i am having two sql query which i have made union of it but i need group by common.
select
distinct ac.CUSTOMER_NAME cust_name,
ac.CUSTOMER_NUMBER cust_no,
ps.CUSTOMER_SITE_USE_ID,
raa_ship_ps.PARTY_SITE_NAME loc,
sum(days_30.AMOUNT_DUE_REMAINING) D_30,
[code]........
I've got function with combined sql statement (union all), how do I split it into two sql requests? This is to avoid time increasing of sql executing. IMHO good solution is to write two functions, how do you think?
FUNCTION f_LintOVRDUAH
(mydate date,
cid number )
[Code]....
Is anyway to create function based index for group function columns.
For example
select max(timestamp),min(age),averge(sal).... ... .. from tab;
Am running the below query and getting the error below :
ORA-00934: group function is not allowed here
SELECT CONTRNO,
SUBNO AS USER_CODE,
TOTAL_POINTS AS AMOUNT,
STARTDATE + 30 AS DATE_F,
'SUB' USER_TYPE
[Code]....
I want to use Analytical function instead of group by clause for below query..
select
CASE
WHEN ADMT.SOURCESYSTEM ='CLU'
THEN COUNT(ADMT.TOTAL_COUNT)*5
ELSE COUNT(ADMT.TOTAL_COUNT)
END TOTAL_COUNT
from ESMARTABC.ABC_DRVR_MFAILS_TMP ADMT
group by ADMT.SOURCESYSTEM
I am trying to use decode funtion with GROUP BY ROLLUP.
MY query is working fine when i use this two queris individually
SELECT SUM(SAL),DEPTNO,JOB FROM EMP GROUP BY ROLLUP ((DEPTNO),(DEPTNO,JOB));
SELECT SUM(SAL),DEPTNO,JOB FROM EMP GROUP BY ROLLUP((JOB),(DEPTNO,JOB));
But when i use Decode funtion so that i can combine above two scenarios it is not working
SELECT SUM(SAL),DEPTNO,JOB FROM EMP GROUP BY ROLLUP ( DECODE(:A,'S',((DEPTNO),(DEPTNO,JOB) ),((JOB),(DEPTNO,JOB) ) ) )
I have a table like below:
COLUMN TYPE
USER_ID VARCHAR2 (10 Byte)
PROCESS_ID VARCHAR2 (30 Byte)
END_TIME DATE(STAMP)
TO_LOC VARCHAR2 (12 Byte)
TO_LOC_TYPE VARCHAR2 (15 Byte)
FROM_LOC VARCHAR2 (12 Byte)
ITEM_ID VARCHAR2 (25 Byte)
CASES NUMBER (12,4)
LMS_UDA1 VARCHAR2 (250 Byte)
ZONE VARCHAR2 (2 Byte)
I only want get one record with all columns, only have one clause MAX(END_TIME) But the other column have difference value. when i use MAX(END_TIME) and GROUP BY USER_ID,PROCESS_ID,CASES,... the sql didnot give one record, It give many records
I am having the following pivot query but I am not able to run it is giving error msg
ORA-00937: not a single-group group function
SELECT DISTINCT
C.SHORT_NAME,
MAX (
COUNT (DECODE (TO_CHAR (a.reg_date_cur, 'MON'), 'JAN', A.CAR_NO))
[code]...
i want to select columns of 3 tables in such a way that period column should be in the group by function.
create view allocated_budgets_detail as
select ba.ba_fin_year, ba.ba_start_date, ba.ba_end_date, ba.ba_rev_no,
bh.bh_budget_code,
bd.bd_period,
bb.bb_entered_amount
from budget_header bh, budget_allocation ba, budget_distribution bd, budget_balance bb
where bh.bh_budget_id = ba.ba_budget_id
and ba.ba_line_id = bd.bd_budget_line_id
and ba.ba_line_id = bb.bb_budget_line_id
group by bd.bd_period
I have 2 tables used in this problem: ODETAILS and ORDERS.
ODETAILS has the following columns: ONO, PNO, QTY, COST
ORDERS has the following columns: ONO, CNO, ENO, RECEIVED, SHIPPED, ORDER_COST
UPDATE ORDERS
SET ORDER_COST= 1 * ( select SUM(
SELECT COST
FROM ODETAILS
WHERE ORDERS.PNO=ODETAILS.PNO
)
);
In ODETAILS there can be more than 1 row for 1 order. So I'm trying to add all the COSTs in ODETAILS.
