I've just inadvertently altered the temp tablespace in a wrong database -
ALTER TABLESPACE TEMP ADD TEMPFILE 'temp_wrong_file.dbf'
SIZE 100M REUSE AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 10M MAXSIZE 1000M;
I need to drop just this wrong temp file and not the original and correct temp file for the database.
Is this correct :-
alter database tempfile 'temp_wrong_file.dbf' drop including datafiles;
Will this drop just the wrong temp file?
The other day, we had a query run amok in our 2-node production cluster. The 3 temp files for the temp tablespace were all still set to autoextend unlimited, something I forgot to change after a recent upgrade. I created 3 new temp files and tried to delete the huge temp files. I did this from sqlplus with this commad:
ALTER TABLESPACE PSTEMP DROP TEMPFILE '+DATA/isis/tempfile/pstemp.291.641298061';
The huge files are still in ASM storage. dba_temp_files reports that the status of them is AVAILABLE but they have no RELATIVE_FNO. Grid Control reports their status as OFFLINE and their size as 0. They are actually close to 20 GB each.
I tested the above alter statement in two test instances, also RACed with ASM storage and the temp files were successfully deleted, but they were much smaller in size. At this point, how do I delete the three 20GB files from ASM in our production instance? Why didn't they delete the first time?
I performed a switchover test of my Exadata databases last night. Both databases are running 11.2.0.2 (BP7) on top of GI of the same version.I'm using Data Guard Broker to administer the Data Guard configuration.
I have, as you'd expect, the standby_file_management set to AUTO, so any file changes/additions/deletions that are made on Primary should be applied to Standby also.And they have been. Until last night.
When I had switched over to running Primary on the Standby site, I got this error message:
Tue Jun 04 22:27:12 2013
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/exdw1pdg/exdw1pdg1/trace/exdw1pdg1_ora_26630.trc:
ORA-25153: Temporary Tablespace is Empty
I checked and my two temp tablespaces existed, but had no files in them. These files are 200Gb and 448Gb in size, so you'd think you'd notice them going missing. This wasn't by any means the first time we switched over (and, yes, I did create temp files for Standby when I built it and first switched over)
We've switched over to Standby multiple times and even ran a whole day's processing against it and haven't seen this. Ultimately, it wasn't a big deal, because I just created a tempfile for each of the tablespaces and off we went.Nothing in MOS seems to mention something like this. Basically, it looks like the switchover process decided to eat my tempfiles but keep my temp tablespace defintion. Odd.
I would like to increase the size of my redo logs. For this I need to drop & recreate them. I have read the Oracle doc [URL] which covers this however :
I have both "normal" and "standby" redo logs (see below) on my primary database - can I drop the standby redo logs? Do these have a link to the redo logs on the standby database?
SQL> SELECt * from v$logfile order by 1;
GROUP# STATUS TYPE MEMBER
---------- ------- ------- ------------------------------------- 1 ONLINE D:ORACLEORADATAREDO01.LOG
2 ONLINE D:ORACLEORADATAREDO02.LOG
3 ONLINE D:ORACLEORADATAREDO03.LOG
4 STANDBY D:ORACLEORADATASTDBYREDO04.LOG
5 STANDBY D:ORACLEORADATASTDBYREDO05.LOG
6 STANDBY D:ORACLEORADATASTDBYREDO06.LOG
I have an oracle autoback of controlfile and spfile. I am trying to restore the production database using this backup, into a new server with a different directory structure.
I have completed the following steps in the restore process.
1. Creating a pfile from spfile
2. Changing the the location of cdump, udump, bdump and the control files ( there are three )
3. Then creating a spfile from this pfile
I am stuck on the next step where to rename all the datafiles and tempfile and restore the database. Following is what I did.
After mounting the database in RMAN, tried to run the following.
