(select * from surveys s join answers a on s.survey_id = a.survey_seq_id where month = 201212 and qa = 1 and main_group_id = 55) a,
(select * from surveys s join answers a on s.survey_id = a.survey_seq_id where month = 201212 and qa = 1 and main_group_id = 3) b
where a.survey_id = b.survey_id and substr(a.question_uid , 3) = substr(b.question_uid, 2))
set b.answer = a.answer;
My second question is: The following query is giving error. What can I do?
update answers ans set (ans.answer) = (with a as (select * from surveys s join answers a on s.survey_id = a.survey_seq_id where month = 201212 and qa = 1 and main_group_id = 55),
b as (select * from surveys s join answers a on s.survey_id = a.survey_seq_id where month = 201212 and qa = 1 and main_group_id = 3)
select a.answer from a join b on a.survey_id = b.survey_id and substr(a.question_uid , 3) = substr(b.question_uid, 2) and b.answer_id = ans.answer_id) where ans.main_group_id = 3;
I am working on this assignment question for class:
Write a SELECT statement that returns a single value that represents the sum of the largest unpaid invoices for each vendor (just one for each vendor). Use an inline view that returns MAX(invoice_total) grouped by vendor_id, filtering for invoices with a balance due
What I have coded so far is below SELECT i.vendor_id, To_char(SUM(invoice_total), '$9,999,999.99') AS sum_invoice_total FROM invoices i join (SELECT vendor_id,
[code]...
I am getting some results which I have attached. I'm not sure if I'm capturing the "largest unpaid invoices for each vendor" part of the question. Yielding to the knowledge the group and trying to use the proper posting etiquette. I have attached my output screen as well.
the execution steps of inline view?importance&advantage of inline view?.Also reference link where i can get more information about inline view(i.e. basics to advanced),exercises and interview questions.
there is a diff. problem for me.when i create table through inline view then it shows 2246 records but if i check these records only in select statement then it shows 124 records. i cant understand how table shows 2246 records even then atual records in inline view shows only 124 records.
following is a query
create table sam as select * from (( select distinct stck.item_code from ( select item_code,bal
I am working on Oracle 10g and Below is my query which is taking 30min. to execute. I am using two inline view and then make joins on these inline view because of i think it Degrade Performance.
Attached query is running fine if inline view B (Marked in Comments) returning value. If inline view B returns NULL then it fails to return result. I want if Inline view B is returning NULL then it should pass ZERO to main query.
I am looking to build a query to update a current value in a DBA view to a new one.i.e. updating directories based on the current value:
CREATE OR REPLACE DIRECTORY 'DIRECTORY_NAME' AS 'DIRECTORY_PATH'(substr(directory_path, 1,5) + '/&dbname' {i.e. this is different for every database name }+ 'DIRECTORY_PATH'(string after /xyz/) WHERE DIRECTORY_NAME in ( select DIRECTORY_NAME from DBA_DIRECTORIES WHERE DIRECTORY_PATH like '/xyz/%' )
i.e. resulting output should be:
CREATE OR REPLACE DIRECTORY 'ABC' AS '/xyz/DBNAME/abc/def/';
(when the directory previously was 'xyz/abc/def/') i.e. basically inserting the db name into the directory.where DBNAME is a variable more directories are added frequently so therefore this needs to be a dynamic procedure to change the directories in the db.
I have big trouble with some Update query on Oracle 11G.I have a set of tables (5) of identical structures and a view that consists in an UNION ALL of the 5 tables.None of this table contains more than 20 000 rows.Let's call the view V_INTE_NE. Each of the basic table has a PRIMARY KEY defined on 3 NUMBERS(10,0) -> INTE_REF / NE_REF / INSTANCE.
Now, I get 6 rows in another table and I want to update my view from the data of this small table (let's call it SMALL). This table has the 3 columns INTE_REF / NE_REF / INSTANCE.
