PL/SQL :: Avoid Cartesian Join In Query?
Oct 24, 2012
must generate a Cartesian join, but I do not know why it happens. dt.debtorkey, cl.clientkey, inv.invoicekey, ag.agingkey are primary keys of each table. The problem is: I got same tuple for 8 times.
select dt.debtorkey, cl.clientkey, inv.invoicekey, ag.agingkey, dt.DebtorNo, dt.Name as "debtor Name", dt.State, cl.ClientNo, cl.Name as "Client Name", inv.InvNo, inv.PurchOrd, inv.Amt,
to_char(inv.InvDate, 'MM-DD-YY') invoice_date, to_char(ag.DateLastBuy, 'MM-DD-YY') aging_lastbuy, to_char(ag.DateLastPmt, 'MM-DD-YY') aging_lastpmt
[code]...
View 14 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 24, 2011
Table script:
CREATE TABLE TEST_ITEM_BU_ID
(
CCN VARCHAR2(100 CHAR),
SKU VARCHAR2(100 CHAR),
BU_ID NUMBER
)
select * from test_item_bu_id;
CCN SKU BU_ID
------------------------------
M10000616-10502414545
M10000600-11437414545
M10000205-113380
M10000205-113390
M10000600-114370
The requirement is to replicate the bu_id records with bu_id=0 as bu_id=414545 ( there is no lookup available) so the same table should act as a lookup table to populate bu_id for the records where bu_id=0
i.e., here it will replicate for the sku set with bu_id value=0
M10000205-113380
M10000205-113390
M10000600-114370
will be replicated against
M10000616-10502414545M10000600-11437414545
so the output should be :
CCN SKU BU_ID
------------------------------
M10000205-11338414545
M10000205-11338414545
M10000205-11339414545
M10000205-11339414545
The below query is supposed to do this.
select a.ccn,b.bu_id,a.sku,b.sku
from test_item_bu_id a ,
( select distinct ccn,sku_num, bu_id
from test_item_bu_id
where bu_id in (414545) and CCN in ('M10000') ) b
where a.bu_id = 0 and a.sku <> b.sku and a.ccn= b.ccn
But we have wrong result here.
CCN BU_ID SKU SKU_1
----------------------------------------------
M10000414545205-11338600-11437
M10000414545205-11338616-10502
M10000414545205-11339600-11437
M10000414545205-11339616-10502
M10000414545600-11437616-10502
How can we avoid the last record, i.e., SKU=600-11437 since it is already having bu_id no need to replicate it, but it is getting replicated since the extra record with bu_id=0 exist for the same sku.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2011
Having production system: 11.2.0.1 on Windows Server x64
Test system: 9.2.0.1 on Windows XP
Problem preface: to get all unique CASEID which should be checked up by biometric system.What i should check - all CASEs for different PERSONs having same PHONEs at least among one phone type (1..4).Real table contains little bit more than 10 million records.I made test scripts.
Below the DDL for test table creation:
------------------------------------------
-- Create CASEINFO test table
------------------------------------------
DROP TABLE CASEINFO;
CREATE TABLE CASEINFO
[code]...
Below i've put SQL/DLL to make test data.number of records inserted 2 millions.
PERSON_COUNT := #/8;
------------------------------------------
-- fill CASEINFO with sample data
------------------------------------------
DECLARE
I INTEGER;
[code]...
Below SQL select to check the data in created table.
------------------------------------------
-- Check test data counters
------------------------------------------
SELECT 'TOTAL',count(*) from CASEINFO
UNION ALL
SELECT 'LEGAL',count(*) from CASEINFO where
[code]...
The PROBLEM is that i am experiencing HUGE perfomance problems on both test and production systems with that query:
select distinct b.caseid
from CASEINFO a, CASEINFO b
where (a.person<>b.person) and (a.sex=b.sex) and
(
(a.phone1=b.phone1) or
(a.phone1=b.phone2) or
(a.phone1=b.phone3) or
[code]...
This query takes almost 90 minutes to execute.And i do not know how to avoid this.Full SQL file to make test attached.
View 13 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2013
Oracle version: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit
OS: Linux Fedora Core 17 (x86_64)
I was practicing on Recursive Subquery Factoring based on oracle examples available in the documentation URL....I was working on an example which prints the hierarchy of each manager with his/her related employees. Here is how I proceed.
