I have this record set coming from two tables.
cursor c1 is select cust_id from tab1 where login=in_login
union
select cust_id from tab2 where login_id = in_login;
in second step; I need to process and filter these ids based on some conditions.The final filtered record set I need to return as Out cursor;
How can I use the processed data to built the output ref cursor ?
I have a table which contains the multiple records for single ID No. Now i have to select single record which contains the latest date. here is the structure Name
Null Type ------ ---- ------------ ID_P NUMBER NAME_P VARCHAR2(12) DATE_P TIMESTAMP(6) Records---------------------1 loosi 22-AUG-13 01.27.48.000000000 PM1 nammi 26-AUG-13 01.28.10.000000000 PM2 kk 22-AUG-13 01.28.26.000000000 PM2 thej 26-AUG-13 01.28.42.000000000 PM
now i have to select below 2 rows how can write select qurie for this?
1 loosi 26-AUG-13 01.27.48.000000000 PM2 thej 26-AUG-13 01.28.42.000000000 PM
Is it possible to:
-define a cursor with bind variables
-get a cursor record from these cursor
-and pass the bind variable in the OPEN clause
Did'nt succeed as shown in the example.
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON SIZE 900000;
DECLARE
--works fine
CURSOR c1 IS SELECT * FROM USER_TABLES WHERE rownum<3;
--doesn't work
--CURSOR c1 IS SELECT * FROM USER_TABLES WHERE rownum<:1;
crec c1%rowtype;
BEGIN
--works fine
OPEN c1;
--isn't possible ?
--OPEN c1 USING 3;
[Code]....
I loop through the 1st cursor (account_csr), while in the 1st csr loop, based on some conditions being true, I want to loop through a 2nd cursor (acctper_csr) but I only want to retrieve data/rows in the 2nd cursor where the account_id column in 1st cursor = account_id column in the 2nd cursor. This will enable me to pull all the account_periods for each account I loop through in the first cursor.
I have attempted several different ways and cannot make this work. Thought I could somehow define a variable and store the account_id from 1st cursor and use on the 'where' clause in the 2nd cursor definition. Have not been able to make this work successfully.
Following is the sample of my
--First cursor (accounts)
CURSOR account_csr is
SELECT *
FROM s_dev_xref1.account A
WHERE a.source = 1
[Code]...
We have a fact table t1 in the warehouse which has above 6 million records.There is to be an update like this where t2 has aid+bid as composite primary key. column aid repeats in t1.There's performance problem and we'v been told to break this huge update into pieces with few commits in the middle.
update t1
set t1.aid =
(select t2.aid from t2
where t1.bid = t2.bid
)
I've tried cursor loop with 3 commits in the middle based on if condition that evaluates on every iteration.
I've got a task to star out account numbers in a free text field. The account numbers can be in a few different formats and there are a number of tables. The formats could increase or change as could the tables. For that purpose I want to use a couple of tables; one to store the formats and one to store the tablenames. The tablenames work fine, but I'm having problem with the formats.
The table definition for the formats is:-
CREATE TABLE account_format (acc_id number(2),acc_format VARCHAR2 (200), acc_replace VARCHAR2 (200),acc_process varchar2(1))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
NOCACHE
NOPARALLEL
MONITORING;
and one insert would be
INSERT INTO account_format
VALUES (1,
'''[0-9]{5}[A-Z]{1}-[0-9]{5}''',
'''[0-9]{5}[A-Z]{1}-[0-9]{5}'',''****-****-****-****''',
'Y');
The idea is to bring back the format and use it in REGEXP_INSTR (or a similar REGEXP) to ascertain if the field contains the account number. The code I have been using looks a bit like this:-
CURSOR m_format_cur IS
SELECT acc.acc_format
FROM account_format acc;
m_format_rec m_format_cur%ROWTYPE;
IF REGEXP_INSTR (m_narrative, m_format_rec.acc_format) > 0 THEN
....
END IF;
I have tried several different ways to get this to work e.g. hardcoding the format and declaring a variable with the format, which both work. Whenever I try to use the value retrieved from the database field it never works. Why should a variable from a cursor not work?