RMAN> run
2> {
3> allocate channel c1 device type disk
4> ;
5> @/home/oracle/rman_scripts/newloc.rman
6> SET NEWNAME FOR DATAFILE 1 TO '/u02/oradata/dorian/system01.dbf';
7> SET NEWNAME FOR DATAFILE 2 TO '/u02/oradata/dorian/undotbs01.dbf';
8> SET NEWNAME FOR DATAFILE 3 TO '/u02/oradata/dorian/sysaux01.dbf';
9> SET NEWNAME FOR DATAFILE 4 TO '/u02/oradata/dorian/users01.dbf';
[code]....
I am getting the following error message.
Starting restore at 25-JAN-2012 21:26:48
released channel: c1
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of restore command at 01/25/2012 21:26:49
RMAN-06026: some targets not found - aborting restore
RMAN-06100: no channel to restore a backup or copy of datafile 30
RMAN-06100: no channel to restore a backup or copy of datafile 29
RMAN-06100: no channel to restore a backup or copy of datafile 28
[code]....
One of our customer have problem with following sql statement:
SELECT c.table_name, c.column_name
FROM user_tab_columns c, user_tables t
WHERE c.table_name = t.table_name
AND c.data_type IN ('CLOB', 'BLOB');
During execution it takes all the TEMP tablespace size(8GB).
I gather system stats (dbms_stats.gather_dictionary_stats(estimate_percent=>null)) but it doesn't resolve problem.Above sql statement works fine with RULE hint but I want to know what is the reason of problem with temporary tablespace.
I am trying to run on Oracle report via Oracle Application Concurrent job. Concurrent job is completing normal but I don't get anything on print out page. In log file of this request I see message 'MSG-01003: Errors =>ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMP'. I almost doubled the TEMP tablespace in size but still I am not able to get rid of this error message.
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe below query throws an error as mention below
My PGA_AGREGATOR_TARGET = 2GB
below query is given below.
RowsPlan
1SELECT STATEMENT
1 HASH JOIN
1 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID WAT_SOURCE_DATA
BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS
BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE INDX_WAT_SRC_DATA_BIT
[code]....
Error Message : ORA-01652:unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMP
Query :
SELECT OR004.wat_id "WAT_ID",
SYSDATE "DATE_FIRST_IDENTIFIED",
SYSDATE "DATE_LAST_IDENTIFIED",
'OR-004' "RULE_REFNO",
'RISK' "RULE_TYPE",
OR004.workspace_id "WORKSPACE_ID",
OR004.workspace_name "WORKSPACE_NAME",
[code]....
this huge report that uses inline views. I keep getting the following error message when running the script through toad. I was thinking about using the USE_HASH hints. The sql optimizer we use is very buggy in Toad. I'm using oracle database version 10.2.0.3.
I can upload explain plan if needed.
SELECT 'Project Number^Project Start Date^Project End Date^Status^Project Manager^Task Number^'||
'Task Start Date^Task Completion Date^Task Manager^Award Number^Award Short Name^Project Organization^'||
'Task Organization^Expense Code^OMB Code^Revenue Line^Burden Rate^Burden Structure^Site^Sponsor^Type^Customer^'||
'Award Type^Award Purpose^Federal Flow Thru Code^IDC Schedule Name^Total Expenditure^Direct Charges^'||
'Indirect Charges^Cost Share Charges^Total Commitments^Direct Commitments^Indirect Commitments^Cost Share Commitments^'||
[Code]...
I have a TEMP tablespace with autoextend on next 10M and maxsize 5120M, now my tablespace is 99.98% full. Am getting ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace temp error, can i use the method to increase the maxsize value to 10240M.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have written make files that compile .pc files in unix. This was for several projects that use an oralib source code directory.Just running proc on one target .pc file works fine on unix. I am trying to use proc - Oracle 10.2.0 - in windows and I keep getting:
Quote:unable to open include file
#include <stdio.h>
and other C library headers.
I am doing all development under cygwin, this way I can write a makefile just like under unix instead of using nmake.All C library headers are in /usr/include When I run proc on Solaris as that:
proc program.pc
No problems, and I do get program.c.
