SQL & PL/SQL :: Required Expected Output Using Decode

Apr 2, 2012

Oracle version : Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod

create table plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh (dry_run_fic_id number,ltr_code varchar2(10),
next_cpn_lvl_id1 number,next_intrvl_code varchar2(10), next_intrvl_value varchar2(120));

begin
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424740,'1','','LTML','48000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424736,'1','','LTML','32000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424738,'1','','LTML','128000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424783,'1','','LTML','96000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424789,'2','','LTML','96000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424750,'1',198,'LTML','10000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424760,'1',199,'LDFM','20000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424770,'1','','LTML','192000');
end;

commit;

Expected output
---------------
DRY_RUN_FIC_ID LTR_CODE NEW_LTR_CODE
424740 '1' '1b'
424736 '1' '1'
424738 '1' '1'
424783 '1' '1a'
424789 '2' '1a'
424750 '1' '1a'
424760 '1' '1a'
424770 '1' '1a'

Rules
---------
1) First next_cpn_lvl_id1 should be considered (next_intrvl_code can be anything), if next_cpn_lvl_id1 is 198 or 199 then new_ltr_code should have 1a.

2) If next_cpn_lvl_id1 is not 198 or 199, then next_intrvl_code should be considered

a) if next_intrvl_code is LTML and mod of next_intrvl_value and 96000 is zero then new_ltr_code should be 1a
b) if next_intrvl_code is LTML and mod of next_intrvl_value and 48000 is zero then new_ltr_code should be 1b

3) If 1 & 2 are not satisfied, ltr_code should be assigned to new_ltr_code.

View 14 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL & PL/SQL :: Arranging Data In Required Format Using Decode By Hardcoding All Values

Feb 26, 2012

I have a sample table where I am arranging data in required format using 'decode' by hardcoding all values, how can we do same using pivot method, can pivot be only used when we want aggregate values in oracle?Also can't we do what i did, using generic max(decode) with select query, if it were a large table (i don't know which would be pivot column here?) ?

Table is
SQL> CREATE TABLE NOWT
2 (COURSE VARCHAR2(20),MEMBER VARCHAR2(20));
[code]....

how can we do that using pivot in Oracle?

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Use Reg-Exp To Get Required Output?

Mar 11, 2013

Following query is giving me the required output but i want to use reg_exp from same output.

SELECT TO_NUMBER ((SUBSTR (narr,
INSTR (narr, '#') + 1,
(INSTR (narr, 'DT')) - (INSTR (narr, '#') + 1)
) "Bill No"
FROM (SELECT '25 NOS. BILL BOOK FOR FAISALABAD @80/- TH A.R. PRINTER AGST BILL#21 DT:31-01-2013 TH

[code]...

Required Output using Reg_Exp

SQL>/
Bill No
----------
21
9

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Print The Multiple Output Statements In Single Output

Jul 1, 2013

DECLARE
JOBSFILE UTL_FILE.FILE_TYPE;
-- TAKE ALL JOB TITLES FROM JOBS
CURSOR JOBSCUR IS
SELECT *
-- DDOCNAME,DDOCTITLE,DSECURITYGROUP,DDOCAUTHOR,DDOCTYPE,DINDATE,PRIMARYFILE,EXTRACTIONDATE,BATCH_ID
FROM TARGET_UCM ;
[code].......

this is my plsql here to print table values i am using many utl_file.put_line statements is there any way to print all table values in a single utl_file.put_line.

View 2 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Get Expected Results From Pivot?

Jan 31, 2013

with t1 as
(
select 'eff_date' param_name, 'mb256_type' param_type,'01-01-1970' param_value from dual
union all
select 'disc_date' param_name, 'mb256_type' param_type,'31-12-9999' param_value from dual
union all
select 'initial val' param_name, 'mb256_type' param_type,'30' param_value from dual)
select param_name,param_type,param_value from t1;

desired output:

need output in a row in three different columns

param_value
01-01-1970    31-12-9999 30

I tried below query

SELECT *   
FROM   (
with t1 as
(
select 'eff_date' param_name, 'mb256_type' param_type,'01-01-1970' param_value from dual
union all
select 'disc_date' param_name, 'mb256_type' param_type,'31-12-9999' param_value from dual

[code]...

and am getting output as

param_type      eff_date_param_value   disc_date_param_value   initial_ignoring_param_value
mbn256_type    <null>                                 <null>                           <null>

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Rebuild And Move Not Working As Expected

Nov 11, 2011

I ran below query and got the indexes to be rebuild:

SELECT (CASE
WHEN b.partitioned = 'NO'
THEN 'alter index '
|| b.owner
|| '.'
|| b.index_name
|| ' rebuild online; '
--|| b.initial_extent
[code]....

