I wrote the function witch returns some information.
function get_cust_info (v_msisdn integer) RETURN sys_refcursor
IS
curs sys_refcursor;
BEGIN
open curs for 'select first_name, last_name, street, town
from the_table where MSISDN = :1' using v_msisdn;
RETURN curs;
end
How to call this function to write result into table? I just want to write function which returns more Varchar.
Is there a way to tell the record count when working with a sys_refcursor?
procedure Login (SSO in varchar2,
UserRole out sys_refcursor) is
begin
begin
open UserRole for
select descr
[code]......
In SQL server the cursor is defined to retrieve row by row and process it. We can fetch records as FIRST, LAST, NEXT, PREVIOUS and SCROLL like that. Can we do the above in oracle. Else what is the use of cursor in Oracle. I know that it is a private area in which the records are processed.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI need to retrieve the records where the involvement is either a person or an organization. Using the code below i receive an error stating that the outer join operator is not allowed in the operand OR:
(( INVOL1.PERSON_IDENTIFIER(+)=ALL_PERSONS.IDENTIFIER )
OR ( INVOL1.OUNIT_IDENTIFIER_INV=INVOL1_ORG.IDENTIFIER(+) ))
If I change it to an and query it will only retrieve the records where there is a person and an organisation as the involvement but I need this option as well as one or the other.
select rownum, CATR_ID, CAT_ID, CATR_REG_COPY, CATR_REG_LABEL, CATR_ACQUIRED_DATE, CATR_REG_DATE, CATR_MEDIA_COMMENTS, CATR_WITH_DIGITAL,
CATR_ORIGINAL, CATR_LINK, CATR_CREATED_BY, CATR_CREATED_DATE, CATR_MODIFIED_BY, CATR_MODIFIED_DATE, CATR_CHECKOUT, Available,
CATR_RETURN_DATE, LOCN_ID, LOCN_SITE, LOCN_LOCATION, MTYPE_GROUP, MTYPE_NAME, ACCESS_LEVEL, DESCRIPTION, CAT_TITLE, CAT_DESCRIPTION,
CATEGORY_ID, CAT_AUTHOR, CAT_PUBLISHED_DATE, CAT_PUBLISHER, CAT_EVAL_RELEVANT_KEYWORDS, CAT_REG_NUMBER, CAT_REG_SUBNUMBER, U_NAME
[Code]..
There are over 1500 records, but this query does not return any row. If i change rownum >= 100 to rownum <= 100 it returns first hundred records though... What is wrong here?
I want Query on this table. EXAMPLE TABLE:
SENDER RECEIVER AMOUNT
A B 1000
B C 2000
A D 3000
C A 3000
B A 4000
A B 5000
A B 1000
B C 2000
C A 3000
B A 4000
A B 5000
A C 10000
Dynamically I am giving user name A. I want to retrieve the data how much money user B taken from user A and how much money user B given to A lly for C and D.
CONDITION: I want to retrieve the records of 2 way transaction that means user A sent money to user B and user B must sent money to user A. I don't want one way transaction records i.e user A sent money to D but user A didn't get money from user D like this records.
OUTPUT LIKE:
USER MONEY_TAKEN_FROM_A MONEY_GIVEN_TO_A
B 12000 8000
C 10000 6000
I need function to pick the record from DB random manner.For example, say we have 500 records and input value to the function is 5 means, it should display the records randomly between 1 to 5
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have to write a file using the UTL_FILE that needs to look like the one below. I am getting the righ results but I am getting duplicates, If I have more than one records retrieve in the Invoice_data_cur cursor(for the same pidm) I got the right results, but I got duplicate data, in another words if I retrieve 3 records from the Invoice_ data_cur, I got the same record write to the file 3 times, but the right results. If I only retrieve 1 record in Invoice_ data_ cur , I only get the results of the in invoice_detail_charges_cur I don't get the results of the invoice_ detail_ payments_ cur:
H xxxxxxxxxxxx
I 00399999 10/02/201000000000005000000000000500Jane Smith
D 00366899 Current charges Fall 201010/02/2010Study Abroad Fee - Semester 0000000001200
D 00366899Current charges Fall 201010/02/2010France School Abroad 0000000011200
[code]....
I am getting data in all the cursors..
I need function to pick the record from DB random manner.
For example
, say we have 500 records and input value to the function is 5 means, it should display the records randomly between 1 to 5
If user inputted value is 10 means, it should display one record between 1 to 10.
I have a following requirement in SQL -
Requirement -
I need to list the purchase Ordrers which are not closed.
my sql query should pull if the PO is not closed in 30,90 and 150 days.
It should be shown only on 3oth,90th and 150th day only even the Purchase order is not closed on 33rd day.
I have a big database, I want to retrieve its records in several tries; first I use "select * from dbname where rownum <1000" but for 2'th try how can I get next 1000 records but not previous records?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi have a doubt in building a query.
I have a table with fields
job_no activity Date
101 anchorage 20/01/2010
102 berthing 25/01/2010
103 sailing 29/01/2010
If i want to know the status of the ship on the date '22/01/2010' It has to show as 'anchorage', becoz on '25/01/2010' only it came to berthing from anchorage. How to write a query to achieve this.
