I need to select a count of records where a field (call it widget) is the same, so i need all records where widgets are distinct. So it would be like asking for a distinct in a where clause. Not having much SQL experience this is a difficulty for me.
lets see .. so a count of records where widget = widget or something along those lines.
I'm trying to leave out results of a query that match certain conditions, basically I'm looking at two tables that each have a status field. If the status of both is equal to zero then I want the result to be left out of the search results. I'm struggling with the logic though. In the where clause I've tried:
(ACCO.STATUS != '0' AND CCO.STATUS != '0')
this, however, omits everything where the status combination isn't 1 and 1. I've also tried:
(
(ACCO.STATUS = '1' AND CCO.STATUS = '1') OR
(ACCO.STATUS = '1' AND CCO.STATUS = '0') OR
(ACCO.STATUS = '0' AND CCO.STATUS = '1')
)
but this does not work either.
I have a SQL statement that returns a set of columns...but...when I create table as <SQL statement> I get the same columns but with 2 of the columns containing each others data, e.g:
SQL Select:
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4
___________________________________
AND10200000017805CG-4CG-3
Create Table as <SQL Select>:
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4
___________________________________
AND10200000017805CG-3CG-4
The SQL Select is correct and the Create Table As <SQL Select> is wrong.
Here is my SQL:
Create table ALTERNATENUMBERS as
SELECT ctry,
id,
MAX(DECODE(tp,'EN', RN)) EN,
MAX(DECODE(tp,'RN', RN)) RN,
MAX(DECODE(tp,'AN', RN)) AN
[code]....
Unfortunately I cannot give you any data (too much of it) and small scale testing works, it's only when I run it on the 11million records do I get some (not all), just some of the data being mixed up between columns.
Now, I've tried:
1. Using SQLPLus - no joy
2. Creating the Table and then inserting the data into a blank table - also no joy
3. Using a VIEW - no joy, listagg doesn't work in VIEW tables
I do understand that without data it's hard to replicate the issue but why this statement works as a SELECT but when written to a table has data anomolies?
We are running on Oracle 10g. The following script results in ORA-00928: missing SELECT keyword. what causes this error? Both 'select' statements when run by themselves, complete successfully.
[code]WITH A1 AS WITH A1 AS ( SELECT MIN (VAPS_RPT_INTV_DMSN.INTV_DT), VAPS_RPT_INTV_DMSN.RPT_ID, VAPS_RPT_INTV_DMSN.RPT_INTV_ID FROM APS.VAPS_RPT_INTV_DMSN, APS.VAPS_RPT_CL_INTV_DMSN WHERE APS.VAPS_RPT_INTV_DMSN.RPT_INTV_ID =
[code]./..
we have a strange symptom in a database Oracle 11.2.0.2 EE. Following question comes from our application developers.
The following SQL statement:
SELECT
v.reporting_month,
sum(v.f_s) "REV_S",
sum(v.f_f) "REV_F",
sum(v.f_c) "REV_C",
[code].......
gives different result when we exchange the index ksr_valid_until_i on table kreditkarten_sets_rs. For some reasons we changed the index from bitmap to normal and are getting different results. Switching back gives us the same results as before. When we avoid the usage of this index in the statement than we are getting the same results as when we are using the normal index.
SQL> desc res;
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
RESULT PUBLIC.XMLTYPE
SQL> select * from res;
RESULT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<fine No="2"><stdNo>2</stdNo><value>300</value><reason>breaks keyboard</reason><
date>2011-10-03</date></fine>
how can me write results of select statement into xml file instead of show them on screen?
I'm working on a Oracle Database, and I'm gettin incorrect results when including a date field in the select list which is NULL in the table.
This works correctly and returns exactly one row:
SELECT firstField FROM table WHERE firstField = 'value'
while this doesn't and returns no rows:
SELECT firstField, secondField FROM table WHERE firstField = 'value'
Where secondField is of type date and its value is NULL (00-000-00). Note that the only thing that changes is the select list.
I need to generate a select query in runtime and store the results of it into a file.Each time the column name and table name in the query will differ.Now im able to generate the select query through for cursor but problem is to store the results to the file.I tried using plsql table,im able to get the values to that table and store the results to a file,but the results of the query is more then 10000 lines (it might increase also)where only 4000 characters where able to store in the plsql table.so rest of them are not stored in the file.
