Performance Tuning :: Select Not IN Statement
Jun 2, 2011
We have a person running a query and following is the explain plan
explain plan for
select distinct(extractvalue(xmltype(a.email_variables), '/CalliopeData/Attributes/HOTEL_BRAND')) as ThisBrand
from hh.t_ecomm_mem_relations a
where extractvalue(xmltype(a.email_variables), '/CalliopeData/Attributes/HOTEL_BRAND') not in (select b.code_brand from hh.t_pr_brand b)
and a.code_corr_ecat = 'PREA'
and a.status = 'S'
and a.audit_time > sysdate - 1
;
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1904775187
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 14 | 32018 | 25 (4)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 14 | 32018 | 25 (4)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | | | |
| 3 | PARTITION RANGE ITERATOR | | 14 | 32018 | 17 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | 13 |
|* 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| T_ECOMM_MEM_RELATIONS | 14 | 32018 | 17 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | 13 |
|* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | X_ECOMM_MEM_RELATIONS3 | 15 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | 13 |
|* 6 | INDEX FULL SCAN | I_PR_BRAND | 1 | 3 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
2 - filter( NOT EXISTS (SELECT /*+ */ 0 FROM "HH"."T_PR_BRAND" "B" WHERE
LNNVL("B"."CODE_BRAND"<>EXTRACTVALUE("XMLTYPE"."XMLTYPE"(:B1),'/CalliopeData/Attributes/HOTEL_BRAND'))))
4 - filter("A"."STATUS"='S')
5 - access("A"."AUDIT_TIME">SYSDATE@!-1 AND "A"."CODE_CORR_ECAT"='PREA')
filter("A"."CODE_CORR_ECAT"='PREA')
6 - filter(LNNVL("B"."CODE_BRAND"<>EXTRACTVALUE("XMLTYPE"."XMLTYPE"(:B1),'/CalliopeData/Attributes/HOTEL_BRAND')))
=========================
I tried not exists and some Antijoin hints in the subquery which is used in filter NOT IN. I tried minus too.
View 15 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 8, 2011
I'm working on a query that will show how many differents SKUs we have on-hand, how many of those SKUs have been cycle-counted, and how many we have yet to cycle-count.I've prepared a sample table and data:
CREATE TABLE SKU
(
ABC VARCHAR2(1 CHAR),
SKU VARCHAR2(32 CHAR) NOT NULL,
Lastcyclecount DATE,
[code]....
What I also want to do is select another column that will group by sku.abc and count the total number of A, B, and C SKUs where the lot.qty is > 0:
SELECT sk.abc AS "STRATA",
COUNT (DISTINCT sk.sku) AS "Total"
FROM sku sk,
(SELECT sku
FROM lot
WHERE qty > 0) item
WHERE item.sku = sk.sku(+)
GROUP BY sk.abc
Finally, I need the last column to display the DIFFERENCE between the two totals from the queries above (the difference between the "counted" and the "total"):
COUNT (DISTINCT sk.sku) - COUNT (DISTINCT s.sku)
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2011
I have two tables with 113M records in DWH_BILL_DET & 103M in prd_rerate_chg_que and Im running following merge query, which is running for 13 hrs to update records, which is quiet longer time.
SQL> explain plan for MERGE /*+ parallel (rq, 16) */
INTO DWH_BILL_DET rq
USING (SELECT rated_que_rowid,
detail_rerate_flag_code,
rerate_sel_key,
[code].....
View 39 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2010
Tried several different ideas today and nothing worked to make a PL/SQL query run faster or detect when an item is missing appropriately. . I'm trying to write a statement that matches 2 fields, but then I have the third field that has multiple results and I need to be able to see if any of those results is a yes.
I have a several million record table with about 15 fields, but created a new smaller table to get only the 3 fields I needed, and removed dups (7000+ recs).
I have an output number repeated about 30K times.
I have stock numbers and they are repeated in each of the output lines.
