The above 8 are the possible ways to key in the data using a form.The logic is like based on a particular condition the message should display in the report.If they specify a particular USER and RESP_NAME and FUNC_NAME then it should display AAAAAAAAAAA (This should take priority first). The priority is in order the default should be the last one.
I have a table name as angdata77 having attributes like asigno..i want to retrieve data from angdata77 by using both group by & order by clauses.. for total count..am using the query as
select asigno,count(*) from angdata77 group by asigno order by asigno;
Is there any other query for retrieving the data from angdata77
Name Null Type --------------------------- -------- ------------- RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER RPTDATE NOT NULL DATE RPTD_BY NOT NULL VARCHAR2(25) PRODUCT_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
describe rptbody
Name Null Type ------------- -------- ------------- RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER LINENO NOT NULL NUMBER COMMENTS VARCHAR2(240) UPD_DATE DATE
The fact is that we store some header in RPTHEAD and store real data in RPTBODY, the question is that if I use below SQL to query all data for a 'PRODUCT_ID'.
SELECT t0.LINENO, t0.COMMENTS, t0.RPTNO, t0.UPD_DATE FROM RPTBODY t0 , RPTHEAD rpthead WHERE ( t0.RPTNO = rpthead.RPTNO AND t0.UPD_DATE>=to_date('1970/01/01 00:00:00','YYYY/MM/DD hh24:mi:ss') AND rpthead.PRODUCT_ID IN ('4647') )
I do not want to have 'ORDER by' clause since data set is too large, the sorting takes long time, is there any way to get the result rows in the order sorted by RPTNO? We have the index for RPTNO on RPTBODY.
I have two block....both are the control block.. in first block i select the date and in second block the data of that date is populated.but the data is populated using cursor in when-button-pressed trigger of that first block button.in cursor the data is selected and placed in field of detail block using into clause.... each field and one item of detail block is srno which is create in post-query of detail block using :sysyem.trigger_record.
Now i want after populated the detail block the data is sorted desc one of the field of the detail block..Can this possible using set_block_property() of block although the block is control block if yes where i should do this?
I have a real problem with form, specifically one of its data blocks. In the order by property of the block i specify it to sort on a branch in ascending order(i tried descending as well) but for some reason the form ignores that and sorts it on the ROWNUM. I even removed the where clause, the order by clause and changed the query data source type to FROM clause and changed the data source name to pre-query. I then created the query string in the block's pre-query trigger and set query_data_source_name property to that query string and still the data in the block is not being sorted on the branch number but instead on the ROWNUM.
I have data block that has hundreds of records. On a screen I display 20 records at a time. On that same screen I have "find badge" function where user types badge/employee id and presses a button to find the record in a data block. I have no problem finding the records in a list and pointing the curser to appropriate record. My question is (which is a user request) if the badge/employee id is found to make that record to be the first record in a list.
We are trying to import data into existing tables in a schema using data pump
However the foreign key tables are being imported first and then the master table data thus violating the constraints
Apparently it seems larger tables are being imported first regardless of referential integrity constraints thus causing constraint violation (contrary to my understanding)
Is it a normal behaviour during data pump import?
Is it possible that the keys being sequence generated are causing this?
As I understand import will commit after each table In that case can we defer commit at all at the expense of large undo, set constraints to deferrable and try the import?
I have to implement a new logic such that , Old logic which pulls data will stay in place.now New logic pull data form SAP . So i have implemented the new logic in to the existing cursor as below.
i.e.
Cursor new_sap old_query Union New_query;
I have 3 new cursor like dis. How to process these old and new cursors in FOR loop.. Ex:
For c1 in C2(order_number) if order_source is sap then ( dis filters old data which is not in SAP) new query in cursor should process else old query in cursor should process end if;
i have three tables: ot_req, ot_po_breakup, and ot_po. when a row is inserted into the ot_po table reffering to ot_req,there is a trigger which creates a seperate reocrd in ot_po_breakup with the details of ot_req ot_req.ri_sys_id as pb_ri_sys_id and ot_req.ri_qty as pb_ri_qty ,pi_sys_id as pb_pi_sys_id .upto this part is okand when i insert also the logic is okay.
i have created a trigger to update the rows in the ot_po_breakup table after insert on ot_poin order of pb_ri_sys_id and pb_pi_sys_id and try to update the values in the columns pb_ves1q, pb_ves2q, and pb_ves3q order. i am trying to take the quantities in ot_po.pi_qty and insert them into the pb_ves1q, pb_ves2q, and pb_ves3q columns of ot_po_breakup where those columns are empty (0 or null) such that the sum of those three columns for that row does not exceed the pb_ri_qty in that row.
My problem is i need to mofify my trigger to do the update and delete , that is whenever the user is updating the column ofot_po.pi_qtythe qty should in ot_po_breakup should get updated accordingly and sum of pb_ves1q,pb_Ves2q and pb_ves3q should be equal to pb_ri_qty and do the same for delete as well
I need to run a query for students that took ALL the following courses: 6710, 6711, 1032, 1035 and ANY of the following courses: 3061,3065
here is my query: =SELECT distinct student_number, last_name, first_name, gender, ethnicity, students.grade_level, lunchstatus, course_name, course_number ,termid from students inner join storedgrades on students.id=storedgrades.studentid where students.schoolid='0976111' and (students.grade_level >'9' and students.grade_level <= '12') and (course_number = all('6710', '6711', '1035')and course_number=any('1031','1032','3061','3065','3062', '3401', '3082')) order by last_name, first_name, grade_level, course_number
The problem is that I'm not getting any results but I know for a fact that some students took the required courses. On a side note, if I change the ALL to ANY - I do get results - but it is not what I want because it would be hard to keep track of the students that met the requirements.
