I have a situation as follows.
Table1 has 10 columns as col1,col2,col3,col4,...col10
Table2 has 5 columns as col1,col2,...col5.
col3 and col4 are common in both tables.I am trying to get common records from both tables.How can I get them.
I am using this query:
Select
t1.col1 as A,
t2.col1 as B,
t3.col1 as C,
t4.col1 as D
[Code]...
with this above query i am getting result like this:
A B C D
2 null 2 null
6 6 null 6
8 null null null
However i need the result like this:
A B C D
6 6 null 6
Note:
I am looking for common value that presents in most of these 4 tables for different t1.col2 values like 'E','G','K',...etc. I cant use the NOT NULL condition in the where clause,since i need to check for different values in t1.col2,for each of this there may be null value in any of the 4 tables.
i am having two sql query which i have made union of it but i need group by common.
select
distinct ac.CUSTOMER_NAME cust_name,
ac.CUSTOMER_NUMBER cust_no,
ps.CUSTOMER_SITE_USE_ID,
raa_ship_ps.PARTY_SITE_NAME loc,
sum(days_30.AMOUNT_DUE_REMAINING) D_30,
[code]........
Is there any function avaialble in SQL that can return the highest common factor among a bunch of numbers. For example
10,20,25 have a highest common factor of 5.
I have a one column table that store lists of elements :
create table test_table (c1 VARCHAR2(4000));
insert into test_table values ('1,23');
insert into test_table values ('1,2');
insert into test_table values ('3,4,5');
[code]...
The output column would be something like that:
output_column
1,2,7,23
6,9,0
3,4,5
I'm grouping columns that have at least one element in common.
(1,23) and (1,2) merge into : (1,2,23)
(1,2,23) and (7,2) merge into : (1,2,7,23) --> Output
(6,9) and (9,0) merge into : (6,9,0) --> Output
(3,4,5) and (5,5) merge into : (3,5,5) --> Output
I have made this logic using only PL/SQL, with loops and nested tables using function memberof, but I suppose that there is a way to improve the performance using only SQL.
My database as well as application on linux. I want to execute this command on linux. I need equivalent code.
host('cmd /c E:data empITC1'.bat');
code of ITC1.bat is
echo off
sqlldr userid=user_name/pass@database control=E:data empITC1.ctl log=E:data emplogITC1.log
echo ........
control file as well as bat file exist in respective folders.
what is the most common mode in dataguard? maximize protection or maximize availability or maximize performance
View 6 Replies View Relatedcreate table call(id number(15) primary key, calling_no varchar2(15), called_no varchar2(15), calldate date, calltime timestamp, duration number(10) ,calltype varchar2(10)); 1. CALL DETAILS OF 9891826547insert into call (id,calling_no,called_no,calldate,calltime,duration,calltype) values (1, 9891826547, 9891210785, to_date('01-Jun-13','dd-Mon-yy'), to_date('19:12:00','hh24:mi:ss'),10,'OUT'); insert into call (id,calling_no,called_no,calldate,calltime,duration,calltype) values (2,9891826547, 9899985476, to_date('01-Jun-13','dd-Mon-yy'), to_date('22:10:12','hh24:mi:ss'),50,'OUT'); insert into call (id,calling_no,called_no,calldate,calltime,duration,calltype) values (3, 9891826547, 9818415767, to_date('02-Jun-13','dd-
[code]...
query to find out common data from 2 columns in two different tables??
View 6 Replies View Relatedi have to give 74 privileges from different users on different tables to one common user,how can i do this?
View 7 Replies View RelatedIn oracle 11g windows8 - OS
Suppose, there is a package p1 with proc A, Proc B and Func C.Now when any of the package proc or func gets invoked from a stored proc G then a common code which reads the cols of table xyz should be executed. How to do that?
I want to compare two tables , and delete the common rows from the first table
Here is what i have done :
Create table test1(Test1C1 Number,
Test1C2 varchar2(50));
Create table test2(Test2C1 Number,
Test2C2 varchar2(50));
Insert into test1 values(1,'testdata1');
Insert into test1 values(2,'testdata2');
Insert into test1 values(3,'testdata3');
[code].......
it deletes all the records from Table test1. What should I modify here ? or should I write a different query ?
The desired contents in table test1 will be
2 testdata2
4 testdata4
6 testdata6
8 testdata8
10 testdata10
Currently if i let required field empty, then APEX puts systematic error message "XXX must have some value." near the field and into the page header. I want to create custom business rule, that would show message for example "This action cannot be performed, because this and that...".
That kind of custom validation should be in my plSql package and somehow it should throw/send the phrase "This action cannot be performed, because this and that..." to the page header where was message "XXX must have some value.".
