which will drive different execution plan from one user to another user for the same query and same objects,owners infact everthing is same.
I have found out only one particular user is getting different execution plan but remaining all are getting same execution plan.
the most accurate/efficient way of obtaining the execution plan for a piece of running SQL in Oracle 9i. in 10g and 11g obviously dbms_xplan.display_cursor(sql_id) can be used,
How can this be achieved in 9i, currently I am simply obtaining the SQL_TEXT and then running an explain plan ("EXPLAIN PLAN FOR..") - I believe this is not necessarily the same explain plan that will be used for the sql that is executing though
[font="Lucida Console"][/font]
Issue: For this sql statement client is changing the date and this sql is running fine in development and taking time in production.So I created the sql profile and push it ot prodcution so for EFFDT <= '25-APR-2010' it was running fine as plan is same as development .....but then again client changed the EFFDT <= '28-AUG-2010' is changed then plan neglected my sql profile because of hardcoded value and so it has parsed the sql again.
How we can fix this plan ? there application is like that so they are goin to pass the hardoce value like this only.....so they can not use bind variable... they are going to fire the sql from one session can we set on the session level like cursor sharing or some hints to get the development plan *for proper formating see the attached file* Statement :
SELECT
DECODE(SUBSTR(JL.PAYGROUP,1,1),'P','P','T','P','C'), JL.DEPTID_CF, JL.OPERATING_UNIT, JL.FUND_CODE,
JL.CLASS_FLD, JL.PROGRAM_CODE, PC.EMPLID, PC.EMPL_RCD, BUGL.BUSINESS_UNIT, JL.ACCOUNT,
SUM(DECODE(JL.GL_NBR,'REGER',JL.AMOUNT,0)), 'Regular Earnings', SUM(DECODE(JL.GL_NBR,'OTERN',JL.AMOUNT,0)), 'Overtime', SUM(DECODE(JL.GL_NBR,'NRTAL',JL.AMOUNT,0)),
[code]....
I am executing below query, but optimizer generating 2 different plans for the same. I don't want to use sql profiles to fix execution plan.
Query
SELECT R.VENDOR_RECORD_SEQ_NO ,
R.VENDOR_SUBJECT_SEQ_NO ,
NVL(D.RESOLVED_VALUE, D.ORIGINAL_VALUE) VAL,
D.CONTROL_COLUMN_SEQ_NO
[code]....
Why the query is behaving differently with the different database.(execution plan)
Whatever the production database is having same database instance replicated to a new schema. I tried both the queries running on both environment.In prod the index has been used but in newdev it is not. This case existing primary key index were not been used.
There is a requirement in my database that I want to restrict the user from directly running queries on database from third party tools such as pl/sql developer and toad.
There is a utility in SQL product_user_profile through which this can be done but it is only restricted if you run the query through sql plus. If I want to restrict and (give suppose select,insert) to a user for directly running queries through PL/SQL.
I created an externally authenticated user in database. And can login without password with below syntax.
SQL> connect / @TESTDB
Connected.
SQL> show user;
USER is "SCOTT"
This scott user has a proxy permission to another DBuser PROXY_USER. Previously I used to login using below syntax.
connect scott[proxy_user]/password_for_scott@TESTDB
So now, what syntax should be used for this "ExternallY Authenticated" user to login as a proxy user?
how can i assign permissions to one user to add,delete,edit data and other user should be able to perform all functions or selected functions
View 12 Replies View RelatedI would like to know if 'user creation definition' is exported in user mode export if export is done with DBA role..If it is Not, does it mean we always need to precreate the user before we import the dump created using 'user mode export'?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI don't know, if this is the intent behavior of oracle or not. But i noticed, my queries Execution plan randomly changes after statistics collection. Several tables are truncated after the daily run at 8AM and statistics gathered for all the tables in that schema.
However execution plans for 2-3 sql statements always changes after this and performance is brought back to normal by executing the procedure by explicitly calling it from the command line with arguments instead of bind variables.
I am using Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
I have 2 schemas in my application.