Why the fragmented size is not reducing.

View 14 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: ORA-00923 - FROM Keyword Not Found Where Expected

Nov 11, 2010

I am having some difficulties with this trigger. It keeps giving me the error "ERROR at line 5: PL/SQL: ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected" when I am not even using a SELECT before the line it says the error is on? Here is the trigger that I am attempting to create.

CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER ClassRestraint
BEFORE INSERT ON Enrolled
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
numCourses NUMBER :=0;
myException EXCEPTION;
BEGIN
[code]...

I am getting the error on line 5.

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: ORA-00932 / Inconsistent Datatypes / Expected - Got -

Mar 6, 2012

I have writen PL/SQL packages for data loging through pipe lined function for better peformance.The below packages has been compiled sucessfully but during the run time it shows an error
like "ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got -".

CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE pkg_mkt_hub_load
AS
PROCEDURE sp_final_load_mkt_hub;
FUNCTION fnc_pipe_tot_lvl_idx_mon_hub
(pi_input_cur IN SYS_REFCURSOR)
RETURN tot_lvl_idx_mon_tt
PIPELINED;

[code]...

SHOW ERRORS

Error:

ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got -
ORA-06512: at "GPAIHMKTDTA.PKG_MKT_HUB_LOAD", line 33
ORA-06512: at "GPAIHMKTDTA.PKG_MKT_HUB_LOAD", line 55
ORA-06512: at "GPAIHMKTDTA.PKG_MKT_HUB_LOAD", line 92
ORA-06512: at line 1

types scripts:

create or replace type tot_lvl_idx_mon_ot as object
(SSIA_INDEX_ID VARCHAR2(60),
start_date date,
CURRENCY VARCHAR2(10),
LEVEL1 NUMBER(31,11),
TYPE VARCHAR2(31) ,

[code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

ORA-00923 - FROM Keyword Not Found Where Expected

Jun 23, 2011

I have this script which should find tablespaces and their size, joined with free bytes. Trying to run this gives me the SQL Error: ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected.

I have two questions:

1. Where should the FROM be?

2. Is there something wrong with the join.

==============================================
set linesize 120
col "TOTAL (KB)" format 99999999999999999
col "FREE (KB)" format 9999999999999999
col TSNAME format a35
col "% FREE" format a10;

SELECT a.tablespace_name TSNAME, sum(a.bytes/1024) "TOTAL (KB)",
Sum(b.bytes/1024) "FREE (KB)"
To_char(round((sum(a.bytes/1024)/sum(a.bytes/1024))*100),2), 'FM99990D999999')
|| ' % ' "% FREE"
FROM dba_data_files a, dba_free_space b
Where a.tablespace_name = b.tablespacename
Group by a. tablespace_name
[/i]
=============================================

I used the script from [URL]

It worked great but I'm not sure how to use the arithmetic functions to show me MB instead of bytes.

View 1 Replies View Related

ORA-00923 / FROM Keyword Not Found Where Expected

Jun 29, 2007

The following syntax gives me the error:

ORA-00923: FROM key word not found where expected

if this is so, why use 'from' in TRIM function? Or is my syntax incorrect?

SYNTAX: select trim leading ('0' from (substr(to_char(polref_nbr),9,10))) "TRIM example" from tbl_vg_adhoc;

View 2 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: ORA-00923 - FROM Keyword Not Found Where Expected

Aug 29, 2012

I am trying to compile this block for updating a record. In the P_ADD_LOV_SQL column, I have to update the following select statment, but when ever I am compiling it it shows error in the Select statement as : ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected. rearrange the select statement so that it doesn't show the error.The coding is :

DECLARE
P_ADD_KEY NUMBER;
P_ADD_CODE VARCHAR2(50);
P_ADD_DESCRIPTION VARCHAR2(75);
P_ADD_MODULE_KEY NUMBER;
P_ADD_PROMPT VARCHAR2(50);
P_ADD_REQUIRED VARCHAR2(1);
P_ADD_FORMAT VARCHAR2(1);
P_ADD_SIZE NUMBER;
[code]....

The column is updated properly. But I can't update by compiling the block.

View 11 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: ORA-00923 / FROM Keyword Not Found Where Expected

May 17, 2013

I want to get the top 10% of salaries in employees table. But I got error:

SQL> select top 10 percent salary
  2  from employees
  3  order by salary desc;

ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected How can I get the top 10% percent?

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Splitting 1 Output Row Into 3 Output Rows

Sep 25, 2013

Currently I have a requirement where I need to create 2 more output rows using each result row.

