INSERT INTO T VALUES (1,'JAMES');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (1,'DOLLY');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (2,'MICHEAL');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (2,'FLASH');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (3,'JAMES');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (3,'MARY');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (4,'JAMES');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (4,'DOLLY');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (5,'JAMES');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (5,'DOLLY');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (6,'JAMES');
INSERT INTO T VALUES (6,'MARY');
SELECT * FROM T ORDER BY 1
ID NAME
1 JAMES
1 DOLLY
2 MICHEAL
2 FLASH
3 JAMES
3 MARY
4 JAMES
4 DOLLY
5 JAMES
5 DOLLY
6 JAMES
6 MARY
each 'ID' has two values always. I want to rank the data based on same pair 'name' in an 'ID'
for example, my desired output is:
ID NAME RANK
1 JAMES 1
1 DOLLY 1
2 MICHEAL 1
2 FLASH 1
3 JAMES 1
3 MARY 1
4 JAMES 2 ---> THAT IS RANK 2 BECAUSE THIS IS THE 2ND TIME JAMES AND DOLLY ARE IN THE SAME 'ID'
4 DOLLY 2 -----> SAME AS ABOVE
5 JAMES 3 ---> THAT IS RANK 2 BECAUSE THIS IS THE 3RD TIME JAMES AND DOLLY ARE IN THE SAME 'ID'
5 DOLLY 3 -----> SAME AS ABOVE
6 JAMES 2 ---> THAT IS RANK 2 BECAUSE THIS IS THE 2ND TIME JAMES AND MARY ARE IN THE SAME 'ID'
6 MARY 2 -----> SAME AS ABOVE
I have the following table and data , I have six employees and carton named A,B,C,D,E and F.
Drop table a ; Create table a (id number(9), emp_id number(9), cartoon varchar2(20), no_cartton number(9)); Insert into a values(1,1,’A’,10); Insert into a values(2,1,’B’,20); Insert into a values(3,1,’D’,25); Insert into a values(4,1,’E’,15); [code].......
I have also Third Query: the first and second query already solved in this link . Sum based on group
it is multiple value of carton A of emp_id 1 with 2 + multiple value of B of emp_id 1 and 2 and so on
More detalies : Multiple value of A for Empid 1 and 2 then add it to multiple value of multiple value of b for empid 1 and 2 then add it to multiple value of c of empid 1 and 2
After finished all carton for 1 and 2 then go to 1 and 3 after finished go to 1 and 4 then 2 and 3 then 2 and 4 and so on
Output will be like this Empid Total
1 with 2 2050 1 with 3 200 1 with 4 500 1 with 5 2250 1 with 6 700 2 with 3 0 2 with 4 700 2 with 5 4300 2 with 6 1700 3 with 4 0 3 with 5 400 3 with 6 0 4 with 5 400 4 with 6 200 5 with 6 1900
I have the following requirement, where I have to display the data based on the group and links when input is given as month. I have written the following code, which is good to display for group. But I want to display for all the groups. CREATE TABLE target_data ( T_LINK VARCHAR2(50) , t_mon varchar2(6) , t_grp varchar2(30) , t_views NUMBER
formatting the data.I want to group the below table data based on the Grade column for a header_data with start_time and end_time displayed in range. I was trying with group by, partitions etc but no luck. I use version 10gr2.
I'm trying to Rank Username based on the Total Sum of amount waived but I want to avoid Ranking the Overall Total at the bottom, plus I dont want them in Ranking order, I want the order to stay the same as it currently is.
SELECT DECODE(GROUPING(USERNAME),1,'TOTAL',0,UPPER(USERNAME)) as "USERNAME", SUM(CASE WHEN TO_CHAR(DATE_PROCESSED,'MON') = 'JAN' THEN AMOUNT_WAIVED ELSE 0 END) AS JAN, SUM(CASE WHEN TO_CHAR(DATE_PROCESSED,'MON') = 'FEB' THEN AMOUNT_WAIVED ELSE 0 END) AS FEB,
I want to do group ranking in desired col3 in such a way that it checks for different values across consecutive rows under col2 and assigns a number to each group. Just when two consecutive rows in col2 have same value then the group ends and the next group starts.
So my desired output is:
Col1 Col2 Col3 1 A 1 2 B 1 3 C 1 4 D 1 5 D 2 6 A 2
[code]...
Here you can see that the first four rows under col2 are unique i.e A,B,C,D so col3 assigns this as group number 1. It ends at row 4 becuase row 5 also has value D under column 2. So in other words, each group must have all unique values and there should not be any repetition. For example, see group 3 (under col3) in above desired output; it starts from row 9 and ends at row 11 because row 12 also has value 'C' and the value 'C' has already occurred in group 3 in row 9.
