SELECT CASE
WHEN currentstep.step_id IN (100)
THEN currentstep.start_date
ELSE (SELECT start_date
FROM audt.os_historystep
WHERE ID =
[code].....
here is the completed query
select EAG.AUDIT_NUMBER Audit_Nbr,
(
SELECT CASE
WHEN currentstep.step_id IN (100)
THEN currentstep.start_date
ELSE (SELECT start_date
FROM audt.os_historystep
[code].....
when I try select from this query I get ORA-00904: "DATE1": invalid identifier.
I have 11.1.0.7 instance running and got more 300G of storage available for the database. I would like to know what are the steps to add these disks/storage to the existing DATA asm disk group?
We have a Production Oracle 10g R2 RAC on HP-UX v2 IA64 servers.We have Two Disk Groups one for Archive (ARC_DISK - 100 GB) and other for Database(DATA_DISK - 1 TB]. We wanted to add more space to the DATA_DISK disk group.Unix admin configured 200 GB from SAN and changed the ownership of the Disk to oracle and permissions to 775 on 1st Node.I opended DBCA from 1st Node and was able to see the disk in 'Show Candidate'.
I added this disk to the DATA_DISK disk group and clicked OK but got ORA- error with some message like some operations could not be performed. I exited DBCA.We realized that we had forgotten to change the ownerhip and permission from the 2nd Node.Unix admin changed the ownership of the Disk to oracle and permissions to 775 on the 2nd Node.
I opened DBCA again from 1st Node and selected the DATA_DISK disk group but could not find the Disk in 'Show Candiate' open. I clicked on 'Show All' and this disk was shown with Header_Status - MEMBER but not allocated to DATA_DISKGROUP. When I clicked the 'Show Member' option, this disk is not shown for DATA_DISK disk group. I exited DBCA at this point.As this is a critcal Production database I didnt proceed any further and exited DBCA.
Now I need to add this Disk to the DATA_DISK disk group but not sure which option to select. I got one reply from another forum to run DBCA select the DATA_DISK Disk Group and then click 'Show All' and select this Disk (which already has MEMBER as Header Status) and select Force Option and click OK to continue.
The below sql is giving different number of result sets while adding further columns in select clause.i.e After adding the columns 4,5,6 in the below query its giving different number of result set.In this case the result set count would be 5.
Before adding the columns 4,5,6,the result set count was 11.
the Q1 and Q2 could have values 1,2,3,4,5 thats means total are 5 questions. i need to know the total users who select value from q1 group by the values from 1..5 the toal_users who select value from q2 values( a group).i need the following result
i am facing group by issue when running the query.the error code is ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression.i suspect is due to the subquery in the SELECT clause.
SELECT WHINR100.COMPANY, WHINH210.SEQN, FXINH039.OTBP, WHINR100.BPID, TCCOM100.NAMA, WHINR100.ITEM, WHINH210.RCNO, FXINH051.btch, case when (whinh210.ORNO in (select fxinh033.pdno from fxinh033)) [code]...
But I cannot get the count I have to do a separate Query to get the count here it is How can I put the two together to get my count information and Report information together in one Report???
Select Count(pm.description), mv.R1_State FROM windsoradm.member_mv mv
MEASURE_VALUE(ID, VALUE) containing measure values. I would like to calculate the average of a specific id interval. In my case the id is the position where the value was captures.
I am calling one record group to get the security permissions. That RC is associated with one SELECT query. That RC is already created and used before i call. I m just re-using the same. But my form/module dont have privilages to see the QUERY in that recrod group. I just want to see the query in side that record group. how to print the SELECT query from the record group.
sql statement to query a transaction table that stores transactions of items bought from my organisation.The report i would like to generate is one that lists the items bought and this should be grouped month by month.