1. Application schema
2. EOD(End of day) schema.
End of day schema is populated from Application schema whenever user runs EOD process. The tables are pulled like this.
1. Master tables : Always deleted and reinserted at each EOD process
2. Log tables for each transaction table: Delta between the last EOD and current EOD data is pulled and are used for populating transaction tables
3. Transaction tables: These are populated from log tables pulled from previous step. The logic is like this
Now based on these tables about 30 reports are generated in EOD schema. Please note that each transaction table will have a EOD_ID and any report generated uses the where condition <transaction table>.EOD_ID = <current EOD_ID>
My log table contract_log and transaction table is contract in EOD schema.
contract_log table has data like this
contract_number contract_date customer_idqtyrateeffective_date
11/Jan/2010CUST-0110101/Jan/2010
1NULLNULLNULL112/Jan/2010
EOD on 1st Jan 2010 constructs contract table as
contract_numbercontract_datecustomer_idqtyrateeod_id
11/Jan/2010CUST-011010EOD-1
(Since the change of rate 11 is not visible on 1st Jan 2010 because it is effective on 2nd Jan 2010)
EOD on 2nd Jan 2010 constructs contract table as
contract_numbercontract_datecustomer_idqtyrateeod_id
11/Jan/2010CUST-011011EOD-2
(Since the change of rate 11 is visible on 2nd Jan 2010)
This logic is working fine. But we run more than 20-30 EODs the processing time increased to 10-15 hours.
It took some time to figure out the issue as a single query when run from toad or pl sql developer runs in few seconds but as a part of the whole package it takes 2-3 hours(each query).
The problem found was that oracle execution plan gets corrupted when the process starts. So what we did was to analyze the tables
after they are pulled. This perfectly solved our problem. Currently the whole process is taking only about 12-13 minutes where about 3 minutes is lost on analyze tables and indexes. I know this is a temporary solution as I need to get out of online analyze of tables and indexes.
My code for table and index regeneration is as below
PROCEDURE sp_gather_table_index_stats(pc_table_name VARCHAR2) IS
CURSOR cur_ind IS
SELECT index_name
FROM user_indexes
WHERE table_name = pc_table_name;
BEGIN
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE ' begin DBMS_STATS.gather_table_stats(user,' || '''' ||
pc_table_name || '''' || '); end;';
FOR cur_ind_rows IN cur_ind LOOP
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE ' begin DBMS_STATS.gather_index_stats(user,' || '''' ||
cur_ind_rows.index_name || '''' || '); end;';
END LOOP;
END;
How can i check the avg time taken by an execution plan. Actually i have a very big query and it changes its execution plan very often, we would like to lock the best execution plan and to find it , i would like to know the Average Execution Time the query takes when it runs using different different execution plans.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have queries on the execution plan of a sql statement
Following is the example
create table t1 as select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
create table t2 as select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t1 select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t1 select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
commit;
create index i1 on t1(id);
create index i2 on t2(id);
create index i11 on t1(object_type);
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'T1',cascade=>true);
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'T2',cascade=>true);
select count(*) from t1 where object_type='VIEW';
COUNT(*)
----------
8934
set autotrace traceonly explain
Can we say in the following case, that,
(1) First index on object_type is accessed to get rowids - t1.object_type='VIEW'
(2) Then the filter on owner is applied - t1.owner='SYS'
(3) Then the table T1 is accessed to fetch data from the rowids returned by the index I11 and filer application - TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID
Though I am unable to understand how filter can be applied to the rowids retrieved from index, we can see from the plan below that The rows accessed have reduced from 8550 to 1221 before we access the table...Thus filter "t1.owner='SYS'" is applied in between. Right?
another question is
Case 1 - do we retrieve a rowid from index for a given value, then retrieve required values from table for that rowid
Thus row at a time in both ... in loop
OR
Case 2 - we first fetch all rowids from index and then retrieve values from table one row at a time from the collection of rowids fetched?