I want to achieve this SQL. I tried using Dense rank but couldn't go through. I want the shortest possible query to acheive this.
I have a query find window that allows you to search on various attributes.Also i have a radio button within the query find that allows you to filter the results either as a single record or mulitiple records For example consider the data below.....
I have a View that joins the 2 tables together so for Record_Id = 1 the view returns 3 rows
I would like to have a query find window that allows you to search using: Record_No Line_Desc
and has a radio button to allow you to either show the records as a single line or as all detail lines Therefore i would like the following selections:
1) Enter no search criteria but select Single radio option will return 1 record with default line description of Line1 2) Enter no search criteria but select Multiple radio option will return all 3 records 3) Enter Line_Desc = Line1 with Single radio option brings back one record with Line_Desc = Line1 4) Enter Line_Desc = Line2 with Single radio option brings back one record with Line_Desc = Line2 5) Enter Line_Desc = Line3 with Single radio option brings back one record with Line_Desc = Line3 6) Enter Line_Desc = Line1 with Multi radio option brings back one record with Line_Desc = Line1 7) Enter Line_Desc = Line2 with Multi radio option brings back one record with Line_Desc = Line2 7) Enter Line_Desc = Line3 with Multi radio option brings back one record with Line_Desc = Line3
I need the form to select from the view but then perform a rank after it has selected the relavant data. Then the radio button would use the ranking to select either one record or multi records.
I'm looking for a script to partition the data into sections where the VALUE is the same over a constant period of time with no breaks. I'd like to give each partition a value to identify it by.
So the outcome of the script would be the following -
I was trying to do something with trunc(date_time) but that didnt work out right as the blocks of data can carry over several days as seen in the rows with IDENTIFIER = 8.
I need to return an ordered list of documents. The documents may belong to a set id (optional) and if so, are either a "master" or a "duplicate" type. For each set there can be only one master but many duplicates. My goal is to group all the sets together such that each master is proceeded by its duplicates.
There's also a documents table containing the documentid and among other things a page_count. In the following example I want to sort the documents first by page count but preserving the master/dupe grouping. Any documents which don't belong to a set or are just a duplicate without a master i want at the end of my set but also ordered by page count.
Here's an example set that I would want to order by:
As you can see I have a little bit of everything here. Docs 2001 and 2002 are the typical set of 1 master and its duplicate. Docs 2010, 2011, and 2012 is the same just a set of 3. Doc 2004 is a master but without any duplicates. Docs 2003 and 2014 are duplicates without a master (these docs have a master in the table but that doc isn't in the set i need to order by). Docs 2008 and 2009 do not belong to a set and as such do not have a master/dupe type.
The result i'm looking to achieve will be ordered as follows:
As I said above I first want to get the groupings of master/dupes and order ascending on the masters page count. For each duplicate of a master I then want to order the duplicates by page count. After I finished ordering all the master/dupe groups I then want to move on to the rest of the documents which will contain documents that don't belong to a set along with documents which are duplicates but have no master in my set. However, documents which are masters but without duplicates should have been ordered along with the other master/dupes groupings.
With this all in mind I have just been completely overwhelmed as to where to even start. Am I using analytic functions? Hierarchical stuff?
I want to find out consecutive non-increasing sequences of value (2nd column) order by sr. no (first column) in ascending order.
For example, in the 2nd column, 17 is followed by 0 and 0 and then 38 so it means 3 consecutive values (i.e starting from 17 are 0 and 0) are non-increasing and they are ranked by '1' in my desired in third column as shown below. similarly, the 2nd non-increasing sequence starts with 38,32,24 and 12 and this is ranked as '2' in the third column. same is the case with rank '3' for the third non increasing sequence. so bascially i want the third column with "ranks" starting and ending as per above logic. i tried using LEAD function but doesn't get what I want. I need the shortest possible query to get that third column since i have other columns in the original table in a multiple group by query.
I'm trying to group sets of data based on time separations between records and then count how many records are in each group.
In the example below, I want to return the count for each group of data, so Group 1=5, Group 2=5 and Group 3=5
SELECT AREA_ID AS "AREA ID", LOC_ID AS "LOCATION ID", TEST_DATE AS "DATE", TEST_TIME AS "TIME" FROM MON_TEST_MASTER WHERE AREA_ID =89 AND LOC_ID ='3015' AND TEST_DATE ='10/19/1994';
[code]....
Group 1 = 8:00:22 to 8:41:22
Group 2 = 11:35:47 to 11:35:47
Group 3 = 15:13:46 to 15:13:46
Keep in mind the times will always change, and sometime go over the one hour mark, but no group will have more then a one hour separation between records.