WITH tmptab(empId, mgrId, lvl) AS
(
SELECT employee_id, manager_id, 0 lvl
FROM employees
WHERE manager_id IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT employee_id, manager_id, lvl+1
FROM employees, tmptab
WHERE (manager_id = empId)
[code]....
107 rows selected.
SQL> However, by accident, I noticed that if instead of putting a comma between the table names I put CROSS JOIN, the very same query behaves differently.That is, if instead of writing
UNION ALL
SELECT employee_id, manager_id, lvl+1
FROM employees, tmptab
WHERE (manager_id = empId)I write
. . .
UNION ALL
SELECT employee_id, manager_id, lvl+1
FROM employees CROSS JOIN tmptab
WHERE (manager_id = empId)I get the following error message
ERROR at line 4: ORA-32044: cycle detected while executing recursive WITH query
I remember, oracle supports both comme notation and CROSS JOIN for Cartesian product (= cross product). For example
SQL> WITH tmptab1 AS
2 (
3 SELECT 'a1' AS colval FROM DUAL UNION ALL
4 SELECT 'a2' AS colval FROM DUAL UNION ALL
5 SELECT 'a3' AS colval FROM DUAL
6 ),
[code]....
SQL> So if both comma notated and CROSS JOIN have the same semantic, why I get a cycle for the above mentioned recursive subquery factoring whereas the very same query works pretty well with comma between the table names instead of CROSS JOIN? Because if a cycle is detected (ancestor = current element) this means that the product with CROSS JOIN notation is generating some duplicates which are absent in the result of the comma notated Cartesian product.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2012
I have a query which is using literals
strquery:='SELECT SUMTOTAL FROM tab1 WHERE BATCHNO = '''
|| gBNo
|| ''' AND A_ID = '''
|| g_id
|| ''' AND L_ID = '''
|| g_LId
|| ''' AND S_Code = ''C_3'' ';
execute immediate strquery; I have been asked to use a bind variable to avoid hard parsing.How do i do it?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2012
I created a "Select List" in the Shared Components area as follows:
My goal is to create a shared select list that can be used on any form for a particular Field.
IF :P10_FK_RSTA_CODE is NULL THEN
RETURN
'select col_description, col_code_pk
from CODE_TABLE
where col_active_ind = ''Y''';
[code].....
Which works great, but how can I make the select list work for the same column on a different form? Because :P10_FK_RSTA_CODE is hard-coded in the function, I can't reuse this Function from a different form. (I could rename the Field on every form to the same name, but I'm hoping there is a better way.)
Is there a way I can pass in a variable from the Field Item to make this dynamic where I can use it on any form?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2013
When to use Cartecian product???? is there any special cases to use cartecian product?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2010
we just installed the patch 10.0.2.0.5 on a 10.0.2.0.3 database and some selects didn't work as before. While changing the select clause, there are different counts.
There are 3 tables:
Detail_1 => MASTER_1 <= Detail_2
MASTER_1 has a primary and an unique Key. The 2 detail tables have FK. Now when selecting only columns from the detail tables (joined with master) we get cartesian selects. If i use one column of the master table in the select clause everything is fine.
Here is an example:
CREATE TABLE MASTER_1
( "KUNID" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
"CUSTOMER_NO" VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
CONSTRAINT "PK_MASTER1" PRIMARY KEY ("KUNID"),
CONSTRAINT "UK_MASTER1" UNIQUE ("CUSTOMER_NO"));
[code].......
So you see, we get different rows only by changing the select clause.
Note: It seemed to be important to have both FK. When deleting one of them - or both - we get the same correct results: 3 rows with any select clause.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2011
The existing format of the records are
MCF_ID MCF_PRDGRP MCF_BSCNME MCF_BSCSUP MCF_CRDNME Cno
------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---
41956 1001 LIM KOK HWA Base LIM KOK HWA 101
41957 1102 CHEN ZHEN Base CHEN ZHEN 102
41958 1102 CHEN ZHEN Sub CHEN HONGJIAN 103
41960 2007 CHEN ZHEN Base CHEN ZHEN 104
41961 2007 CHEN ZHEN Sub CHEN HONGJIAN 105
41968 2108 WEE LIANG Base WEE LIANG 106
41969 2108 LOW KAH Sub LOW KAH 107
This should be modified as below.
