Create Reverse Key Index On Table
Feb 25, 2013
difference between the ways we create Reverse Key Index on the table.The two ways are as below:
1) CREATE INDEX <Index_Name> ON <Table_Name>(<Column_Name) REVERSE ;
2) CREATE INDEX <Index_Name> ON<Table_Name>(REVERSE(<Column_Name>)) ;
Which one is the appropraite one.
Are both going to act in the same way.
I created index in both ways one by one on the table.But when I fire the select statement against the same table, The explain plan doesn't show any cost and it shows the full table scan in both ways.The select statement used is as below...I want to compare the column with string RBO(i.e('RBO%') at the start.
SELECT *
FROM <Table_Name>
WHERE REVERSE (<Column_Name>) LIKE '%OBR' ;
The select statement is giving me the correct result. Only the explain plan is showing Full Table Scan.can we use this reverse with IN operator also in the same way by reversing the values.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 3, 2012
I've read some documentation about the reverse key indexes, but I haven't understood when really it can be useful use them. when it's smart to use them according to your experiences?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2012
I have table a in database 1 . Now i have created the MV for table a in database 2.
then i am going to create a synonym in different schema in the database 2.
Now i want to update the synonym in database 2 the same as to refresh in table a database 1.
How to achieve this??
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2010
I use Oracle 10.0.2.0.1.If I create a table with constraint key; after that I create an unique index key, I got an error. Does it mean when I create a table with constraint the unique index are automatically created and I could not create index key as I did as below?
create table test_const(ename varchar2(50) not null,
key_num number not null,
descr varchar2(100),
constraint constraint_test_const unique (ename, key_num));
create unique index test_const_idx on test_const
(
"ENAME","KEY_NUM"
)
tablespace tmp_data;
Error report: SQL Error: ORA-01408: such column list already indexed 01408. 00000 - "such column list already indexed" added [pre] tags by Sriram
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2010
Is it a possible to create table using clause below together with index ?
create table the_table
as
select col1, col2 from table2
I got procedure which create a table in the schema B. The procedure is called from schema A. But when I write into procedure query for create index
then I got a error:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges when
...executing
Therefore I think about to create table together with index.
begin
B.proc.cre_table;
end;
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2012
I am trying to create a new index on large table of size around 100GB. but i am getting the following error:
ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMP.
temp tablespace size is : 20 GB.
does it mean that the whole index will be created at temp tablspace first?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2012
Can we create non-cluster index on a clustered index?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2013
Let's consider such table that all rows fit into single block:
SQL> create table test as select rownum id, '$'||rownum name from dual connect by level <= 530;
Table created.
SQL> create index i_test on test(id);
Index created.
SQL>
SQL> begin
[code].....
why does approach with full scan take longer even if table occupies only one data block? PS. 11gR2
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2011
I have a huge table (about 60 gb) partition over range. The index on this table is global index created on 4 columns together. I have a query which is running very slowly. The explain plan is showing the use of this global index.Explain plan is not showing pstart and pend because the index is global.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2013
How to force an index if the table not using the index?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2011
I am trying to reverse data from couple record. I have display the output below of how I want it to be and is it possible to do it?
Quote:
This is how it is right now
ID|FROM_UOM_KEY|UOM_KEY|UOM|QUANTITY
1 |PK |PK |PK |1
2 |EA |PK |PK |3
3 |PK |PK |PK |1
4 |EA |PK |PK |3
I want it to be like this.
ID|FROM_UOM_KEY|UOM_KEY|UOM|QUANTITY
1 |EA |PK |PK |1
2 |PK |PK |PK |3
3 |EA |PK |PK |1
4 |PK |PK |PK |3
Here is the code
SELECT
from_uom_key,
vip.UOM_KEY,
--DECODE ( from_uom_key,from_uom_key,vip.UOM_KEY,from_uom_key),
[Code]....
View 21 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2012
I have table having a single column a, which contain the values "HP Laptop", can search it in either way , i mean to say either user input the HP Laptop or Laptop HP? is it possible via SQL query ?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2013
i want to create a bitmap index,but getting the error shown below..i created primary key on column dname of dept and unique constraint on empno of emp.
SQL> create bitmap index bindx on dept d(d.dname) from emp e,dept d where e.deptno=d.deptno;
create bitmap index bindx on dept d(d.dname) from emp e,dept d where e.deptno=d.deptno
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-25954: missing primary key or unique constraint on dimension
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2010
How to create index on materialized view which is refreshed daily basis.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2013
I am going through this scenario:
* 35 | ID TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROW | S_ORG_EXT | 3064K| 2472M| | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 | INDEX FULL SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U1 | 14 | | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
35 - filter("T2"."ACCNT_FLG"<>'N' AND ("T2"."INT_ORG_FLG"<>'Y' OR "T2"."PRTNR_FLG"<>'N'))
This unselective index scan on step 36 of the explain is returning 14 rows but optimizer is selecting 3064 K rows from the table .