I need to run a query that runs a stored procedure. The stored procedure takes a cursor of record ids as a parameter. I've been making the cursor like this, if there was a smarter way. I can't change the stored procedure, so this is the only thing I have control over.
CURSOR id_cur
IS
SELECT id
FROM table t
WHERE
t.id IN (
id1,
id2,
...
id500
);It just seems kind of strange to select only ids from records when the list of ids is given.
this is just the continuation of my previous topic,
After I bound data into the textboxes, now I want to delete it when I mistakenly click on the same data twice.
this is my screenshot:
when I updated a record in my form check my screenshot: and clicked save button the result was:
as you can see in the message at the bottom, it has 18 records. And since my original data(subjects) are just 9. And also the grades that I input didn't display all.
This is my code in when-new-block-instance trigger:
DECLARE
CURSOR studgrade_cur IS
SELECT e.student_id, s.subject_code --, g.grade
[code]...
i want to check cursor having record or null/ if having records then count of records?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a table of 3 columns:
SQL> show user
USER is "ANDREY"
SQL>
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> --create the table:
[code]...
I insert rows into it:
SQL> --fill it with data:
SQL>
SQL> insert into a(key1 , key2) values (1 , 1);
1 row created.
SQL> insert into a(key1 , key2) values (1 , 5);
[code]...
i want to perform a logic by which:for every distinct value of key1 - values of key2 will be checked in all records holding that particular key1 value, and update the key3 field to 'inactive' where the key2 value for that particular key1 is the highest in number.
i've found out that i could do it by an SQL statement:
update a
set key3 = 'inactive'
where key2 = (
select max(key2)
from a a2 where a2.key1=a.key1
);
however I wanted to use the cursor to "load" the max key2 values FOR EACH distinct key1 value exists in the table,and do the same thing as the update statement above WITH A CURSOR,So tried and wrote the following:
SQL> create or replace procedure proc1
2 IS
3
4
5 var1 a.key1%type;
[code]...
unfortunately, it works only for one row, and i don't understand what's wrong, I executed, and checked what has changed:
SQL> exec proc1;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select * from a;
KEY1 KEY2 KEY3
---------- ---------- ----------
1 1 active
1 5 incative
2 24 active
2 21 active
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
In my form line level block contains 100 records.i will check the check box for line number 96 and 97. Then i will press save(I have written some logic here) button it will generate one number for selected check boxes. After generating this number cursor(control) should be on same line number 96 or 97.
View 10 Replies View Relatedi have two tables one as test_master and other one limit master.
test master table structure
ct_id ct_a ct_b ct_C ct_d ct_e...... etc
1 -- -- -- -- --
1 -- -- -- -- --
2 -- -- -- -- --
limit master structure
limit_id ct_a_limit ct_b_limit ct_c_limit ct_d_limit ct_e_limt ..... etc
1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
ct_id and limit_id is match column used for mapping.
now i want the total count of no of records in test_master in which test_master column value not exceed limit master column limit value if any one column exceeds its limit then the same row will be in my count criteria.
how to achieve the same using sql/oracle query.
Is there any defined record count range for the following ways of bulk insert :
INSERT INTO ABCTEMP SELECT * FROM DEFTEMP;
OR
through a cursor, bulk fetch and bulk insert under a loop.
I have Two cursor record block..which is attached in form..
My TASK IS
In my first Block, When DBCR Column = 'D' Then in backend this column value should be save as a '1'
WHEN DBCR Column = 'C' Then Then in backend this column value should be save as a '2'
My Both Field is on Data Block...
In Property palette of this field can we write any decode condition..so it reflects directly on database.
I have two cursors like
cursor_A IS select * from table_a where condition_A;
cursor_B IS select * from table_a where condition_B;
record_A is a recorded of cursor_A%ROWTYPE
record_B is a recorded of cursor_B%ROWTYPE
I define a procedure like pro_A(record_in cursor_A%ROWTYPE) can I overload this procedure by defining pro_B(record_in cursor_B%ROWTYPE)?
