i have a table named employees in which there are 2 columns dep_id and name. One record having name as annie has dep_id=null .
When i arrange the records of the table in ascending order using order by dep_id the record with name annie and dep_id is placed in the last because null is consired largest. How can I bring that record to the top without changing the ascending order of the dep_id.
I have migrated from Oracle 8i (8.1.7) to Oracle 10g, but when I execute a query in 8i without any order by clause, I get a result in ascending order. The same query when executed in 10g gives a result which is not ordered. How to get an order result in 10g. There are many forms and reports which use lov which are not ordered. Can I set the ordering at the database, so that I do not have to alter all the forms and reports.
I have also migrated my forms from 5 to 6, but the combo box in some forms in 6i do not appear at run time. How I can solve this problem. I have attached an forms5 .fmb file/.
Does ascending index ensures that query without order by will have the result set sorted?
E.g. the query is
select * from table_t where odm_type='I' and odm_uid>nvl(OpUidParm,-1);
column odm_type has index created like this (default is ASC):
create index ODM_UID_I on table_t (ODM_UID);
Will such a query always return the first record having the minimal odm_uid in all Oracle versions?
i have a table test on 4 different-different database, at the starting structure is same in all the database. and now i want to change the datatype of the primary key column named "testid" , then i add a temp column in test table (and it is added at the last in table).
i have copied the data of testid in temp column and renamed it as testid and i dropped the testid column , then the problem is that primary key column will comes at last and i want to make it like previous position so that there will not be any difference in all 4 database as in structure.
is it possible to changing column order as our desire without dropping the table?and i made all the script to changing the datatype of primary key column.
my simplified database schema is:
Order
OrderID
Status
OrderItems
OrderID
EAN
Amount
Store
EAN
Amount
now,I need trigger that will on updating table Order and changing status to "GoodsReceived" increase amounts in Store according to values in OrderItems.
create or replace trigger order_received_trigger
before update
on Order
for each row
begin
if (:old.status=4 and :new.status=1) then
/*
select ean, sum(amount)
from OrderItems
where OrderID=:old.OrderID
group by ean;
*/
end if;
end;
but now i dont know how to apply that select on table Store.
How to avoid sort operation by an order by clause without changing the sort area size.what hints or changes should be done in query so that order by clause work faster.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have 2 record groups names RG1,RG2 , I attached RG1 record group to LOV1 at design time,I want to change the record group RG1 to RG2 for LOV1 at run time.
View 11 Replies View RelatedI am working on forms 6i, ebs 11i and data base 9i. I have below requirement to achieve.
I want to create a lov for a column called 'FORM'.
I have lookup for this as follows
lookup code meaning description
FORM FORM XXSMCINV_FORM
in the description, it's value set name.
I am manually checking the value set name and writing static record group.
Right now, i have static record group for this like below.
select ffvv.flex_value "FORM"
from fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs,fnd_flex_values_vl ffvv
where ffvs.flex_value_set_id=ffvv.flex_value_set_id
and ffvs.flex_value_set_name='XXSMCINV_FORM' order by flex_value;
It's working fine.
But in the lookup, they can add one more FORM like below.
LOOKUP_CODE MEANING DESCRIPTION
FORM FORM XXSMCINV_FORM
FORM1 FORM1 XXSMCINV_FORM1
Now i have to change the record group query manullay like below.
select ffvv.flex_value "FORM"
from fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs,fnd_flex_values_vl ffvv
where ffvs.flex_value_set_id=ffvv.flex_value_set_id
and ffvs.flex_value_set_name='XXSMCINV_FORM' order by flex_value;
UNION
select ffvv.flex_value "FORM"
from fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs,fnd_flex_values_vl ffvv
where ffvs.flex_value_set_id=ffvv.flex_value_set_id
and ffvs.flex_value_set_name='XXSMCINV_FORM1' order by flex_value;
Is there anyway i can make this automatic whenever they add new FORM lookup.
Is this possible to achieve using dynamic record group.
I have a table as below:-
CREATE TABLE TEST_EMP_WIP
(
EMP VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
WIP NUMBER,
MAX_SEQUENCE NUMBER
)
[Code]....