I have another field, that's Yes, No or Maybe for something being on the shelf.
I tried indexing all 3 columns
output stock # shelf
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 x5323 Yes
1 p2323 No
2 x5323 No
I have a list of unique stock numbers that include output numbers that I want to check and see if they were on the shelf for that particular output run. I put those in a cursor. There are about 100 of them. The idea was to do a for loop thru the cursor, and if I didn't find the item in the smaller table I created, write that to a file. Problem is, detection isn't always correct and it takes forever to run.
I've tried to explain (to the non technical people) that this may be something that takes awhile, because I'm looking at 100 original stock numbers that have to go through the smaller table of 7000 records to find the match. I'm matching on output number for both the cursor and table, and stock number for cursor and table. Code below:
cursor cr_stocknums is select unique stocknums, outputnums from large_table.
I created table check_table, create table check_table as select outputnums, stocknums, shelf from large_table.
Then I tried things like exists, not exists, etc. in a for loop. Nothing worked.
for i in 1..tot_stock_nums
loop
select unique stocknum (tried stocknum alone, also tried select 1, in the where clause I tried where exists)
into variable_name
from check_table
[code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2012
I have the following problem. When I used in the IN-Statement fixed values e.q. 197321,197322,197323 ..., the index i_tab2_index works fine (index range scan).
But when I used in the IN-Statement an Sub-Select, the index i_tab2_index doesn't work (fast full scan)!My scale indices and used Selects:
CREATE INDEX i_tab1_index ON tab1 ( datum, flag_inst );
CREATE INDEX i_tab2_index ON tab2 ( tab2Idx, kontro );
SELECT count(epidx) as rowAnz
FROM tab2
WHERE tab2Idx IN ( SELECT tab1IDX FROM tab1
WHERE datum BETWEEN '20120117' AND '20120117'
AND flag_inst = '1' )
AND kontro = '9876521'
[code]...
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2011
mbr has 60,000 rows and member has 60,000 rows approx. two tables have indexes on ssn, and citi_no on them.
PK of mbr : mbr_id
PK of member : mbr_id
other columns are not PK, and have no index on it.
I'm wondering why the statment doesn't use index while ssn and citi_no have index.
MERGE INTO mbr t
USING (SELECT mbr_id,citi_no
FROM member) a
ON (t.ssn = a.citi_no)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET t.asis_mbr_id = a.mbr_id
where t.ssn not in(select ssn from mbr group by ssn having count(*) > 1)
View 19 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2012
Is there is any view/query from where I can find how many sql using literals.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2012
I have queries on the execution plan of a sql statement
Following is the example
create table t1 as select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
create table t2 as select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t1 select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t1 select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
commit;
create index i1 on t1(id);
create index i2 on t2(id);
create index i11 on t1(object_type);
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'T1',cascade=>true);
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'T2',cascade=>true);
select count(*) from t1 where object_type='VIEW';
COUNT(*)
----------
8934
set autotrace traceonly explain
Can we say in the following case, that,
(1) First index on object_type is accessed to get rowids - t1.object_type='VIEW'
(2) Then the filter on owner is applied - t1.owner='SYS'
(3) Then the table T1 is accessed to fetch data from the rowids returned by the index I11 and filer application - TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID
Though I am unable to understand how filter can be applied to the rowids retrieved from index, we can see from the plan below that The rows accessed have reduced from 8550 to 1221 before we access the table...Thus filter "t1.owner='SYS'" is applied in between. Right?
another question is
Case 1 - do we retrieve a rowid from index for a given value, then retrieve required values from table for that rowid
Thus row at a time in both ... in loop
OR
Case 2 - we first fetch all rowids from index and then retrieve values from table one row at a time from the collection of rowids fetched?
