SQL & PL/SQL :: Explicit Name For Index Of IOT
Feb 18, 2011Need some Clarification on the below query:
Can we specify explicit name for the index of the IOT.
ADVERTISEMENT
SQL & PL/SQL :: Differences Between Explicit And Implicit Cursor?
Nov 16, 2011what are the main points that these examples are considered cursors? and why are they called explicit and implicit cursor.
explicit
for x in (select * from emp) loop
dbms_output.put_line('emp no: '||x.empno);
end loop;
implicit
select empno
into vEmpno
from empno
where empname = 'SCOTT';
for all we know that these are not clearly defined on the declaration area as cursor.
SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Fetch Two Times Same Explicit Cursor
Nov 25, 2012I need to open an explicit cursor for making a total: after I have to use the same information of that explicit cursor for dividing a column of the cursor by that total. It is not enough to open close, reopen and reclose because I just obtain one register at the same time and it is the same register two times consecutively.
I don't want to use auxiliary structures cause there are 18000 columns for 10200 rows.
FOR i IN 300..300 --18000
LOOP
y:=ymax-ysize*(i+0.5);
[Code]......
SQL & PL/SQL :: Difference Between Implicit And Explicit Cursor?
Feb 21, 2013What is the difference between implicit cursor and explicit cursor in PL/SqL?
And what is ref cursor ?
PL/SQL :: Difference Between Explicit And Implicit Cursor?
Nov 5, 2013difference between between these two constructs. Finally when i read the asktom.oracle.com , I was totally confused. The reason is thatTom says...we can retrieve more than one row in implicit cursor. If that would be case, what's the difference between these two cursors?? when to use?? My understanding was implicit cursors" ---> single-row queryExplicit cursors ---> multi-row query Experts
View 10 Replies View RelatedPL/SQL :: Creating A Procedure Using Explicit Cursor?
Nov 19, 2013I am writing this procedure with a explicit cursors defined in it. However when i compile the procedure i get this error: Error(39,1): PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored Error(39,1):PLS-00394: wrong number of values in the INTO list of a FETCH statement .
create or replace PROCEDURE PRO_ICMISd_customer_no BB_PM.customer_no%type;d_pr_code_bbl BB_PM.pr_code_bbl%type;d_pr_code_pmm BB_PM.pr_code_pmm%type;d_subdept_desc PM.subdept_desc%type;d_class_desc PM.class_desc%type;d_cat_desc PM.cat_desc%type;d_subcat_desc PM.subcat_desc%type;d_brand_name PM.brand_name%type;d_product_desc PM.product_desc%type;d_unit_price_bbl PM.unit_price%type; e_customer_no BB_PM.customer_no%type;e_pr_code_bbl BB_PM.pr_code_bbl%type;e_pr_code_pmm BB_PM.pr_code_pmm%type;e_subdept_desc PM.subdept_desc%type;e_class_desc PM.class_desc%type;e_cat_desc PM.cat_desc%type;e_subcat_desc PM.subcat_desc%type;e_brand_name PM.brand_name%type;e_product_desc
[code]....
SQL & PL/SQL :: Choose Explicit Cursor To Loop Through At Runtime?
Nov 1, 2011Oracle Version: 11.2.0.2.0. I have two explicit cursors and I would like to choose at run time which one to run. Here is a simplified code snippet of what I am doing today:
DECLARE
CURSOR Cursor_A IS
SELECT * FROM EMP_A;
CURSOR Cursor_B IS
SELECT * FROM EMP_B;
RUNA CHAR(1) := 'Y';
[code]....
I want to avoid maintaining the same long list of transformations. I also want to avoid, if possible, an explicit FETCH INTO, because there are hundreds of fields in both tables. I'm looking for something like this (and I know this doesnt work):
DECLARE
CURSOR Cursor_A IS
SELECT * FROM EMP_A;
CURSOR Cursor_B IS
SELECT * FROM EMP_B;
RUNA CHAR(1) := 'Y';
CursorToRun IS REF CURSOR;
[code]....