How can i create such custom error message to appear out using PlSql package function that i define myself? I plan to create a common validation package, which has lots of plsql functions to validate lot of APEX pages/forms, all those functions should throw/send somehow error messages to page header. I looked that this unofficial solution does not suit for me:
[URL].......
Because it disables APEX systematic automatic validations as i understand, and is unofficial.
while trying to open an exisitng Form, an Error message appears as:
PDE-PLI011 A tools common schema table is missing from the object store.
and failed to open. what's the problem ? what i have to do ? it was working fine before.
I am trying to update records in the target table based on the records coming in from source. For instance, if the incoming record is present in the target table I would update them in the target else I would simply insert. I have over one million records in my source while my target has 46 million records. The target table is partitioned based on calendar key. I implement this whole logic using Informatica. Looking at the informatica session log I find that the informatica code is perfectly fine but its in the update part it takes long time (more than 5 days to update one million records). find the TARGET TABLE query and the UPDATE query as below.
TARGET TABLE:
CREATE TABLE OPERATIONS.DENIAL_REGRET_FACT
(
CALENDAR_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL,
DAY_TIME_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL,
SITE_KEY NUMBER NOT NULL,
RESERVATION_AGENT_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL,
LOSS_CODE VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL,
PROP_ID VARCHAR2(5) NOT NULL,
[code].....
I have written the following PL/SQL procedure to delete the records and count the number of records has been deleted.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE Del_emp IS
del_records NUMBER:=0;
BEGIN
DELETE
FROM candidate c
WHERE empid in
(select c.empid
from employee e,
candidate c
where e.empid = c.empid
and e.emp_stat = 'TERMINATED'
);
[code]....
I am running a query in our Clarity PPM database to return a list of all Support projects. This returns a simple list of project code and project name:
The query has the project resource tables associated with it, so I am able to list all resources allocated to the project. But for now i am only selecting a DISTINCT list of projects.
Query for anyone interested:
Select distinct
Project_code,
project_name
from
niku.nbi_project_current_facts nbip,
niku.odf_ca_project cst,
niku.prtask t,
[code]........
I have a separate query which returns a list of support resources.
select res.full_name, res.unique_name , dep.description
from niku.srm_resources res,
niku.pac_mnt_resources pac,
niku.departments dep
where res.unique_name = pac.resource_code
and pac.departcode = dep.departcode
and res.is_active = 1
and description like 'IMS%'
and UPPER(dep.description) like '%SUP%'
What I need to be able to do in the first query, is return only projects that do NOT have a resource that appears in the resource list in the second query.
(the res.unique_name field in the second query can be linked to the same in the first query)
Logically, the process would be:
1. Identify Support Project
2. Identify Resources allocated to the project team
3. Compare with List of Support Resources
4. If any Resources in that list do NOT appear on the project, then return project.
In Oracle database pl/sql 11.2: describe the differences between :
records,
tables, and
tables of records.
I am working on the below query:-
SELECT adv_list.advisor_code advisor_code,
adv_list.available_wip, tot_score from(
SELECT advisor.advisor_code advisor_code ,
(wip.wip_limit - SUM (DECODE
(lead_status, 'F1', 1,0)))
available_wip,advisor.tot_score
[Code]...
The below query returns :-
Advisor_code Tot_Score
------------- ---------
00015946 10
00026742 10
00081276 10
00540272 5
My requirement is to get only those records that have the max(Tot_Score).
So I should get:-
Advisor_code Tot_Score
------------- ---------
00015946 10
00026742 10
00081276 10
I am trying to put MAX(TOT_SCORE) in the select list but its not giving the desied result.
I do not want to give it in the where clause as I will have to gain put the whole subquery again.
wherein I can get the MAX tot_score records only with minimum coding.
Type Specification :
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE ArrayCounterSum AS OBJECT
(
-- AUTHOR : CLIVE.GREGORY
-- CREATED : 03-04-2010 14:44:02 14:44:02
-- Modified : S. Glass - Removed read function to increase performance
[code]...
Type Body :
TYPE BODY ArrayCounterSum AS
2
3
4
5
[code]...
So the output will be : 6_10_15_13_14 (Sum of all rows and return as an array)My Goal is to AVG the ROWS and retrun it into array. so what change should I make in above code in order to get the AVG of all records.
I have a table that contains history for vehicle positions. In order to find the latest positions quickly, I've included a LATEST column that is 1 if the record is the latest position and 0 otherwise. The table is maintained via a stored procedure. The procedure first sets the latest record for the vehicle to history...
UPDATE vehicle_positions SET latest = 0 WHERE vehicle_id = <vehicle ID> AND latest = 1
It then inserts the new latest record...
INSERT INTO vehicle_positions (vehicle_id, longitude, latitude, insert_time, latest) VALUES (<vehicle_id>, <x pos>, <y pos>, SYSDATE, 1)
Is it possible for me to end up with 2 latest records?Consider this scenario...
