I need to do a PL/SQL program that prints the same that this WITH clause query, without using WITH or CONNECT BY, i was thinking about a solution with cursors?
WITH recursiveBOM
(assembly_id, assembly_name, parent_assembly) AS
(SELECT parent.assembly_id,
parent.assembly_name,
parent.parent_assembly
FROM bill_of_materials parent
[code].....
I have the following table structure...............
Main_Head table name
main_head_id ,pk
head_desc,
head_id ,
sub_head_id
keys
col table ref col
sub_head_id main_head head_id
the table is recursive table self join
-----------------------------------------
now i want to write the query which return all head_desc which have same head_id
I have this SQL select to give me all the nodes of a tree starting at a particular node:
SELECT tree.node_id, LEVEL depth_level
FROM tree_of_nodes nodes
START WITH nodes.node_id = 1000
CONNECT BY PRIOR nodes.node_id = nodes.parent_id
I need to update a column called dept_level, which is essentially the same as Oracle's LEVEL. Something like this statement is what I need, but obviously this statement doesn't work:
update tree_of_nodes
set depth_level = LEVEL
START WITH nodes.node_id = 1000
CONNECT BY PRIOR nodes.node_id = nodes.parent_id
I've tried inline views and other approaches and have not found a method that works.
To use dynatree (URL] I want the result to be in the xml form.but the result is not what I want.
SELECT
XMLELEMENT("div",xmlattributes('tree' AS "id"),
(SELECT DBMS_XMLGEN.getXMLType(
DBMS_XMLGEN.newContextFromHierarchy('
SELECT LEVEL,
case
when CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF = 0 then
[code]....
We are on oracle 10.2.0.4 on solaris 10. My question is on a sql query. Is it possible to rewrite a query to avoid the connect by and prior constructs and use joins? For example i have the following query:
SELECT empno,
ename,
job,
mgr,
hiredate
FROM emp
START WITH empno in (7566,7698)
CONNECT BY PRIOR empno = mgr
How can it be rewritten using a two table join (self join)? I am not sure if it can be done and whether it is possible.
I have a table:
create table FIELDS
(
FIELD_NAME VARCHAR2(30) not null,
PRG_FIELD NUMBER not null,
LENGTH NUMBER
);
with
INSERT INTO FIELDS VALUES('FIELD1', 1, 3);
INSERT INTO FIELDS VALUES('FIELD2', 2, 3);
INSERT INTO FIELDS VALUES('FIELD3', 3, 4);
INSERT INTO FIELDS VALUES('FIELD4', 4, 2);
INSERT INTO FIELDS VALUES('FIELD5', 5, 1);
I need to insert in a table:
create table STUFF
(
FIELD_NAME VARCHAR2(30) not null,
FSTART NUMBER not null,
LENGTH NUMBER
);
And the output I want is:
INSERT INTO STUFF VALUES('FIELD1',0,3);
INSERT INTO STUFF VALUES('FIELD2',3,3);
INSERT INTO STUFF VALUES('FIELD3',6,4);
INSERT INTO STUFF VALUES('FIELD4',10,2);
INSERT INTO STUFF VALUES('FIELD5',12,1);
So each field starts where the previous (ordered by PRG_FIELD asc) ends.
I think the query should use both lag and connect by but I haven't had any luck writing it. The problem is that all the examples I've seen around, using connect by prior, utilize 2 fields with different names, es connect by prior emp_id = mgr_id. Instead I should do something like connect by prior prg_field = prg_field-1 but that doesn't seem to work.
PS: I don't necessarily need to do this, I have a guy manually writing the inserts, this is just an exercise I would like to figure out
I am working on the quality center oracle database to write a query that fetches all steps of a test case including the ones having calls to tests. Structure of table is explained below. I've made up an example and attached it as an image to this post. This image also has the expected result of the query I want to write.
Table Name: STEPS (This table contains steps belonging to tests. Some steps are simply calls/links to other tests)
Columns:
STEP_ID (primary key - integer)
STEP_NAME (char)
STEP_DESC (char)
ORDER (integer)
TEST_ID (reference to table TEST.test_id)
[code].......
Referring to the example (see attached image), I'm looking to write a query that gives me all steps (including steps from called tests) of the test - "Empty trash from mailbox" in the correct order.
To start with I can write the following query to get steps of the test - "Empty trash from mailbox".
SELECT * FROM steps WHERE test_id = (SELECT test_id FROM test WHERE test_name = 'Empty trash from mailbox')
We have an requirement to create xml data for entire database (selected tables) which are in hierarchy.Procedure should read node_mapping table having parent and child tables relationship info and build XML Select statement.