I tried creating combined index on all 3 columns mentioned in the predicates for 35th step , but that is not utilized .
how to index this whole expression ::--
(ACCNT_FLG<>'N' AND (INT_ORG_FLG<>'Y' OR PRTNR_FLG<>'N'))
Something like CREATE INDEX XYZ on table((ACCNT_FLG<>'N' AND (INT_ORG_FLG<>'Y' OR PRTNR_FLG<>'N')) compute statistics ;
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2012
how to create a primary key with out creating an index?
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2013
we create index on multiple tables in oracle
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 3, 2012
I have an IOT table with partitioned on list. I have p1,p2 and p3 partitions. Now I would like to create a bitmap index on partition key.
I gave ALTER TABLE .. MOVE MAPPING TABLE;
But getting the below error,
ORA-28660: Partitioned Index-Organized table may not be Moved as a whole.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2012
11.2.0.1...How do I create an index on a view or any workaround that my view won't get duplicates?
SQL> create unique index indx01 on db_backup_details_vw(id);
create unique index indx01 on db_backup_details_vw(id)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01702: a view is not appropriate here
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2012
The Text is displayed correctly when there is no "Arabic comma" ، , otherwise the text will be reversed, How can I avoid the issue, why we have such problem only when we add the comma. The screenshot: s10.postimage.org/8qw1l8621/Arabic_comma.png
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2010
Trying to get a number out of an error backtrack
06512: at "SCHEMA.PROCEDURE", line 4
I only need to take the 4 out of this message. Of course the number might be anything from 1 to 10000.
The database languages might differ so I can't do this using
v_line_no:=SUBSTR(v_line_no,INSTR(v_line_no,'line')+5)
As it would not find any 'line' inside the string.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2011
What is the difference between CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE Vs CREATE TABLE .?
Is CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE included in CREATE TABLE?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2013
I have following records in table (T)
Idtype_cdNbrDt
1A1001/1/2013
2A101Null
3B100Null
4C100Null
5A100Null
Based on the type-cd, I need to create Unique index on Nbr & Dt columns
In above record set, I want to create Unique index on type_cd=A and not on B&C (Here i expect duplictes for a combination of Nbr & Dt)
Can we create Unique index on subset of record?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2012
Is there any rule in documentation, when create partition index? For tables, it is said to partition when table is greater than 2GB, but what about index? WHat size it should have to partition?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2010
how I can create an index dynamically? The DBA wants me to put this code below in the beginning of a PL/SQL package. At first, I tried by just putting the below syntax in the code, but I get an 'Alter' is not a valid identifier.
alter index ZZAP_selected_invoices_n1 rebuild online;
And then once the job completes...
alter index ZZAP_selected_invoices_n1 unusable;
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 6, 2011
I have column containing three values:-N,E,Y.I want to get results with only E and Y values.Is it it possible to create index which would not look for N values.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2011
We are trying to create an index using parallelism. The table contains 24 Million row. But It takes very long time. Also we are unable to see any sessions confirming that the index creation is using parallelism. The creation goes on for more than 3 hours. SQL statement executed :
CREATE INDEX ANT.ANT_OM_TRAN ON APPS.ANT_OM_TRAN_INDX (last_update_date) PARALLEL 4 TABLESPACE APPS_TS_IDX;
I found out the session using the query
select sid,serial#,program,module,osuser,username,machine,inst_id,sql_id
from gv$session where type not in ( 'BACKGROUND') and machine='APCUSDE'
and osuser='applmgr' and program like 'sqlplus%' order by logon_time ;
select * from gv$sqltext where sql_id='akrr2ww1ukq5z';
The given queries were used to check if it was using parallelism, but i was unable to find anything.
SELECT QCSID, SID, INST_ID "Inst", SERVER_GROUP "Group", SERVER_SET "Set",
NAME "Stat Name", VALUE
FROM GV$PX_SESSTAT A, V$STATNAME B
WHERE A.STATISTIC# = B.STATISTIC# AND NAME LIKE 'PHYSICAL READS'
AND VALUE > 0 ORDER BY QCSID, QCINST_ID, SERVER_GROUP, SERVER_SET;
SELECT * FROM V$PX_PROCESS;
how can i make sure that, it is using parallelism.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2010
Using oracle 10g R2 on sun-solaris 10 (sparc-64) Well in the MIS system we have lot of ad-hoc queries coming up. We have proper indexing. Say an example which runs very slow;
SELECT GLKCO, GLDCT, GLDOC, GLDGJ, GLJELN, GLEXTL, GLPOST, GLICU, GLICUT, GLDICJ, GLDSYJ,
GLTICU, GLCO, GLANI, GLAM, GLAID, GLMCU, GLOBJ, GLSUB, GLSBL, GLSBLT, GLLT, GLPN, GLCTRY, GLFY, GLFQ,GLCRCD, GLCRR, GLHCRR, GLHDGJ, GLAA, GLU, GLUM, GLGLC, GLRE, GLEXA, GLEXR, GLUPMJ, GLUPMT, GLBCRC, GLCRRM, GLACR, GLAN8
FROM "PRODDTA"."F0911"
WHERE GLUPMJ <> 0
AND TO_DATE('1 JAN' || (19+substr( GLUPMJ , 1, 1)) || substr( GLUPMJ ,2,2)) + substr( GLUPMJ , 4, 3 ) -1 BETWEEN SYSDATE - 365 AND SYSDATE
[code]....
