I have written trigger to satisfy the requirement, when i write row level it comes out with mutating error on table which is very obvious, i have change it to statement level which is fine but it doesn't satisfy the requirement.
I want to capture the id column , which rows got inserted or updated .
Is there any way to get the newly inserted or updated rows as in case of row level i can get it form :new.id.
I have a table which contains data of all calcualted payements for a Land for a particular period i.e. for a Land 124 for the duration of Jan-2010 to Mar-2010 100 rupees rent is paid to the owner.Requirement here is that for a particular duration i.e is for Jan-2010 to Mar-2010 system calculation of rent for a land file multiple times where the table would contain history of each transaction i.e. a user can calculate for a Land 124 for duration fo Jan-2010 to Mar-2010 rent more than ten times and there would be ten records in the table but only one record out of these would be valid where the user cannot calcualte rent for Lnd 124 for Jan-2010 to Mar-2010 without updating the status of the last record in the table for the same land and duration to invlaid. I want to add this business validation through triggers as i am not able to do so through check constarinst.I want to ensure that only one record should be valid for a particular land for a particular duration since row level triggers do not allow us to query the table ion which the trigger is executing i am trying to use statement level trigger but i have a few doubts here: Incase of a Before Insert statement level trigger does the trigger have access to the data which is being inserted into that the table cause whenever a record is being inserted into a table the systen would check through the trigger that if there is a valid (payment_status is valid) payment record in the table for that same land file and same duration.If there is a valid record then the trigger would through an exception. I know you can use a row level trigger with an autonomous transaction should work wihtout giving the mutating table error issue but i wont to know if using a statement level trigger here is feasible!!
between statement level or row level trigger, which trigger will execute first.We have BEFORE_UPDATE_ROWLEVEL_TRIGGER and BEFORE_ UPDATE_ STATEMENT LEVEL_TRIGGER triggers on table product.
I need to check somewhere in the code as " Check the variable with in 20 varaiables , if not excute somes statements"
Example
a1=20,a2=30,a3=40......a20=200; (Like this way i have 20 varaibles with values) v1=150; if( v1<>a1 AND V1<> a2 AND V1 <> a3...... AND V1<>20) execute some insert block; End if;
But it's writting very diffcult as i need to compare with 20 varaiables.Was there any alternative sloution like taking some VARRAY and checking in IF condition like v1 NOT IN(Va) (Where 'Va' is like VARRAY)
I'm trying to create a row-level trigger named TRG_PROB_FEE to run before insert or update of the problem fee attribute on the problem table. If the associated DML command would result in a null for the problem fee(prob_fee), then get the value of the problem fee attribute from the associated contract (con_probfee) to use as the value for problem fee (prob_fee) in the Problem table.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRG_PROB_FEE BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE OF PROB_FEE ON PROBLEM FOR EACH ROW BEGIN IF :NEW.PROB_FEE IS NULL THEN SELECT CON_PROBFEE INTO PROBLEM FROM CONTRACT WHERE CON_PROBFEE = :NEW.PROB_FEE END IF; END; /
I have created trigger on database level in system schema. While i am creating new tables in system schema, trigger logged the entry but when i am creating table in scott schema it is not working for that.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER ddltrigger AFTER DDL ON DATABASE BEGIN INSERT INTO aud_log (user_name, ddl_date, ddl_type, object_type, owner, object_name ) VALUES (ora_login_user, SYSDATE, ora_sysevent, ora_dict_obj_type, ora_dict_obj_owner, ora_dict_obj_name ); END;
while replicating form mssql 2005 it is entering space for null in oracle clob col.so i wanted to know.
1)can check constaint modify the content of column on which it is defined?
like i want to enter null in a column , if entered date is greater than current date else the entered date.i do not want to use triggers or client side script.
Table LEAVE Column Type Null Description APP_NO Number(6,0) Not Null PK Leave Application Number ECN Number(6,0) Not Null FK Employee Code Number APP_Date Date Not Null Date of Application From_Date Date Not Null Date from which the leave starts TO_Date Date Not Null Date upto which the current application leave remains i.e. end of leave applied for date NO_OF_Days Number(2,0) Not Null Difference between TO_Date and From_date LEAVE_TYPE VARCHAR2(3) Not Null Can be one of SL, CL, LWP or LTA Status VARCHAR2(25) Not Null Can be one of Saved, Rejected or Approved Remark VARCHAR2(100) Nullable Reason to be put if status is rejected [code]....