When I try to join the two tables :
SELECT * FROM T_INTE_NE T2 WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM SMALL T1 WHERE T2.INTE_REF = T1.INTEREF AND T2.NE_REF = T1.NEREF AND T2.INTE_INST = T1.INSTANCE )
I get the 6 lines in 0.037 seconds
When I try to update the view (I have an INSTEAD OF trigger that does nothing (just return for testing even without modifying anything), I execute the following query :
UPDATE T_INTE_NE T2 SET INTE_STATE = -11 WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM SMALL T1 WHERE T2.INTE_REF = T1.INTEREF AND T2.NE_REF = T1.NEREF AND T2.INTE_INST = T1.INSTANCE ) The 6 rows are updated (at least TRIGGER is called) in 20 seconds. However, in the execution plan, I can't see where Oracle takes time to achieve the query : Plan hash value: 907176690
[code]....
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("T2"."INTE_REF"="T1"."INTEREF" AND "T2"."NE_REF"="T1"."NEREF" AND "T2"."INTE_INST"="T1"."INSTANCE")
Note- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
Statistics ----------------------------------------------------------- 3 user calls 0 physical read total bytes 0 physical write total bytes 0 spare statistic 3 0 commit cleanout failures: cannot pin
[code]....
I get exactly the same execution plan (when autotrace is ON).Furthermore, if I try to do the same update on each of the basic tables, I get the rows updated instantaneously.
select rtrim(xmlagg(xmlelement(e, table_name||',')).extract('//text()'),',') from ( select distinct table_name from tr_products tr join all_instruments v on tr.PROD_COA_ID = v.PROD_COA_ID where tr.LEVEL_06_VALUE like t1.COLUMN_VALUE||'%' or tr.LEVEL_05_VALUE like t1.COLUMN_VALUE||'%' or tr.LEVEL_04_VALUE like t1.COLUMN_VALUE||'%' or tr.LEVEL_03_VALUE like t1.COLUMN_VALUE||'%' or tr.LEVEL_02_VALUE like t1.COLUMN_VALUE||'%' or tr.LEVEL_01_VALUE like t1.COLUMN_VALUE||'%')
This is an excerpt of a code of a huge query, I didn't want to write it all here because there is no point in doing that since this is the part of the query that I'm actually having problem with, and I think you will be able to understand my question just by looking at this piece of code.
Anyway, this here is actually a subquery in a select-clause of a main query, and apparently it has a (nested) subquery of its own (as seen in the code). I want to reach some values ("COLUMN_VALUE") that are correlated to the parent query (t1 is alias of a table in the from-clause of the main query), and as you can see, I'm trying to reach it from this level 2 subquery. As I have recently found out, Oracle does not allow this, it only tollerates correlation down to level 1.
Here is a scheme of my query:
select something1, (select something2 from (select something3 from some_table2 t2 where t1.value = t2.value)) from some_table t1
can this be overridden somehow, is there a workaround for this limitation?
i want to create "on update" database trigger on materialized view which is on replication schema.I would like to update rows in table when update occurs on materialized view on master side.I wrote some code and tried with this:
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER a after update on A@dirfep.us.oracle.com FOR EACH ROW BEGIN
Simplifying the data structure that my problem concern, let's say there are two materialized views between whose data there's a one-to-many relationship [the relationship can be logical without a need of creating any foreing keys].
The data should be as actual as possible respecting the content of the master tables, let's say it shoul be refreshed every 5 minutes.
As far as I know, the jobs related to each snapshot, even if they have a START WITH and NEXT parameter set to the same value, work independently...So: what would be the best manner to synchronize the jobs so as to make sure the data of both snapshots are coherent?
we are trying to create a materialized view (MV) which would access the remote database through db link. Now we need to do update on the local MV so that it should be reflected on the master table.
There is no primary key on this table and we are using "complete refresh" option. since we dont have control over remote database, we are not allowed to create MV log over there.
in this scenario, if i try to create updatetable MV with complete refresh, we are getting below error:
SQL Error: ORA-12013: updatable materialized views must be simple enough to do fast refresh
I have 3 tables, user_login_event, person and resource_viewed_event. What I want to do have a report for each month, users logged in our application and then show for each month, how many records were created in table person and how many resource views events were logged in resource_viewed_event.
