I am fetching more than one column data from a table repetedly(By different query string each time) through ref cursor using concatenate function successfully. But I can see if one concatenate function is getting missed due to human intervention, it's causing failure for entaire process and returning oracle exception as "Failed - ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got -".
View 3 RepliesI have writen PL/SQL packages for data loging through pipe lined function for better peformance.The below packages has been compiled sucessfully but during the run time it shows an error
like "ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got -".
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE pkg_mkt_hub_load
AS
PROCEDURE sp_final_load_mkt_hub;
FUNCTION fnc_pipe_tot_lvl_idx_mon_hub
(pi_input_cur IN SYS_REFCURSOR)
RETURN tot_lvl_idx_mon_tt
PIPELINED;
[code]...
SHOW ERRORS
Error:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got -
ORA-06512: at "GPAIHMKTDTA.PKG_MKT_HUB_LOAD", line 33
ORA-06512: at "GPAIHMKTDTA.PKG_MKT_HUB_LOAD", line 55
ORA-06512: at "GPAIHMKTDTA.PKG_MKT_HUB_LOAD", line 92
ORA-06512: at line 1
types scripts:
create or replace type tot_lvl_idx_mon_ot as object
(SSIA_INDEX_ID VARCHAR2(60),
start_date date,
CURRENCY VARCHAR2(10),
LEVEL1 NUMBER(31,11),
TYPE VARCHAR2(31) ,
[code].....
There we have two tables: my_comment and sys_comment.And field comment_desc in table my_comment is CLOB, and in table sys_comment is VARCHAR.
And I can run following two SQL successsfully:
SELECT comment_desc FROM my_comment;
SELECT TO_CLOB(comment_desc) FROM sys_comment;
But when I do UNION of them, execute following SQL:
SELECT comment_desc FROM my_comment
UNION
SELECT TO_CLOB(comment_desc) FROM sys_comment;
Error occurs:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got CLOB
I am using below query for collect
select account_id_N,collect(connection_id_v) from My_test_table group by account_id_n;
but its giving me error as below.
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected NUMBER got -
00932. 00000 - "inconsistent datatypes: expected %s got %s"
*Cause:
*Action:
My table looks like this ->
Dp_value
124325
2434
3536
3536
Code is ->
(case when CL.DECIMALPLACES = 0 and CL.FIELDTYPE = 'D' and cl.DATATYPE = 'N'
then trim(dp."Value")*1000
else dp."Value" end) as dp_value,
What I am trying to do ->
From another table cl I want to say if decimal place is 0, fieldtype is decimal (D/C) and datatype is number (N/T)then multiply the number with 1000.
If not then leave it as it is.
When I run my code I get the error:
ORA-00932 : inconsistent datatypes: expected NUMBER got CHAR
for else dp."Value" end)
I am working on a data migration project where I am extracting data from Oracle8i database and writing it to a Text file using File_UTL utility. In one extract procedure, I need to write a LONG datatype with some VARCHAR2 datatype in extract file. Procedure compiled fine but I am getting the "ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes" error while executing the final procedure to write data to a file.
below the code snipplet. I am trying t write Account_Primarykey, Account_name and it's AText (LONG datatype) together in a extract file:
create or replace procedure FORCE_W_ACCOUNT as
Begin
declare
file_handel UTL_FILE.FILE_TYPE;
[code]...
I am getting this error on a varchar2(30) data column that I am trying to convert to number. I am creating a new view against some tables that house converted legacy data.The table is defined with a line_type column and a line_value columns. The line_type will contain either 'AMT', 'DATE' or 'STR'. The line_value column is defined as varchar2(30). Based on the line_type, that will determine how I format the line_value data. I have created the select for my view to translate this using a case statement:
CASE line_type
when 'AMT' then round(to_number(line_7_value),2) when 'DATE' then to_date(line_7_value, 'YYYY-MM-DD')
ELSE
line_7_value
END
I can't figure out what I am doing incorrectly. It does not like the "When 'AMT'" line, gives me an error of 'inconsistent data type, expected NUMBER, got CHAR". The data in line_7_value is defined as varchar2(30), I attempting to use To_number to convert it to a number, then round the number. I don't know why it says it is 'expecting number'.
I have a PLSQL block as below :
DECLARE
cursor c1 is select /*+ INDEX(NI04.NI_DPR_DEALER IX_DPR_DEALER) */ DEALER_CODE from ni_dpr_dealer where not exists (select null from dealer_processed where ni_dpr_deale
r.DEALER_CODE = dealer_processed.DEALER_CODE);
type cur_type is REF CURSOR;
[code].......
show errors;
I am getting errors as below
Entering
Dealers count ::13236
entering conditions
Dealer name at 1 => HOL202
DECLARE
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got -
ORA-06512: at line 27
I am Having below query which is having total 664 records and for WHERE Clause (accountno ='13987135') it is having 3 records but when i am taking count it is returning 3 at first time and again returning 4 every time from then onwords.