MCF_ID MCF_PRDGRP MCF_BSCNME MCF_BSCSUP MCF_CRDNME Indicator Sub Name baseCno SubCno
------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- ------ ------
41956 1001 LIM KOK HWA Base LIM KOK HWA 101
41957 1102 CHEN ZHEN Base CHEN ZHEN Sub CHEN HONGJIAN 102 103
41960 2007 CHEN ZHEN Base CHEN ZHEN Sub CHEN HONGJIAN 104 105
41968 2108 WEE LIANG Base WEE LIANG 106
41969 2108 LOW KAH Sub LOW KAH 107
[Code]..
Throught this query, I get a extra record with null value in the Sub_name and Sub_Cno.update this query using a self join.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2012
I have an attendance table in which we have empno, time_in, time_out..etc.
I want to create a matrix report that should shows all dates of any specific required month in columns and present empno in rows and time_in in cells.
I did it with using a temporary table by filling all the required dates and outer join with attendance table, it works fine, but it takes so long, is there any other better fast way to do it?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2010
I have the following 2 tables.
A) Docversion
CREATE TABLE DOCVERSION
("OBJECT_ID" VARCHAR2(250 BYTE),
"OBJECT_CLASS_ID" VARCHAR2(250 BYTE),
);
[Code]..
Join column : object_id and parent_id.
The object id in docversion will have multiple values for element value in listofstring table.
ordinal value represents teh sequence of element value
Eg:
data for docversion:
1 23
2 34
data for LISTOFSTRING:
1 11 0 100
1 11 1 109
1 11 2 119
2 22 0 A
2 22 1 B
ouptut:
I want the output as follows
docversion.objectid,listofstring.elementvalue
1 100,109,119
2 A,B
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2012
How to update single table column using join query
Example:
Update table1 t1,table2 t2
set t1.column2 = 'Y'
where t1.column1 = t2.column1
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2011
I have come across a join in a query which has the (+) symbol at the end of it.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2013
I have been told to create a query which should give out the same output as the UI of an exception management application . However , many referenced tables have one to many relationship . I created a query using a function which was giving the required output . But the performance of the query was not good as for each row . Is there a method to create a select using joins to show one to many relationship in a table .
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2008
In my Oracle 9i Schema, I have two tables:
Table One
pocOne pocTwo
2 3
2 4
1 2
Table Two
TableTwoId Name
1 Jones
2 Smith
3 Edwards
4 Camden
My SQL to fetch all records with Smith works great:
select Name from TableTwo
Inner Join TableOne
on TableTwo.TableTwoId in (TableOne.pocOne, TableOne.pocTwo)
where Name = 'Smith'
Now I need to create an alias for the Name field. Here is my attempt:
select myAliasName from TableTwo
Inner Join TableOne
on TableTwo.TableTwoId in (TableOne.pocOne, TableOne.pocTwo),
(select Name as myAliasName from TableTwo)
where myAliasName = 'Smith'
This attempt pulls up all the records instead of just Smith records. How I can create an alias for the Name field in my above query?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 10, 2012
I want to convert join to subquery. how cna i do this.
FROM
TABLE_1 A
INNER JOIN TABLE_2 B
ON ( A.COL_1 = B.COL_1)
[Code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2011
TABLE - 1
CIDDOB(DATE)
12312-MAR-63
58918-JAN-78
658927-DEC-43
46515-FEB-80
TABLE - 2
DIDDOB_INFO(VARCHAR2)
34425 Mar 1967
123 12 MAR 1963;25 FEB 1974;25 AUG 1978
46515 FEB 1980
I want to join the columns DOB from table -1 and DOB_INFO from table 2 but the datatype of DOB is DATE and DOB_INFO is VARCHAR. TO_DATE function is not working here.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2010
the following statement gives each customer owns how many promotions.
Q:) how do i retrieve a customer who has max. promotions?