However in windows I get the previous error message. I have tried to do proc include=/user/include program.pc and proc include=/user/include parse=full program.pc but I still get the same error message.
How can I know if database files are on file system or raw files?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI want to compare two dump files and their respective log files, to see the difference. Is there any way.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI tried to create an index on a large volume table(approx 9 GB) and I got the below error message:-
ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMP
The size of our TEMP tablespace is 3GB and currently it is showing as full.
This tablespace is locally managed and we are not running any other operation on this test database at the moment.
We need to delete data from this table based on a column value, so I was planning to create an index on that column.
I saw on the net that one of the proposed solution is :-
alter tablespace TEMP default storage (pctincrease 1);
alter tablespace TEMP default storage (pctincrease 0);
alter tablespace TEMP coalesce;
but it was mentioned that this does not work with Locally Managed Tablespaces.
We are currently using Oracle 9.2.0.7.0 production release installed on Linux platform(Linux 2.6.9-89.0.25.ELsmp #1 SMP i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux)
I increased the size of TEMP tablespace to 12 GB but the index creation still failed with the same error.
We all know that Temp segments in Temporary tablespace don't deallocate even after the process completes, the extents are only marked for reuse.
After an instance restart, it should de-allocate, or what is the default behavior?
Doesn't SMON de-allocate temporary segments here during instance startup?
If it doesn't de-allocate space then it will run out of space, the next time a huge sort operation takes place.
So my next question is how to estimate the correct space of the temp tablespace in the physical design phase.?
CODECREATE TEMPORARY TABLESPACE temp02
TEMPFILE ' /u01/app/oracle/oradata/ora11gR2/temp02.DBF' SIZE 100M
AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 2M MAXSIZE 500M
EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL UNIFORM SIZE 1M;
CODESQL> SELECT * from DBA_TEMP_FREE_SPACE;
TABLESPACE_NAME TABLESPACE_SIZE ALLOCATED_SPACE FREE_SPACE
------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ----------
TEMP 30408704 30408704 29360128 – Default for system
TEMP02 104857600 1048576 103809024
SQL> select tablespace_name, file_id, bytes_used, bytes_free from v$temp_space_header;
TABLESPACE_NAME FILE_ID BYTES_USED BYTES_FREE
------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ----------
TEMP 1 30408704 0
TEMP02 2 1048576 103809024
Created a user ‘test’ and assigned TEMP02 as its temporary tablespace.
After running sort (a table containing 20 Million records from User test (session 1)
Sys> SQL> select tablespace_name, file_id, bytes_used, bytes_free from v$temp_space_header;
TABLESPACE_NAME TABLESPACE_SIZE ALLOCATED_SPACE FREE_SPACE
------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ----------
TEMP02 104857600 35651584 69206016
TEMP 30408704 30408704 29360128
After Running sort from User test (session 2) but same table
Sys> SQL> select tablespace_name, file_id, bytes_used, bytes_free from v$temp_space_header;
TABLESPACE_NAME TABLESPACE_SIZE ALLOCATED_SPACE FREE_SPACE
------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ----------
TEMP02 104857600 70254592 34603008
TEMP 30408704 30408704 29360128
Free sort space is reduced and more extents allocated for the sort segment
Sys>
select username, tablespace,contents, segtype, extents, blocks from v$sort_usage;
USERNAME TABLESPACE CONTENTS SEGTYPE EXTENTS BLOCKS
------------------------------ ------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------- ----------
TEST TEMP02 TEMPORARY SORT 33 4224
SQL> select tablespace_name, current_users, total_extents, used_extents, free_extents, added_extents, max_used_size