Precompilers, OCI & OCCI :: Compile PC File With Created Make File - No Explicit Type Given
Jan 22, 2008I am trying to compile a .pc file with the make file which I created. But when I try to give make command I am getting following error
>make testfile
cc -o testfile testfile.c
"testfile.c", line 117: warning: no explicit type given
"testfile.c", line 119: warning: no explicit type given
"testfile.c", line 121: warning: no explicit type given
"testfile.c", line 122: warning: no explicit type given
"testfile.c", line 123: warning: no explicit type given
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
sqlcxt testfile.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to testfile
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `testfile'
Text :: Index For Domain Index With Composite Domain Index (CDI) Very Slow
Jun 27, 2012I am on 11.2.0.3 Enterprise Edition. We are using the new feature "Composite Domain Index" for a Domain index on a very large table (>250.000.000 rows). It really works with mixed queries. We added two number columns using FILTER BY.We have lots of DML on this table. Therefore, we are executing synchronize and optimize once the week. The synch behaves pretty normal. But "optimize_index" takes a very very long time to complete. I have switsched on 'logging' for the optimize process. The $I table takes some time but is finished normally. But the optimization of the $S table (that is the table created for the CDI feature) is running over 12 hours now - and far from being finished. From the logfile, I can see that it optimizes 1000 rows every 20 minutes. Here is the output of the logfile:
Oracle Text, 11.2.0.3.0
14:33:05 06/26/12 begin logging
14:33:05 06/26/12 event
14:33:05 06/26/12 process $N for optimize: SEQDEV.GEN_GES_DESCRIPTION_CTX_I
14:33:16 06/26/12
14:33:16 06/26/12
[code]....
I haven't found a recommendation from Oracle not to use "optimize_index" for Domain Indexes with CDI. But in my case, it would be much faster just to drop and recreate the Domain Index in question.
Performance Tuning :: Local Index Versus Global Index On Partitioned Table
Jun 28, 2011I have a huge table (about 60 gb) partition over range. The index on this table is global index created on 4 columns together. I have a query which is running very slowly. The explain plan is showing the use of this global index.Explain plan is not showing pstart and pend because the index is global.
View 6 Replies View RelatedServer Administration :: Convert Global Index To Local Index
Jun 23, 2011I have a global index and I want to convert it to local index.Is there a way to recreate local index with out dropping the global index.
I can create a local index first and then drop the global index. But is there a way to create it with out dropping the global index, just convert it.
SQL & PL/SQL :: Open Ref Cursor From Explicit Cursor
Nov 23, 2011I want to return ref cursor based on explicit cursors
create table jumbo(id number, name varchar2(20));
insert into jumbo values(1,'jumbo');
create table mumbo(id number, name varchar2(20));
insert into mumbo values(1,'mumbo');
commit;
[Code].....
The above procedure has compilation errors when I am trying to open ref cursor
LINE/COL ERROR
-------- --------------------------------------------------------
20/24 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
20/38 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
32/24 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
32/38 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
SQL>
SQL & PL/SQL :: ORA-01502 - Index Or Partition Of Such Index Is In Unusable State?
Nov 29, 2010I am facing the error "ORA-01502: index or partition of such index is in unusable state " while loading the text data using
sql loader with direct path (direct = Y ,rows = 10000) option. Table consists an composite non unique index. If I query the dba indexes for the effected index it shows the index status as VALID. There was no maintaince done on the effected table or index. I have tried loading the same data using conventional path but didn't found any issues for the same.
Performance Tuning :: Index With NVL / Query Is No Longer Using Index
Nov 19, 2010I have a query which had a join:
a.c1=b.c1 and a.c2=@var
where @var is user supplied input at runtime...We had a index on a.c2 . The CBO would use this index to generate an opitimised query plan.We found some records from table "b" were dropping due to inner join. So we made a change in join. It'd be like
a.c1(+)=b.c1 and nvl(a.c2,@var)=@var
This query is no longer using the index, instead its doing a full table scan causing the query to slowdown.I have tried creating index on nvl(a.c2,'31-dec-9999')
But the CBO won't use it.Anyway to create index on this col so that full table scan can be avoided?