In my requirement I am populating charges table with types of charges, on each line item of charges, I need to apply 2 types of taxes and populate it along with the charge line item. I will be storing charges in table charges and the 2 taxes to be applied in taxes table respectively. For each row of charges, i need to apply these 2 taxes present in taxes table resulting in 3 rows output.

--Create tables charges
create table charges
(
charge_type varchar2(10) ,
charge number
);

[Code]....

My expected output should be like below:

Item_type amount
-------------------- ----------
charge1 100
Charge1_tax1 10
Charge1_tax2 20
charge2 200
Charge2_tax1 20
Charge2_tax2 40

how I can achieve the expected output using a single sql query

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: ORA-00932 Inconsistent Datatypes - Expected - Got CLOB

Jun 21, 2006

There we have two tables: my_comment and sys_comment.And field comment_desc in table my_comment is CLOB, and in table sys_comment is VARCHAR.

And I can run following two SQL successsfully:
SELECT comment_desc FROM my_comment;
SELECT TO_CLOB(comment_desc) FROM sys_comment;

But when I do UNION of them, execute following SQL:

SELECT comment_desc FROM my_comment
UNION
SELECT TO_CLOB(comment_desc) FROM sys_comment;

Error occurs:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got CLOB

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Failed - ORA-00932 / Inconsistent Datatypes / Expected - Got -

Aug 19, 2013

I am fetching more than one column data from a table repetedly(By different query string each time) through ref cursor using concatenate function successfully. But I can see if one concatenate function is getting missed due to human intervention, it's causing failure for entaire process and returning oracle exception as "Failed - ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got -".

View 3 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Sample Function Returns Many Times Of Expected Value

Nov 30, 2012

The SAMPLE clause in the select statement works well in most cases, but we found in some instances the result is way off - between 200% to 700% discrepancy has been observed.

For example, we have thee tables with the following results:

Table1: 495,365,317 rows (20 cols, unique primary key present), SAMPLE ( 0.002018712182064212 ) returns 41,499 (about four times off - we expected about 10,000)
Table2: 3,350,864,539 rows ( 5 cols, unique primary key present), SAMPLE ( 0.00029843044634040336 ) returns 9,835 (this is good as it is close to 10,000)
Table3: 6,974,724,543 rows ( 5 cols, no unique primary key present), SAMPLE ( 0.00014337483779250091 ) returns 58,789 (about six times off - we expected about 10,000)

The tables got billions of rows, and that is why we want to do sampling. The sample percentage rate is computed to return about 10,000 rows in all three tables.On Table3, we ran the sampling three times in one occasion, and we got "58,570", "24,575" and "24,561"

I expected +/- 20% of variance, but 200% to 700% seems to be way too much.Once again, I stress that it does work well in most cases (another 3.4 billion table and numerous smaller tables we tested were well within +/- 5 percent of the target).I noted the presence of a primary key above because I read an article saying that the SAMPLE function relies on the existence of a primary key (which does not quite explain the examples above).Is this kind of spread something we should expect or is it a bug? Is the sampling rate too small for such large tables?

View 2 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: ORA-00932 / Inconsistent Datatypes / Expected NUMBER Got -

Dec 26, 2012

I am using below query for collect

select account_id_N,collect(connection_id_v) from My_test_table group by account_id_n;

but its giving me error as below.

ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected NUMBER got -
00932. 00000 - "inconsistent datatypes: expected %s got %s"
*Cause:   
*Action:

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: ORA-00932 Inconsistent Datatypes - Expected NUMBER Got CHAR

Aug 17, 2010

My table looks like this ->
Dp_value
124325
2434
3536
3536

Code is ->
(case when CL.DECIMALPLACES = 0 and CL.FIELDTYPE = 'D' and cl.DATATYPE = 'N'
then trim(dp."Value")*1000
else dp."Value" end) as dp_value,

What I am trying to do ->
From another table cl I want to say if decimal place is 0, fieldtype is decimal (D/C) and datatype is number (N/T)then multiply the number with 1000.

If not then leave it as it is.

When I run my code I get the error:
ORA-00932 : inconsistent datatypes: expected NUMBER got CHAR
for else dp."Value" end)

View 9 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Oracle RDBMS 10g R2 - SQL Performs As Expected When Trace Enabled

Aug 7, 2012

Environment:
Oracle RDBMS 10g R2.
DB OS: HP Itanium

We use Oracle EBS R12.1.2 in our company and one of the analyst reported performance with saving the configuration in Pricing module. The common fix is to gather stats on BOM_EXPLOSIONS table. Recently, when the issue occurred I collected statistics on the table. The performance didnt improve. I went ahead and decided to trace the Oracle form session using the profile 'Initialization SQL Statement - Custom" at user level.