Lets only worry about the timestamp fields in these tables now as I want to use them to join the tables together or at least build correlated subqueries along the months. I have tried several options, all not leading to a desired result:
Left outer join. Works but its incredibly slow:
SELECT distinct to_char(ule.TIMESTAMP,'YYYY-MM') as "YYYY-MM", count(distinct ule.id) as "User Logins", count(distinct ule.user_id) as "Users logged on", count(distinct p2.id) as "Existing Users", count(distinct p1.id) as "New Users", count(distinct r1.id) as "Resources created"
[code]....
Tried the same with left outer joins of temporary tables created through select statements:
select distinct ule.month as "Month", count(distinct p1.user_id) as "Users created", count (ule.id) as "Logins", count (distinct ule.user_id) as "Users logged in", count(rv.id) as "Resource Views", count(distinct rv.resource_id) as "Resources Viewed"
[code]....
Tried the same with left outer joins of temporary tables created through select statements:
select distinct ule.month as "Month", count(distinct p1.user_id) as "Users created", count (ule.id) as "Logins", count (distinct ule.user_id) as "Users logged in", count(rv.id) as "Resource Views", count(distinct rv.resource_id) as "Resources Viewed"
[code]....
another approach is to create my own temporary tables using select statements and create fixed Month values which I can use to directly link the sets together.
select distinct ule.loginday as "Month", count(distinct ule.id) as "Logins", count(distinct ule.user_id) as "Users logged in", count(distinct p1.user_id) as "Users created", count(distinct p2.user_id) as "Existing users1"
[code]....
performance is OK with 2 tables but the example above takes forever to execute.
Tried an approach with union but this creates new rows for each table
SELECT DISTINCT p1.MONTH AS "Month", COUNT(DISTINCT p1.user_id) AS "Users created", NULL AS "Logins", NULL AS "Users Logged in", NULL AS "Resource views", NULL AS "Resources viewed" FROM (SELECT To_char(person.created_on_date, 'YYYY-MM') AS MONTH,
we're having a few tables which queries about 10.000 articles. As we don't show them all at once we are using pagination and use the rownum to show only a limited number of the results.
Now as these queries are pretty complex we have to optimize them and since we use pagination we have to call our query twice (first we make a count(*) and then we call the small resultset of a few rows). Ofcourse we are looking for a solution to call it only once and still use the pagination. We could load the whole resultset of 10.000 results and let java show only a few but that makes our line between the oracle and webserver pretty heavy. Is there a way to call the total number of results and give back only a small resultset just in one query?
how joins work with in-line views.I have a query and its explain plan as below:
SELECT e.ename,e.deptno,d.dname FROM dept d, emp e WHERE e.deptno=d.deptno AND e.deptno=20 [code]....
I do not find any difference in both the explain plans. Both are same. In my second query, the filtered rows will be joined to dept table. And hence the baggage will reduce.But how can I verify that in-line view has worked better?
I have been using With for many queries for readability. This most recent query seemed to be taking a bit longer to run and I didn't think much of it until a colleague showed me their version (totally different sql statement) which ran faster, but seemed more complicated and had more lines of code. I noticed that the other version did not use with. I moved the sql of the with into the join and the query ran faster dropping from 30 seconds to 798 msecs. The question is am I sacrificing speed for readability by using With, or it really depends on the overall sql statement.
Here is the query using WITH:
with prev as ( select person_uid, id, name, academic_period, case when enrolled_ind = 'Y' and registered_ind = 'N' and student_status = 'AS' then 0 else 1 end as enreg_stat,
I have created a few flash charts using APEX4.2. Is there a way for the user to view the chart and then email it as an inline image to someone? I know that the user can save the chart as PDF file, then send it as an attachment via Outlook ( or similar system), but can I integrate these manual steps to one ( template), similar to the IR report's download feature ?