Its a simple query to retrieve data with the Order_ID.If the record is there its fine and can retrieve the data. But my query is to retrieve the list of order_id which has no records in database.
View 12 Replies View Relatedi want to retrieve records of empno from SCOTT.EMP talbe in form but without data block wizard using ..how .. and what logic will be in coding
DECLARE
TYPE EROC IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2(200) INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
E1 EROC;
NO_EMPNOVARCHAR2(2000);
[code]....
just caling here EMPNO and :v_empno is fields on form...
I have created one global temporary table in which I inserted 2 rows.
I am fetching the rows by using following cursor :
declare
cursor c1 is
select TTD_TRV_MODE
from global_tra_trv_dtl;
v_trv_mode varchar2(10);
Begin
open c1;
[code]....
But instead of 2 rows , 3 rows are getting fetched.
I wrote the following block :
set serveroutput on
declare
rec employees%rowtype;
cur SYS_REFCURSOR;
begin
open cur for 'select * from employees where rownum<:a' using 4;
for i in cur
[code]....
It gave errors if we execute is as such, but worked when I commented out the for loop and instead de-commented the simple loop. Does that mean that FOR cannot be used to loop through the records of a ref cursor ?
I have to optimize a batch job which returns > 1 lakh records . I have a commit limit being passed . I am planning to divide the cursor records for processing as follows. If the cursor suppose returns 1000 rows and the commit limit passed is 200 , then i want to fetch 200 records first , bulk collect them into associative arrays and then bulk insert into target table.
After this is done, i will fetch the next 200 records from the cursor and repeat the processing. I would like to know how i can divide the cursor records, and fetch "limit" number of records at a time and also be able to go to the next 200 recs of the cursor next time.
After opening a dynamic cursor, usually fetch hit record into some variables. However, if I do not want to "FETCH INTO " operate Just only skip this record.
DECLARE
TYPE weak_cur_type IS REF CURSOR;
weak_cur_1 weak_cur_type;
weak_cur_2 weak_cur_type;
vs_dsql VARCHAR2(2048);
vd_create_time DATE;
vn_count NUMBER(8);
vn_total_amount NUMBER(13);
[Code]...
/* Formatted on 22/01/2013 19:32:50 */
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test_rdm_miles (
p_ref_cursor OUT SYS_REFCURSOR
p_success NUMBER)
IS
BEGIN
OPEN p_ref_cursor FOR
SELECT 5168 mem_uid,
[code]....
I have a Procedure with out parameters as a REF CURSOR and response message as p_success.This ref cursor will be returned to the calling service. Is there a way in oracle by which we can identify whether the Ref cursor holds data without actually fetching it. Since if i choose to fetch the data, i will lose one row when i return the ref cursor back to the calling service Or else is there way i can retrieve the row i lose during fetch.
Other alternative what have been suggested is create an object type ,fetch the ref cursor values in object type. Then i can use the ref cursor to return the data by table casting.
one more solution is
OPEN
FETCH
CLOSE
OPEN (AGAIN) { this will lead to redundancy)
I am having a table with 4 columns as mentioned below
For a particular prod the value greater less than 5 should be rounded to 5 and value greater than 5 should be rounded to 10. And the rounded quantity should be adjusted with in a product starting with order by of rank with in a prod else leave it
Table1
Col1prodvalue1rank
1A21
2A62
3A53
4B61
5B32
6B73
7C41
8C22
9C13
10C74
Output
Col1prodvalue1rank
1A51
2A52
3A33
4B101
5B02
6B63
7C51
8C52
9C03
10C44
I have taken all the records in to a cursor. Once after rounding the request of 1st rank and adjusting the values of next rank is done. Trying to round the value for 2nd rank as done for 1st rank. Its not taking the recently updated value(i,e adjusted value in rounding of 1st rank).
This is because of using a cursor having a value which is of old value. Is there any way to handle such scenario's where cursor records gets dynamically updated when a table record is updated.
i have a ref cursor and i have used 'open cursor for' statement:
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE aepuser.pkg_test
AS
TYPE cur1 IS REF CURSOR;
PROCEDURE get_empdetails (p_empno NUMBER, io_cur OUT cur1);
END;
[code]...
then i want to know that- will oracle automatically deallocate the memory occupied by records in cursor area?if yes, then when it will be free , in case of 'open cursor for' ?
I'm dealing with an ORA-1000 error in a Pro*C application where all the cursors are correctly closed (or so it seems to me).
Here is the code for a simple program which reproduces the problem:
Each cursor is opened in a PL/SQL package:
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE emp_demo_pkg AS
TYPE emp_cur_type IS REF CURSOR;
PROCEDURE open_cur(curs IN OUT emp_cur_type, dept_num IN NUMBER);
END emp_demo_pkg;
[Code]....
While testing the initialization parameter open_cursors is set to 50.