Suppose Case 1 is what is happening then can we say, both the steps mentioned by IDS 2,3 in plan below are executed exactly equal number of times and the filter "t1.owner='SYS'" is applied at some later stage? Of course in this case the values in ROWS stand misleading then
select * from t1,t2 where t1.id = t2.id and t1.object_type='VIEW' and t1.owner='SYS';
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 26873579
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1221 | 233K| 915 (1)| 00:00:11 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1221 | 233K| 915 (1)| 00:00:11 |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 1221 | 116K| 381 (1)| 00:00:05 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I11 | 8550 | | 24 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T2 | 161K| 15M| 533 (1)| 00:00:07 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - access("T1"."ID"="T2"."ID")
2 - filter("T1"."OWNER"='SYS')
3 - access("T1"."OBJECT_TYPE"='VIEW')
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2011
Test1 table have around 385772300 rows. below delete and select statment talking lot of time.
Select stament taking more than 1 hrs.
SELECT TO_NUMBER(MAX(f.T3))
--INTO v_FISCAL_MONTH_ID
FROM Test1 f;
delete statment taking more than 2 hours
DELETE FROM TEST1 WHERE TRUNC(T10) < TRUNC(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-36));
CREATE TABLE Test1
(
[Code].....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2012
i am trying to analyze a query i have and noticed that it does not show the sql_id in v$session.
preparing a test case:
create table t1(a number, b varchar(10));
insert into t1 values(123 , 'value1');
when i execute
select count(*) from dual;
select * from dual;
select count(*) from t1;
i can see the sql_id by running
select
sql_id sql_id_,
sql_child_number sql_child_num,
module module_,
action action_,
logon_time lgtime,
[code]....
however, when i'm running
select * from t1
sql_id and sql_child_id in v$session appears to be null, and i can't analyze it.
why those columns are NULL?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 5, 2010
this statement is taking 1hr , can we reduce the timing?
CREATE TABLE DGT_ITEMEFFORTDATA (ENTERPRISEID, OWNERTYPE, OWNERID, SUPEROWNERTYPE, SUPEROWNERID,
ITEMTYPE, ITEMID, STAGEID, USERID, DATEIDENTIFIED,
DATECLOSED, ACTIVITYCODEID, PHASEID, RELEASEID, MONTHID,
QUARTERID, INITIALEFFORT, BASELINEDEFFORT,
ACTUALEFFORT, ITEMSTATUS, ALLOCATIONSTATUS, STAGESTATUS,
OCCURANCETYPE, DSLPROJECTTYPE, METRICCALCRUNID,
[code].....
This is the explain plan of the above query
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%C
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 11M| 4137M| 46149 (
| 1 | UNION-ALL | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| DGT_ITEMEFFORTDATA_DAILY | 3455K| 428M| 14575
[code].....
This is the index details
1DGT_ITEMEFFORTDATA_DAILYHCLT_IDX_DGT_IFDITEMID4
2DGT_ITEMEFFORTDATA_DAILYHCLT_IDX_DGT_IFDITEMTYPE3
3DGT_ITEMEFFORTDATA_DAILYHCLT_IDX_DGT_IFDOWNERID2
4DGT_ITEMEFFORTDATA_DAILYHCLT_IDX_DGT_IFDOWNERTYPE1
There is no index on DGT_ITEMEFFORTDATA_TEMP table
[code].....
View 27 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2010
In my code I am using delete statement which is taking too much time to execute.
Statement is as follow:
DELETE FROM TRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION T
WHERE (ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID,NM_ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,CD_BOOK_KEY,ACTIVITY_DT)
IN (SELECT ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID,NM_ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,CD_BOOK_KEY,ACTIVITY_DT
FROM LOAD_TRADE_ORDER
WHERE IND_IS_BAD_RECORD='N');
Tables Used:
oTRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION Row count (329525880)
oLOAD_TRADE_ORDER Row count (29281)
Every column in "IN" clause and select clause is containing index on it
Every time no of rows which to be deleted is vary (May be in hundred ,thousand or hundred thousand )so that I am Unable to use "BITMAP" index on the table "LOAD_TRADE_ORDER" column "IND_IS_BAD_RECORD" though it is containing distinct record in it.
