When i opened the form and after querying the records if I press CTL+ Down Arrow the record is deleted.
This is the normal runtime form behavior. When ever pressing CTL+ Down arrow I don't want to delete the record, I tried with KEY-DELREC but it is not happening.
Form has insert and delete enabled.
I would like to prevent the deletion of a record based on some column value.
Something like:
IF (COLA value < 10) THEN
SHOW ALERT;
RECORD IS NOT DELETE
ELSE
DELETE RECORD AS NORMAL
END IF;
I want this to happen even before the record is marked for deletion, but I don't know where to put it. I tried a pre-delete trigger, but it does not work they way I want.
I want to give update rights of a block to restricted set of people... how can i achieve it???
View 3 Replies View Relatedthere is non database data block of table type.
now i want restrict user that he will not enter same number again.
I'm trying to restrict update in a specific field in my form . I have set its property(update allowed) to no and still the field is update able. I am also having on-commit trigger in my form level that well display a message and followed by the command commit. is it possible the trigger is overriding the property(update restriction).
View 9 Replies View Relatedhow can we restrict standard save button functionality in custom form?
View 4 Replies View Related I am using Forms 6i,Oracle Apps... I have database block.... generally we can retrieve the all the records by press F11 and Ctrl F11.... but my requirement is i have to restrict the user that they can access the records based on the condition ...
For example....let we take emp table....I have to restrict the user that they can query dept no 10 employees only.
SQL Plus version Oracle8 Enterprise Edition Release 8.0.5.0.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 8.0.5.1.0 Production
Forms Version : 6i
Reports Version: 6i
O/S : Microsoft Windows Xp professional Version 2002 Service Pack 3
With reference to the above version details here is the requirement. How do I restrict user on key next item trigger i.e I want the cursor to move to next field only when user presses "ENTER" button on the key board any other key like mouse should not allow user to move to the next field.
Restrict field after insertion before commit. i mean when user inputs the data in one field and moves to next field.when ever he want to return back on the previous field it can't be edited.before commit;
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have master and detail form. In detail(tabular form) i want to restrict user to enter only 10 rows.if he tries to go for 11th row he shud get a message (Only 10 records can be created at a time).
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a sale invoice form with 3 data blocks.
Data block 1- master_blk : For date/customer of sale invoice
Data block 2- detail_blk1 (detail of the master block - For products and qty)
Data block 3- detail_blk2 (detail of DETAIL_BLK1 For entering serial numbers of products)
My requirement is that whatever quantity user enter in data block 2 against each product he must enter equal number of serial numbers of that product in data block 3.
For this I have created on item (cnt_iteml : to count product's serial numbers in block3 ) in data block 2, and on summary item (t_serial_no ) in block3.
Whenever user changes in quantity, cnt_iteml: item is populated with t_serial_no in block3 of that product by following trigger on quantity column.
POST-Change Trigger ( quantity column )
:stock_transactions.cnt_itl:=:serial_numbers.t_serial_no;
Following trigger is written on block level at data block-3 to populate cnt_iteml with t_serial_no.
PRE-RECORD
IF GET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('SERIAL_NUMBERS',STATUS) IN ('CHANGED') THEN
:stock_transactions.cnt_itl:=:serial_numbers.t_serial_no;
END IF;
Above triggers are fulfilling my requirement except following condition.
If user after entering serial numbers in block 3 and without saving goes back to block2 and try to navigate to another record he gets a message asking him to save changes by forms. At this time if user presses no then cnt_itl item is not been populated with t_serial_no item's value.
What I want in above condition is that if user was inserting new record cnt_it item should be populated with 0, so that he shouldn't be able to save this record. And If he was updating then cnt_itl item should be populated with actual no of records in database against that product.
My procedure proc_ex is in when_validate_item trigger
I have one Multi Record data block in my form with values in its items
I need to Populate multi record block values to one Record Group using
add_group_row,
add_group_column,
set_group_char_cell to populate values to record group
Let us suppose my multi record data block looks like
item1 item2 item3 item4
10 20 50 70
25 15 30 45
45 90 47 38
75 25 85 90
30 56 78 80
how to populate these multi record datablock values to Record Group ???..Eagerly waiting for your Replies
I have a fairly standard Purchase Order form which contains pre-loaded data (been uploaded from an XML file).When the Purchase Order is processed, the form updates a Price History table only if the Price on the PO_Details changes.The code for updating the price history table is contained in a PRE_UPDATE trigger on the PO_Details Data Block.
No other data changes on the PO_Details table.I now want to change this so that the Price History table is updated even if the price does not change i.e I want to create a history record for each record on the PO_Details irrespective of whether it was updated or not.
Is there an alternative trigger that I can move my code to (ie move it from PRE_UPDATE) to some other trigger that is fired for each PO_Details record even if there is no change.
I create a data block on a table when I am inserting new record only one record have been saved. Last record no longer exist.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have one multi record block in that i have one LOV..If i choose lov in first record that won't be display in second record lov...
View 4 Replies View RelatedI want to delete archivelogs from ASM and want to schedule a script for same in crontab.
Also i removed archives manually from asmcmd.But when i runned below command,i didn't observed any change in the free_space.
select total_mb,free_mb,(total_mb-free_mb) used from v$asm_diskgroup;
How can we clean a tablespace(delete all the contents) without dropping the tablespace.
View 3 Replies View Relatedhow to write the package for deletion?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a RAC system with DR set-up, this is a test environment and it doesn't have any backup, why DR is required but it exist. Since this is a test a lot or archives gets generated and deleting the archives has become a daily job for this server manually.