I have a BEGIN Block of the code where a loop is running .I also have a CONTINUE statement in the EXCEPTION Block of the code where I return the control to the BEGIN Block in case of any exception.Now as per ORACLE Company, CONTINUE has a old issue which is already registered by Oracle Company Bug 7306422.
The issue is where CONTINUE statement does not run properly when your code Optimization level is 2. However it will work properly if we have the Optimization Level as 0 and 1.are facing the same issue here and have a workaround.
Is there any code which I can permanently use instead of CONTINUE but have the same logic incorporated.i.e returning to the next iteration whenever I say to pass the control.
i am trying to upgrade my existing system (6i) to 11g. I have installed Weblogic 10.3.5 with forms and reports 11.1.2.1.0 on windows 7 32 bit. I can connect to my database (10g) from Form builder.
But when I try to open a form/pll of 10g or 6i, it says PDE-PLI018 could not find library and it shows the path of my earlier folder, which now does not exist.
I have made changes in registry FORMS_PATH, FORMS_BUILDER_PATH, UI_ICON And in default.env file FORMS_PATH and CLASSPATH
I have added entry to tnsnames.ora, through which I can connect to DB. And have followed below site to configure weblogic and FM forms and reports;
[URL]
1) Do we have to connect (create a bridge) to DB from weblogic except tnsnames.ora.
2) For library error I think I am missing some settings to be done.
3) If I am able to rectify above error then can I directly use [URL] and access the system from another pc, or still there are some modifications needed.
create table t (a varchar2(20),b number(8)); insert into t values ('aa',4); insert into t values ('ba',6); insert into t values ('ca',7); insert into t values ('da',8);
in place of 8 there can be any number between 1 to 100
if in place of 8 number is <10 insert into t values('ea',10); ---- this i need dynamic insert if in place of the number between 11-19 then insert into t values('ea',20); ---- this i need dynamic insert and so on
i tried as below
select case when max(b) <10 then 10 when max(b) between 10 and 20 then 20 end from t;
but i cant write case for again and again upto nth
I have oracle 10g R2 on windows.I have two tables and say table A ant Table B. Both have column Total_amount. There are primary key's on Both tables.
Sample query SELECT A.EMPNO,A.EMP_CODE,nvl(A.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0) "A_TOTAL_AMOUNT", nvl(B.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0) "B_TOTAL_AMOUNT",(nvl(A.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0) - nvl(B.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0)) "DIFFERENCE" FROM A, B WHERE A.EMPNO =B.EMPNO (+) AND A.EMP_CODE = B.EMP_CODE (+) AND round((nvl(A.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0) - nvl(B.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0)),3) <> 0Above query retrives only Non-matching rows.
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRI_COMPL_FEATURES 2 AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON COMPLEMENTS FOR EACH ROW 3 DECLARE 4 v_fno NUMBER; 5 v_tab VARCHAR2(30); 6 v_unique_id VARCHAR2(40); [code]....
Trigger created.When I am trying to insert into complements table it is throwing error as follows:
SQL> insert into complements values(19,NULL,'5',6,7,NULL,'W2023648',NULL,NULL); insert into complements values(19,NULL,'5',6,7,NULL,'W2023648',NULL,NULL) * ERROR at line 1: ORA-20010: ORA-04091: table TEEMNGWS.COMPLEMENTS is mutating, trigger/function may not see it ORA-06512: at "TEEMNGWS.TRI_COMPL_FEATURES", line 19 ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger 'TEEMNGWS.TRI_COMPL_FEATURES'
I can understand that I am trying to perform DML operation(i.e select) on table which trigger is fired.But how can I implement the same logic when AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE trigger is written.
I installed web logic server and form & report on my linux system and gave configuration option later . so now web logic admin server is running on different port and wls_reports server is running to different port in cluster. How its running on cluster and when i run
localhost:9002/reports/rwservlet/getserverinfo?server="report_server_name" i am getting rep-51002 error.
I'm having a problem with null values. I want to display old student in a display item if subjects text item has records. Otherwise, display new student if it has null values. This is the code that i tried so far..
IF :block2.subjects IS NULL THEN :block3.type := 'NEW STUDENT'; ELSE :block3.type := 'OLD STUDENT'; END IF;
I receive the output from only one of the nested blocks:
bad PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
I understand that I don't need nested blocks for the example above, but this was just a condensed version of what I'm trying to do. I think nesting blocks will be easier to read and maintain, instead of having a huge CASE statement.
How can I execute only the nested block for which the condition is true and ignore the nested blocks that follow?
Are nested blocks not the correct answer here? Should I be looking at invoking procedures/functions instead?
I have written the following PL/SQL block logic tofetch the records from the emp table and compare the records with emp_10 table to perform insert if the records are newelse to perform update the existed records in the emp_10 table.
DECLARE CURSOR tranche_balance_cur IS SELECT empno, ename, sal,
[code]...
Execution scenario 1:
I have commented insert and update statements in that case I got the following out put.
Inserted Records4 Updated Records10
As per the logic it's giving the correct output because the cursor is fetching 14 records in that already 10 records are existed in emp_10 tableand 4 are new records.so that it's showing the count for inserted records as 10 and updated records as 4.
Execution scenario 2: I have uncommented insert and update statements in that case I got the following out put.
Inserted Records13 Updated Records1
As per the logic it's not giving the correct output.
I tried with using TRIM function in the comparision logic to avoid spaces.
TRIM(emp_10.empno) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.empno) AND TRIM(emp_10.ename) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.ename) AND TRIM(emp_10.sal) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.sal) AND TRIM(emp_10.deptno) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.deptno)