Even table "TRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION" is containing "RANGE" PARTITION over it on the column "ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID". With this I am enclosing table scripts with Indexes and Partitions over it.
way for fast execution in of above delete statement?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2011
refer following sql statements and code
Session 1
create table tab1 as select * from dba_objects where object_id is not null;
alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';
declare
x number;
begin
for i in 1..4
loop
[code]....
Session 2
after "starting" the above pl/sql block from Session 1, I keep on querying tab2 from Session 2 And as soon as 2 records are inserted in tab2, I create index from Session 2
select * from tab2;
select * from tab2;
select * from tab2;
N
----------
1
2
create index i on tab1(object_id);
As I have tested from a single session (just before this test) such index is used for the sql statement
select count(1) into x from tab1 where object_id=2331;
However when I checked the trace file I am not geeting results as expected
I am expecting 4 execution plans - 2 FTS and 2 Index Access scans and for this I am issuing following command
tkprof dst1_ora_7369.trc dst1_ora_7369.txt aggregate=no sys=no
But unfortunately I am getting following output
SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM
TAB1 WHERE OBJECT_ID=2331
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 1 0 0
Execute 4 0.00 0.00 0 2 0 0
[code]....
1) Why I am unable to see 4 execution plans - 2 with FTS and 2 with Index access when I mentioned 'aggregate=no'?
2) Whether the index i will be used for last 2 iterations after first 2 iterations of FTS?
If answer to above question 2) is 'No'
By which method I can force an ongoing sql statement in loop to take different execution path? Of course I can't hard parse sql in 'that' current session Will flushing Shared pool work in above case?
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2010
Can we have same execution plan for a create table statement where the name of the table changes every time as follows:
create table test
as
select * from t1
Here table name changes from test to another table name next time
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 23, 2010
I have a view, below, which does few left outer joins to the same V_MARKET view to get data i need. When I run SQL by itself, ut runs pretty fast, 2-5 seconds. But when I do "select * from V_DEPT_DATA where busines_date = '01-APR-10'", it takes more than 10 minutes to run. I added all needed indexes and still have problems with it .
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW V_DEPT_DATA
AS
SELECT
v1.business_date ,
v1.division ,
v1.department ,
v1.account ,
en.trader ,
[code]........
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2010
I've been examining som old queries in an existing db due to more and more problems regarding performance. The sql is used as backend for a java/jboss web application with the possibility for users to enter data. With more and more data, there starting to come complaints about the performance.
I stumbled upon a select query with an embedded cursor similar to this :
select id, name ...,
cursor(select id, sequence.... from table2),
cursor(select id, name.... from table3)
from table1
join table4 on (table1.id = table4.id)
where .....
The javacode is a prepared statement with the actual sql as a string and the content of the cursors saved in conjunction with each row.
when i use sqldeveloper to show the explain plan without the cursors, the cost is 2428
when i use sqldeveloper to show the explain plan with just 1 of the cursors, the cost is ~165000
Is there a better way to do this instead of cursors ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2011
I am running the following delete query and it has been running for over 2hrs:
delete from dw.ACCOUNT_FACT
where rowid in
(select rowid from DW.ACCOUNT_FACT
minus
select max(rowid) from DW.ACCOUNT_FACT
[Code]..
Here is the explan plain result:
explain plan for delete from dw.ACCOUNT_FACT
where rowid in
(select rowid from DW.ACCOUNT_FACT
minus
select max(rowid) from DW.ACCOUNT_FACT
group by CRTORD_FIPS_CD, LAST_PAYMENT_DT, ORDER_NUM,
[Code]....
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 611392786
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | DELETE STATEMENT | | 2604G| 260T| | 9018K (91)| 30:03:37 |
| 1 | DELETE | ACCOUNT_FACT | | | | | |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 2604G| 260T| 369M|
[Code].....
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
2 - access(ROWID="$kkqu_col_1")
I have all constraints disabled. How do I make this delete finish faster? We're trying to remove duplicates from this table using the criteria giving in the statement.