EMP WIP MAX_SEQUENCE RANK
002 2 2 1
003 1 4 2
005 3 5 3
010 1 4
011 1 5
I have to find the next EMP whose MAX_SQUENCE needs to be updated with a sequence. In this case the next would be '010' I fetched the EMP who falls after the max value of the column max_sequence in order of EMPCODE.
select emp_next from (
SELECT emp,max_sequence, LEAD(emp, 1, 0) OVER (ORDER BY emp) AS emp_next
from test_emp_wip where wip > 0 )
where max_sequence=(select max(max_sequence) from test_emp_wip where wip > 0)
EMP_NEXT
010
After sometime, the record would look like :-
EMP WIP MAX_SEQUENCE RANK
002 2 2 1
003 1 4 2
005 3 5 3
010 1 6 4
011 1 7 5
Now the next update should be done to the EMP '002' in cyclic manner.
tell me a way to do this. I can insert new columns if needed in table for calculation.
I have data block that has hundreds of records. On a screen I display 20 records at a time. On that same screen I have "find badge" function where user types badge/employee id and presses a button to find the record in a data block. I have no problem finding the records in a list and pointing the curser to appropriate record. My question is (which is a user request) if the badge/employee id is found to make that record to be the first record in a list.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow can I Sort Ascending or Descending of Last Total Column of Matrix Report R6i i.e. F_SumsalPerempno, summing total salary of each empno at end of each row.
I need the employee paid highest amount of total salary during the year to appear on first row, while months to display as per original order.
Using Application Express 4.2.1.00.08
Any problem using 4.2's One Level Tabs - Content Frame page where you have a parent region (of type content frame Body Container ) while number of child regions (of type Hide & Show Region - Borderless ), if you want to re-order them by changing the sequence, it has no effect when you run the page.
The regions still show in the same order top to bottom as it did before the update of sequences. Heading links (to show/hide child regons in content frames) has the same ordering as before.
what is missing in this pfile that would cause enterprise manager not to appear ?
In the Oracle Database 10g: Administration Workshop II The chapter 8 excercise calls for the database to be started using the pfile init_sgalab.ora . The purpose of this I suppose is to simulate a memory error.
When I get to the part where I need to use OEM to fix the problem, OEM does not come up. The contents of init_sgalab.ora are :
--------------------------------------------
background_dump_dest='/u01/app/oracle/admin/orcl/bdump'
compatible='10.2.0.1.0'
control_files='/u01/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/control01.ctl','/u01/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/control02.ctl','/u01/app/oracle/oradata/orcl /control03.ctl'
core_dump_dest='/u01/app/oracle/admin/orcl/cdump'
db_block_size=8192
[code].......
I am not sure what is missing in this file to be able to bring up OEM.
Also, I looked at the logs and this is the only error message I found that might be relevant in
/u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/jhlinux.home.com_orcl/sysman/log/emoms.log
2010-06-04 23:33:59,809 [HttpRequestHandler-8546123] ERROR eml.OMSHandshake processFailure.619 - OMSHandshake failed.(AGENT URL = http://jhlinux.home.com:3938/emd/main)(ERROR = INTERNAL_ERROR)
We came in this morning with one of the servers down. After bringing it back up and checking the alert log, the only indicators that something was wrong were the hundreds of ora_01403 and the resulting trace files that were created.
The trc files for the most part indicated 'knpssamsg encountered 1304; end of error statck dumped in slave;' date and time and service name being sys$users.
Is there a way to force a query to ALWAYS bring back a certain amount of rows, even if some of the rows are blank?
I know there's a way in MSSQL but not sure how to in SQL+
How can we bring down the databases in oracle fail safe environment?
We have one database X in two server�s windows A & B with oracle fail safe environment.
What procedure should we fallow to bring down the database X.
Today I was strangling to bring down the database because database was automatically coming up once brought down the database. what procedure should we follow to bring down the database in OFS environment.
I have to write a sub query / build a logic for the below.
There are several accounts which should have a zero balance i.e sum of all the amoutns in that account should be zero. If they are non zero , i have to report which amounts make up non zero balance.
