SQL & PL/SQL :: Query Logic - Students Who Took ALL / ANY Courses
Mar 1, 2011
I need to run a query for students that took ALL the following courses: 6710, 6711, 1032, 1035 and ANY of the following courses: 3061,3065
here is my query:
=SELECT distinct student_number, last_name, first_name, gender, ethnicity, students.grade_level, lunchstatus, course_name, course_number ,termid
from students inner join storedgrades on students.id=storedgrades.studentid
where students.schoolid='0976111'
and (students.grade_level >'9' and students.grade_level <= '12')
and (course_number = all('6710', '6711', '1035')and course_number=any('1031','1032','3061','3065','3062', '3401', '3082'))
order by last_name, first_name, grade_level, course_number
The problem is that I'm not getting any results but I know for a fact that some students took the required courses. On a side note, if I change the ALL to ANY - I do get results - but it is not what I want because it would be hard to keep track of the students that met the requirements.
The above 8 are the possible ways to key in the data using a form.The logic is like based on a particular condition the message should display in the report.If they specify a particular USER and RESP_NAME and FUNC_NAME then it should display AAAAAAAAAAA (This should take priority first). The priority is in order the default should be the last one.
i have a table students create table students (name varchar2(10),rolno number(10),sub1mark number(10),sub2mark number(10),total number(10),percentage number(10),status varchar2(10))
i am go to create trigger on students after entering the values of name,rolno,sub1mark,sub2mark the values of total & percentage come automatically .trigger is
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER UCSETH.students_comm_trig BEFORE INSERT ON UCSETH.STUDENTs FOR EACH ROW BEGIN set NEW.total = new.sub1mark+new.sub2mark; set new.percentage=new.total/2;
I have been asked to show the names and room number according to students who have 4 classes in a room.
select s.name, r.room_no from s, r where r.room_no = u.room_no and e.unit_code = u.unit_code GROUP BY s.name, r.room_no HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT s.stu_no) > 4;
However I get the error 'ERROR at line 4: ORA-00904: "U"."UNIT_CODE": invalid identifier'
I have a SQL link table called student_monitor containing the follwing attributes and e.g. data
student_id, Class_id, Predicted_Grade, Actual_Grade 1 1 A C 2 1 B B 3 1 C B
I need to be able to flag which students are under achieving on their target grades and dont know how to do this or the best way to do this as i cannot calculate the diff between a char?
I have to implement a new logic such that , Old logic which pulls data will stay in place.now New logic pull data form SAP . So i have implemented the new logic in to the existing cursor as below.
i.e.
Cursor new_sap old_query Union New_query;
I have 3 new cursor like dis. How to process these old and new cursors in FOR loop.. Ex:
For c1 in C2(order_number) if order_source is sap then ( dis filters old data which is not in SAP) new query in cursor should process else old query in cursor should process end if;
i have three tables: ot_req, ot_po_breakup, and ot_po. when a row is inserted into the ot_po table reffering to ot_req,there is a trigger which creates a seperate reocrd in ot_po_breakup with the details of ot_req ot_req.ri_sys_id as pb_ri_sys_id and ot_req.ri_qty as pb_ri_qty ,pi_sys_id as pb_pi_sys_id .upto this part is okand when i insert also the logic is okay.
i have created a trigger to update the rows in the ot_po_breakup table after insert on ot_poin order of pb_ri_sys_id and pb_pi_sys_id and try to update the values in the columns pb_ves1q, pb_ves2q, and pb_ves3q order. i am trying to take the quantities in ot_po.pi_qty and insert them into the pb_ves1q, pb_ves2q, and pb_ves3q columns of ot_po_breakup where those columns are empty (0 or null) such that the sum of those three columns for that row does not exceed the pb_ri_qty in that row.
My problem is i need to mofify my trigger to do the update and delete , that is whenever the user is updating the column ofot_po.pi_qtythe qty should in ot_po_breakup should get updated accordingly and sum of pb_ves1q,pb_Ves2q and pb_ves3q should be equal to pb_ri_qty and do the same for delete as well
I have a BEGIN Block of the code where a loop is running .I also have a CONTINUE statement in the EXCEPTION Block of the code where I return the control to the BEGIN Block in case of any exception.Now as per ORACLE Company, CONTINUE has a old issue which is already registered by Oracle Company Bug 7306422.
The issue is where CONTINUE statement does not run properly when your code Optimization level is 2. However it will work properly if we have the Optimization Level as 0 and 1.are facing the same issue here and have a workaround.
Is there any code which I can permanently use instead of CONTINUE but have the same logic incorporated.i.e returning to the next iteration whenever I say to pass the control.
i am trying to upgrade my existing system (6i) to 11g. I have installed Weblogic 10.3.5 with forms and reports 11.1.2.1.0 on windows 7 32 bit. I can connect to my database (10g) from Form builder.
But when I try to open a form/pll of 10g or 6i, it says PDE-PLI018 could not find library and it shows the path of my earlier folder, which now does not exist.
I have made changes in registry FORMS_PATH, FORMS_BUILDER_PATH, UI_ICON And in default.env file FORMS_PATH and CLASSPATH
I have added entry to tnsnames.ora, through which I can connect to DB. And have followed below site to configure weblogic and FM forms and reports;
[URL]
1) Do we have to connect (create a bridge) to DB from weblogic except tnsnames.ora.
2) For library error I think I am missing some settings to be done.