View 16 Replies
View Related
Aug 25, 2010
Is there any way i can Get how many rows are processing with UPDATE statement while the Update statement is still running.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2010
high number of executions of specific types of queries which is using only rownum clause. For exam.
select ani, rowid from tbl_smschat_upuor where rownum<=:"SYS_B_0";
DB is having high number of executions of these type of queries and these when I m checking the execution plan for the same type of queries it is accessing the full table scan.
======================execution plan for above query
1000 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 91289622
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2011
Having production system: 11.2.0.1 on Windows Server x64
Test system: 9.2.0.1 on Windows XP
Problem preface: to get all unique CASEID which should be checked up by biometric system.What i should check - all CASEs for different PERSONs having same PHONEs at least among one phone type (1..4).Real table contains little bit more than 10 million records.I made test scripts.
Below the DDL for test table creation:
------------------------------------------
-- Create CASEINFO test table
------------------------------------------
DROP TABLE CASEINFO;
CREATE TABLE CASEINFO
[code]...
Below i've put SQL/DLL to make test data.number of records inserted 2 millions.
PERSON_COUNT := #/8;
------------------------------------------
-- fill CASEINFO with sample data
------------------------------------------
DECLARE
I INTEGER;
[code]...
Below SQL select to check the data in created table.
------------------------------------------
-- Check test data counters
------------------------------------------
SELECT 'TOTAL',count(*) from CASEINFO
UNION ALL
SELECT 'LEGAL',count(*) from CASEINFO where
[code]...
The PROBLEM is that i am experiencing HUGE perfomance problems on both test and production systems with that query:
select distinct b.caseid
from CASEINFO a, CASEINFO b
where (a.person<>b.person) and (a.sex=b.sex) and
(
(a.phone1=b.phone1) or
(a.phone1=b.phone2) or
(a.phone1=b.phone3) or
[code]...
This query takes almost 90 minutes to execute.And i do not know how to avoid this.Full SQL file to make test attached.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Sep 15, 2011
I was confused by partitioed table, when i select a partition of table, how does oracle to scan blocks? it scan all blocks of table or scan a single partition blocks only?
SQL> Explain Plan For
2 Select Count(1) From Tb_Hxl_List Partition(p_L3);
Explained.
SQL> Select * From Table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 18 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | |
| 2 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE| | 33115 | 18 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TB_HXL_LIST | 33115 | 18 (0)| 00:00:01 |
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2009
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
----------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
5 rows selected.
I have a problem with views and nested selects which I cannot explain. Here is a trimed down version of the research I have done. notice the following:
1) all code is executed from the same user CDRNORMALCODE. this user has all views and procedural code
2) all data is owned by a different user CDRDATA. This user has no views and no code.
My problem is this:
If I reference the table directly with a delete statement that uses a nested select (i.e. IN clause with select), the index I expect and want is used.But if I execute the same delete but reference even the most simple of views (select * from <table>) instead of the table itself, then a full table scan is done of the table.
Here is an execute against the table directly (owned by cdrdata). Notice the reference to the table in the table schema on line 3. Also please notice INDEX RANGE SCAN BSNSS_CLSS_CASE_RULE_FK1 at the bottom of the plan.
SQL> show user
USER is "CDRNORMALCODE"
SQL>
SQL> explain plan for
2 delete
[code]...
OK, here is an update. The views I am useing normally have instead of triggers on them. If I remove the instead of trigger the problem looks like it goes away, when I put the trigger back the problem comes back.But why would an instead-of-trigger change the query plan for a view?
SQL> DELETE FROM PLAN_TABLE;
5 rows deleted.
SQL> explain plan for
2 delete
3 from BSNSS_CLSS_MNR_CASE_RULE_SV
[code]...
View 10 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2011
Our application servers will be running a SELECT which returns zero rows all the time.This SELECT is put into a package and this package will be called by application servers very frequently which is causing unnecessary CPU.