I also monitored the session in OEM 10g grid. The analyst performed the same set of steps and the performance was normal and acceptable. Analyst tried again and performance was matching with the expectation. I cleared the trace profile and analyst tried again. This time analyst had worse performance as the original issue. The issue got fixed later part of the day on its own. This has made me curious and thought to discuss it here.

I have had similar experience with 10g and 11g, when I enable the trace on the issue cannot be reproduced and when trace is off the issue pops back up.

View 2 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Oracle Exchange Partition Feature Not Working As Expected?

Aug 17, 2012

I used the Exchange Partition feature to swap segments between 2 tables- one Partitioned, and one Non-Partitioned. The exchange went well. However, all the data in the partitioned table has gone to the partition which stores the maxbound values.

/** actual table names changed due to client confidentiality issues */

-- Drop the 2 intermediate tables if they already exist

drop table ordered_inv_bkp cascade constraints ;
drop table ordered_inv_t cascade constraints ;
/**

1st create a Non-Partitioned Table from ORDERED_INV and then add the primary key and unique index(s):

*/
create table ordered_inv_bkp as select * from ordered_inv ;
alter table ordered_inv_bkp add constraint ordinvb_pk primary key (ordinv_id) ;
--
create unique index ordinv_scinv_uix on ordered_inv_bkp(
SCP_ID ASC,

[code]....

-- Next, we have to create a partitioned table ORDERED_INV_T with a similar

-- structure as ORDERED_INV.

-- This is a bit tricky, and involves a pl/sql code

declare
l_dt_start DATE;
l_ptn VARCHAR2(50);
cnt PLS_INTEGER;
l_cnt_initial PLS_INTEGER;
ts_name VARCHAR2(50);
l_sql VARCHAR2(10000);
ts_indx VARCHAR2(100);

[code]....

-- Add section to set default values for the intermediate table OL_ORDERED_INV_T

FOR crec_cols IN (
SELECT u.column_name ,u.nullable, u.data_default,u.table_name
FROM USER_TAB_COLUMNS u WHERE
u.table_name ='ORDERED_INV' AND
u.data_default IS NOT NULL )
LOOP

[code]....

-- Next, use exchange partition for actual swipe

-- Between ordered_inv_t and ordered_inv_bkp

-- Analyze both tables : ordered_inv_t and ordered_inv_bkp

BEGIN
DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS(OWNNAME => 'HENRY220', TABNAME => 'ORDERED_INV_T');
DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS(OWNNAME => 'HENRY220', TABNAME =>'ORDERED_INV_BKP');
END;
/
SET TIMING ON;

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Backup & Recovery :: ORA-00314 - Log 3 Of Thread 1 - Expected Sequence 207 Does Not Match 198?

Nov 30, 2011

While starting up my database i am getting this error.by mistake i had moved log files, and after some time again i inserted those log files again into same directory i am getting this error.

View 13 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Parallel Operations Not Executing With Expected Degree

Apr 2, 2012

I am executing a sql statement which is doing FTS in parallel mode The server has 8 cpus and threads_per_cpu is 2

The v$sql shows PX_SERVERS_EXECUTIONS as 8

select PX_SERVERS_EXECUTIONS, sql_text from v$sql where sql_id='0q0nk5117yth2'
8, select /*+ full(a) parallel(a)....

however the px_sessions shows 17 sessions (16 parallel session + 1 parent session (where sid = qcsid) Now in px_sessions, these 16 parallel session are divided in 2 server sets 1 and 2 and values for degree and required degree are 8 and 16 respectively

However, all the time, only 8 sessions which belong to server set = 1, were active though its state was waiting with event "PX Deq Credit: send blkd"

The other session which belong to server set = 2 were never active and always had waint event ='PX Deq: Execution Msg'

what could be the reason that 16 parallel session could not be started though I am the only person using the server, there aren't any batch jobs, dbms_jobs,even archivelogs (not a prod system)?

Note that paralel_max_servers setting is 16

Another issue being the duing start of the query approximately 100-115 blocks were read for the query (checked from longops) however after 60-70% blocks are read the number of blocks read / seconds falls down to 10-20 blocks / second across all parallel sessions.

View 2 Replies View Related

Data Guard :: ORA-00314 / Log 1 Of Thread 1 - Expected Sequence# 77 Doesn't Match 0

Feb 29, 2012

When i open the primary database in my dataguard env,it raise error?