View 3 Replies View RelatedTable A
Id Country city
1 US
2 US Boston
3 Boston
4 US Newyork
5 London
6 Japan Tokyo
Im looking for a query which returns results based on both city and country passed.
If i pass country US and city Boston it should return row2 with US and Boston row
If i pass country null and city Boston it should return row3
If i pass country UK and city Boston it should return row3
If i pass country UK and city London it should return row5
i.e. If country/city combination exists in DB return that row Else city row should be returned.
there are some data in the table que_history (seqnbr is the key), e.g.
SEQNBR DN SL_TIME
20070927003668 (024)2272 AD182040 2007-9-27 15:15:00
20070928001343 (024)2272 AD182040 2007-9-28 9:55:14
20070928001624 (024)2272 AD182040 2007-9-28 10:30:06
20070928000910 (024)25672 AD000002 2007-9-28 9:06:59
20070928001288 (024)25672 AD000002 2007-9-28 9:49:13
20070923003834 (024)2585 AD210076 2007-9-23 17:15:13
20070923003890 (024)2585 AD210076 2007-9-23 17:23:54
20071001001593 (024)2589 AD000018 2007-10-1 11:54:39
20071003002814 (024)2589 AD000018 2007-10-3 16:53:52
20070923003320 (024)8831 AD000110 2007-9-23 15:24:39
I wanted to use this SQL to get the records ( dn is the same and the sl_time's interval is 600minutes) .
select A.* from que_history A,que_history B
where A.dn=B.dn and A.seqnbr<>B.seqnbr
and (A.sl_time-B.sl_time)*24*60 between -600 and 600
order by A.dn;
but the result is not the right.
select the rows from a table with the same particular field in PL/SQL. Actually I don't want to write two loops one inserted into another.
View 7 Replies View RelatedOracle 11.2.0.3 on Linux.
I need to execute this insert as select:
INSERT INTO TAB1 (SQL_ID,SQL_FULLTEXT)
SELECT DISTINCT t.sql_id, t.sql_text FROM DBA_HIST_SQLTEXT;
But I get this error:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got clob
This is TAB1:
SQL_ID VARCHAR2(13)
SQL_FULLTEXT CLOB Y
SQL_CUSTOM_HASH VARCHAR2(60) Y
Should I user dbms_lob package? Is so, I do not understand how.
I am using 10g.
I want to do a select statement that will give me the name of the fields in a table. And I also want to know the field type and field size.
Can this be done?
I want to create a SELECT, that shall give back only a special amount of rows, depending on the sum of one of the selected fields.
At first a code sample of the complete selection:
SELECT DISTINCT mnr, ktxt,
(SELECT Sum(meng_4)FROM reldb d1 WHERE d1.mnr=d.mnr)qty
FROM reldb d
WHERE mnr IN (SELECT mnr FROM relac WHERE Lower(rlnr) NOT LIKE 'platte geprägt%')
AND saext='M'
ORDER BY qty DESC,ktxt;
This selection produces some lines of output (in my case i.e. like 300). What I want to see is only that much lines that the condition 'sum of all items listed below meng_4<=sum of all items meng_4 of the whole selection * 0.9' is fulfilled.
So, if the whole selection produces a total of 10000 as sum for all items meng_4, I want to see only that amount of rows that sums a total of at least 9000 for all items meng_4.
I hope, this specification is exactly enough to understand my intent.
1. Can I do this in a query?
2. If yes, what would this query look like?
I have an Oracle 10g database, on the App Serv I have an image file that has 20,000 .jpg files that has an id number as each image name.I have successfully queryed the image file and posted one image to my web page matching the image id number.
sample:
select substr(spriden_last_name,1,20)||', '||
substr(spriden_first_name,1,20)||' '||
substr(spriden_mi,1,1) stname,
'<img src = "/images/&1..JPG" width="400" height="400"/>' pic
from spriden
where spriden_id = '&1'
/
the &1 is the matching id number that is input from the user.My task now is to select multiple images using a department field in the spriden table to pull the needed id numbers.I have not been successful in the proper format to pass the id number to the <img src field.