Currently it is building SQL statement whenthere are one parent having multiple childrens i.e Dept having emp, emp_act, emp_rsch..but when child node are having childrens then it is not working - it has to repeatedly call this procedure (recursive) and build below given SQL statement.
1. To change procedure to build xml sql statement when there are multiple childrens to child nodes (hierarchy)
2. To format the output in xml data
We are using ORACLE 11G and WINDOWS 7
CREATE TABLE node_mapping
(
NODE_ID NUMBER(5) PRIMARY KEY,
PARENT_NODE VARCHAR2(100),
CHILD_NODE VARCHAR2(100),
PARENT_NODEID VARCHAR2(50),
CHILD_NODEID VARCHAR2(50)
[code]....
How can we overcome recursive triggers in oracle SQL?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI need to use Recursive Subquery Factoring for a project of mine, specifically I need to use some code I have found in a function.
[URL]
The code I have so far is this:
create or replace
function recursive
(
pattern in raw
, solution in raw
) return number as
[code]....
But when trying to compile it in Oracle SQL Developer, I get the following two errors:
Error(9,1): PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
Error(10,30): PL/SQL: ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
The errors refer to these two lines:
with x( s, ind ) as
( select sud, instr( sud, '' '' )
I have looked over and over the code again, and I do not see any missing parenthesis. Furthermore I tried using with in a smaller test function:
create or replace function test
(
p in number
)
return number as
v number;
begin
with t(a) as
[code]....
Which compiles just fine, so I'm not sure why that line is being ignored in this function. The whole idea here is to replace the sudoku string in the function with a variable that I built from the two parameters.
I am using Oracle 10g Database as back end and Developer 6i as front end.I have a procedure which is called upon SAVE. Means before COMMIT;This procedure holds few updates and delete statments.
This prcedure is throughing sql error as follows: ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level
The error occur when an delete statment is issued which as follows: DELETE FROM DUMMY_TAB001;
I issue the same statement from SQL it is running fine. But when my from runs on this delete statment encounter it through the above oracle error ORA-00604.
In MS Windows, if I copy a file and paste it into the same folder, I get a copy with the text 'Copy of' in front of the file name. If I paste it again, I get another copy with a different version number.
E.g.
sqlnet.log
Copy of sqlnet.log
Copy (1) of sqlnet.log
Copy (2) of sqlnet.log
I was wondering if I could copy existing rows into a table and do the same thing?
So, for example if I had this table:
create table tst_srch (srch_is varchar(100), user_name varchar(100), srch_name varchar(100));
insert into tst_srch values (1,'USER1','SRCHA');
insert into tst_srch values (2,'USER1','SRCHB');
insert into tst_srch values (3,'USER1','SRCHC');
insert into tst_srch values (4,'USER1','SRCHD');
insert into tst_srch values (5,'USER2','SRCHC');
insert into tst_srch values (6,'USER2','SRCHD');
insert into tst_srch values (7,'USER2','SRCHD_1');
Could I write a procedure like copy_searches('USER1','USER2') that would copy all USER1's searches to USER2 - including renaming any duplicates.
So it would create these new rows:
8,USER2,SRCHA
9,USER2,SRCHB
10,USER2,SRCHC_1
11,USER2,SRCHD_2
I've looked at various insert statements, merge and match statements and exception handling in procedures .
Ive just tried running a simple
update BASIC set 'column name' = NULL
Which works fine if i specify a where clause that returns a low amount of values, but im trying to run this update for the whole column (1000's or records).
Ive had no experience of this error before and am unsure of where to start, ive had a quick read around but see something of removing triggers?
The full error is :
ORA-00036: maximum number of recursive SQL levels (50) exceeded
ORA-06512: at "new.su_Table", line 61
I'm trying to drop a user but it gives me below error message-
SQL> drop user <username> cascade;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-24005: must use DBMS_AQADM.DROP_QUEUE_TABLE to drop queue tables
However when i check from dba_queue_tables or user_queue_tables it doest show any queue tables.