If i have amts as +20 , -20 , -30,-10 i.e the sum is -40 indicating a non zero amount. I need the entire details of the records which makes up non zero sum. So in above case details related to -30 aand -10.
I'm using a sum group clause on several fields at which sum is required to be checked ie. date , account , currency . query that will bring individual records that don't make the sum zero.
Is it possible to write a outer query which will bring individual records which don't sum up to zero.
Which step in the following plan is the first step of execution
I reckon it is "TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE"
Is that correct?
In the "Predicate Information (identified by operation id):"
section the predicates - access and filter for the step "TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES" are displayed first
Isn't there any relation between the order of execution steps and the order in which predicates are displayed?
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 538700484
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2364 | 14 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2313 | 13 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2281 | 12 (9)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 2255 | 11 (10)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 175 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 12 | 612 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES | 43 | 5332 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | VIEW PUSHED PREDICATE | | 1 | 2080 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 154 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 103 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE | 1 | 32 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_BBS_1 | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DAILY_CHECK | 1 | 71 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_SEARCH | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_IAM_SR_NO | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 32 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I have below tables,
describe rpthead
Name Null Type
--------------------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
RPTDATE NOT NULL DATE
RPTD_BY NOT NULL VARCHAR2(25)
PRODUCT_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
describe rptbody
Name Null Type
------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
LINENO NOT NULL NUMBER
COMMENTS VARCHAR2(240)
UPD_DATE DATE
The fact is that we store some header in RPTHEAD and store real data in RPTBODY, the question is that if I use below SQL to query all data for a 'PRODUCT_ID'.
SELECT t0.LINENO, t0.COMMENTS, t0.RPTNO, t0.UPD_DATE
FROM RPTBODY t0 , RPTHEAD rpthead
WHERE
(
t0.RPTNO = rpthead.RPTNO
AND
t0.UPD_DATE>=to_date('1970/01/01 00:00:00','YYYY/MM/DD hh24:mi:ss')
AND
rpthead.PRODUCT_ID IN ('4647')
)
I do not want to have 'ORDER by' clause since data set is too large, the sorting takes long time, is there any way to get the result rows in the order sorted by RPTNO? We have the index for RPTNO on RPTBODY.
My procedure proc_ex is in when_validate_item trigger
I have one Multi Record data block in my form with values in its items
I need to Populate multi record block values to one Record Group using
add_group_row,
add_group_column,
set_group_char_cell to populate values to record group
Let us suppose my multi record data block looks like
item1 item2 item3 item4
10 20 50 70
25 15 30 45
45 90 47 38
75 25 85 90
30 56 78 80
how to populate these multi record datablock values to Record Group ???..Eagerly waiting for your Replies
I am loading data file using SQL Loader in TOAD 10.5.1.3 in Oracle 10g using the control file below and loading data into 2 tables post1.thead and post1.tdetl. THEAD contains item level transaction and TDETL is detail level when a transaction has a discount or promo attached to for that item. When the
LOAD DATA
APPEND
INTO TABLE post1.thead
WHEN (1:5) = 'THEAD'
TRAILING NULLCOLS
(file_type POSITION(1:5)CHAR,
[code]....
A particular THEAD value may have 0, 1 or many TDETL corresponding values.below is a sample data file. When the position 21 in the TTAIL has a value of 1 or 2, then we know that there is a promo or discount applicable to the ITEM (THEAD).
THEAD0000000002201109142011091400000000000002091 1 0 -1
TTAIL0000000003000000
THEAD0000000012201109142011091400000000000002091 1 0 -1 20110914-1
TDETL0000000013CMPSPL1004 0 000000010000P0000000000000019990000000000000000200000
TTAIL0000000014000001
THEAD0000000021201109142011091400000000000002091 1 0 -1
TDETL0000000022EMPDSC1005 0 000
TDETL0000000023SCOUP 1006 0 973452 000
TTAIL0000000024000002
What I want to acheive is to accurately reflect a TDETL to its corresponding THEAD, as both THEAD and TDETL are loaded into separate tables. How can we have the 2 records correlated?