Even though i am using COL1 CHAR(500) NULLIF COL1=BLANKS, then also i am getting same error for those columns.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI have a table where i need to update one field values based on another field of the same table , simply as it is.I have done this using one select all check box , on clicking that all check boxes of item_trans table will get selected , then i will un select some of check box and then using one button, i will update the value of the fields which are checked only.
I have put the sample code but when i am updating its taking long time and hanging.I am also attaching the form based on the test case provided.
--tables with insert statement
create table item_trans (trans_item varchar2(12),trans_qty number,trans_act_qty number)
insert into item_trans(TRANS_ITEM,TRANS_QTY,TRANS_ACT_QTY) VALUES ('TREE1',40,NULL);
insert into item_trans(TRANS_ITEM,TRANS_QTY,TRANS_ACT_QTY) VALUES ('TREE2',20,NULL);
insert into item_trans(TRANS_ITEM,TRANS_QTY,TRANS_ACT_QTY) VALUES ('TREE3',20,NULL);
--i want to set the value of trans_Act_qty as trans_qty
--i create one dummy or test block to keep the select all check box. for that table test script is
CREATE TABLE TEST
(
C VARCHAR2(2000 BYTE),
B NUMBER,
A NUMBER
);
insert into test (C,B,A) values ('A',1,1);
--code written in select all check box which is created on test.block.
BEGIN
GO_BLOCK('item_trans');
FIRST_RECORD;
LOOP
:M_END_YN := :M_END_ALL;
[code].......
--code written in M_END_YN ( actual check boxes where i will uncheck).
IF :M_END_YN = 'N' THEN
:M_END_ALL := 'N';
END IF;
--code written on button to update those values which are checked.
BEGIN
GO_BLOCK('item_trans');
FIRST_RECORD;
LOOP
IF :M_END_YN = 'Y' THEN
[code]......
I am New to Apex. Im using Apex Version 4.2.
I have a tab named APPROPRIATIONS it has 10 fields. Among which is PROJECT NUMBER, AUTHORIZAION DATE (CALENDER TYPE POPUP), And FUNDS CHECK FLAG.
The Scenario is depending upon PROJECT NUMBER the Fields are Populated including FUNDS CHECK FLAG .
But the AUTHORIZAION DATE is a MANDATORY field has to be filled by User
The Requirement is to make AUTHORIZAION DATE as MANDATORY only when the FUNDS CHECK FLAG is *"BLANK "* or *“Y”*
If the FUNDS CHECK FLAG is *“N”* then the AUTHORIZAION DATE to be made OPTIONAL.
I need to update a field with the 1st 9 characters of another field in the same record.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a table called Customer_Type with following fields
Customer_type ,Active_date, Inactive_date
regular,11/01/2011
daily,11/04/2011
monthly,11/05/2011/11/11/2011
Tbale 2:Customer
Customer_name,Customer_type,Customer_Inactive_date
John,regular,
James,monthly,
Jake,daily,
Jill,monthly
What i wnat is to update the Customer_inactive_date with the Incative_date field from Customer_type based on their Customer_type... So james and Jill would have their rows updated in this scneario ..How can i achive this in pl/Sql
I have teh code using merge function..I want something in traditional old fashion..
The sql statements are below
CREATE TABLE CUSTOMER_TYPE
(
type_code VARCHAR2(10),
[Code]....
i have a query where i am using the max function to find the most recent record. What i want to do is use that query as part of an insert statement into a different table, however, i don't want to insert the column that i used the max function on. Is there anyway to use the max function without having the column it is being used on showing in the results?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am getting duplicate results..I have been at it for hours now.This is what I have:
DECLARE
v_course_id classes.course_id%TYPE := :course_id;
v_instr_id classes.instr_id%TYPE := :instructor_id;
[code]...
The output I get is this (There is only 1 of each in the database)
Class ID: 1 Status: Enrolled Name: John O'Reilly
Class ID: 1 Status: Enrolled Name: Natacha Hansen
Class ID: 1 Status: Enrolled Name: Reed Jetto
Class ID: 1 Status: Enrolled Name: Janis Greenberg
Class ID: 1 Status: Enrolled Name: Vishal Singh
Class ID: 1 Status: Enrolled Name: Francis Hamilton
[code] ...