It's my understanding that Oracle doesn't close the cursors until it needs the space for another cursor, which in my test case seems to happen when I enter a value of 50 or bigger for "number of loops". To see how oracle is reusing the cursors, while the test program is running I run SQL*Plus and query v$sesstat for the session that's running the test with the following sentence:
select name, value
from v$sesstat s, v$statname n
where s.statistic# = n.statistic#
and sid = 7
and name like '%cursor%';
Even before I enter a value for number of loops I can see that the session opened 4 cursors and closed 2 of them:
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 4
opened cursors current 2
Entering a value of 5 for number of loops yields
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 11 <----- 7+
opened cursors current 8 <----- 6+
With a value of 30
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 36 <----- 25+ (apparently, Oracle reused at least 5 cursors)
opened cursors current 33 <----- 25+
With a value of 47
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 53 <----- 17+
opened cursors current 50 <----- 17+
Now I reached the upper limit set by the initialization parameter open_cursors.
Entering a value of 48, I get the ORA-1000 error.
ORA-01000: maximum open cursors exceeded
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.EMP_DEMO
Since I open and close the cursor in the same loop iteration, I expect to find in every iterarion 1 explicit cursor and a number of implicit cursors (the PL/SQL call along with the so-called recursive cursors), but I don't expect the sum of all of them to be greater than 50. If my understanding is correct Oracle should be reusing the 50 cursors previously marked as "closeable", not raising the ORA-1000 error.
Is it possible to:
-define a cursor with bind variables
-get a cursor record from these cursor
-and pass the bind variable in the OPEN clause
Did'nt succeed as shown in the example.
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON SIZE 900000;
DECLARE
--works fine
CURSOR c1 IS SELECT * FROM USER_TABLES WHERE rownum<3;
--doesn't work
--CURSOR c1 IS SELECT * FROM USER_TABLES WHERE rownum<:1;
crec c1%rowtype;
BEGIN
--works fine
OPEN c1;
--isn't possible ?
--OPEN c1 USING 3;
[Code]....
just looking around to use the new feature available in oracle 11g to convert the dbms_sql numeric cursor to reference cursor, how to do it?
parse and execute the sql string first with dbms_sql and then convert it to ref cursor?
I want to return ref cursor based on explicit cursors
create table jumbo(id number, name varchar2(20));
insert into jumbo values(1,'jumbo');
create table mumbo(id number, name varchar2(20));
insert into mumbo values(1,'mumbo');
commit;
[Code].....
The above procedure has compilation errors when I am trying to open ref cursor
LINE/COL ERROR
-------- --------------------------------------------------------
20/24 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
20/38 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
32/24 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
32/38 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
SQL>
Can i user exist when cursor will using For Cursor .
View 15 Replies View RelatedI am trying to update records in the target table based on the records coming in from source. For instance, if the incoming record is present in the target table I would update them in the target else I would simply insert. I have over one million records in my source while my target has 46 million records. The target table is partitioned based on calendar key. I implement this whole logic using Informatica. Looking at the informatica session log I find that the informatica code is perfectly fine but its in the update part it takes long time (more than 5 days to update one million records). find the TARGET TABLE query and the UPDATE query as below.
TARGET TABLE:
CREATE TABLE OPERATIONS.DENIAL_REGRET_FACT
(
CALENDAR_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL,
DAY_TIME_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL,
SITE_KEY NUMBER NOT NULL,
RESERVATION_AGENT_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL,
LOSS_CODE VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL,
PROP_ID VARCHAR2(5) NOT NULL,
[code].....
I have written the following PL/SQL procedure to delete the records and count the number of records has been deleted.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE Del_emp IS
del_records NUMBER:=0;
BEGIN
DELETE
FROM candidate c
WHERE empid in
(select c.empid
from employee e,
candidate c
where e.empid = c.empid
and e.emp_stat = 'TERMINATED'
);
[code]....
I am running a query in our Clarity PPM database to return a list of all Support projects. This returns a simple list of project code and project name:
The query has the project resource tables associated with it, so I am able to list all resources allocated to the project. But for now i am only selecting a DISTINCT list of projects.
Query for anyone interested:
Select distinct
Project_code,
project_name
from
niku.nbi_project_current_facts nbip,
niku.odf_ca_project cst,
niku.prtask t,
[code]........
I have a separate query which returns a list of support resources.
select res.full_name, res.unique_name , dep.description
from niku.srm_resources res,
niku.pac_mnt_resources pac,
niku.departments dep
where res.unique_name = pac.resource_code
and pac.departcode = dep.departcode
and res.is_active = 1
and description like 'IMS%'
and UPPER(dep.description) like '%SUP%'
What I need to be able to do in the first query, is return only projects that do NOT have a resource that appears in the resource list in the second query.
(the res.unique_name field in the second query can be linked to the same in the first query)
Logically, the process would be:
1. Identify Support Project
2. Identify Resources allocated to the project team
3. Compare with List of Support Resources
4. If any Resources in that list do NOT appear on the project, then return project.
I have googled so much but unable to find the explanation how the following query work.
SELECT * FROM EMP a WHERE 2 = (SELECT COUNT(rowid) FROM EMP b WHERE b.rowid <= a.rowid);