2 from v$sort_segment;
TABLESPACE_NAME CURRENT_USERS TOTAL_EXTENTS USED_EXTENTS FREE_EXTENTS ADDED_EXTENTS MAX_USED_SIZE
------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- -------------
TEMP 0 28 0 28 0 1
TEMP02 1 66 33 33 66 66
After the sort completes;
Sys> SQL> SELECT * from DBA_TEMP_FREE_SPACE;
TABLESPACE_NAME TABLESPACE_SIZE ALLOCATED_SPACE FREE_SPACE
------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ----------
TEMP02 104857600 70254592 103809024
TEMP 30408704 30408704 29360128
Free space shows the Temp02 extents are free for re-use by another process Extents not de-allocated
SQL> select tablespace_name, file_id, bytes_used, bytes_free from v$temp_space_header;
TABLESPACE_NAME FILE_ID BYTES_USED BYTES_FREE
------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ----------
TEMP 1 30408704 0
TEMP02 2 70254592 34603008
Actual space (bytes) free in Temp02
Does it mean that 34603008 is actually free and 103809024 is marked free
select username, tablespace,contents, segtype, extents, blocks from v$sort_usage;
No records
Agreed here
SQL> select tablespace_name, current_users, total_extents, used_extents, free_extents, added_extents, max_used_size from v$sort_segment;
TABLESPACE_NAME CURRENT_USERS TOTAL_EXTENTS USED_EXTENTS FREE_EXTENTS ADDED_EXTENTS MAX_USED_SIZE
------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- -------------
TEMP 0 28 0 28 0 1
TEMP02 0 66 0 66 66 66
After a startup of instance;
SQL> SELECT * from DBA_TEMP_FREE_SPACE;
TABLESPACE_NAME TABLESPACE_SIZE ALLOCATED_SPACE FREE_SPACE
------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ----------
TEMP 30408704 30408704 29360128
TEMP02 104857600 70254592 34603008
SQL> select tablespace_name, file_id, bytes_used, bytes_free from v$temp_space_header;
TABLESPACE_NAME FILE_ID BYTES_USED BYTES_FREE
------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ----------
TEMP 1 30408704 0
TEMP02 2 70254592 34603008
Why is the sort segments not de-allocated after instance startup??
What is the Best option for SQL/sybase server Temp table to use/for data manipulation (Insert/update/delete) inside the procedure in oracle Other then global temporary table.
Since we are porting from SQL/Sybase to Oracle we don't want to Create too many global temporary table.
what are minimum privilege required to create GTT (Global Temp Table)?
View 7 Replies View Relatedhow to check the maximum space ever used for TEMP. I want to know it because I need to resize the TEMP and I want to know how small it can be. As I can see from a documentation hURL....max_size is max number of extens ever used in a segment
I could multiply max_size by extent_size and it would give me the max size of temp ever used
SQL> select segment_file, extent_size, max_size from v$sort_segment;
SEGMENT_FILE EXTENT_SIZE MAX_SIZE
0 128 23625
0 128 753
most of the time i am seeing temporary tablespace issues like temp tablespace is 100% full.
do we have any procedure to clean up temporary data from tablespaces.
and does it effects to database anything.
share any link
I am building a reporting table using the count analytic function in order to count up several different attributes in one statement.What I find is that this method quickly eats up my TEMP space. This is 10gR2. I have attempted to use MANUAL workarea policy with as large ofsort_area_size as possible (2G) but that does not seem to have any effect on performance or TEMP usage. The RAW table is about 12G with 75 million rows. I am not that concerned about execution time, but rather TEMP usage.
--INSERT into <object>...
select distinct
file_sid,filename,control_numb,processing_date,file_class,
vendor_id,vendor_desc,
c_status_id,c_status_desc,
[code]...
I am not seeing any increase in onepass or multipass executions on the PGA during execution of this statement using...
SELECT CASE WHEN low_optimal_size < 1024*1024
THEN to_char(low_optimal_size/1024,'999999') ||
'kb <= PGA < ' ||
(high_optimal_size+1)/1024|| 'kb'
ELSE to_char(low_optimal_size/1024/1024,'999999') ||
[code]...