Oracle Version :- 11.2.0.2 I found a error in a trigger(Statement Level) ORA-00604:error occurred at recursive SQL level string. Before Finding this issue,Once the DB Response was slow . Will this be the issue Of DB Slow response. The Above trigger fires for each entry in an transaction table. The code is Patched and was executed . The above issue was found during another issue and not the DB Slow response. My Doubt is Whether DB response slow issue would be because of this. Now after fixing this Slow response was not reported.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI have getting error will insert into table i.e
i have a trigger as below
create or replace trigger INS_ERRORS
before insert on MIG_STG_ERRORS
for each ROW
declare
V VARCHAR2(22);
[code]........
when i insert into MIG_STG_ERRORS getting error message like 00036. 00000 - "maximum number of recursive SQL levels (%s) exceeded"
*Cause: An attempt was made to go more than the specified number of recursive SQL levels.
*Action: Remove the recursive SQL, possibly a recursive trigger.
When trying deploy an mapping, the database link get this error:
ORA-06550: PACKAGE BODY, line 0, column 0:
ORA-04052: error occurred when looking up remote object db1.someC@db1@LOC_db
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-12170: TNS:Connect timeout occurred
I can use tnsping towards the db. I can use
elect * from v$instance@db1@loc_db
From front end the user will enter VACANCY_ID in the label box and once he saves that transaction, in background VACANCY_CD filed(sequence) willautomatically generated
.below is my code:{code}create table tmp1(vac_id number,vac_cd number);create sequence tmp1_seq MINVALUE 1 MAXVALUE 9999999999999999999999999999 INCREMENT BY 1 START WITH 1 CACHE 20 NOORDER NOCYCLE ;select tmp1_seq.nextval from dual; ---initiating seqselect tmp1_seq.currval from dual; --checking the current val--trigger creationCREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRIGGER1 AFTER INSERT ON TMP1 FOR EACH ROW DECLARE seqval
[code]...
Error: ORA-00036: maximum number of recursive SQL levels (50) exceededORA-00036: maximum number of recursive SQL levels (50) exceeded
I have inherited a query that union alls 2 select statements, I added a further field to one of the select statements ( a date field). However I need to add another dummy field to the 2nd select statement so the union query marries up I have tried to do this by simply adding a
select
'date_on'
to add a field called date on populated by 'date_on' (the name of the column in the first query)
however when I run the union query i get the error Ora-01790 expression must have same datatype as corresponding expression.
I have a dynamic query stored in a function that returns a customized SQL statement depending on the environment it is running in. I would like to create a Materialized View that uses this dynamic query.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have data in a table and another in XML file,I used SQL query to retrive the data placed on the table, and link this query with XML query that retrieves the data stored in the xml file. The data stored in the table and xml file sharing a key field, but the xml contents are less than what in the table.I want to show only the data shared between the two queries, how can I do that?
e.g.:
Table emp:
e_id | e_name | e_sal
023 | John | 6000
143 | Tom | 9000
876 | Chi | 4000
987 | Alen | 7800
XML File
<e_id>
143
876
So, I want the output to be:
e_id | e_name | e_sal | e_fee
143 | Tom | 9000 | 300
876 | Chi | 4000 | 100
I am looking to simplify the below query,
DELETE FROM A WHERE A1 IN (SELECT ID FROM B WHERE BID=0) OR A2 IN (SELECT ID FROM B WHERE BID=0)
Since both the inner queries are same,I want to extract out to a local variable and then use it.
Say,
Array var = SELECT ID FROM B WHERE BID=0;
And then ,
DELETE FROM A WHERE A1 IN (var) OR A2 IN (var)
How to do this using SQLPLUS?
I have the following four tables with the following structures Table A
ColA1 ColA2 ColA3 ColA4 ColA5 AA 100 CC DD EE
Table B
ColB1 ColB2 ColB3 ColB4 ColB5 AA 100 40452 A9 CDE
when these two tables were joined like the following:
Select colA1,ColA2, ColA3, ColA4, ColB3,ColB4, ColB5 from table A Left outer join (select ColB3, ColB4, ColB5 from table B where colB3 = (select max(colB3) from table B ) on (colA1 = colB1 and ColA2 = col B2)
Now i have to join the next table C with table B
Table C structure is
ColD1 ColD2 ColD3 Desc1 A9 Executive Desc1 A7 Engineer
I have the common column such as ColD2 and colB4 to get the Col D3
how do i join the existing query + join between table b and table c?
how to achieve F11(Query mode) and Execute Query in Oracle Forms?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a query that is pulling back more rows when I use the dblink than when I hit the linked database directly.
For example:
select
x,y,z
from
mytable@dblink
returns 788,324 rows
while
select
x,y,z
from
mytable
returns 712,102 rows
It's the exact same query, with the only difference being the dblink. It's not pulling the data into a cursor or array, it's a simple, straightforward query on a remote database.