Performance Tuning :: Force Index If Table Not Using Index?
Aug 9, 2013How to force an index if the table not using the index?
View 10 Replies View RelatedWhen Index Lock Contention Occurs / How To Know Which Index Is Causing
Aug 27, 2012We have occurrences of enq : TX - index contentions in the database. Using the SQL ID, we have identified the INSERT statement and the table which they are trying to insert.
This table has almost 25 different indexes, some of which are unique as well.I am wondering how to identify the actual index causing issue, out of these 25 indexes.
Is there any way to pin point to the name of index which is causing the lock?My plan is, once the index is identified, I would like to check the extents and inittrans and other attributes of this index to fix.
SQL & PL/SQL :: Create Non-cluster Index On A Clustered Index?
Jul 11, 2012Can we create non-cluster index on a clustered index?
View 5 Replies View RelatedSQL & PL/SQL :: Difference Between Index And Clustered Index
Aug 3, 2010Any on give explanation for difference between Index and Clustered Index?
It will be great if i get explanation how memory allocation and Execution takes place.?
Performance Tuning :: Difference Between Index Rebuild And Index Rebuild Online?
Jan 10, 2011What is the difference between index rebuild and index rebuild online.
View 3 Replies View RelatedPL/SQL :: Index Range Scan And Table Access By Index Rowid Versus Table Access Full
Oct 5, 2013Let's consider such table that all rows fit into single block:
SQL> create table test as select rownum id, '$'||rownum name from dual connect by level <= 530;
Table created.
SQL> create index i_test on test(id);
Index created.
SQL>
SQL> begin
[code].....
why does approach with full scan take longer even if table occupies only one data block? PS. 11gR2
Last Used Time Of Index
Apr 7, 2011I'm using Oracle 11g and I have a bunch of indexes and I want to check if they are being used. I just ran my workloads and now I want to see when each one was last used so I can see if it was during my timeframe or not.
After I ran my test, I found the below, but since I did not enable this, plus I have many indexes.
--Monitor an index to see if it's used
alter index SAMPLE_INDEX monitoring usage;
select * from v$object_usage where index_name = 'SAMPLE_INDEX';
alter index SAMPLE_INDEX nomonitoring usage;
Index With Degree More Than 1
Jul 29, 2010There is an index with degree 16 on a rac env. The base table has no degree. The table and index are not partitioned. Does the degree of index only affect index DDL (alter, rebuild etc)? Any effects on query (PQ)?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIndex In Cache
Apr 21, 2013i have a application which uses 32 tables for retrieval in this 4 tables are important and have a size more than 100 mb can i move the index of these 4 tables cache memory to improve the applications retrieval performance if i done so ,then that will affect any other applications performance
View 1 Replies View RelatedSQL & PL/SQL :: Index And Group By
Sep 5, 2012I have a query that extracts the row with a max(record_date) within a group.
select ssn, fund, type_indicator, annuitant, cur_year, record_date, guarantee
from LC_MORTALITY
where (ssn, fund, type_indicator, annuitant, cur_year, record_date) in
(select ssn, fund, type_indicator, annuitant, cur_year, max(record_date)
from LC_MORTALITY
group by ssn, fund, type_indicator, annuitant, cur_year);
the table has index that matches the group by clause exactly.
create index IDX_LC_MORTALITY_sftayd on LC_MORTALITY
(SSN,
FUND,
TYPE_INDICATOR,
ANNUITANT,
cur_year,
record_date
However, the plan ignores the index
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1963K| 241M| | 1375K (4)| 05:21:04 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN RIGHT SEMI| | 1963K| 241M| 9701M| 1375K (4)| 05:21:04 |
| 2 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 145M| 8038M| | 241K (12)| 00:56:22 |
| 3 | HASH GROUP BY | | 145M| 8038M| | 241K (12)| 00:56:22 |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| LC_MORTALITY | 145M| 8038M| | 219K (3)| 00:51:13 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | LC_MORTALITY | 145M| 9840M| | 222K (5)| 00:51:49 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[code]...