I'd like to get a better explaination of how analytics use the instance resources and TEMP space. For example if I add
a count with a different window (such as the last two columns commented in the above query) I blow out my temp space (70G).
Is the critcal factor the use of distinct? or multiple windows? or something else?
I'm trying to create a stored procedure that has two temporary tables within it, and then queries both them tables and inserts the results into a table. I created the script but when they try to run in on the server it wont run.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE UpdateFIDB_SP
IS
BEGIN
CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE myAAAA
AS
(SELECT AAAA.1111, AAAA.2222, BBBB.3333_EXT, CCCC.4444, DDDD.5555, DDDD.6666, DDDD.7777,
DDDD.8888, AAAA.9999, EEEE.1010, EEEE.1A1A, EEEE.1B1B, FFFF.3333_LO, FFFF.1C1C,
[code]........
I have a Physical Standby database on server#2 which has its UNDO and TEMP tablespaces in a mount point that is a bit small. I discovered yesterday that this mount point was completely filled. This is not an immediate problem, because even though the TEMP and UNDO tablespaces are large, there is almost no usage of them.
I logged into my Primary, and created a new temp tablespace (TEMP2), made it the database default, dropped the TEMP tablespace, and then re-created the TEMP tablespace in a different mount point (with a much higher capacity!). I then made the new TEMP as the database default temp tablespace again. I expected that these changes would be propagated over to the Physical Standby via log application, but they didn't come over.
I have standby_file_management set to AUTO, and there are no unapplied logs. Everything OTHER than the temp tablespaces seems to be in synch.
I'm having some trouble dealing with the PL/SQL coding. At the moment, I have a file (set of data) that is read using java. An array is created (line by line) and is passed into a temp. table, which is then called by the plsql (call PKG_xxx.PRC_xxx...) script/command for processing. Is there any way I could directly get the file loaded into plsql (into a temp. table maybe?)
The data are just numbers and letters. I already got the PL/SQL part to select the set I want for different cases. All I need is to get the file (directly or indirectly) for the procedure without going through java.
I need to create a temp table within a stored procedure. I want to apply some logic on the table, and then delete it when it is completed in runtime -- all inside the stored procedure.
View 13 Replies View RelatedIn one of the databases, we have created more temp tables as on commit preserve rows. but i want to change the on commit preserve rows to on commit delete rows as per application requirements.I have searched the google but i didnt find any alter scripts for it.?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to use Global temporary tables, and index on this table to get my results faster. I can see even if I run any query on this table, it does full table scan and not Index scan..
create global temporary table abc_tab on commit preserve rows
as select a,b,c from xyz;
create index lmn on abc_tab(a,b,c)
I have been developing in MS SQL for about 15. So I'm still getting use to the syntax and features within Oracle.I'm trying to create a stored procedure that has two temporary tables within it, and then queries both them tables and inserts the results into a table.I created the script but when they try to run in on the server it wont run.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE UpdateFIDB_SP
IS
BEGIN
CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE myAAAA
AS
(SELECT AAAA.1111, AAAA.2222, BBBB.3333_EXT, CCCC.4444, DDDD.5555, DDDD.6666, DDDD.7777,
DDDD.8888, AAAA.9999, EEEE.1010, EEEE.1A1A, EEEE.1B1B, FFFF.3333_LO, FFFF.1C1C,
AAAA.1D1D
[code].....
example to use temp table in function with only ref cursor.
I need to use for the reporting purpose.
Is it possible to create local temp variable based table within sql procedures, i am planning on writing few select queies,and want to store teh result of each select to a temp variable based table.
Within sql serevr, i can create temp tables within and then later after i use teh data at teh end drop the table.
Is it possible, since i don't want to create any physical tables.
how I can replace gtt in the following procedure with an Oracle Collection?
gtt or Collection is more efficient?
PROCEDURE report_gen (
i_table IN NUMBER
)
IS
BEGIN
create global temporary table test_gtt (tid NUMBER(15));
[code].....