Oracle VM 2 Node RAC cluster Oracle 11G 11.2.0.3.0 Oracle 11g rel 2 GI
on current 2 node cluster we have GI and RAC db configured Nodes: vmorarac1,vmorarac2
we shutdown vmorarac1 to clone it to vmorarac5
on new node I have changed the hostname to vmorarac5 In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 change ip to new ip and same for /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 152.144.199.210,152.144.199.211
mad echanges to /etc/hosts on vmorarac1/2 for 2 new IP address assigned to vmorarac5
Is there a technique to getting a Top-N query to work as a sub-select in a larger query -or- is there another way to generate Top-N like results that works as a sub-select?
Background:
We have a large query that is being used to build an export from a legacy HR system to a new one. Amount the data needed in the export is the employees primary phone number.
The legacy HR system allows multiple phone numbers to be stored in a simple table structure:
SELECT emp_id, phone_type, phone_number FROM employee_phones
The new HR system does allow for multiple phone numbers, however they need a primary phone number identified and stored with the employee master information. (Subsequent phone numbers get stored in alternate table.)
From a business perspective, we have decided that if they have a HOME phone in the legacy system that should be the primary in the new system, if no HOME phone, then WORK, if no WORK then CELL.
That can be represented as:
SELECT * FROM employee_people_phones WHERE emp_id = '46021' ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')
SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM employee_people_phones WHERE emp_id = '46021' ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results WHERE ROWNUM = 1
SELECT phone_number FROM (SELECT phone_number FROM employee_people_phones WHERE emp_id = '46021' ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results WHERE ROWNUM = 1
phone_number ------------------- 1111111111
However, when the Top-N query is added as a sub-select in a larger query using the employee id from the larger query (WHERE emp_id = export.emp_id), it fails saying that �export.emp_id� is not a valid id.
(SELECT phone_number FROM (SELECT phone_number FROM employee_people_phones WHERE emp_id = export.emp_id ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results WHERE ROWNUM = 1)
1.Any way around this? Is it possible to put a Top-N (with a WHERE clause using data from the main query) in a sub-select?
2.Any alternatives (other than Top-N) to delivering a ROWNUM=1 result with a �custom� ORDER BY statement?
Other Notes: Yes, we know we could do two queries in the data conversion first deliver the bulk data to the target table, and then update with the phone numbers. However, for multiple reasons, that is less than desirable.
I'm trying to group sets of data based on time separations between records and then count how many records are in each group.
In the example below, I want to return the count for each group of data, so Group 1=5, Group 2=5 and Group 3=5
SELECT AREA_ID AS "AREA ID", LOC_ID AS "LOCATION ID", TEST_DATE AS "DATE", TEST_TIME AS "TIME" FROM MON_TEST_MASTER WHERE AREA_ID =89 AND LOC_ID ='3015' AND TEST_DATE ='10/19/1994';
[code]....
Group 1 = 8:00:22 to 8:41:22
Group 2 = 11:35:47 to 11:35:47
Group 3 = 15:13:46 to 15:13:46
Keep in mind the times will always change, and sometime go over the one hour mark, but no group will have more then a one hour separation between records.
I read that rownum is applied after the selection is made and before "order by". So, in order to get the sum of salaries for all employees in all departments with a row number starting from 1, i wrote :
select ROWNUM,department_id,sum(salary) from employees group by department_id
If i remove rownum, it gives the correct output. Why can't rownum be used here ?
We're using Oracle 10g for development purposes. I have 2 same schema with approximately same data. I'm running same query on 2 schemas and I see that the first schema runs the query around 20sec and the 2.schema less than 1 sec. I thought first that there may be missing constraints or indexes but all are the same.
I checked the plan for the 2 schemas and I see that the plan is different.
Here is the query: SELECT ccc.ComponentId AS "ComponentId", ccp.Code AS "ParentCode", ccc.Code AS "ChildCode" FROM CatalogueComponent ccp INNER JOIN CatalogueComponent ccc ON ccp.ComponentId = ccc.ParentComponentId WHERE ccc.ComponentId IN (20934777, 1594747)
I'm sending also the 2 output of PLAN results from 2 different schemas.
what should I do to fix the problem with the NAFBCA schema.