I have a table which contains the multiple records for single ID No. Now i have to select single record which contains the latest date. here is the structure Name
Null Type ------ ---- ------------ ID_P NUMBER NAME_P VARCHAR2(12) DATE_P TIMESTAMP(6) Records---------------------1 loosi 22-AUG-13 01.27.48.000000000 PM1 nammi 26-AUG-13 01.28.10.000000000 PM2 kk 22-AUG-13 01.28.26.000000000 PM2 thej 26-AUG-13 01.28.42.000000000 PM
now i have to select below 2 rows how can write select qurie for this?
1 loosi 26-AUG-13 01.27.48.000000000 PM2 thej 26-AUG-13 01.28.42.000000000 PM
I have a fairly standard Purchase Order form which contains pre-loaded data (been uploaded from an XML file).When the Purchase Order is processed, the form updates a Price History table only if the Price on the PO_Details changes.The code for updating the price history table is contained in a PRE_UPDATE trigger on the PO_Details Data Block.
No other data changes on the PO_Details table.I now want to change this so that the Price History table is updated even if the price does not change i.e I want to create a history record for each record on the PO_Details irrespective of whether it was updated or not.
Is there an alternative trigger that I can move my code to (ie move it from PRE_UPDATE) to some other trigger that is fired for each PO_Details record even if there is no change.
I have the following case to solve:
Example Table:
Nr_ordPos1Pos2Itemqty
O4018510000107 170,00
O4018520000107 30,00
O40651010000107 500,00
O40651020000107 50,00
O4114510000107 300,00
O31141010000107 50,00
O3114520000107 50,00
I need to create a query that returns record by record a field qty_progr with the cumulate qty considering previous records. The result should be the following:
Nr_ordPos1Pos2Itemqty qty_progr
O4018510000107 170,00 170,00
O4018520000107 30,00 200,00
O40651010000107 500,00 700,00
O40651020000107 50,00 750,00
O4114510000107 300,00 1050,00
O31141010000107 50,00 1100,00
O3114520000107 50,00 1150,00
I create a data block on a table when I am inserting new record only one record have been saved. Last record no longer exist.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have one multi record block in that i have one LOV..If i choose lov in first record that won't be display in second record lov...
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have been implementing a script to change a lot of data in a database production.Because of this the database will be 100% dedicated to the execution of that script, in the sense that nothing else will be running in this period (the application will be stopped).
what can i do to improve performance of that execution? is there any oracle manual online for this type of problem? I do not know if it's possible, but I'm thinking of things like disabling locking mechanism (if possible I could run instead of a process many processes in parallel), disabling index growing (during the process), disabling constraints.
I have a table in which years are stored in the form '2008/2009'. This is making it very difficult for me to do any calculations on that field and so I was wondering if there was a way to change the years (in a query and not in the actual table) so that if the year was '2008/2009' I would have just '2009'.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI created a table of Number(20,4) column. I inserted an amount value 999999999999999.5555 but this value is rounded off to 1000000000000000.0000 automatically in Oracle. How to avoid this? I tried for less number of digits and I am getting the exact value. Is there any way to get the exact value without changing the datatype?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am struggling with the ORA_ROWSCN pseudocolumn. (Oracle version is 11g). I am aware that without ROWDEPENDANCIES set on the tables, the SCN of a row is in reality that of the block in which the row is resides. The problem I am seeing goes something like this:
1) A datapump import creates a large table (400M+ rows) at 11 am in the morning
2) No subsequent changes are made to this table (at least that I know of)
3) Despite no changes being made the ORA_ROWSCN of almost all the rows changes every few minutes. (a few rows remain with SCN's indicating the original time of import, but the rest change)
I detect this behavior by running this query:
SELECT ora_rowscn, SCN_TO_TIMESTAMP(ora_rowscn),COUNT(*)
FROM test_table GROUP BY ora_rowscn
This ran around 5.15 am on 10/27 and resulted in:
72353518 27-OCT-12 05.17.21.000000000 AM 492009391
67515248 26-OCT-2 11.01.45.000000000 AM 370
Note that almost all rows have a very recent SCN. Only a tiny portion of the rows (370) have an SCN consistent with when the import completed. If I rerun the query a bit later, the SCN of the large rowcount will have advanced again.Block size on the database is 8192.