SELECT Count(*) cnt FROM(SELECT rownum rnum,
secno,
positionname,
tradingsymbol,
cusipcum,
businessclientname,
businessclientid,
[code].....
I am receiving two large export files from a vendor, so I have no control over the contents. I need to import these into our database. The two export files are very similar, except the one has slightly differenet columns in it. So, export file 1 may have a table:
COLUMN_A
COLUMN_B
COLUMN_C
The second file may have:
COLUMN_A
COLUMN_B
COLUMN_D
At the destination, I have a table that has:
COLUMN_A
COLUMN_B
COLUMN_C
COLUMN_D
Is there a parameter that would let me interchangably import either (or both) files into this destination table? This is my first attempt at data pump - but I know using import this has caused me issues. Not sure if the same limitations exist? Will the missing columns cause it to fail?
I have a column in a database that contains both numerical and char data. I would like to be able to do two different things (two different queries)
1. divide the numerical data in the column by 10 and leave the char data alone (just return it)
2. detect the numerical data in the column and treat is as a different value so I can run averages & counts on it while disregarding the char data
I'm not at all sure how to do number 2. I thought a CASE statement would work for number 1, but then I realized CASE doesn't like different datatypes:
select
case when '1234' = 'checked' then 'checked'
when '1234' = 'gen.nograde' then 'gen.nograde'
when '1234' = null then null
else '1234'/10 end as "GRADE"
from dual
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected CHAR got NUMBER
00932. 00000 - "inconsistent datatypes: expected %s got %s"
On DB 11.2. I am dynamically building a DB after update trigger that compares old/new column values. I wanted to include a nvl statement in my if conditions as some field values may be blank.
Since I have many different datatypes (varchar,date,number,blob,clob), is there a single nvl comparison I can use that will work against all of these? I was hoping not to have to check the datatype and change my nvl comparison depending on what type it is. i.e.
nvl(x,'1') or nvl(mydate,sysdate)
I want to join two columns, one with a Long and another with a Varchar2.
How to achieve that?
Have table with two columns with datatypes as number and varchar and the values in A column like 1,2,3 AND B column values like a,b,c. Now need to display data in a single column as 1,a,2,b,3,c.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm new to XML to Oracle data integration. I do have clob column that has the XML data and trying to bring it into the Oracle relational tables, as a part of it we are developing PL/SQL procedure that calls this CLOB column, I want to know if we can variablize the data types ( Just like tablename. column name%type) in the select of the XML data:
select v.instrid, v.endtoendid, v.txid, v.cd, v.ccy,
replace(v.intrbksttlmamt,'.',',') as intrbksttlmamt, v.chrgbr, v.bic1, v.nm1, v.adrline11, v.adrline12, v.ctry1, v.iban1,
v.bic2, v.bic3, v.nm2, v.adrline21, v.adrline22, v.ctry2, v.iban2, v.cdtrref, v.addtlrmtinf
from the_data w,
xmltable(xmlnamespaces(default 'urn:iso:std:iso:20022:tech:xsd:pacs.008.001.01'),
[code]....
I do define the data types after every column name , the problem is incase there is change in datatype I do need to manually edit the procedure to change the datatype is there a way I can variablize them something like tablename.columname%type.
I would like to run below query on all tables, however it doesnt work on clob and long datatypes
select * from owner.table_name
minus
select * from owner.table_name@remote_db;
from dba_tables
where owner in ( '....');
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got CLOB
How can I compare the data of clob and long datatypes using dblink ?
We are using Oracle Streams for replication.
Column datatypes in some of the tables on Source and Destination are different (Number on Source and Varchar2 on destination).
Do we have to create any rule or dml handler to handle this or Streams will automatically take care of it?We are oracle 10g.
Below is the sample code working fine in 10g and not working now in 11g.
CREATE OR REPLACE AND RESOLVE JAVA SOURCE NAMED "PSTest" AS
import java.sql.SQLData;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.SQLInput;
import java.sql.SQLOutput;
import java.util.List;
[code]....
we got the below error: ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected an IN argument at position 1 that is an instance of an Oracle type convertible to an instance of a user defined Java class got an Oracle type that could not be converted to a java class
Current Oracle version is Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bit and the version we are upgrading is Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit
with t1 as
(
select 'eff_date' param_name, 'mb256_type' param_type,'01-01-1970' param_value from dual
union all
select 'disc_date' param_name, 'mb256_type' param_type,'31-12-9999' param_value from dual
union all
select 'initial val' param_name, 'mb256_type' param_type,'30' param_value from dual)
select param_name,param_type,param_value from t1;
desired output:
need output in a row in three different columns
param_value
01-01-1970 31-12-9999 30
I tried below query
SELECT *
FROM (
with t1 as
(
select 'eff_date' param_name, 'mb256_type' param_type,'01-01-1970' param_value from dual
union all
select 'disc_date' param_name, 'mb256_type' param_type,'31-12-9999' param_value from dual
[code]...