Session #1: UPDATE vehicle_positions SET latest = 0 WHERE vehicle_id = 123 AND latest = 1
Session #2: UPDATE vehicle_positions SET latest = 0 WHERE vehicle_id = 123 AND latest = 1
Session #1: INSERT INTO vehicle_positions (vehicle_id, longitude, latitude, insert_time, latest) VALUES (123, 32.8533, -117.1180, SYSDATE, 1)
Session #2: INSERT INTO vehicle_positions (vehicle_id, longitude, latitude, insert_time, latest) VALUES (123, 32.8534, -117.1178, SYSDATE, 1)
I'd end up with 2 latest records. How can I protect against this? I considered using SELECT FOR UPDATE, but seems like there are too many negatives going that route
oracle version: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
CREATE TABLE MACHINE_M (
IDVARCHAR(20)NOT NULL,
NAMEVARCHAR(20)
)
[Code]....
Now when there records in READING_DWR are 1 lakh, i am getting the o/p in 10 sec.
However when there are bulk records, it is taking 3 to 4 min.
Is there any way to improve my query performance?
I just loaded the 10g client EM on my Windows workstation to connect to our 10g database.Everything works great except I dont see any place where I can edit records. I have to use SQL Plus to edit records but was hoping to use a GUI like I had with 9i client OEM.Before we had 10g, I used to have the 9i OEM and it let me edit records in 9i OEM where I could add, delete and update records with a user friendly interface.
how I can edit records in 10g EM?
how to retrive alternate records from the table in the answer table the first row wil be in upper case and the second row wil be in lower case ...like wise wat is the querry
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have the following sample data:
Sample Data
WITH DATA AS
(
SELECT '100' GRP, '01-JAN-2012' EFFECTIVE_DATE, '30-JUN-2012' TERMINATION_DATE from DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '100' GRP, '01-JUL-2012' EFFECTIVE_DATE, '31-JUL-2012' FROM DUAL
union all
[code]......
Query Result
10001-JAN-201230-JUN-2012
10001-JUL-201231-JUL-2012
10031-JUL-201205-AUG-2012
10001-AUG-201215-AUG-2012
10017-AUG-201231-AUG-2012
Expected Output
10031-JUL-201205-AUG-2012
10017-AUG-201231-AUG-2012
The above mentioned output is produced by using the following business rules:
-- row no 1 = Valid records
-- row no 2 = effective date is 1 day after termination date of row no 1. Means valid records
-- row no 3 = effective date is equal to the row no 2 termination date -- Means invalid record
-- row no 4 = effective date is 1 day after termination date of row no 2 Means valid records
-- row no 5 = The gap between row no 4 termination date and row no 5 effective date is more than 1 day. Means record is invalid.
Query always compare effective date with previous valid record termination date by using the above mentioned condition and return result accordingly.
Summary is that there should be 1 day gap between termination date and next effective date as well as effective date
is always less than termination date in same rows. In addition, if record is invalid then next record check with previous valid record termination date.
i have a one table with name as sms_tbl having one field name as sms_text and it contains text messages like
sample_text:Welcome to I-Care, your TPA for your<Insurer> health policy Your ID no is <I-Care ID>
in above text i need to insert records from two tables in the place of <Insurer> and <I-Care ID>.
where <Insurer> and <I-Care ID> records are in two different tables
where i have mapping for this records and there is no mapping for sms_tbl and how to insert these two records in above sample_text
How to create any constraints other than NOT NULL in PLSQL RECORD.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have been doing some code in collection for testing. I have been doing the below but getting the error.
SQL> desc t_mine;
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------------------- --------
OWNER NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
OBJECT_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_start_time PLS_INTEGER := DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
3 v_elapsed PLS_INTEGER;
4 type allobjects_record is record
5 (owner varchar2(1000)
[code].......
ERROR at line 15:
ORA-06550: line 15, column 15:
PL/SQL: ORA-00947: not enough values
ORA-06550: line 15, column 3:
PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
I followed the below link
[URL].......
I need to find the most recent rows (top 10) in a table... I have about 300 tables so the fields are different, is there a way to generically find it?
View 17 Replies View RelatedI have a table zTEST with several products and ID's. Now I want to exclude all products which are in table zTEST_EXCL and have ID's up to ID+2. The Result is then in table zTEST_RESULT.
What is the smartest way to do this?
create table zTEST
( PRODUCT number,
ID number);
insert into zTEST (PRODUCT, ID) values ( 1 , 1 );
insert into zTEST (PRODUCT, ID) values ( 1 , 2 );
insert into zTEST (PRODUCT, ID) values ( 1 , 3 );
insert into zTEST (PRODUCT, ID) values ( 1 , 4 );
[Code]...