If I can't, Can I call pro_A by passing record_B as the parameter to it?
I have a csv file which is in this format -
qwerty SCHEMATIC FILE
; Version 2007.7.1
Project,qwerty Project,,1,,7,1.5,1.5,1,1,0,,0,1,0,0,0,0,3,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,2,3,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,3,3,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
abc,25150-28407.dat,,102,192,42,12632256,1,1,102,192,42,1,12632256,0,6,1,0,32896,1,0,0,0,0,,,-1,-1,-1,-1,0,0,0,-1,-1,-1
xyz, , , 0, 102, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, , , , , , , , , , , 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
Product,00094416505678,19133,"24-36""X80"" FOLD DR VIA MEH",,4.5,81,3, 8421504,,0,,L.T.L. WHOLESALE.,abc,,0,0,0,
Product,00094416502345,37154,"24-36""X80"" xyz WHITE",,5,81,3, 8421504,,0,,L.T.L. WHOLESALE.,abc,,0,0,
Product,00094416501111,83120,"24-36""X80"" abc WH",,5,81,3, 8421504,,0,,L.T.L. WHOLESALE.,abc,,0
Can I create an external table for loading this file based on selection of fields driven by the record identifier which is the first field of each record, except for the firt two?
For e.g In the above file, for records which say 'abc' in it's first field, I want to load the 2,3,6,8 fields delimited by a comma (the values may as well be null in those fields) and for records which say 'Product' in their first fields, I want to load 5,8,9 and 10 fields from the same file. Basically, I want to know if we can use instr function while choosing the fields line by line based on a search criteria in the file. There will be less columns in my table than the number of fields in the csv file, so I guess I got to mention 'MISSING FIELD VALUES ARE NULL' option. There is another challenge too - I have to skip loading the first two lines from the file to the table.
I have written a big pl/sql proc for doing the same, using utl_file.get_line option, but it is still untested and I would be extremely happy to believe that this can be achieved by creating an external table too.
i m using oracle 10g 10.2.0.2 version.i create a form and using check box on this form.when i click this check box then loop is using behind it.and current cursor is going to last record
i want if i click 4 record then cursor is still showing on 4 record mean i click which record after using loopmy current cursor is showing on that particular record
how it is possible
Is there a way we could define a record or a nestedtable with a type based on weak refursor i.e
TYPE RC IS REF CURSOR;
C2 RC;
Type t is table of c2%rowtype;
Following is some more explanation of what I am trying to do.
I have a table T with column A and B. Column A is a primary key with number 1,2,3,4,5,6, Column B has diffrent sql stmts stored. i.e 'Select * from emp', Select count(1) from dept' and so on. So table will look like
1 Select * from emp
2 Select count(1) from dept
Now I want to select statements stored in table T one by one and execute them by using cursor. Problem arises as i need to fetch the cursor into some variable but the outcome of each statment is diffrent and oracle does not allow to use cursorname%rowtype for a weak ref cursor.
Just explaining what I am trying to achieve:
1) i have a hr.departments table that was loaded in hr schema on 1st oct 2012 with 4 columns(department_id, department_name, manager_id, location_id)
2) now I have a new schema by my name 'rahul' and I have loaded departments table but now an additional column has come into picture,ie created_date, this table got loaded on 1st-Nov-2012
3) Now going forward my columns could be dropped from the departments table (it can be a case), for example might be my departments table in my schema 'rahul' one day could comprise of only 3 columns(department_id,department_name,manager_id)
4) Now in the next step, I have managed to extract common column names(in a single line where columns are delimited using a comma) from both the tables(hr.departments and rahul.departments) which are (department_id, department_name, manager_id, location_id) using all_tab_cols table and I have written a function for it which i will be pasting below.
5) now going forward, using the above column names line with column names delimited using comma, I have used a ref cursor and assigned a query to it using the line of columns that I have extracted from the above point
6) Now I want to create a record variable which refers to my ref cursor, something like we do when we create a record variable by reffering to an explicit cursor defination that we give in the declaration block.
PS:
1) I have been out of touch with plsql for a long time so I have lost a lot of mmeory regarding plsql.