What I really want to do is that when a record is inserted in the LEAVES table (an application for leave is submitted by any employee and if it is approved) then I want to update the _USED values of the corresponding LEAVE_TYPE in the LEAVEENTITLE table which holds values of types of leaves entitled to employee.
For example if 3 rows are inserted in the LEAVES table as INSERT INTO LEAVES (APP_NO,ECN,FROM_DATE,TO_DATE,APP_DATE,NO_OF_DAYS,LEAVE_TYPE,STATUS,REMARK) (1,1234,'2012-01-01','2012-01-05','2012- 01-01',5,'SL','APPROVED',null); INSERT INTO LEAVES (APP_NO,ECN,FROM_DATE,TO_DATE,APP_DATE,NO_OF_DAYS,LEAVE_TYPE,STATUS,REMARK) (2,1235,'2012-01-01','2012-01-05','2012- 01-01',5,'CL','SAVED',null); INSERT INTO LEAVES (APP_NO,ECN,FROM_DATE,TO_DATE,APP_DATE,NO_OF_DAYS,LEAVE_TYPE,STATUS,REMARK) (3,1236,'2012-01-01','2012-01-05','2012- 01-01',5,'LTA','REJECTED','Clash with the annual meet, revise dates');
Then the value of SL_USED in the LEAVEENTITLE table of record corresponding to the ECN = 1234 should be updated with +5 and naturally the SL_ UNUSED value of the record should be updated as SL_ENTITLED - SL_USED. For the APP_NO 2 and 3 none of the values in LEAVEENTITLE should be updated as the STATUS is not 'APPROVED'
I tried with the following trigger, but is compiling with a warning (not showing what the warning is)
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER leaveentitle AFTER INSERT ON LEAVES FOR EACH ROW BEGIN UPDATE LEAVEENTITLE LVE SET LVE.SL_USED = SL_USED+(CASE WHEN :NEW.LEAVE_TYPE = 'SL'&& NEW.STATUS='APPROVED' THEN :NEW.NO_OF_DAYS SL_UNUSED=SL_ENTITLED - SL_USED ELSE 0 END), [code]....
I have a multi record control block (basically a text item displaying 6 records) where user enters values and I want to process the values using pre-insert trigger.
I want to read value in each record and then do some tasks using a pre-insert trigger before I commit the values. To navigate between the records I was using first_record, next_record, clear_record built-ins but it gives errors like "40737-illegalrestricted procedure next_record in pre-insert trigger".
I would like to create a trigger on a table, but only if the table exists.
This is what i've got so far:
create or replace function tableExists (tablename in varchar2) return boolean is c int; begin
[Code].....
This would give me the error:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "CREATE" when expecting one of the following: ( begin case declare exit for goto if loop mod null pragma raise return select update
I have created the below trigger in Oracle to ensure that a value in a table remains at 180 but I need to restrict this to one row in this table. Is there a way to use an IF statement or a where clause of some type for a particular row in that table? The Row is called ADMIN. Triggers weren't covered in my course so only know a few basic statements.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER DAYSAGO_trg BEFORE UPDATE ON days_ago FOR EACH ROW BEGIN :NEW.days_ago := 180; END;
In a trigger(on update of a table t1) I am trying to write, I am doing an insert on t2 accessing ':new' values of the update on t1.
But in my Insert statement, I am having get one of the column values from another table. How can I write my insert statement in such a way as to insert values contained in ':new' pseudo columns and a select from another table. Below is my insert statement in the trigger : -------
IF (:old.GROUP_YELLOW <> :new.GROUP_YELLOW) THEN INSERT INTO TEST.W_THRESHOLD_LOG (THRESHOLD_LOG_WID, CHANGE_DATE, MEASURE_TYPE_WID, MEASURE_NAME, CUSTOMER_WID, CUSTOMER_NAME, USER_ID, CHANGED_ITEM, PREV_VALUE, NEW_VALUE) VALUES(TEST.W_THRESHOLD_LOG_SEQ.NEXTVAL, SYSDATE, :new.MEASURE_TYPE_WID, 'Rolling Stabilty' , :new.CUSTOMER_WID, 'Customer1', 'User1', 'GROUP_YELLOW', :old.GROUP_YELLOW , :new.GROUP_YELLOW); END IF; -------
In the above code if the hardcoded value 'Customer1' need to be picked from another table, i.e .