SELECT C.CUSTOMER_ID,COUNT(P.PROMOTION_ID)
FROM PROMOTIONS P,CUSTOMERS C
WHERE C.CUSTOMER_ID = P.CUSTOMER_ID
GROUP BY C.CUSTOMER_ID
=====================================================
CUSTOMER_ID COUNT(P.PROMOTION_ID)
-------------------------------------
001 | 5
002 | 8
003 | 4
004 | 6
005 | 5
006 | 3
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2010
In SQL, almost all the thing which are possible with join is possible with sub-query also and vice-a-versa.
So when should I use sub-query and when should I go for join?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2013
How to use outer join condition in my below query. In the table APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_HEADER goh I have more records in the table APPS_JP.GEDIS_ORDER_BUILDS gob I have less number of records.
I want all the records from APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_HEADER goh including other conditions. I have tried goh.OFFER_NO=gob.OFFER_NO(+) but same result.
SELECT GOH.ORIG_SYSTEM,
gsp.USER_NAME,
goh.ORDER_NO,
goh.OMEGA_ORDER_NUMBER,
goh.ORDER_TYPE,
[code].......
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2011
joining this query instead of using the left join. Reason is want to show the score column in a different place and also do not want to show the second IPS column that is used in the joined query.
Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Product
select * from
(
select i.ips,
p.project_name,
p.project_segment,p.location,p.project_exec_model,
p.project_exec_model||' - '||p.project_config pmodel,
one.score schedule,two.score cost,three.score execution,four.score commercial,
nvl(one.score,0)+nvl(two.score,0)+nvl(three.score,0)+nvl(four.score,0) as total,
[code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2013
I saw a strange plan for one query in TESTING DB today. Although 2 tables are involved i dont see any join , NL/HJ/SMJ !! i am not facing any performance issue but curious to know what type of optimization oracle is doing here.
Query text and plan :
SELECT FIRST_NAME
FROM CAMPA.TABLE_A
WHERE NAME_ID =
(SELECT NAME_ID
FROM CAMPA.TABLE_B
WHERE ban=:b1);
[code]....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2012
I've seen this example numerous places, and tried to implement it, but I keep getting an "invalid identifier" error message, despite the fact that I've got the table and column specifically identified.For instance, my query reads like:
UPDATE tbl1
SET tbl1.EMPID =
(SELECT tbl2.EMPIDA FROM tbl2
WHERE LOWER(tbl1.EMAILCOL) = LOWER(tbl2.EMAILCOL2)
)
WHERE tbl2.EMPIDA IN ('Z1O435','S8M4722','M0D5156')
AND EXISTS
(SELECT tbl2.EMPIDA
FROM tbl2
WHERE tbl1.EMAILCOL= tbl2.EMAILCOL2 );
But I'll keep getting flagged at the tbl2.EMPIDA column reference. I have not tried this in SQL Plus, just in TOAD, but it seems to repeatedly fail.I have had to dump records to standalone Access tables and link back to perform the updates.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2011
I have two tables. By joining these two tables, I need to update a field in table1.
UPDATE table1
SET table1.FLAG = 'Fixed'
where table2.lastname = table1.lastname
and table2.status in ('fulltime','parttime')
I keep getting error 'table1.lastname' is invalid identifier.
I can't understand the error message. I made sure that the fields exist.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2013
The full statement is:
SELECT v.key$ FROM VERSION_TABLE v, DOCUMENT_TABLE d, CLASS_TABLE z WHERE
v.documentKey = d.key$ AND
d.classKey = z.key$ AND
z.key$ IN (SELECT zz.key$ FROM CLASS_TABLE zz
START WITH zz.name = 'esDTTemplate'
CONNECT BY PRIOR zz.key$ = zz.parentKey) AND
v.ESGROUP = 'SearchOperatorsMapping' ORDER BY d.name
Now I noticed that the subquery is never used to seed the join: indexes - if any - are used. Otherwise a full table scan is performed.In the example - if ESGROUP is indexed, then it's chosen to start the join evaluation. If not, a full table scan is performed.Is there any way to suggest to the optimizer to use the subquery in case there are no indexes - as a fallback ?
In the above example where VERSION_TABLE contains nearly two million records, the no index solution takes 60 secs. vs. less than 1 sec. in the index case.Wrapping the hierarchical query in a inline view leads to same result.