2) basically I need to compare data in hr.departments table with rahul.departments table for only columns that are common to both the tables, rest new or discarded columns information will go in one of the log tables that I have created(this is done already)
Code :
===================================================================================================
create or replace procedure p_compare_data(fp_old_table_name in varchar2, fp_new_table_name in varchar2)
is
[Code].....
how to write below query in pl/sql cursor. The help table has two associated tables, help_txt and help_id, which will have strings of data concatenated into one sales contact record. There are multiple lines of text per comment and multiple lines of resolution text at 40 characters per line. The key to the help_text table (id, date,seqno) is the main key to the help_txt table and help_id t table with a sequence added to each table
The formatted string will contain some text and variables with the comment lines (1-10 or more) concatenated first, followed by the resolution lines (1-10 or more). There will be multiple comment and multiple resolution lines. The Cust_Cmnt_Txt lines and the Resolved_Desc lines should be concatenated and formatted in the following string (% marks the variable string) :
'help taken ' %help.Taken_Dte 'received from the following source: ' %help.id. 'Remark Text: ' %help_text (where help_txt_Seq = 1) %help_text (where help_text_seq = 2-10 or more) 'Resolution: ' %help_id_Res_Txt.Resolved_Desc (where help_ID_Txt_Seq = 1) %help_ID_Res_Txt.Resolved_Desc (where help_id_Txt_Seq = 2-10 or more)
I have made a travel booking system which comprises of 3 forms
1)Travel Booking form
2)Reservation Form
3)Cancellation Form
Under one booking number i can add multiple users in which they can have there multiple travels.
Users can cancel there individual travels under a prescribe booking number which on doing the Cancel flag turns to 'Y'.
What i want is, If a user is cancelling his/her travel under any booking number then while retriving the records in Travel Booking form, the travels which are cancelled should not be in enable mode.
For one user there can be 4 travels out of which 2 are cancelled, how can i track only those records whoes cancel flag is set to Y. some logic to find it out. Else can i use :system.cursor_record. If yes, How to use it for this system.
I have to update 20 and 60 million records of a table. The update statement are
1> 20 million recs
update mycustomer set update_time=add_months(sysdate,240) where seq_num = 1;
commit;
2> 60 million recs
update mycustomer set update_time=sysdate-seq_num where seq_num <> 1;
commit;
Q1> Is there any way to improve performance
Q2> Will parallel dml improve performance
Q2> Would a pl/sql cursor make any difference in speed.
create table test1
( ID NUMBER(11)
,MEMBER_NMBR NUMBER(10)
,CODE_NMBR NUMBER(7)
,ROW_EFCTV_DT DATE
,ROW_TRMNTN_DT DATE
[code]....
insert into test1 values (11007,7462,32,'30/sep/2012','31/dec/9999',3,'25/sep/1998','AUTUMN',1,0,344);
insert into test1 values (11007,7462,32,'30/oct/2012','31/dec/9999',3,'25/sep/1998','AUTUMN',1,0,344);
IDMEMBER_NMBRCODE_NMBRROW_EFCTV_DTROW_TRMNTN_DTFLAG_NMBRBRTH_DTNAMECLAIM_CDAMT1AMT2
1100774623209/30/2012 00:0012/31/9999 00:00309/25/1998 00:00AUTUMN10344
1100774623210/30/2012 00:0012/31/9999 00:00309/25/1998 00:00AUTUMN10344
I have to update the row_trmntn_dt of first row to row_efctv_dt of 2nd row which is 30th Oct 2012 - 1 day i.e. 29th Oct 2012
I'm dealing with an ORA-1000 error in a Pro*C application where all the cursors are correctly closed (or so it seems to me).
Here is the code for a simple program which reproduces the problem:
Each cursor is opened in a PL/SQL package:
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE emp_demo_pkg AS
TYPE emp_cur_type IS REF CURSOR;
PROCEDURE open_cur(curs IN OUT emp_cur_type, dept_num IN NUMBER);
END emp_demo_pkg;
[Code]....