Is it better to use UNION (or) UNION ALL with DISTINCT,Which one will improve performance.
Query1:
SELECT deptno FROM emp
UNION
SELECT deptno FROM dept
Query2:
SELECT DISTINCT * FROM(SELECT deptno FROM emp
UNION ALL
SELECT deptno FROM dept)
I mean to say query1 is better (or) query2 is better,which query improves the performance.
I am using this query:
Select
t1.col1 as A,
t2.col1 as B,
t3.col1 as C,
t4.col1 as D
[Code]...
with this above query i am getting result like this:
A B C D
2 null 2 null
6 6 null 6
8 null null null
However i need the result like this:
A B C D
6 6 null 6
Note:
I am looking for common value that presents in most of these 4 tables for different t1.col2 values like 'E','G','K',...etc. I cant use the NOT NULL condition in the where clause,since i need to check for different values in t1.col2,for each of this there may be null value in any of the 4 tables.
I have a situation as follows.
Table1 has 10 columns as col1,col2,col3,col4,...col10
Table2 has 5 columns as col1,col2,...col5.
col3 and col4 are common in both tables.I am trying to get common records from both tables.How can I get them.
Is there any function avaialble in SQL that can return the highest common factor among a bunch of numbers. For example
10,20,25 have a highest common factor of 5.
I have a one column table that store lists of elements :
create table test_table (c1 VARCHAR2(4000));
insert into test_table values ('1,23');
insert into test_table values ('1,2');
insert into test_table values ('3,4,5');
[code]...
The output column would be something like that:
output_column
1,2,7,23
6,9,0
3,4,5
I'm grouping columns that have at least one element in common.
(1,23) and (1,2) merge into : (1,2,23)
(1,2,23) and (7,2) merge into : (1,2,7,23) --> Output
(6,9) and (9,0) merge into : (6,9,0) --> Output
(3,4,5) and (5,5) merge into : (3,5,5) --> Output
I have made this logic using only PL/SQL, with loops and nested tables using function memberof, but I suppose that there is a way to improve the performance using only SQL.
My database as well as application on linux. I want to execute this command on linux. I need equivalent code.
host('cmd /c E:data empITC1'.bat');
code of ITC1.bat is
echo off
sqlldr userid=user_name/pass@database control=E:data empITC1.ctl log=E:data emplogITC1.log
echo ........
control file as well as bat file exist in respective folders.
what is the most common mode in dataguard? maximize protection or maximize availability or maximize performance
View 6 Replies View Relatedcreate table call(id number(15) primary key, calling_no varchar2(15), called_no varchar2(15), calldate date, calltime timestamp, duration number(10) ,calltype varchar2(10)); 1. CALL DETAILS OF 9891826547insert into call (id,calling_no,called_no,calldate,calltime,duration,calltype) values (1, 9891826547, 9891210785, to_date('01-Jun-13','dd-Mon-yy'), to_date('19:12:00','hh24:mi:ss'),10,'OUT'); insert into call (id,calling_no,called_no,calldate,calltime,duration,calltype) values (2,9891826547, 9899985476, to_date('01-Jun-13','dd-Mon-yy'), to_date('22:10:12','hh24:mi:ss'),50,'OUT'); insert into call (id,calling_no,called_no,calldate,calltime,duration,calltype) values (3, 9891826547, 9818415767, to_date('02-Jun-13','dd-
[code]...
query to find out common data from 2 columns in two different tables??
View 6 Replies View Relatedi have to give 74 privileges from different users on different tables to one common user,how can i do this?
View 7 Replies View RelatedIn oracle 11g windows8 - OS
Suppose, there is a package p1 with proc A, Proc B and Func C.Now when any of the package proc or func gets invoked from a stored proc G then a common code which reads the cols of table xyz should be executed. How to do that?
I want to compare two tables , and delete the common rows from the first table
Here is what i have done :
Create table test1(Test1C1 Number,
Test1C2 varchar2(50));
Create table test2(Test2C1 Number,
Test2C2 varchar2(50));
Insert into test1 values(1,'testdata1');
Insert into test1 values(2,'testdata2');
Insert into test1 values(3,'testdata3');
[code].......
it deletes all the records from Table test1. What should I modify here ? or should I write a different query ?