It uses the index but still shows "table access full" in one place. Why is there still a full access?Can I do anything to optimize further?
SQL & PL/SQL :: Use Of Table Index?
Feb 10, 2012Am pasting the sample code here, which i got from some site..
DECLARE
TYPE population_type IS TABLE OF NUMBER INDEX BY VARCHAR2(64);
country_population population_type;
continent_population population_type;
howmany NUMBER;
[code]...
Here we are fetching indexes (like Antartica/Australia) from these two statements continent_population.FIRST or continent_population.LAST. If there are three or more indexes in the same table, how to fetch all of them?
I have tried using this, but doesnt work because loop variables are by default integers:
for i in continent_population.FIRST .. continent_population.LAST loop
dbms_output.put_line('i:'||i);
end loop;
SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Rename A Index
Aug 8, 2011How can i rename a index? is there a way except for drop and create.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen To Use A Reverse Key Index
Jul 3, 2012I've read some documentation about the reverse key indexes, but I haven't understood when really it can be useful use them. when it's smart to use them according to your experiences?
View 4 Replies View RelatedSQL & PL/SQL :: Functional Index
May 19, 2011How can i turn this into functional index.
WHERE (IPC_DISP_ID IS NOT NULL AND DISP_EXIST > 0)
AND (IPC_UPU_BCD IS NOT NULL AND RECPT_EXIST > 0)
AND ( (IPC_ITM_ID IS NOT NULL AND ITM_EXIST > 0) OR IPC_ITM_ID IS NULL )
SQL & PL/SQL :: Delete An Index
Jun 27, 2010I have a very huge table. There are many indexes.My focus is on the following indexes:
APT_DEDUCTIBLE A_PT_ORDREGBUS_UNIT
APT_DEDUCTIBLE A_PT_ORDREGMD_CODE
APT_DEDUCTIBLE A_PT_ORDREGPT_CODE
[Code]...
My Question is, since this 3 indexes has two columns "Bus_unit and Md_code", which index can i delete. Will they effect on database performance, if i delete one of them?
PL/SQL :: Index Not Being Used In Group By
Sep 14, 2012Here is the scenario with examples. Big table 333 to 500 million rows in the table. Statistics are gathered. Histograms are there. Index is not being used though. Why?
CREATE TABLE "XXFOCUS"."some_huge_data_table"
( "ORG_ID" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
"PARTNERID" VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"EDI_END_DATE" DATE NOT NULL ENABLE,
"CUSTOMER_ITEM_NUMBER" VARCHAR2(50) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"STORE_NUMBER" VARCHAR2(10) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"EDI_START_DATE" DATE,
[Code]...
Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> SELECT num_rows FROM user_tables s WHERE s.table_name = 'some_huge_data_table';
NUM_ROWS
----------
333338434
SQL> SELECT MAX(edi_end_date)
2 FROM some_huge_data_table p
3 WHERE p.org_id = some_number
4 AND p.partnerid = 'some_string';
MAX(EDI_E
---------
13-MAY-12
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
SQL> explain plan for
2 SELECT MAX(edi_end_date)
3 FROM some_huge_data_table p
4 WHERE p.org_id = some_number
5 AND p.partnerid = 'some_string';
Explained.
SQL> /
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2104157595
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 22 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 22 | | |
| 2 | FIRST ROW | | 1 | 22 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX)| some_huge_data_table_PK | 1 | 22 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL> explain plan for
2 SELECT MAX(edi_end_date),
3 org_id,
4 partnerid
5 FROM some_huge_data_table
6 GROUP BY org_id,
7 partnerid;
Explained.
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 3950336305
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 2 | 44 | 1605K (1)| 05:21:03 |
| 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 2 | 44 | 1605K (1)| 05:21:03 |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| some_huge_data_table | 333M| 6993M| 1592K (1)| 05:18:33 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why wouldn't it use the index in the group by? If I write a loop to query for different partnerid (there are only three), the whole things takes less than a second.
btw, I gave the index hint too. Didn't work. Version mentioned in the example.