Suppose Case 1 is what is happening then can we say, both the steps mentioned by IDS 2,3 in plan below are executed exactly equal number of times and the filter "t1.owner='SYS'" is applied at some later stage? Of course in this case the values in ROWS stand misleading then
select * from t1,t2 where t1.id = t2.id and t1.object_type='VIEW' and t1.owner='SYS';
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 26873579
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1221 | 233K| 915 (1)| 00:00:11 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1221 | 233K| 915 (1)| 00:00:11 |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 1221 | 116K| 381 (1)| 00:00:05 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I11 | 8550 | | 24 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T2 | 161K| 15M| 533 (1)| 00:00:07 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - access("T1"."ID"="T2"."ID")
2 - filter("T1"."OWNER"='SYS')
3 - access("T1"."OBJECT_TYPE"='VIEW')
So the situation is like this
- Database A (20 tables)
- Database B (20 tables)
- Both A and B are Oracle 11gR2
- Both of these databases run on different hardware (A is a VM, B is on a physical host)
- The 20 tables in A and B have exactly same number of rows and after preparing the data, the schemas were analysed using the same DBMS_STATS parameters
Despite this, the execution plans appear to be quite different for the same queries between A and B
I imagine there is something outside of the Oracle table rowcounts, table stats, column stats, index stats that's resulting in the different execution plans.
refere to below 2 queries and their execution plans:
First Query
INSERT INTO temp_vendor(vendor_record_seq_no,checksum,rownumber,transaction_type,iu_flag)
SELECT /*+ USE_NL ( vd1 ,vd2 ,vd3 ) leading ( vd1 ,vd2 ,vd3 , tvd) */
vd1.vendor_record_seq_no, tvr.checksum, tvr.rownumber, tvr.transaction_type, 'U'
FROM vendor_data vd1,
[code]...
Second Query
SELECT vd1.vendor_record_seq_no, tvr.checksum, tvr.rownumber, tvr.transaction_type, 'U'
FROM ( select * from vendor_data vd1
where vd1.study_seq_no = 99903
AND vd1.control_column_seq_no = 435361232
[code]...
Both are to achieve same output but written in different ways. CAn I get same exectuion plan from 1st query as there is for 2nd using hints
We are trying to implement the following security to our database.
As of now, the access rights are same for all the windows users logging into the Oracle application with the same Oracle user Id.
But now, we want to improve our security by granting different levels of rights to the users based on their Network Id even though they use the same Oracle User Id to log into the application.
We are not looking for the users to be identified externally.
(CREATE USER "OPS$ORACLE-BASE.COMTIM_HALL" IDENTIFIED EXTERNALLY;
GRANT CONNECT TO "OPS$ORACLE-BASE.COMTIM_HALL";
)
- we have user id parameter.can we update the parameter(:parameter.p_userid) before firing "WHEN NEW FORM INSTANCE TRIGGER"(when new form instance trigger contain code for tree node), for login another canvas as per user rights?
- i have created a login form in one canvas.
- also tree node Hierarchy form created on another canvas. now we want to login through login screen, after login only those forms should show in tree Hierarchy which users have rights. for this purpose we want to pass the parameter of userid before connecting to tree node form through the following query
SELECT COUNT (*)
INTO v_count
FROM usersinfo
WHERE usersname = :USERBLOCK.usernames AND passwords = :USERBLOCK.passwords ;
[code]...
Every thing is working but when we click on button in login form at that time parameter.p_userid will return null. because above code is define on button click in login screen, i cannot understand where i need to define the above code .
User session has expired. I have to enable user without changing the password of the user.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have the database user called c88888 and is locked yesterday. I came to this with the following query.
select * from dba_users where username like 'C88888';
Due to invalid password the user was locked. Can we track who hit the database with the wrong password?
I Created One Trigger as Follows
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRIGGER1
BEFORE INSERT
ON table1
FOR EACH ROW
[code]......