PS: the execution plan (without index) is:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 9 (100)| |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 1 | 171 | 9 (23)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN SEMI | | 1 | 171 | 8 (13)| 00:00:01 |
[code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2011
I have this table
create table ACTIONARI_ARH
(
actionar_id NUMBER(10) not null,
id VARCHAR2(20) not null,
id_2 VARCHAR2(20),
tip VARCHAR2(1),
nume VARCHAR2(100),
prenume VARCHAR2(100),
adresa VARCHAR2(200),
[code]....
and this view
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW ACTIONARI AS
SELECT "ACTIONAR_ID","ID","ID_2","TIP","NUME","PRENUME","ADRESA","LOCALITATE","JUDET","TARA","CERT_DECES","DATA_REGISTRU" Data_operare,"USER_MODIF","DATA_MODIF","REZIDENT"
FROM (
select
[code]....
The table has about 30 milion records and holds persons names, addresses, personal id (id), and internal id(actionar_id) and date when a new adress has been added.
The view is about getting only the most recent info for one person (actionar_id).
if i run a
a) select * from actionari a where a.actionar_id = 'nnnnnnn', result is returned immediatly, oracle uses index and does not do a full table scan.
b) select * from actionari a where a.actionar_id in ('nnnnnnn','mmmmmm','ooooooo'), result is returned immediatly, oracle uses index and does not do a full table scan.
my problem when i use this view in a join.let's assume i have another table with no more than 500 records, something like
create table SMALL_TABLE
(
actionar_id NUMBER(10) not null,
......
);
and if i run
select *
from SMALL_TABLE s
join actionari a
on a.actionar_id = s.actionar_id;
it takes like forever to process, forever means 1~3 minutes.by looking at the execution plan, oracle does a full table scan, creates the view for all unique 7milion persons, and only then joins the result with the actionar_is's in the small table and returns the desired 500 record result.i am using oracle 10g.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2010
I have constructed a cross join query, with the test case below
create table ajit_sites (
site_id char(1));
insert into ajit_sites values ('A');
insert into ajit_sites values ('B');
insert into ajit_sites values ('C');
COMMIT;
sql below is constructed to display combination of all sites (cross-join), it also removes records where "origin" is the same with "dest"
select
a.site_id origin, b.site_id dest
from
(select site_id from ajit_sites) a,
(select site_id from ajit_sites) b
where
a.site_id <> b.site_id b
Is there any way i could remove records with the behavior below
Origin , Dest
A , B
B , A
For instance from the example above, i want to only retain one of the records since record (A, B) or record (B, A) means the same.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2013
How Can I delete the returned two rows?
1 select s.reg_no,s.course_code,
2 s.section src_sec,a.section a_sec,a.att_date,a.att_flag
3 from attendance a ,src s
4 where a.semester_code=1
5 and a.semester_year=2013
6 and s.semester_code=1
[code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2013
I have two tables : oa_membership_dtl(in this created_by field is varchar2(200 byte) ,oa_partner_usr_dtl(in this table partner_userid is number(8,0) i need to do join on above fields.
I am using following two queries:
select * from oa_membership_dtl membership
join oa_partner_usr_dtl partner_user
on to_char(partner_user.partner_userid,'9999')=membership.created_by
select * from oa_membership_dtl membership
join oa_partner_usr_dtl partner_user
on rtrim(ltrim(partner_user.partner_userid||' '))=rtrim(ltrim(membership.created_by))
by using first data is not fetched but 2nd is working fine , i am getting the matched records using 2nd query.
whats the diff between to_char and || symbol?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2013
Lets say I have three tables t1 and t2 and t3.
SELECT * FROM T1;
Id
____
1
2
3
4
SELECT * FROM T2;
Id
____
1
SELECT * FROM T3;
Id
____
1
Now when data exists in T2 and T3, I want to return only the records in T1 that match the records in T2 and T3 which is basically a normal join
select t1.id from t1, t2,t3 where t1.id = t2.id and t1.id = t3.id
However when there are no records in T2 or T3, I want to return all records in T1 i.e 1,2,3,4
One way of doing that is using the not exists clause
select * from t1 where not exists ( select null from t2 where t2.Id != t1.id) and not exists ( select null from t3 where t1.Id != t3.id)
Is there a better way of doing this in sql ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