and am getting output as
param_type eff_date_param_value disc_date_param_value initial_ignoring_param_value
mbn256_type <null> <null> <null>
I ran below query and got the indexes to be rebuild:
SELECT (CASE
WHEN b.partitioned = 'NO'
THEN 'alter index '
|| b.owner
|| '.'
|| b.index_name
|| ' rebuild online; '
--|| b.initial_extent
[code]....
Why the fragmented size is not reducing.
I am having some difficulties with this trigger. It keeps giving me the error "ERROR at line 5: PL/SQL: ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected" when I am not even using a SELECT before the line it says the error is on? Here is the trigger that I am attempting to create.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER ClassRestraint
BEFORE INSERT ON Enrolled
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
numCourses NUMBER :=0;
myException EXCEPTION;
BEGIN
[code]...
I am getting the error on line 5.
I have this script which should find tablespaces and their size, joined with free bytes. Trying to run this gives me the SQL Error: ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected.
I have two questions:
1. Where should the FROM be?
2. Is there something wrong with the join.
==============================================
set linesize 120
col "TOTAL (KB)" format 99999999999999999
col "FREE (KB)" format 9999999999999999
col TSNAME format a35
col "% FREE" format a10;
SELECT a.tablespace_name TSNAME, sum(a.bytes/1024) "TOTAL (KB)",
Sum(b.bytes/1024) "FREE (KB)"
To_char(round((sum(a.bytes/1024)/sum(a.bytes/1024))*100),2), 'FM99990D999999')
|| ' % ' "% FREE"
FROM dba_data_files a, dba_free_space b
Where a.tablespace_name = b.tablespacename
Group by a. tablespace_name
[/i]
=============================================
I used the script from [URL]
It worked great but I'm not sure how to use the arithmetic functions to show me MB instead of bytes.
Oracle version : Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
create table plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh (dry_run_fic_id number,ltr_code varchar2(10),
next_cpn_lvl_id1 number,next_intrvl_code varchar2(10), next_intrvl_value varchar2(120));
begin
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424740,'1','','LTML','48000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424736,'1','','LTML','32000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424738,'1','','LTML','128000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424783,'1','','LTML','96000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424789,'2','','LTML','96000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424750,'1',198,'LTML','10000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424760,'1',199,'LDFM','20000');
insert into plc_dw_dry_run_fic_rfsh values (424770,'1','','LTML','192000');
end;
commit;
Expected output
---------------
DRY_RUN_FIC_ID LTR_CODE NEW_LTR_CODE
424740 '1' '1b'
424736 '1' '1'
424738 '1' '1'
424783 '1' '1a'
424789 '2' '1a'
424750 '1' '1a'
424760 '1' '1a'
424770 '1' '1a'
Rules
---------
1) First next_cpn_lvl_id1 should be considered (next_intrvl_code can be anything), if next_cpn_lvl_id1 is 198 or 199 then new_ltr_code should have 1a.
2) If next_cpn_lvl_id1 is not 198 or 199, then next_intrvl_code should be considered
a) if next_intrvl_code is LTML and mod of next_intrvl_value and 96000 is zero then new_ltr_code should be 1a
b) if next_intrvl_code is LTML and mod of next_intrvl_value and 48000 is zero then new_ltr_code should be 1b
3) If 1 & 2 are not satisfied, ltr_code should be assigned to new_ltr_code.
The following syntax gives me the error:
ORA-00923: FROM key word not found where expected
if this is so, why use 'from' in TRIM function? Or is my syntax incorrect?
SYNTAX: select trim leading ('0' from (substr(to_char(polref_nbr),9,10))) "TRIM example" from tbl_vg_adhoc;
I am trying to compile this block for updating a record. In the P_ADD_LOV_SQL column, I have to update the following select statment, but when ever I am compiling it it shows error in the Select statement as : ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected. rearrange the select statement so that it doesn't show the error.The coding is :
DECLARE
P_ADD_KEY NUMBER;
P_ADD_CODE VARCHAR2(50);
P_ADD_DESCRIPTION VARCHAR2(75);
P_ADD_MODULE_KEY NUMBER;
P_ADD_PROMPT VARCHAR2(50);
P_ADD_REQUIRED VARCHAR2(1);
P_ADD_FORMAT VARCHAR2(1);
P_ADD_SIZE NUMBER;
[code]....