Here GLUPMJ already indexed so the second query returing an index scan but the first query does a FTS naturally.Now even if I plan to create a function based index on 'the bold highlighted' but how.
create index glupmj_idx on f0911(TO_DATE('1 JAN' || (19+substr( GLUPMJ , 1, 1)) || substr( GLUPMJ ,2,2)) + substr( GLUPMJ , 4, 3 ));..Error If I don't use a FBI my query will result in FTS.
1> how to create a FBI here in this case
2> In MIS systems where 'n' no of ad-hoc queries can come up, how to avoid FTS.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2011
I was comparing cost of rebuild vs create index...I carried out the following test
SQL> create table t4 as select * from t1;
Table created.
SQL> create table t5 as select * from t1 where 1=2;
Table created.
SQL> create index i5 on t5(id);
Index created. SQL> select bytes,extents,blocks from user_segments where segment_name='I5';
BYTES EXTENTS BLOCKS
---------- ---------- ----------
65536 1 8
SQL> alter index i5 unusable;
Index altered.
SQL> alter table t5 nologging;
Table altered.
SQL> Alter session set skip_unusable_indexes=True;
Session altered.
SQL> insert /*+ append */ into t5 select * from t1;
563904 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
Now I compared the cost (elapsed time, logical I/O) of the operations
create index i4 on t4(id);
Vs
alter index i5 rebuild online;
Following is the related trace of above 2 steps
create index i4 on t4(id)
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 1 0 0
Execute 1 1.17 3.38 9497 7869 335 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 2 1.17 3.38 9497 7870 335 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 5
[code]....
So which option we shall pick in such cases? {Of course I haven't set 'nologging' for the indices but it is same for both indices we are comparing}
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2013
Oracle Version: 11gR2: 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit
OS: Linux Fedora Core 17 X86_64
Currently, I'm reading the online book Oracle Concepts, Chapter 3: 3 Indexes and Index-Organized Tables, section: Reverse Key Indexes in order to understand this topic.
As I understand for each pair of (key, rowid) in the index structure, the rowid for each row in the table obviously remains the same but the bytes of the key are reversed before the key is stored. So for example on a 32 bit machine (just an example) a key = 10 AB CD EF will be stored as FE DC BA 01 , am I right?
According to the documentation, this becomes interesting in RAC environments in order to remove a hot spot from the index (when multiple instances repeatedly modify the same block) with the disadvantage that in some cases there cannot be Index Range Scan any more as data in the index is not sorted by column key when it is stored.
I was just curious to see how bytes of each key are reversed and after a bit googling I found an article where Tom Kyte shows with an example by using dump function (which as I understand gives the internal representation of a given expression) the difference in the sequence of bytes. Here is the link
[URL]
So based on his instructions I tried to do my own test, yet I don't get the same result, that is, the bytes are not reversed for me once we rebuild the index by REVERSE key word.
I'm going to write down here the test that I did, where is/are my error(s)
Test Case:
(I use a copy of the employees table in hr sample schema)
SQL> CREATE TABLE emp_test AS SELECT * FROM hr.employees;
Table created.
SQL> CREATE INDEX emp_test_idx ON emp_test(first_name);
[code]...
Now, a test SQL Query using the index we've just defined (just for giving an example)
SQL> SELECT first_name,
2 dump(first_name, 16) as dump_result
3 FROM emp_test
4 WHERE first_name = 'Kelly';
FIRST_NAME DUMP_RESULT
-------------- ----------------------------------
Kelly Typ=1 Len=5: 4b,65,6c,6c,79
[code]...
So, according to the above Execution plan, Oracle does an Index Range Scan using the index that I defined on my table that is, emp_test_idx. According to the output of dump, the key (first_name) in that index is stored (in terms of bytes) as 4b,65,6c,6c,79
SQL> SELECT chr(to_number('4b', 'xx')) ||
2 chr(to_number('65', 'xx')) ||
3 chr(to_number('6c', 'xx')) ||
4 chr(to_number('6c', 'xx')) ||
5 chr(to_number('79', 'xx')) first_name
6 FROM DUAL;
FIRST_NAME
--------------------
Kelly
Which as we can see corresponds to the first name 'Kelly', the first name we specified in the above SQL query.
Now let's rebuild the index
SQL> ALTER INDEX emp_test_idx REBUILD REVERSE;
Index altered.
SQL>
Once the index keys have been reversed, I run the very same query in order to see the difference
SQL> SELECT first_name,
2 dump(first_name, 16) as dump_result
3 FROM emp_test
4 WHERE first_name = 'Kelly';
[code]...
So the second time after the index has been reversed, I still get the very same sequence of bytes, that is, 4b,65,6c,6c,79, whereas I expected to get 79,6c,6c,65,4b (that is, the reversed order of the initial bytes sequence)
View 8 Replies
View Related