Is there a technique to getting a Top-N query to work as a sub-select in a larger query -or- is there another way to generate Top-N like results that works as a sub-select?
Background:
We have a large query that is being used to build an export from a legacy HR system to a new one. Amount the data needed in the export is the employees primary phone number.
The legacy HR system allows multiple phone numbers to be stored in a simple table structure:
SELECT emp_id, phone_type, phone_number
FROM employee_phones
emp_idphone_typephone_number
------- --------------- -------------------
46021CELL2222222222
46021HOME1111111111
46021WORK3333333333
The new HR system does allow for multiple phone numbers, however they need a primary phone number identified and stored with the employee master information. (Subsequent phone numbers get stored in alternate table.)
From a business perspective, we have decided that if they have a HOME phone in the legacy system that should be the primary in the new system, if no HOME phone, then WORK, if no WORK then CELL.
That can be represented as:
SELECT *
FROM employee_people_phones
WHERE emp_id = '46021'
ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')
emp_idphone_typephone_number
------- --------------- -------------------
46021HOME1111111111
46021WORK2222222222
46021CELL3333333333
Or similarly with Top N concept:
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT *
FROM employee_people_phones
WHERE emp_id = '46021'
ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results
WHERE ROWNUM = 1
emp_idphone_typephone_number
------- --------------- -------------------
46021HOME1111111111
Or really what I want in my export:
SELECT phone_number
FROM (SELECT phone_number
FROM employee_people_phones
WHERE emp_id = '46021'
ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results
WHERE ROWNUM = 1
phone_number
-------------------
1111111111
However, when the Top-N query is added as a sub-select in a larger query using the employee id from the larger query (WHERE emp_id = export.emp_id), it fails saying that �export.emp_id� is not a valid id.
(SELECT phone_number
FROM (SELECT phone_number
FROM employee_people_phones
WHERE emp_id = export.emp_id
ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results
WHERE ROWNUM = 1)
1.Any way around this? Is it possible to put a Top-N (with a WHERE clause using data from the main query) in a sub-select?
2.Any alternatives (other than Top-N) to delivering a ROWNUM=1 result with a �custom� ORDER BY statement?
Other Notes: Yes, we know we could do two queries in the data conversion first deliver the bulk data to the target table, and then update with the phone numbers. However, for multiple reasons, that is less than desirable.
I am having a Select query(below Query1) and I want to use one column(sum(col4)) from this Select query to be displayed in another Select query(Query 2). how to display this.
Query 1 :-
select a.col1,a.col2,b.col3,sum(b.col4)
from tab a, tab b
where a.key1=b.key1 and a.key2=b.key2
group by a.col1,a.col2,b.col3
Query 2 :-
select a.col1,a.col2,b.col3,sum(b.col6)
from tab a, tab b
where a.key1=b.key1 and a.key2=b.key2
group by a.col1,a.col2,b.col3,b.col5
This query is written in inner join, can any one try to write using sub query.
SELECT B.CNO
FROM CUSTEN A
INNER JOIN ORDS B
ON A.CNO = B.CNO
AND A.PRNO = B.PRNO
[Code]...
I have the folloiwng two queries:
Query_1: select count(*) yy from table1;
Query_2: select count(*) zz from table2;
I need to compute the following:
var:=(yy/zz)*100
How can I achieve this in a single query?
I have a a table like with columns ( date_field, client_id(c_id), transaction_id(trx_id), mobile, amount )
table example data like
date_fieldc_idtrx_idmobileamount
24-JAN-1215100100120111111100100
24-JAN-1217100100220111111112150
24-JAN-1215100100320111111113100
24-JAN-1216100100420111111114200
24-JAN-1215100100520111111115100
24-JAN-1216100100620111111116100
24-JAN-1218100100720111111117100
24-JAN-1216100100820111111118100
24-JAN-1215100100920111111119200
24-JAN-1216100101020111111110100
24-JAN-1215100101120111111111100
24-JAN-1216100101220111111112100
24-JAN-1215100101320111111113100
Now using the unique index (Trx_id) I need to get max 3 records for each client (c_id).
Expecting result should be
date_fieldc_idtrx_idmobileamount
24-JAN-1217100100220111111112150
24-JAN-1218100100720111111117100
24-JAN-1216100100820111111118100
24-JAN-1216100101020111111110100
24-JAN-1216100101220111111112100
24-JAN-1215100100920111111119200
24-JAN-1215100101120111111111100
24-JAN-1215100101320111111113100