the execution steps of inline view?importance&advantage of inline view?.Also reference link where i can get more information about inline view(i.e. basics to advanced),exercises and interview questions.
View 3 RepliesI am working on this assignment question for class:
Write a SELECT statement that returns a single value that represents the sum of the largest unpaid invoices for each vendor (just one for each vendor). Use an inline view that returns MAX(invoice_total) grouped by vendor_id, filtering for invoices with a balance due
What I have coded so far is below
SELECT i.vendor_id,
To_char(SUM(invoice_total), '$9,999,999.99') AS sum_invoice_total
FROM invoices i
join (SELECT vendor_id,
[code]...
I am getting some results which I have attached. I'm not sure if I'm capturing the "largest unpaid invoices for each vendor" part of the question. Yielding to the knowledge the group and trying to use the proper posting etiquette. I have attached my output screen as well.
below query, first query is giving proper output i.e. 0 while second is giving wrong output i.e. 1.
Why this happen , what's wrong in using count in inline view ?
selecT count(*)
from (select *
from dual
where 1 = 2
union
select * from dual where 1 = 2);
[Code]....
there is a diff. problem for me.when i create table through inline view then it shows 2246 records but if i check these records only in select statement then it shows 124 records. i cant understand how table shows 2246 records even then atual records in inline view shows only 124 records.
following is a query
create table sam as
select * from
((
select distinct stck.item_code
from (
select item_code,bal
[code]...
I am working on Oracle 10g and Below is my query which is taking 30min. to execute. I am using two inline view and then make joins on these inline view because of i think it Degrade Performance.
Query :-
SELECT LEVEL_USER,
TRIAL_NO,
UNIT_NO,
COUNTRY_CODE,
PERSONNEL_NO,
[code].......
Note :- i have Attached the explain Plan for the same .Please let me know how can i improve performance of this Query.
which one is better in performance point of view and why between inline view and correlated query.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCan I update inline view like below?
update
(select * from surveys s join answers a on s.survey_id = a.survey_seq_id where month = 201212 and qa = 1 and main_group_id = 55) a,
(select * from surveys s join answers a on s.survey_id = a.survey_seq_id where month = 201212 and qa = 1 and main_group_id = 3) b
where a.survey_id = b.survey_id and substr(a.question_uid , 3) = substr(b.question_uid, 2))
set b.answer = a.answer;
My second question is: The following query is giving error. What can I do?
update answers ans set (ans.answer) = (with a as (select * from surveys s join answers a on s.survey_id = a.survey_seq_id where month = 201212 and qa = 1 and main_group_id = 55),
b as (select * from surveys s join answers a on s.survey_id = a.survey_seq_id where month = 201212 and qa = 1 and main_group_id = 3)
select a.answer from a join b on a.survey_id = b.survey_id and substr(a.question_uid , 3) = substr(b.question_uid, 2) and b.answer_id = ans.answer_id) where ans.main_group_id = 3;
SQL Error: ORA-00904: "ANS"."ANSWER_ID":
Attached query is running fine if inline view B (Marked in Comments) returning value. If inline view B returns NULL then it fails to return result. I want if Inline view B is returning NULL then it should pass ZERO to main query.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs there a function that allows the following?
select SOME_FUNCTION('N','E','S','W') from dual;
That returns
N
E
S
W
Currently I'm just doing the following
WITH direction AS
(SELECT 'N' dir FROM DUAL
UNION
SELECT 'E' FROM DUAL
UNION
SELECT 'S' FROM DUAL
UNION
SELECT 'W' FROM DUAL)
SELECT *
FROM direction;
Below is the query where I need to filter the data using window function.
I don't want to use inline view for mt query because i need to use the same query in OWB which it wont support.
Select a.Physical_Id,
a.Booking_Begin_Date,
a.Booking_End_Date,
[Code]....
I Cannot use below query in OWB Which is Inline View
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Select b.* From
(Select a.Physical_Id,
a.Booking_Begin_Date,
[Code].....
After searching a lot on net the differences between inline view and subquery that i came across are
1) you can use order by in inline view but not in subquery.
2) you can use alias for inline view but not subquery.
i have to fetch the same outcome using both the functionality respectively, then what is the technical impact/better.
Just want to confirm, that where Oracle stores data fetched from inline view.
I am asking, as I am making an inline view on a very large table and its getting failed with TEMP space error.
we're having a few tables which queries about 10.000 articles. As we don't show them all at once we are using pagination and use the rownum to show only a limited number of the results.
Now as these queries are pretty complex we have to optimize them and since we use pagination we have to call our query twice (first we make a count(*) and then we call the small resultset of a few rows). Ofcourse we are looking for a solution to call it only once and still use the pagination. We could load the whole resultset of 10.000 results and let java show only a few but that makes our line between the oracle and webserver pretty heavy. Is there a way to call the total number of results and give back only a small resultset just in one query?
When to use inline query and to use join.
View 3 Replies View Relatedhow joins work with in-line views.I have a query and its explain plan as below:
SELECT e.ename,e.deptno,d.dname FROM
dept d,
emp e
WHERE e.deptno=d.deptno
AND e.deptno=20
[code]....