The column is updated properly. But I can't update by compiling the block.
I want to get the top 10% of salaries in employees table. But I got error:
SQL> select top 10 percent salary
2 from employees
3 order by salary desc;
ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected How can I get the top 10% percent?
The SAMPLE clause in the select statement works well in most cases, but we found in some instances the result is way off - between 200% to 700% discrepancy has been observed.
For example, we have thee tables with the following results:
Table1: 495,365,317 rows (20 cols, unique primary key present), SAMPLE ( 0.002018712182064212 ) returns 41,499 (about four times off - we expected about 10,000)
Table2: 3,350,864,539 rows ( 5 cols, unique primary key present), SAMPLE ( 0.00029843044634040336 ) returns 9,835 (this is good as it is close to 10,000)
Table3: 6,974,724,543 rows ( 5 cols, no unique primary key present), SAMPLE ( 0.00014337483779250091 ) returns 58,789 (about six times off - we expected about 10,000)
The tables got billions of rows, and that is why we want to do sampling. The sample percentage rate is computed to return about 10,000 rows in all three tables.On Table3, we ran the sampling three times in one occasion, and we got "58,570", "24,575" and "24,561"
I expected +/- 20% of variance, but 200% to 700% seems to be way too much.Once again, I stress that it does work well in most cases (another 3.4 billion table and numerous smaller tables we tested were well within +/- 5 percent of the target).I noted the presence of a primary key above because I read an article saying that the SAMPLE function relies on the existence of a primary key (which does not quite explain the examples above).Is this kind of spread something we should expect or is it a bug? Is the sampling rate too small for such large tables?
Environment:
Oracle RDBMS 10g R2.
DB OS: HP Itanium
We use Oracle EBS R12.1.2 in our company and one of the analyst reported performance with saving the configuration in Pricing module. The common fix is to gather stats on BOM_EXPLOSIONS table. Recently, when the issue occurred I collected statistics on the table. The performance didnt improve. I went ahead and decided to trace the Oracle form session using the profile 'Initialization SQL Statement - Custom" at user level.
I also monitored the session in OEM 10g grid. The analyst performed the same set of steps and the performance was normal and acceptable. Analyst tried again and performance was matching with the expectation. I cleared the trace profile and analyst tried again. This time analyst had worse performance as the original issue. The issue got fixed later part of the day on its own. This has made me curious and thought to discuss it here.
I have had similar experience with 10g and 11g, when I enable the trace on the issue cannot be reproduced and when trace is off the issue pops back up.
I used the Exchange Partition feature to swap segments between 2 tables- one Partitioned, and one Non-Partitioned. The exchange went well. However, all the data in the partitioned table has gone to the partition which stores the maxbound values.
/** actual table names changed due to client confidentiality issues */
-- Drop the 2 intermediate tables if they already exist
drop table ordered_inv_bkp cascade constraints ;
drop table ordered_inv_t cascade constraints ;
/**
1st create a Non-Partitioned Table from ORDERED_INV and then add the primary key and unique index(s):
*/
create table ordered_inv_bkp as select * from ordered_inv ;
alter table ordered_inv_bkp add constraint ordinvb_pk primary key (ordinv_id) ;
--
create unique index ordinv_scinv_uix on ordered_inv_bkp(
SCP_ID ASC,
[code]....
-- Next, we have to create a partitioned table ORDERED_INV_T with a similar
-- structure as ORDERED_INV.
-- This is a bit tricky, and involves a pl/sql code
declare
l_dt_start DATE;
l_ptn VARCHAR2(50);
cnt PLS_INTEGER;
l_cnt_initial PLS_INTEGER;
ts_name VARCHAR2(50);
l_sql VARCHAR2(10000);
ts_indx VARCHAR2(100);
[code]....
-- Add section to set default values for the intermediate table OL_ORDERED_INV_T
FOR crec_cols IN (
SELECT u.column_name ,u.nullable, u.data_default,u.table_name
FROM USER_TAB_COLUMNS u WHERE
u.table_name ='ORDERED_INV' AND
u.data_default IS NOT NULL )
LOOP
[code]....
-- Next, use exchange partition for actual swipe
-- Between ordered_inv_t and ordered_inv_bkp
-- Analyze both tables : ordered_inv_t and ordered_inv_bkp
BEGIN
DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS(OWNNAME => 'HENRY220', TABNAME => 'ORDERED_INV_T');
DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS(OWNNAME => 'HENRY220', TABNAME =>'ORDERED_INV_BKP');
END;
/
SET TIMING ON;
[code]....
While starting up my database i am getting this error.by mistake i had moved log files, and after some time again i inserted those log files again into same directory i am getting this error.
View 13 Replies View Related