I am testing a supposedly very simple stored procedure in XE. It compiles with no errors but when I enter the following command in the SQL Command window I get an ORA-00911: invalid character.
call get_all_customer_orgs;
The get_all_customer_orgs procedure is defined as.
create or replace procedure get_all_customer_orgs (p_recordset out sys_refcursor)
is
begin
open p_recordset for
select * from customerorgs;
end get_all_customer_orgs;
I don't understand what the invalid character could be.
Is there anyway to pivot the results of a query?
so if i have:
SELECT GROUP, count(*)
FROM GROUP
GROUP BY GROUP
And it give the following output:
A 10
B 50
c 24
Is there anyway to put into this format?
A B C
10 50 24
I am doubting that there is and that i am going to have to handle this in my code later, but it never hurts to ask!
I would like to give back to the our application user a page of results for a given query along with the total result count, something like: "Showing 1-25 of 650 total results".
Currently I am doing this by submitting a second query:
select count(*) from (<previous query criteria>)
Is there a better performing approach I could be using?
I am trying to create a query that displays the given error message if the result of my COUNT(*) is smaller than 1, but displays the result of my first query (data) if the total count is bigger than 1 (read: the query found data, so it needs to display the rows according to the search).
What do I need to do to display 'data' if 'data2' contains rows?
WITH data
AS (SELECT a.order_id, a.session_id, a.log_id, b.date_of_order, a.operation,
b.funct_prod_code, b.sts_status_code, b.ost_order_situation_code, c.order_situation_oms,
[Code]....
Result are different after adding the Order By clause in below query.
Query
select sum(wpsv1.primary_qty) detail_qty,
wpsv1.from_subinventory subinventory,
wdd.revision revision,
[Code]....
SELECT
pas_code,
pas_profile,
count(sutp_id),
sum(sutp_price),
[code]...
And the problem is, that when i use sutp_price_proc and pbk_price in grouping, it splits my results by those rows. If i delete them from grouping, sql gives me error about not a single grouping in line 1.
pas_codepas_profilesutp_idsutp_pricex
2664good stuff310069< because pbk_price is like 67 from that period
2664good stuff310071< because pbk_price is like 50 from other period
how to get all results in a single line like:
pas_codepas_profilesutp_idsutp_pricex
2664good stuff6200140
My table structure is like this
CREATE TABLE Tab1(LVL1_NM VARCHAR2(20), LVL2_NM VARCHAR2(20), LVL3_NM VARCHAR2(20), LVL4_NM VARCHAR2(20))
and the values will be for one value of LVL1_NM there will be different LVL2_NM values like wise for each and every value of LVL2_NM column there will different values in LVL3_NM column like wise for LVL4_NM is there any way to get the results as per their relation ships.
I have this table,
Create table TBL_OK_HIST
(
DATE_KEY NUMBER,
A_N VARCHAR2(22 BYTE),
R_DUR VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
CH_DUR VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
REV VARCHAR2(20 BYTE)
)
insert into TBL_OK_HIST
values (20101010,123456768,5,20,2);
insert into TBL_OK_HIST
values (20101010,123496568,15,20,2);
insert into TBL_OK_HIST
values (20101012,122235768,25,25,3);
[Code] ......
Thus, applying the following would yeld:
Select * from TBL_OK_HIST
DATE_KEYA_N R_DUR CH_DUR REV
201010101234567685202
2010101012349656815202
2010101212223576825253
201010112345676819202
2010101234567681252527
2010101323456768136365
2010101056768123411202
2010101134681256717202
2010101068123456755559
generate the following results:
range_start_rdur range_end_rdur no_of_an sum_of_rdur sum_of_chdur sum_of_rev
1 5 1 5 20 2
6 10 1 9 20 2
11 15 2 26 40 4
16 20 1 17 20 2
21 25 1 25 25 3
26 30 0 0 0 0
31 35 0 0 0 0
36 40 1 36 36 5
41 45 0 0 0 0
46 50 0 0 0 0
51 55 2 107 107 16
I thought I would make use of the following query, but I am not getting the proper results when applying it to a real table with more than 20 mln records:
SELECT trunc(R_DUR/6)*5+1 as range_start_rdur,
trunc(R_DUR/6)*5+5 range_end_rdur,
sum(noofan) as no_of_an,
sum(sumofrdur) as sum_of_rdur,
sum(sumofchdur) as sum_of_chdur,
[Code] ...........