Server Administration :: Delete Statements UseTemp Tablespace?
Jun 16, 2011
Why large delete statements, with no where clauses, could be using up temp tablespace segments? I thought temp tablespace was just for sort operations,joins, etc.
We have a weekly job that inserts rows into a staging table, deletes, with commit, the a few minutes later and repeats the process. Each delete is using some of the temp tablespace. Eventually we run out of space (ora-01652). That's another thing. I would have thought the space would be released for the next process, but it's now.
We will probably switch to truncate statements, but this situation really puzzles me. I've tried view the docs but don't see any of delete statements using temp tablespace.
i have a tablespace which contains 121 datafile(max limit reached) as a dba what we have to do?
creating a new tablespace with a datafile and assign the users to the current tablespace which i created now.iif the above process is correct,after some time the tablespace which was filled up got freed up.now can i give the access to the users previous (i.e. freed up tablespace) and current tablespaces
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
My os version is
Linux damdat01 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Aug 19 04:00:49 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
My database is OLP system.
My question is what are the advantages and disadvantages having one single tablespace versus multiple tablespace?
Easy to maintain when you have single tablespace. but hard to track the IO issues if you have one single tablespace.
One of the procedures that am working on is failing with ORA-0000: normal, successful completion error.
The procedure has got several update and delete statements and have logging enabled after each step. The problem with that again is, each time the log table gets updated thereby losing the history of until what point the procedure ran successfully.I have this issue only in production environment and unable to simulate it in dev environment which limits my options of troubleshooting the procedure code. I was using SQLERRM in the code.
Is there a way I can identify the bad records/ record causing this issue? Am very new to PL/SQL and do not know how to proceed with this.How do you debug this sort of issues??(where one procedure internally invokes another one which again invokes other one etc)
I have one database which is recently upgraded from oracle 8.1.5 to oracle 10.2.0.4.The database is having around 300 tablespace and total size of the database is 1.5 TB.
The database was created in oracle 8i and all the teblespace were DMT(Dictionary Managed Tablespace) .Usually after up gradation all the tablespace are in DMT mode. Now my requirement is to convert all the tablespace into LMT (Locally Managed Tablespace) so that I can AVAIL ALL THE FEATURES OF LMT.
This database is a mission critical database and very less downtime can be allowed.
1)If i issue a DELETE statement to delete a row, will this statement drag any data from the datafile to database buffer? How is the change made by a DELETE statement recorded in buffer cache? How is this change then applied to the data in datafiles after commit?
Problem Description: There are five range partitioned tables which are partitioned by date,designed by previous DBA.Four tables are in one tablespace and one more table is in another tablespace.For every three months there are two tablespaces are created autamatically in new names for future dates.There is no scheduled job for this.How they are created?.This is our question.
In my database ,the size of the system tablespace is 1024M.now i found its free space is 477.875M.
SQL> SELECT TABLESPACE_NAME,SUM(BYTES)/1024/1024 M FROM DBA_FREE_SPACE where tablespace_name = 'SYSTEM' GROUP BY TABLESPACE_NAME ; TABLESPACE_NAME M --------------- ------- SYSTEM 477.875
In system tablespace ,the max size segment is IDL_UB1$,it is 167M
SQL> SELECT SEGMENT_NAME, SX || 'M' "Size" FROM (SELECT SEGMENT_NAME,SUM(BYTES)/1024/1024 SX FROM DBA_SEGMENTS WHERE TABLESPACE_NAME = 'SYSTEM' GROUP BY SEGMENT_NAME) WHERE SX > 100 ORDER BY SX DESC; SEGMENT_NAME Size ------------- ----- IDL_UB1$ 167M
My tablespace contains two datafiles dfile1.dbf and dfile2.dbf on D drive of my filesystem. Now i copied these dbf files on pasted it on a location in E drive. Now i want my tablespace to use dbf files pasted in new location.
Will i have to Alter Tablespace Add Datafile with Reuse clause
I have got oracle 11g release 1, I need recomendation, how can I delete safely content from the folder C:oraclediag dbmsinstancenameinstancenameincident?
In My database rollback segment space is not releasing space even though, there is no transaction is using RBS. RBS tablespace size is around 70GB. Unfortunately still our environment is running in 9i due to application code
SQL> show parameter undo
NAME TYPE VALUE ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------ undo_management string MANUAL undo_retention integer 1800 undo_suppress_errors boolean FALSE undo_tablespace
Erroneously created datafile, re: "/path/../large_rbs_03.dbf" was created under the SYSTEM tablespace which is supposedly be in the LARGE_RBS tablespace.
How do I make the said datafile be under LARGE_RBS?
As the undo segments are used in round robin fashion, Is it possible that with varying load (concurrent users, size and number of transactions), the size of Undo tablespace on a particular day is less than the Undo tablespace size few days back, by any chance?
As a basic understanding I know that Undo is preserved for read consistency and transaction, instance recovery So if there are lot of transaction on a database on 05 Feb and before that, but there aren't any transactions on 6,7,8,9, then on 10th Feb can we see the Undo tablespace size is less than that of 05 Feb?
In the following case when data belonging to table is not required for any queries, transactions, even then the undo size is not restored upon dropping the table.
As such for large operations and batch processes shall we keep undo tablespace with files as 'Autoextend' with 'Maxsize' as 'Unlimited'?
I want to increase the size of the tablespace but when i login as sysdba or admin user i can just see the 21 tables in the dba_tablespaces or user_tablespaces. I want to see the tablespaces related to the application.
Due to improper documentations of a certain project, I need to drop a DEFAULT tablespace of a newly created instance including it's associated datafiles by using this command:
"DROP TABLESPACE <tablespace name> INCLUDING CONTENTS AND DATAFILES;"
The default tablespace name is QWER (qwer01.dbf) and I added 2 datafiles in it, re: OPD_SML01.dbf & EXYT_SML01.dbf.
i want to create tablespace in raw partion on windows.I have added a hard disk and added extended partition to it. Then created 4 logical partitions of 256 MB with diskpart.exe.I have assigned a drive letter to one of them as X:
However, I am having trouble in creating tablespace on it. I referred to [URL]... I get following error,
C:UsersAdministrator>sqlplus SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on Fri Aug 17 15:32:17 2012 Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle. All rights reserved. Enter user-name: SYSTEM Enter password:
Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing opti