SELECT NAME FROM W_CUSTOMER_DIM WHERE CUSTOMER_WID = THRESHOLD.CUSTOMER_WID
how can I rewrite my query to the above value from the select into my insert statement..?
I want to write a sql query which will fetch the data from manual_temp_master and manual_temp_detl.But from manual_temp_detl table, Price_bkt_cds columns should be displayed as columns. Like the should look like as below:
what is the difference on DBMS_STATS for table level and partition level , which will provide the best optimizer . If the table xxxx is partitioned from 1 to 10 ,then running gather stats on table xxxx as whole table level or partition level which will provide best result on the performance.
Can you take an incremental backup level 1 or level 0 without archivelogs?
syntax would bebackup as compressed backupset cummulative level 1 database.
The reason I ask is because when I run backup as compressed backupset cummulative level 1 database plus archivelogs # it runs fine, but when I run backup as compressed backupset cummulative level 1 database it just hangs.
HOW to use variable P_TMPLID in following statement
TYPE typ_unrecon IS TABLE OF REC_' || P_TMPLID ||'_UNRECON%ROWTYPE index by binary_integer;
because its throwing error while compiling
and also in statement FORALL i IN unrecondata.FIRST .. unrecondata.LAST SAVE EXCEPTIONS --STRSQL := ''; --STRSQL := ' INSERT INTO REC_' || P_TMPLID ||'_UNRECON VALUES ' || unrecondata(i); -- EXECUTE IMMEDIATE STRSQL; INSERT INTO REC_' || P_TMPLID ||'_UNRECON VALUES unrecondata(i);---throwing error on this statement commit; --dbms_output.put_line(unrecondata(2).TRANSID); EXCEPTION
In the following merge statement in the USINg clause...I am using a select stament of one schema WEDB.But that same select statement should take data from 30 schemeas and then check the condition below condition
ON(source.DNO = target.DNO AND source.BNO=target.BNO);
I thought that using UNIONALL for select statement of the schemas as below.
I am using JDBC to run a few queries from my Java program (multi-threaded one).I am facing an issue where a select statement is blocking a delete statement. From the java code point of view, there are 2 different threads accessing the same tables (whith different DB connection objects).
When the block occurs (which i was able to find out from the java thread dump that there is a lock on oracle), the below is the output:
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(sysdate, 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') 2 || ' User '||s1.username || '@' || s1.machine 3 || ' ( SID= ' || s1.sid || ' ) with the statement: ' || sqlt2.sql_text ||' is blocking the SQL statement on '|| s2.username || '@' 4 5 || s2.machine || ' ( SID=' || s2.sid || ' ) blocked SQL -> ' 6 ||sqlt1.sql_text AS blocking_status FROM v$lock l1, v$session s1, v$lock l2 , 7 v$session s2,v$sql sqlt1, v$sql sqlt2 8 WHERE s1.sid =l1.sid 9 AND s2.sid =l2.sid AND sqlt1.sql_id= s2.sql_id AND sqlt2.sql_id= s1.prev_sql_id AND l1.BLOCK =1 10 AND l2.request > 0 AND l1.id1 = l2.id1 AND l2.id2 = l2.id2; [code]...
From the above it can be seen that a select statement is blocking a delete. Unless the select is select for Update, it should not block other statements is not it ?
I have a transaction table with some custom properties and two status columns. There are 2 different applications(.Net and Pl/SQL Procedure) using the table. Both the process run parallel and fetch records one by one, perform some calculation and update the status column.
There are likely more chances that both applications will fetch the sane record and try to update the same row. This will cause a lock. Can i use row level lock before update by each application? Or is there any other methods/process in which this can be handled. ?
I want to display result with respective levels. for example p21 ,p30 are coming under first level . p22,p25 ,P31,P32are 2nd level. p23,p24,p26,p27 are 3rd level p28,p29 are FOURTH level item_id's.
Already I 'VE tried using CONNECT BY PRIOR clause.BUT STILL I COULDN'T GET THE RESULT.