Original query and plan
SQL> SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_SET_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_ID, TARGET_VERSION
FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS
WHERE SEGMENT_JOB_ID NOT IN
(SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID
FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS) 2 3 4 5 ;
[code]....
Which option will be better or do we have other options?They need to pass the column's with zero rows to a ref cursor.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2013
select
serialnumber from product where productid in
(select /*+ full parallel(producttask 16) */productid from producttask where
startedtimestamp > to_date('2013-07-04 00:00:00', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
and startedtimestamp < to_date('2013-07-05 00:00:00', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
and producttasktypeid in
[code]....
Explain plan output:
Plan hash value: 2779236890
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name| Rows| Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time| Pstart| Pstop |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT || 1 | 29 | 9633M (8)|999:59:59 |||
|* 1 | FILTER |||| ||||
| 2 | PARTITION RANGE ALL || 738M| 19G| 6321K (1)| 21:04:17 | 1 | 6821 |
[code]....
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - filter( EXISTS (<not feasible>)
4 - filter("PRODUCTID"=:B1)
5 - filter(ROWNUM<100)
12 - access("MODELID"=:B1)
[code]....
Note: - SQL profile "SYS_SQLPROF_014153616b850002" used for this statement
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2010
I have a table that partitioned into six partitions. each partitions placed in different table space and every two table space placed it on a different hardisk
when I will do query select with the non-partition keys condition, how the search process ? whether the sequence (scan sequentially from partition 1 to partition 6) or partition in a hardisk is accessed at the same time with other partition in other hardisk. ( in the image, partition 1,4 accessed at the same time with partition 2,5 and 3,6)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2010
Looking to understand the difference between instance tuning and database tuning.
What is the difference between these two tuning exercises? I understand that an instance is memory based structures (logical) where as database consists of physical structures.
However, how does one tune a database the physical structure? Does it have to do with file placements/block sizes etc. Would you agree that a lot of that is taken care by ASM now in 11g? What tools are required/available (third party as well as oracle supplied) for these types of tuning scenarios?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2013
In the following merge statement in the USINg clause...I am using a select stament of one schema WEDB.But that same select statement should take data from 30 schemeas and then check the condition below condition
ON(source.DNO = target.DNO
AND source.BNO=target.BNO);
I thought that using UNIONALL for select statement of the schemas as below.
SELECT
DNO,
BNO,
c2,
c3,
c4,
c5,
c6,
c7
[code]....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2010
i want to select dynamic column names in my select statement in my function.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2012
I am using JDBC to run a few queries from my Java program (multi-threaded one).I am facing an issue where a select statement is blocking a delete statement. From the java code point of view, there are 2 different threads accessing the same tables (whith different DB connection objects).
When the block occurs (which i was able to find out from the java thread dump that there is a lock on oracle), the below is the output:
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(sysdate, 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
2 || ' User '||s1.username || '@' || s1.machine
3 || ' ( SID= ' || s1.sid || ' ) with the statement: ' || sqlt2.sql_text
||' is blocking the SQL statement on '|| s2.username || '@'
4 5 || s2.machine || ' ( SID=' || s2.sid || ' ) blocked SQL -> '
6 ||sqlt1.sql_text AS blocking_status FROM v$lock l1, v$session s1, v$lock l2 ,
7 v$session s2,v$sql sqlt1, v$sql sqlt2
8 WHERE s1.sid =l1.sid
9 AND s2.sid =l2.sid AND sqlt1.sql_id= s2.sql_id
AND sqlt2.sql_id= s1.prev_sql_id AND l1.BLOCK =1
10 AND l2.request > 0 AND l1.id1 = l2.id1 AND l2.id2 = l2.id2;
[code]...
From the above it can be seen that a select statement is blocking a delete. Unless the select is select for Update, it should not block other statements is not it ?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 29, 2010
Why Blind select is better than Conditional select Statement?
View 10 Replies
View Related