SQL> alter database open;
alter database open
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00314: log 1 of thread 1, expected sequence# 77 doesn't match 0
ORA-00312: online log 1 thread 1: '/u01/app/oracle/oradata/oracl/redo01.log'

View 9 Replies View Related

Recovery Manager (RMAN) :: Duplicate Restoring Older Version Of File Than Expected?

Feb 28, 2013

We are running 11.2.0.3.2.

In my catalog for the "source" database (rman target db), I have the backupsets for a full database backup ended at Feb. 7, 03:43:37. These are online backups. So, there are archived redo logs being generated while it runs and the following archived redo logs finished at Feb. 7, 04:00:24.

We duplicate databases all the time. So, this is not a new concept for us. The one thing that has changed is that we now back up to disk (using the flashback recovery area) and then later on, initiate a backup to tape. Prior to this go-live, we did all of our backups directly to tape. The catalog does not seem confused. It knows it needs to go to tape because it's beyond the retention for disk backups. The only problem is that it is going to the backup prior to the backupset I want, only for a couple of files.

In the past, when all went directly to tape, we would do a set until time 'Feb. 7, 03:43:37' and it would automatically restore the backupset that finished then and apply archived redo logs as necessary to make a consistent copy. Now, if I use the same model, it's going to a backup set from the prior date for 3 particular files. If I change the time to when the archived redo logs ended their backup, 04:00, it still goes back to the day before, but only for 2 files.

I can list a backup of each specific file and see that the file is in the backupset for which I expect RMAN to pull. How can I figure out a date/time to go back to if not using the method of reviewing the catalog entries and timestamps?

View 4 Replies View Related

Required Database 10.2.0.4 For Linux 64 Bit

Oct 8, 2012

We are planning Database Migration From Windows to Linux Using RMAN..We required Oracle database 10.2.0.4 for Linux 64 bit.

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Use Substr To Get Required Result

Jan 7, 2013

i have following table

CREATE TABLE THREAD_SHADES
(
ITM_COD NUMBER NOT NULL,
ITM_DES VARCHAR2(250 BYTE) NOT NULL,
)

[Code]...

Result is

ITM_COD ITM_DES
80064186THREAD TEX-105 SHADE# 7921 (1500 MTRS)
80064187THREAD TEX-40 SHADE#7921 (3000 MTRS)
80114482THREAD TEX 40 SHADE C-8762 1500MTR LOCAL
80130541THREAD TEX-60 SHADE C8676 J&P COAST ASTRA 1000 MTRS

I want a query which should return only Sahde # from above data result must be as

7921
C-8762
C-8762
C8676

View 9 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Passing Required Parameter

Jun 14, 2011

I have a procedure with 20 parameters, acutely it is to update a table and each param represents respective columns in a table. I want to update only few selected columns(random), as of now am passing Null as param values for remaining.

Is there any way to ignore the unnecessary parameters instead of passing NULL value.My Proc call looks like...

Exec MyProce(IN_ID, NULL, NULL, NULL,NULL,NULL,'SOME_VALUE', NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,...);

Or

Exec MyProce(IN_ID, NULL, NULL, NULL,'SOME_VALUE' ,NULL,'SOME_VALUE', NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,...);

View 4 Replies View Related

CPU License Details Required

Aug 23, 2013

In our project we have many instance running with Oracle in one solaris zone. We are in the process of cost reduction so planning to bring the CPU in shared pool and reduce them.

if we can bring all the NUP (Named user Perception) CPU on one shared pool. Will it be cost effective and is there any problems in performing such change.

View 3 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Distinct Preceding Value Required

Sep 12, 2012

Following on from this answered thread: (xmlagg(xmlelement) - Distinct Values Required..Whereby the last poster recommended the use of

RTRIM (
XMLAGG (
XMLELEMENT (
E,
XMLATTRIBUTES (segment1|| ',' AS "Seg")
)
ORDER BY segment1 ASC
).EXTRACT ('./E[not(@Seg = preceding-sibling::E/@Seg)]/@Seg'),
','
)

To get a distinct list of elements. Works great, but I actually need to use the concept of "distinct immediately preceding".

Sample data:

create table xml_test
(emp_number number, seq number)

insert into xml_test values ('12345',1);
insert into xml_test values ('23456',2);
insert into xml_test values ('44323',3);
insert into xml_test values ('12345',4);
[code]....

View 7 Replies View Related

Database Size Required For SOA?

Jun 19, 2012

I will be installing SOA Suite with OSB in Exalogic for testing. It is not for the production environment and very simple application will be used for testing. Database admin asked me what size database would be required but I did not find clear answer in the documentation anywhere.

View 0 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved