Explain plan for <SQL_STATEMENT>" and ranselect plan_table_output from table(dbms_xplan.display()) afterward.
There's an object "vm_nwvm_1" under the column "name" and I have no ideas where this objects come from. I query the table user_objects and look for the name and I don't see it. Before the I did dbms_stat command on the schema. My performance was very reason able and I didn't see the object "vm_nwvm_1" under the explain plan. I only see it after "dbms_stat".
I have created an non unique index lk_fein on lookup_fein( code,map_id,trash). When I check the explain plan it does a full table scan on lookup_fein. if I force it to use index by it does and the cost also decreases.
Declare Itm1 varchar2(30) := :system.trigger_item; Begin CLEAR_FORM(NO_VALIDATE,FULL_ROLLBACK); :B1.NEW_FORM := :SYSTEM.CURRENT_FORM; --Here B1 is the Block Name Go_Item(Itm1); End;
what privilege is require for a user to execute explain plan? I get below error while try to execute explain plan.
SQL> explain plan for SELECT /*+ FULL(t) */ COUNT(*) FROM "DREAM"."CONSUMER.TAB" t WHERE ROWNUM <= 1000000; explain plan for SELECT /*+ FULL(t) */ COUNT(*) FROM "DREAM"."CONSUMER.TAB" t WHERE ROWNUM <= 1000000 * ERROR at line 1: ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
We have recently upgraded application (from Oracle Applications 11.5.9 to 12.1.3) and database (from 9.2.0.5.0 to 11.2.0.3.0).Since we are confronting to performances issues, i try to analyse some queries which Explains plans seems strange (in my opinion).Studying one of them i discover the next case (which according to my logic, i can't explain): --
Just bind variable --select *from MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS mmtwhere 1 = 1and mmt.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = :p1and mmt.ORGANIZATION_ID = :p2and mmt.TRANSACTION_REFERENCE = :p3--and mmt.SUBINVENTORY_CODE = :p4 PlanSELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 5 Bytes: 361 Cardinality: 1 2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS Cost: 5 Bytes: 361 Cardinality: 1 1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX XXSPE.XXSPE_MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSAC_N99 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 2-- Nvl on bind variable --select *from MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS mmtwhere 1 = 1and mmt.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = :p1and
I am facing a weird situation wherein the explain plan of same sql in SIT and PROD is different.In fact the explain plan is very costly in Prod.Also the DB version of both SIT and PROD is same.
Below is the sql and corresponding explain plan in Prod and SIT respectively.
Query: SELECT seq,CCN,ProcessorPart,root_item,comp_path,Item,comp_item,comp_item_type, lag(comp_item_type,1,'PART') over(PARTITION BY seq ORDER BY lvl)Nxt_comp_item_type,lvl,bom_qty, ROUND(CASE min(abs(bom_qty)) OVER (PARTITION BY seq ORDER BY lvl) WHEN 0 THEN 0 ELSE 1 END * EXP (SUM (LN (nullif(abs(bom_qty),0))) OVER (PARTITION BY seq ORDER BY lvl))) Ulti_qty, 'AMER'
[code]...
The tables referred in above query is small tables containing arnd 10k records.The above tables are partitioned on Region and not indexed.
I am not able to attribute why there is a huge change in Cost between SIT and Prod.Apparently the Job is going for 3-5 hours which used to get completed within 20mins in SIT.
however I was able to identify a poorly performing query that seemed to be maxing out our CPU. I have been trying to understand the Explain Plan. The plan below is from our test system which has considerably less information in the tables than our PROD system.
I can see there are a bunch of table scans at the end which may indicate missing indexes, but I am unclear on whether this is actually a problem as the %CPU seems to be worse for the JOIN near the top of the plan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | Inst |IN-OUT| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1870M| 3018G| | 677M (1)|999:59:59 | | | | 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 1870M| 3018G| 3567G| 677M (1)|999:59:59 | | |
1. In previous version of Toad (9.7.2) during executing a statement I was able to click on 'Explain plan current statement'. In this version of Toad (10.6.0. 42) is not a possible to do it.In the Toad options I've filled the sign: "use a separate connection when Toad itself is generating transactions"
2. During executing a statement I still see 'clock' cursor.Is it a possible to disable to see it?
I need to warn readers that I am not a DBA but am heavily involved in application development. Whatever I know about database tuning is whatever I've managed to pick up via self-learning, and I must admit that the sum total of my knowledge isn't a lot.
Anyway, our "DBAs" recently did an upgrade to our 10g database, going from version 10.2.0.2.0 to 10.2.0.4.0. Immediately after the upgrade, a particular query has started to under-perform. The query itself was not altered in any way during the upgrade.
We have two explain plans for the query, a before and an after plan. The two plans are similar but not identical. The plans are too massive to post here, so I hope the following synopsis of the differences will do.
The 10.2.0.2.0 plan:
shows a HASH GROUP BY has a TempSpc column in the explain plan shows a particular table (EMP_HISTORY) as having ~1700 rows
The 10.2.0.4.0 plan:
shows SORT GROUP BY instead of HASH GROUP BY does not show a TempSpc column in the explain plan shows the EMP_HISTORY table as having only 25 rows
Other than these points, no other discernible differences can be noted. I'm wondering what would cause HASH to change to SORT. I'm told that stats are up-to-date.
I have two Oracle instances that are setup identically.When I run a query on one of them, it takes around 3 seconds, on the other it takes around 200 seconds.
I have looked at the explain plans, and it has shown me what I think is the problem. On one instance, it does a join on two tables, then runs the other filter/access predicates. On the other instance it runs the filter/access predicated first, then does the expensice join. The one that does the join first is the one that takes around 200 seconds. How to tell Oracle to make this join after runnning the other predicates?
when i runnung the explain plan syntax , show error : running --- SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display) ; ERROR: an uncaught error in function display has happened; please contact Oracle support Please provide also a DMP file of the used plan table PLAN_TABLE ORA-00904: "OTHER_TAG": 無效的 ID
since the optimizer (during explain plan) assumes all bind variable to be of varchar type, while checking plan for SQL statement using bind variable of numeric and date type shall we convert (typecast) it as following?
variable n_sal number variable dt_joining date exec n_sal:= 1000 exec dt_joining := '12-dec-2005' select first_name from emp_data where sal=to_number(n_sal) and joining=to_date(dt_joining);
(1) how can i fill some value in a table column based on some existing column value automatically without user intervention. my actual problem is i have 'expiry date' column and 'status'. the 'status' column should get filled automatically based on the current system date. ex: if expiry date is '25-Apr-2011' and current date is '14-May-2011', then status should be filled as 'EXPIRED'
(2)hOw can i build 'select' query in a report (report 6i) so that it will show me list of items 'EXPIRED' or 'NOT EXPIRED' or both expired and not expired separately in a single report based on user choice. 'EXPIRED' & 'NOT EXPIRED' can be taken from the above question no. 1.
if a table contains two columns and both are part of the primary key of that table (Kind of obvoius).
should i opt for a index organized tbale in this case ?Or should i opt for another running sequential colum which would serve as a primary key of this table and define the actual two columns of the system as unique keys.
there is a drawback if a most of the tables of a database contain composite primary keys?
I am trying to join column names from a table with data from a different table. I think i should be able to pass the parameter to a 'select list' in a query. Look at my sample data below. And the data in sales table can grow till 15 rows and similarly corresponding columns in saleshist.
I have two table country and state.Columns are given below
SQL> DESC Country
Name Null? Type ----------------- -------- -------------- PRIMARY_KEY NOT NULL NUMBER DISPLAY_ORDER NOT NULL NUMBER NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(50) TREE_POSITION NOT NULL VARCHAR2(250) PARENT_ID NUMBER
SQL> desc state Name Null? Type ----------------- -------- ------------------------- PRIMARY_KEY NOT NULL NUMBER DISPLAY_ORDER NOT NULL NUMBER NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(50 CHAR) VALUE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(50 CHAR) TREE_POSITION NOT NULL VARCHAR2(250 CHAR) PARENT_ID NUMBER
Now I have to insert the values in the state table taking from the country table.
EXAMPLE :
INSERT INTO STATE (PRIMARY_KEY, DISPLAY_ORDER, NAME, VALUE, PARENT_ID, TREE_POSITION) VALUES (251, 1, 'Alaska', 'AK', 233, 'STAT_USUS_AKAK');
but here the tree position is static it can be anything at the client side so I want to make it dynamic. So to make dynamic what I have used is mentioned below:
INSERT INTO STATE (PRIMARY_KEY,DISPLAY_ORDER,NAME, VALUE, PARENT_ID, TREE_POSITION) VALUES
[code].....
Now I want that Quote: select tree_position from L_STATE_ITEM where name ='United States')||'_ALAL' which i have used in the state table to put value in the tree_position, I want to make the other half part after the concatenation operator "_ALAL" also dynamic.
So I was just wondering If I can pic that value from the "VALUE COLUMN" of the same table.
How can I add new column at the specified location in a oracle table? I am having a flat file from which data is inserted to the table..But initially I don't need that column so I m not having this column in the table but if further i need that column at the particular location then how can I do this..?
I have some tables. TABLE1 contains columns called query_id and a column called List_name TABLE2 holds a list of data and the TABLE_NAME = value in TABLE1 held under LIST_NAME TABLE3 contains column with Query_ID and other info.
Is it possible to grab the entry in TABLE1 under LIST_NAME as a TABLE_NAME in a data source?
i'v a problem regarding dual table,i logged to oracle as sys as sysdba and i add a column to dual table and then want to delete that added column but oracle gives "ORA-12988: cannot drop column from table owned by SYS"
i'm not able to drop any user oracle gives "ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1" "ORA-01031: insufficient privileges"
another error:: SP2-0575: Use of Oracle SQL feature not in SQL92 Entry Level oracle gives error when i want to switch user all problems starts when i add that column to dual table
I have one table which has 90 columns all has varchar2 datatype except one Column[primary key (Number)]. In this Table we have 1000 records, I want to fetch those records from Table which has value in all 90 columns means there is no null value in any column.
I know simple method Like this :-
column_name1 IS NOT NULL AND Column_name2 IS NOT NULL.
Like this we can write IS NOT NULL condition for all column.Is there any other way to write this Query because it makes Query very longer and it is very tedious job to write this Condition for all Columns.