I want have a script to delete archive logs which is in non-ASM (i.e. filesystem) after ensuring that the archive log has been applied in standby database. If this can done only by RMAN.
We had an escalation wherein one of team members accidentally deleted an LDAP entry for a database. We use Oracle Net Manager to add/delete the connect descriptor.
Are there any logs using which we can find out as to who deleted the entry.
As far as I know, in APEX 4.0 no other user other than the one who created a Public report can delete it. Can this behavior be changed somehow?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am facing Deadlock issue in my transaction when record is been deleted in the same table in parallel from a PLSQL package. The package is been called from the Java code.The example and the table structure is given below.
Col1 of tab1 is foreign key to col1 of tab2.
Commit will not be done until all the below dml scripts are executed in both environment.
1st session:
Delete from tab1 where col1=1001;
Delete from tab2 where col1=2001;
Result: Deletion successful
2nd session:
Delete from tab1 where col1=1002;
Delete from tab2 where col1=2002;
Result: Deletion successful
1st session:
Delete from tab1 where col1=1003;
Delete from tab2 where col1=2003;
Result: Deletion successful
2nd session:
Delete from tab1 where col1=1004;
Delete from tab2 where col1=2004;
Result: Query is executing for a longer time.
1st session:
Delete from tab1 where col1=1003;
Delete from tab2 where col1=2003;
Result: Query is not executed and throws Deadlock in the back end.
I was carrying out an experiment in order to crash the database and recover it.
The database was running, I moved the control file to another location and to my surprise the database was still running. I tried issuing checkpoint and transaction but it didn't affect database operations. I tried doing log switch. It completed successfully. According to my understanding and Oracle Certification books database was supposed to crash. But it didn't.
I tried this not only on RHEL, Windows XP but also in Solaris 5.10. The database version is Oracle 10.2.0.4 Standard Edition.
Maybe you can tell me if you think it's right or wrong for Oracle to behave like that. What basically happened is that I've set up a trigger to capture deleted rows from testtab into testtab_del.
I have inserted and immediately after - deleted a row from testtab. Then I inserted another row, committed, and checked my testtab_del table.
I've seen that val1 was inserted and committed into testtab_del. This happened in spite of the fact that this row never existed as a *committed row*.
What do you think about this behavior in this scenario? Works as designed or not?
SQL> show user
USER is "ANDREY"
SQL> col tcol for a10
SQL> drop table testtab;
[Code]....
I have deleted a user with CASCADE option.
After deletion, the size of tablespace should be reduced.
But the tablespace size is same as before deletion of user.
Currently , that USER is deleted and not present in the database . Still space is not released after user deletion.
One question reg Materialized views.
If as part of housekeeping of the Source database we delete some records (older records), will the materialized view also be updated with the deletion? I believe the answer is yes. In that case can we ensure that this delete does not happen?
Is there anyway we can prevent MView refresh from deleting the records that is once inserted even if we delete the same records in source DB?
I'm on a Windows server 2003 R2 64 bit, database is 11.1.0.7. From RMAN connected to the target and the catalog, this is a show all;
RMAN> show all;
RMAN configuration parameters for database with db_unique_name ORCL are:
CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO RECOVERY WINDOW OF 3 DAYS;
CONFIGURE BACKUP OPTIMIZATION OFF;
CONFIGURE DEFAULT DEVICE TYPE TO DISK;
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP ON;
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 'F:oracleadmin
[code]....
I'm running incremental backups, a level 0 on sunday and a level 1 the other days of the week, this is the ctl file:
LEVEL 0:
connect target /@ORCL
connect catalog rman/rmanpw@rmancat
RUN
{
[code]....
The level 0 does delete the archive logs (because of the delete input). Each backupset has two copies of the archive logs (which is what I want), and I expected the logs to be deleted after being backed up 2 days (each day is twice, 2 days = 4 times). But it's not deleting the logs, even after 6 runs.
I have a DR setup with the following configuration
CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO RECOVERY WINDOW OF 30 DAYS;
CONFIGURE BACKUP OPTIMIZATION OFF; # default
CONFIGURE DEFAULT DEVICE TYPE TO DISK;
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP ON;
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO '%F'; # default
CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE DISK PARALLELISM 1 BACKUP TYPE TO BACKUPSET;
CONFIGURE DATAFILE BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE MAXSETSIZE TO UNLIMITED; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION FOR DATABASE OFF; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM 'AES128'; # default
CONFIGURE COMPRESSION ALGORITHM 'BASIC' AS OF RELEASE 'DEFAULT' OPTIMIZE FOR LOAD TRUE ; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY TO APPLIED ON STANDBY
I dont want to backup the STDBY DB but I want the ARC files to be removed when applied so my flash area does not fill up. Is there some command(rman or not) that can fire off this policy?
when a user change or delete any record or row in forms data automatically move to other table because i want to compare old and new record.
View 8 Replies View RelatedSuppose there is customers table and the user (Scott) is having select,update,insert privelege on the customers table.
a.)From the form i.e GUI he is having all the access,we want that when he logs on with sql plus directly then he would only be able to run select query only.
b.)When we are using third party tools such as pl/sql developer tools and toad then we are not able to restrict the user by running only the select queries.The utility which was used previously was only used for SQL Plus.
Resolution:
a.)I am able to restrict the user when he logs on with sqlplus and he is able to run anly select queries.
b.)How we can restrict the user so that in pl/sql he is able to issue only the select query.
Trigger the user when logs on session id is captured and user can be restricted in logging in to the plsql developer and toad applications