I do not find any difference in both the explain plans. Both are same. In my second query, the filtered rows will be joined to dept table. And hence the baggage will reduce.But how can I verify that in-line view has worked better?
I have been using With for many queries for readability. This most recent query seemed to be taking a bit longer to run and I didn't think much of it until a colleague showed me their version (totally different sql statement) which ran faster, but seemed more complicated and had more lines of code. I noticed that the other version did not use with. I moved the sql of the with into the join and the query ran faster dropping from 30 seconds to 798 msecs. The question is am I sacrificing speed for readability by using With, or it really depends on the overall sql statement.
Here is the query using WITH:
with prev as
(
select person_uid, id, name, academic_period,
case when enrolled_ind = 'Y' and registered_ind = 'N' and student_status = 'AS' then 0 else 1 end as enreg_stat,
[Code]....
I have created a few flash charts using APEX4.2. Is there a way for the user to view the chart and then email it as an inline image to someone? I know that the user can save the chart as PDF file, then send it as an attachment via Outlook ( or similar system), but can I integrate these manual steps to one ( template), similar to the IR report's download feature ?
View 0 Replies View Relatedcan we change the existing materialized view to normal view? if yes how?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to create a Materialized View on a remote database from a simple view. The reason is, the data owners don't want to grant explicit tables privileges to external subscribers.
A new schema is created to publish data in the form of a view. I've created mlogs on the master tables, and granted them to the subscriber, but it's still complaining about a missing primary key on the view. A primary key does exist in the master table.
Is there another work around for this situation without having to work inside the data sources' environment?
is it possible to create primary key on view and use this view for creating foreign key .
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe wrote one data load process to load GZ files into Database.during process we will change client facing view definitions to backup table so that we can work on base tables.
This view definition changes are related to FROM and WHERE clause (not columns/type). during load process, client/user may connect to current server and accessing these views. My question is what will be the reflection of changing view definition while user is accessing view?
I created a scenario-
STEP1: Created a view-
create or replace view view_01 as
select object_name from dba_objects union all
select object_name from dba_objects union all
select object_name from dba_objects union all
[code]....
View definition is replaced by new definition while select is executing on that view. select returned number of records as per view definition one.
Are oracle view have Dynamic view function?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a materialized view "pro_mview",I am trying to refresh the MVIEW by using the following statement.
EXEC DBMS_MVIEW.REFRESH('pro_mview','C');
But I am getting the below error.
*
Error at line 1:
ORA-12008: error in materialized view refresh path
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2256
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2462
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2431
ORA-06512: at line 1
I am able to fetch the data from that materialized view(pro_mview).
difference between view and materialized view?
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhat would be the difference between a view and a materialized view? whether DML possible on a view? i think error occurs if DML tried on a view which is a combination of two or more tables, whether DML possible on a materialized view?
View 7 Replies View RelatedCan we create view in another view
View 10 Replies View RelatedI am using some UPS shipping software that imports shipping information based on an order number that the user enters and we are having performance problems. In the software's configuration you choose one database object (namely a table or view) to get the information from. I have created myView that selects from multiple tables, lookup tables, etc. I must use a view because the software only has the ability to add a " and <importKeyThatIHaveDefined> = <valueEnteredByUser>". For instance " and order_number = 123". It cannot join multiple tables, etc. The address_field1 info is the same for each record with the same order_number so I can just get the first row (or any row with order_number = <enteredOrderNumber> for that matter).
When I first looked at this it was created as something like this:
select order_number, line_number, order_number || '' || line_number as ol, address_field1 from order;Keep in mind that there are more than just this table and more fields selected. They are all joined correctly (for lookup values etc.).
The concatenation was determined to be the bottleneck in performance. ol was defined as the import key to be used and the users were just entering the order number plus a 1 to get ONLY the first line number. Each order (usually) has more than one line and even the line number is not necessarily unique for each order. For instance, order 123 may have line 1 twice and line 2 once.
select order_number, line_number, address_field1 from order where rownum = 1;
The software appended the " and order_number = 123" as expected but because rownum = 1 had already been executed (before the and order_number = 123" the view only returned one row even WITHOUT the order_number = 123.
I need to return only ONE row for a given order number EVEN IF there are multiple records with the same order_number and line_number. Using "where order_number = <enteredOrderNumber> and line_number = 1" is not necessarily unique so that won't work.If I can't make it work this way and can't use the rownum = 1 what options do I have?
I have a view ( from many tables) , an error view in wich i monitor errors that appear in my project. This view should be empt always but whenever a error occurs the view shows me this. I wanna put a trigger or something like that on that view to send me an e-mail whenever a line is inserted in that view. ( I don't wanna use a job for that to make a count because this will affect the entire database).
View 3 Replies View RelatedIf you have one table called CUST_ACCOUNTS and a view called CUST_ACCOUNTS -- and then you want to select from the view and not the table.Is there a prefix for views or something that I can have in front of the name to specify it's the view I want data from?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhich is better to use of Views and Materialized views so as to have good performance ? Also I need to search for a particular value in the view. Any function in sql to implement this ?
View 3 Replies View Related