While testing the initialization parameter open_cursors is set to 50.
It's my understanding that Oracle doesn't close the cursors until it needs the space for another cursor, which in my test case seems to happen when I enter a value of 50 or bigger for "number of loops". To see how oracle is reusing the cursors, while the test program is running I run SQL*Plus and query v$sesstat for the session that's running the test with the following sentence:
select name, value
from v$sesstat s, v$statname n
where s.statistic# = n.statistic#
and sid = 7
and name like '%cursor%';
Even before I enter a value for number of loops I can see that the session opened 4 cursors and closed 2 of them:
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 4
opened cursors current 2
Entering a value of 5 for number of loops yields
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 11 <----- 7+
opened cursors current 8 <----- 6+
With a value of 30
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 36 <----- 25+ (apparently, Oracle reused at least 5 cursors)
opened cursors current 33 <----- 25+
With a value of 47
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 53 <----- 17+
opened cursors current 50 <----- 17+
Now I reached the upper limit set by the initialization parameter open_cursors.
Entering a value of 48, I get the ORA-1000 error.
ORA-01000: maximum open cursors exceeded
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.EMP_DEMO
Since I open and close the cursor in the same loop iteration, I expect to find in every iterarion 1 explicit cursor and a number of implicit cursors (the PL/SQL call along with the so-called recursive cursors), but I don't expect the sum of all of them to be greater than 50. If my understanding is correct Oracle should be reusing the 50 cursors previously marked as "closeable", not raising the ORA-1000 error.
just looking around to use the new feature available in oracle 11g to convert the dbms_sql numeric cursor to reference cursor, how to do it?
parse and execute the sql string first with dbms_sql and then convert it to ref cursor?
I want to return ref cursor based on explicit cursors
create table jumbo(id number, name varchar2(20));
insert into jumbo values(1,'jumbo');
create table mumbo(id number, name varchar2(20));
insert into mumbo values(1,'mumbo');
commit;
[Code].....
The above procedure has compilation errors when I am trying to open ref cursor
LINE/COL ERROR
-------- --------------------------------------------------------
20/24 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
20/38 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
32/24 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
32/38 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
SQL>
Can i user exist when cursor will using For Cursor .
View 15 Replies View RelatedMy procedure proc_ex is in when_validate_item trigger
I have one Multi Record data block in my form with values in its items
I need to Populate multi record block values to one Record Group using
add_group_row,
add_group_column,
set_group_char_cell to populate values to record group
Let us suppose my multi record data block looks like
item1 item2 item3 item4
10 20 50 70
25 15 30 45
45 90 47 38
75 25 85 90
30 56 78 80
how to populate these multi record datablock values to Record Group ???..Eagerly waiting for your Replies
I am loading data file using SQL Loader in TOAD 10.5.1.3 in Oracle 10g using the control file below and loading data into 2 tables post1.thead and post1.tdetl. THEAD contains item level transaction and TDETL is detail level when a transaction has a discount or promo attached to for that item. When the
LOAD DATA
APPEND
INTO TABLE post1.thead
WHEN (1:5) = 'THEAD'
TRAILING NULLCOLS
(file_type POSITION(1:5)CHAR,
[code]....
A particular THEAD value may have 0, 1 or many TDETL corresponding values.below is a sample data file. When the position 21 in the TTAIL has a value of 1 or 2, then we know that there is a promo or discount applicable to the ITEM (THEAD).
THEAD0000000002201109142011091400000000000002091 1 0 -1
TTAIL0000000003000000
THEAD0000000012201109142011091400000000000002091 1 0 -1 20110914-1
TDETL0000000013CMPSPL1004 0 000000010000P0000000000000019990000000000000000200000
TTAIL0000000014000001
THEAD0000000021201109142011091400000000000002091 1 0 -1
TDETL0000000022EMPDSC1005 0 000
TDETL0000000023SCOUP 1006 0 973452 000
TTAIL0000000024000002
What I want to acheive is to accurately reflect a TDETL to its corresponding THEAD, as both THEAD and TDETL are loaded into separate tables. How can we have the 2 records correlated?