I read that rownum is applied after the selection is made and before "order by". So, in order to get the sum of salaries for all employees in all departments with a row number starting from 1, i wrote :
select ROWNUM,department_id,sum(salary) from employees group by department_id
If i remove rownum, it gives the correct output. Why can't rownum be used here ?
I'm using this code, and it performs fine, but I'm wondering if there is a more elegant way to do it--maybe with "ROLLBACK". Basically (as you can see) I need to get a normal count for each group but also for each group take a percentage of the total count (so all groups pct adds up to 100 (oh yeah, don't test for zero below, but just a test... )
select c.Event, c.code, count(1) as calls, total.total_count, count(1) / total.total_count * 100 as pct_of_total from table1 c
[Code]....
[Edit MC: add code tags, do it yourself next time]
I need to update the TEMP_GP_SEQ table and on the COLUMN COL7 based on the grouping range mentioned above using the sequence created. But the sequence should not be incremented for each and every record, it should be incremented only for change of groups. For example
Actually the group by fetched two rows with a total record count of 4 (2 records in both the rows). SO the COL7 is updated for these four rows with M as a prefixed word and the number followed after M is from the sequence. Here the number is changing (sequence is incrementing) only when there is a change in grouping criteria and it remains the same throughout a group.
how to logically connect two tables. Here is an example of what I'm trying to do:
HOSTS TABLE CPU TABLE ----------- --------- ID HOST ID CPU 01 host1 01 proc01 02 host2 01 proc02 03 host3 02 proc01 02 proc02 02 proc03 02 proc04 03 proc01
Based on the above, I can see that 'host1' has 2 CPUs, 'host2' has 4 CPUs, and 'host3' has 1 CPU. What I'd like to do is create a query that would output:
HOST CPU ---------- host1 2 host2 4 host3 1
I'm looping through the hosts and passing the them into another query as bind variables. That's slow and cannot be the best way to do this. I'm aware that I need to using a GROUP BY HAVING COUNT, but that doesn't seem to be working. It tends to return the total count of all CPUs rather than CPUs per host.
My requirement is Data from a TableA has to be provided as an overall view
TABLEA ID ENTITY REQ_FLG PAR_FLG EXT_FLG CONV_1 ACCNT Y Y Y CONV_1 PROD Y Y N CONV_1 ADDR Y N N CONV_2 DID Y N N CONV_2 ORDER Y N N
Required to show the data in report as
ID Expand View_Report Populate ENTITY QRY_STATUS CONV_1 Expand Report Populate ACCNT Y Y Y PROD Y Y Y ADDR Y N N CONV_2 Expand Report Populate DID Y N N ORDER Y N N
Where "Expand", "Report", "Populate" are provided as Hard coded values in query.
Sample Query. SELECT ID ,'Expand' AS EXPAND ,'Report' AS VIEW_REPORT , 'Populate / Reset' AS POP , DECODE(MN_TBL.ENTITY,NULL,NULL,ENTITY) AS ENTITY , REQ_FLG || ' ' || PAR_FLG || ' ' || EXT_FLG AS QRY_STATUS FROM TABLEA GROUP BY GROUPING SETS ((ID), (ENTITY, REQ_FLG , PAR_FLG , EXT_FLG )) ORDER BY CONVERSION_ID, ENTITY
Above query works fine, where single ID is present
ID Expand View_Report Populate ENTITY QRY_STATUS CONV_1 Expand Report Populate ACCNT Y Y Y PROD Y Y Y ADDR Y N N
But when more than one ID is present the entire thing collapses
My weekly reports should start from Thursday and it ends on Wednesday . I need to aggregate data from Thursday to Wednesday. At the end of every month i generate report for the last 4 weeks.
I couldn't find a way to group by correctly. When I make group by trunc(fragment_date,'day')+2 and check the data it aggregates data from Monday to Sunday.
SELECT COUNT(c.country_id) FROM countries c, employees e, locations l, departments d
[Code]....
I really dont know when and where to use the group by statement from the query above when I added C.country name before the word from I'm always getting this error "ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression"
This time, I am going to provide the DML statements.
I have a simple table with 3 fields in it.I want to group by ACCT_NUMBER and sum of BALANCE field. But I want to get the description of the first row in a group.
the statements below. Here there are two groups of records 2001 and 2002. My sql(which I am working on) should return the following :
2001 EMPL TRAINING-MIS 20 2002 OTHER PROF SERV-HR 40
The following query will group by ACCT_NUMBER and sum of the BALANCE field. But how can I get the DESCRIPTION?
SELECT ACCT_NUMBER, SUM(BALANCE) FROM TEST GROUP BY ACCT_NUMBER CREATE TABLE "TEST" ("ACCT_NUMBER" VARCHAR2(20 BYTE), "DESCRIPTION" VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