Here , I Want To Insert The Data From My User To Test User . In This Situation When I Execute The Above Trigger It Shows The Error PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
One of our clients is using Rule Based Optimizer on Oracle 10.2.0.3.0
2-3 weeks backs, during performance issue in one of the sql queries, one of our team members executed tuning adviser for it, created SQL profile and the subsequent execution of the SQL did not took much time (less I/O). Now it took hardly a minute to execute
When this happened I checked that the SQL profile forced that particular query to use CBO (say plan_hash_value is PHV1 here). Yesterday the same query again took 15-20 minutes for execution. I checked that even for this execution the query used the same SQL profile but "this time" with different plan_hash_value - say PHV2.
Today again the query executed in less than a minute and used the plan_hash_value as PHV1.
select distinct plan_hash_value,timestamp from dba_hist_sql_plan where sql_id='mysqlid' order by 1,2;
PLAN_HASH_VALUE TIMESTAMP
--------------- --------------------
890360113 20-feb-2013 16:38:39
3736413466 04-mar-2013 08:12:52
1237282258 03-jan-2013 17:15:02
I confirmed from awrsqrpt as well that different plans were used for different plan_hash_values and every time same SQL profile was used
SQL> select name,CATEGORY,SIGNATURE,CREATED,LAST_MODIFIED,TYPE,STATUS,FORCE_MATCHING from dba_sql_profiles;
NAME CATEGORY SIGNATURE CREATED LAST_MODIFIED TYPE STATUS FOR
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ---------- -------------------- -------------------- --------- -------- ---
SYS_SQLPROF_015ffffcc3e1c5b000 DEFAULT 1.5512E+19 20-feb-2013 16:30:48 20-feb-2013 16:30:48 MANUAL ENABLED NO
I am unable to understand how execution plan and thus plan_hash_value is changing for the same SQL Profile. I read that SQL Profile (unlike stored outline) keeps up with increasing data volume and may not keep up with changing data distribution.
I checked that values for 4 bind variables out of 81 are different for execution between today and yesterdays' run(queried v$sql_bind_capture based on last_captured)
My questions are
1) does the different plan_hash_values with different execution plans for query using same SQL profile mean the query was hard parsed multiple times and still used the same SQL profile?
2) If that is the case why I never saw child_number = 1 in any of the views for the same sql_id. I tried it repeatedly over last 2 weeks and always found child_number=0 in v$sql (also loaded_versions=1)
3) Does the different values of bind variable are causing this flip-flop of the plans? How can I conclude this?
I have 2 plans with 2 different plan_hash_values. I know which would be better. How can I force the sql to use better plan in the two in this case where I am using Rule Based Optimizer and have SQL profile created If this is not possible then how can I create stored outline from the existing plan (not waiting for subsequent execution to take place).
I have two users say A and B. I have all the tables,views,indexes, types,procedures,packages etc. User B wants to access all the objects from user A.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a strange problem when creating a view in user from another user
I have a user called "Cash_tst"
its syntax creation is
-- Create the user
create user CASH_TST
identified by ""
default tablespace CASH
temporary tablespace TEMP
profile DEFAULT
quota unlimited on cash;
-- Grant/Revoke object privileges
grant connect to CASH_TST;
grant dba to CASH_TST;
grant resource to CASH_TST;
-- Grant/Revoke system privileges
grant create any view to CASH_TST;
grant unlimited tablespace to CASH_TST;
I want to create a view
CREATE VIEW TAMER
AS SELECT *
FROM [b]AROFL[/b].RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_ALL_BEFO
"AROFL" is another user on the same database
when try to create the view "tamer" i got message of
"insufficent privilege"
although i granted "create any view" to the user "cash_tst"
we are trying ti implement BMC monitoring tool for our oracle 11g2 RAC/solaris10 environment. for the purpose we create a user called bmcuser in OS level, this user connecting database to monitor, this user occupy shared memory as oracle. Explain why this user taking that much shared memory just to connect database using sqlplus.
