be the validations would also be performed twice, which couldn't be felt ). Since i read somewhere that key-commit is fired on different events, which i infered to be firing only just before database commit.
Restrict field after insertion before commit. i mean when user inputs the data in one field and moves to next field.when ever he want to return back on the previous field it can't be edited.before commit;
I am just making a audit table as well. i have learnt the basics from here URL.....
My problem is that after inserting into audit table if i issue commit command then the table + unsaved data present on the form is also saved.What i want is that i issue a command which save only inserted record in audit table, and should NOT save data present on the data entry form. (which will be saved later by other method/button).
I have a fairly standard Purchase Order form which contains pre-loaded data (been uploaded from an XML file).When the Purchase Order is processed, the form updates a Price History table only if the Price on the PO_Details changes.The code for updating the price history table is contained in a PRE_UPDATE trigger on the PO_Details Data Block.
No other data changes on the PO_Details table.I now want to change this so that the Price History table is updated even if the price does not change i.e I want to create a history record for each record on the PO_Details irrespective of whether it was updated or not.
Is there an alternative trigger that I can move my code to (ie move it from PRE_UPDATE) to some other trigger that is fired for each PO_Details record even if there is no change.
Our organization has recently decided to go for storage metro cluster solution for disaster recovery. In a Data guard environment, we normally calculate how much archive log is generating and based on that value we calculate the required bandwidth.
For storage metro cluster, we need to find how much block is changing in our primary database, and the same rate of change would apply on DR cluster. Now, i need to give the assumption how much changing is happening in my system. How to calculate the change.