The desired contents in table test1 will be
2 testdata2
4 testdata4
6 testdata6
8 testdata8
10 testdata10
I'm trying to group sets of data based on time separations between records and then count how many records are in each group.
In the example below, I want to return the count for each group of data, so Group 1=5, Group 2=5 and Group 3=5
SELECT AREA_ID AS "AREA ID",
LOC_ID AS "LOCATION ID",
TEST_DATE AS "DATE",
TEST_TIME AS "TIME"
FROM MON_TEST_MASTER
WHERE AREA_ID =89
AND LOC_ID ='3015'
AND TEST_DATE ='10/19/1994';
[code]....
Group 1 = 8:00:22 to 8:41:22
Group 2 = 11:35:47 to 11:35:47
Group 3 = 15:13:46 to 15:13:46
Keep in mind the times will always change, and sometime go over the one hour mark, but no group will have more then a one hour separation between records.
Currently if i let required field empty, then APEX puts systematic error message "XXX must have some value." near the field and into the page header. I want to create custom business rule, that would show message for example "This action cannot be performed, because this and that...".
That kind of custom validation should be in my plSql package and somehow it should throw/send the phrase "This action cannot be performed, because this and that..." to the page header where was message "XXX must have some value.".
How can i create such custom error message to appear out using PlSql package function that i define myself? I plan to create a common validation package, which has lots of plsql functions to validate lot of APEX pages/forms, all those functions should throw/send somehow error messages to page header. I looked that this unofficial solution does not suit for me:
[URL].......
Because it disables APEX systematic automatic validations as i understand, and is unofficial.
I read that rownum is applied after the selection is made and before "order by". So, in order to get the sum of salaries for all employees in all departments with a row number starting from 1, i wrote :
select ROWNUM,department_id,sum(salary) from employees group by department_id
If i remove rownum, it gives the correct output. Why can't rownum be used here ?
while trying to open an exisitng Form, an Error message appears as:
PDE-PLI011 A tools common schema table is missing from the object store.
and failed to open. what's the problem ? what i have to do ? it was working fine before.
Refer to the txt file to create table and insert data.
I executed the following query-
SELECT priority, detail, COUNT(1) FROM TEST GROUP BY priority, detail
and got the following result-
PRIORITYDETAIL COUNT(1)
StandardPatch 27
StandardInitial TSS 1
StandardInitial development 10
StandardProduction deployment5
High PriorPatch 1
Now I want that Initial TSS and Initial development should be combined as Initial together and I should get the result as follows:
PRIORITYDETAIL COUNT(1)
StandardPatch 27
StandardInitial 11
StandardProduction deployment5
High PriorPatch 1
is there any difference between
- returning from the procedure 2 ref cursors containing result set of 2 queries
- returning from the procedure 1 ref cursor containing result set of that 2 queries as one (with UNION ALL)?
Will 2nd option be faster or similar to 1st?
I have a query which has 5 unions, each clause of the union takes 1 hr to run and query results come back in 5 hrs, Is there any way I can make these clause to run in parallel?
View 13 Replies View RelatedI am facing an issue in union clause
Below is my query Issue faced is that based on union I want to limit the result and does not want second query to give duplicate result as both queries deal with same table
SELECT TAB1.ID, TAB1.CRNCY_CODE, TAB2.SCHEME_CODE, DECODE( 'INFENG',CAST( '' AS VARCHAR(20)),
NVL(TAB2.ALT1_SCHEME_DESC,TAB2.SCHEME_DESC),TAB2.SCHEME_DESC),
TAB1.SUB_HEAD_CODE, DECODE( 'INFENG' ,CAST( '' AS VARCHAR(20)),NVL(TAB1.ALT1_SUB_HEAD_DESC ,
TAB1.SUB_HEAD_DESC),TAB1.SUB_HEAD_DESC)
[code]...
select null ID,null crncy_code,TAB2.SCHEME_CODE ,
NVL(TAB2.ALT1_SCHEME_DESC,TAB2.SCHEME_DESC),TAB2.SCHEME_DESC,null SUB_HEAD_CODE from TAB2 where TAB2.SCHEME_TYPE ='SCHEME1';
[CODE]