oracle taking 55% bmcuser taking 44%,
SQL> show parameters memory
NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
hi_shared_memory_address integer 0
memory_max_target big integer 3232M
memory_target big integer 3232M
shared_memory_address integer 0
SQL> show parameters sga
NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
lock_sga boolean FALSE
pre_page_sga boolean FALSE
sga_max_size big integer 3232M
sga_target big integer 0
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
6449 bmcuser 47M 44M sleep 23 10 0:57:31 0.2% PatrolAgent/1
[code]........
pga & uga usage sessionwise
SID ORA_USR OS_USR S_PROG S.MACHINE S.PGA_MEM S.PGA_MEM_MAX S.UGA_M S.UGA_M_MAX
252 (null) oracle oracle@racdev1.zakathouse.org (ARC3) racdev1. 31054584 32168696 181056 181056
227 (null) oracle oracle@racdev1.zakathouse.org (ARC2) racdev1. 31054584 32168696 181056 181056
177 (null) oracle oracle@racdev1.zakathouse.org (ARC0) racdev1. 31054584 32168696 181056 181056
576 (null) oracle oracle@racdev1.zakathouse.org (LGWR) racdev1. 16693544 21281064 181056 181056
326 (null) oracle oracle@racdev1.zakathouse.org (LMS0) racdev1. 13753080 13753080 181056 181056
376 (null) oracle oracle@racdev1.zakathouse.org (LMS2) racdev1. 13556472 13556472 181056 181056
[code]........
refer following sql statements and code
Session 1
create table tab1 as select * from dba_objects where object_id is not null;
alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';
declare
x number;
begin
for i in 1..4
loop
[code]....
Session 2
after "starting" the above pl/sql block from Session 1, I keep on querying tab2 from Session 2 And as soon as 2 records are inserted in tab2, I create index from Session 2
select * from tab2;
select * from tab2;
select * from tab2;
N
----------
1
2
create index i on tab1(object_id);
As I have tested from a single session (just before this test) such index is used for the sql statement
select count(1) into x from tab1 where object_id=2331;
However when I checked the trace file I am not geeting results as expected
I am expecting 4 execution plans - 2 FTS and 2 Index Access scans and for this I am issuing following command
tkprof dst1_ora_7369.trc dst1_ora_7369.txt aggregate=no sys=no
But unfortunately I am getting following output
SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM
TAB1 WHERE OBJECT_ID=2331
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 1 0 0
Execute 4 0.00 0.00 0 2 0 0
[code]....
1) Why I am unable to see 4 execution plans - 2 with FTS and 2 with Index access when I mentioned 'aggregate=no'?
2) Whether the index i will be used for last 2 iterations after first 2 iterations of FTS?
If answer to above question 2) is 'No'
By which method I can force an ongoing sql statement in loop to take different execution path? Of course I can't hard parse sql in 'that' current session Will flushing Shared pool work in above case?
I have two Oracle instances that are setup identically.When I run a query on one of them, it takes around 3 seconds, on the other it takes around 200 seconds.
I have looked at the explain plans, and it has shown me what I think is the problem. On one instance, it does a join on two tables, then runs the other filter/access predicates. On the other instance it runs the filter/access predicated first, then does the expensice join. The one that does the join first is the one that takes around 200 seconds. How to tell Oracle to make this join after runnning the other predicates?
Can we have same execution plan for a create table statement where the name of the table changes every time as follows:
create table test
as
select * from t1
Here table name changes from test to another table name next time
User A contains tables, views, LOB's, types, procedures, triggers, sequences, indexes, synonyms. User B wants to have read-only privilege on the objects of User A.
I can provide select on privilege on tables and views. How about providing read-only privileges to other objects?
I want to perform something like -
Conn xyz/passwordxyz
grant create procedure to 'xyz';
I want to give permissions to my current user 'xyz' , I am able to give permissions to user using system user but Is there any way to grant permissions to user 'xyz' while I am using 'xyz' user.
I have two databases (say DATABASE 1 with user USER1 with table A and DATABASE2 with user USER1 with table A). I want to select the table A in USER1 DATABASE2 from DATABASE1 USER1.
View 5 Replies View Related