3) If I am able to rectify above error then can I directly use [URL] and access the system from another pc, or still there are some modifications needed.
create table t (a varchar2(20),b number(8)); insert into t values ('aa',4); insert into t values ('ba',6); insert into t values ('ca',7); insert into t values ('da',8);
in place of 8 there can be any number between 1 to 100
if in place of 8 number is <10 insert into t values('ea',10); ---- this i need dynamic insert if in place of the number between 11-19 then insert into t values('ea',20); ---- this i need dynamic insert and so on
i tried as below
select case when max(b) <10 then 10 when max(b) between 10 and 20 then 20 end from t;
but i cant write case for again and again upto nth
I have oracle 10g R2 on windows.I have two tables and say table A ant Table B. Both have column Total_amount. There are primary key's on Both tables.
Sample query SELECT A.EMPNO,A.EMP_CODE,nvl(A.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0) "A_TOTAL_AMOUNT", nvl(B.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0) "B_TOTAL_AMOUNT",(nvl(A.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0) - nvl(B.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0)) "DIFFERENCE" FROM A, B WHERE A.EMPNO =B.EMPNO (+) AND A.EMP_CODE = B.EMP_CODE (+) AND round((nvl(A.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0) - nvl(B.TOTAL_AMOUNT,0)),3) <> 0Above query retrives only Non-matching rows.
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRI_COMPL_FEATURES 2 AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON COMPLEMENTS FOR EACH ROW 3 DECLARE 4 v_fno NUMBER; 5 v_tab VARCHAR2(30); 6 v_unique_id VARCHAR2(40); [code]....
Trigger created.When I am trying to insert into complements table it is throwing error as follows:
SQL> insert into complements values(19,NULL,'5',6,7,NULL,'W2023648',NULL,NULL); insert into complements values(19,NULL,'5',6,7,NULL,'W2023648',NULL,NULL) * ERROR at line 1: ORA-20010: ORA-04091: table TEEMNGWS.COMPLEMENTS is mutating, trigger/function may not see it ORA-06512: at "TEEMNGWS.TRI_COMPL_FEATURES", line 19 ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger 'TEEMNGWS.TRI_COMPL_FEATURES'
I can understand that I am trying to perform DML operation(i.e select) on table which trigger is fired.But how can I implement the same logic when AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE trigger is written.
I installed web logic server and form & report on my linux system and gave configuration option later . so now web logic admin server is running on different port and wls_reports server is running to different port in cluster. How its running on cluster and when i run
localhost:9002/reports/rwservlet/getserverinfo?server="report_server_name" i am getting rep-51002 error.
I'm having a problem with null values. I want to display old student in a display item if subjects text item has records. Otherwise, display new student if it has null values. This is the code that i tried so far..
IF :block2.subjects IS NULL THEN :block3.type := 'NEW STUDENT'; ELSE :block3.type := 'OLD STUDENT'; END IF;
I receive the output from only one of the nested blocks:
bad PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
I understand that I don't need nested blocks for the example above, but this was just a condensed version of what I'm trying to do. I think nesting blocks will be easier to read and maintain, instead of having a huge CASE statement.
How can I execute only the nested block for which the condition is true and ignore the nested blocks that follow?
Are nested blocks not the correct answer here? Should I be looking at invoking procedures/functions instead?
I have written the following PL/SQL block logic tofetch the records from the emp table and compare the records with emp_10 table to perform insert if the records are newelse to perform update the existed records in the emp_10 table.
DECLARE CURSOR tranche_balance_cur IS SELECT empno, ename, sal,
[code]...
Execution scenario 1:
I have commented insert and update statements in that case I got the following out put.
Inserted Records4 Updated Records10
As per the logic it's giving the correct output because the cursor is fetching 14 records in that already 10 records are existed in emp_10 tableand 4 are new records.so that it's showing the count for inserted records as 10 and updated records as 4.
Execution scenario 2: I have uncommented insert and update statements in that case I got the following out put.
Inserted Records13 Updated Records1
As per the logic it's not giving the correct output.
I tried with using TRIM function in the comparision logic to avoid spaces.
TRIM(emp_10.empno) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.empno) AND TRIM(emp_10.ename) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.ename) AND TRIM(emp_10.sal) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.sal) AND TRIM(emp_10.deptno) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.deptno)
I have inherited a query that union alls 2 select statements, I added a further field to one of the select statements ( a date field). However I need to add another dummy field to the 2nd select statement so the union query marries up I have tried to do this by simply adding a
select 'date_on' to add a field called date on populated by 'date_on' (the name of the column in the first query)
however when I run the union query i get the error Ora-01790 expression must have same datatype as corresponding expression.
I have a dynamic query stored in a function that returns a customized SQL statement depending on the environment it is running in. I would like to create a Materialized View that uses this dynamic query.
I have data in a table and another in XML file,I used SQL query to retrive the data placed on the table, and link this query with XML query that retrieves the data stored in the xml file. The data stored in the table and xml file sharing a key field, but the xml contents are less than what in the table.I want to show only the data shared between the two queries, how can I do that?
e.g.:
Table emp:
e_id | e_name | e_sal 023 | John | 6000 143 | Tom | 9000 876 | Chi | 4000 987 | Alen | 7800
I have the following four tables with the following structures Table A
ColA1 ColA2 ColA3 ColA4 ColA5 AA 100 CC DD EE
Table B
ColB1 ColB2 ColB3 ColB4 ColB5 AA 100 40452 A9 CDE
when these two tables were joined like the following:
Select colA1,ColA2, ColA3, ColA4, ColB3,ColB4, ColB5 from table A Left outer join (select ColB3, ColB4, ColB5 from table B where colB3 = (select max(colB3) from table B ) on (colA1 = colB1 and ColA2 = col B2)
I have a query that is pulling back more rows when I use the dblink than when I hit the linked database directly.
For example:
select x,y,z from mytable@dblink
returns 788,324 rows
while select x,y,z from mytable
returns 712,102 rows
It's the exact same query, with the only difference being the dblink. It's not pulling the data into a cursor or array, it's a simple, straightforward query on a remote database.
