SQL & PL/SQL :: Trying To Get Two Values From Case Statement
Jul 10, 2013
In the following query WHEN
supplier_name = 'IBM' and supplier_type = 'Hardware' THEN
only 'North office' is being retrieved but how to get 'South office' also along with it.Is there a way to write multiple conditions in THEN clause of case stmt something like THEN 'North office' AND 'South office'.
BANNER ---------------------------------------------------------------- Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bi PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production CORE 10.2.0.1.0 Production TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
I'm getting this error while executing a package.But this is unpredictable because sometimes it's coming and sometimes it's not. Everytime I'm passing the value as 'ALERT' for the transaction name. Sometimes it's successful and sometimes it's throwing ORA-06592
CASE UPPER(IC_TRANSACTION_NAME) WHEN 'ALERT' THEN SELECT A.FACILITY_ID INTO VN_FACILITY_ID FROM ALERT A WHERE A.ALERT_ID = IN_PARENT_NODE_ID; INSERT INTO TRANSACTION_HISTORY (TXN_HISTORY_ID,
select empno,ename,deptno,employee_status from emp,dept where emp.deptno=dept.deptno and ( employee_status in(Case employee_status when {?Status}=1 then 'A' when {?Status}= 2 then 'T' When {?Status}= 3 then 'A'||','||'T')) OR ( end_date >= {?START_DATE} AND end_date <= {?END_DATE} ) )
Since when i pass employee_status as input 1 it have given me 4 records. When I pass employee_status as input 2 it have given me 3 records. When I pass employee_status as input 3 it should give me 4 records + 3 records=7 records.
4 records for employee_status 'A' 3 RECORDS for employee_status 'T' 7 records for employee_status 'A' AND 'T'
Can we use the sequence.nextval,sequence.currval inside case block.
CREATE TABLE EQUALITY_TEST(NUM1 NUMBER, NUM2 NUMBER, SEQ NUMBER); INSERT INTO EQUALITY_TEST VALUES ( 2 ,0 , NULL); INSERT INTO EQUALITY_TEST VALUES ( 2 ,2 , NULL); INSERT INTO EQUALITY_TEST VALUES ( 2 ,2 , NULL); INSERT INTO EQUALITY_TEST VALUES ( 12 ,2 , NULL); INSERT INTO EQUALITY_TEST VALUES ( 12 ,12 , NULL); INSERT INTO EQUALITY_TEST VALUES ( 12 ,12 , NULL); CREATE SEQUENCE SEQ_TEMP START WITH 100 INCREMENT BY 1;
Now i need to update SEQ column with SEQ_TEMP sequence. When NUM1,NUM2 values are unequal sequence should be incremented otherwise need to use the same sequence number(CURRVAL)
I have tried like this
UPDATE EQUALITY_TEST SET SEQ= CASE WHEN NUM1=NUM2 THEN SEQ_TEMP.NEXTVAL ELSE SEQ_TEMP.CURRVAL END ; SELECT * FROM EQUALITY_TEST;
insert into lookups values ('Rent' , 500); insert into lookups values ('Breakpoint' , 10);
create table products (id number, cost number, year varchar2(4));
insert into products values (1, 1000, '2011'); insert into products values (1, 2000, '2011'); insert into products values (2, 100, '2011'); insert into products values (3, 50, '2011');
commit;
I want to write a query which lists the IDs and the sum(cost), and a Y/N indicator which is set to 'Y' IF sum(cost) > ( (lookups.rent value) * (100 - lookups.breakpoint value))/100
I have written this query:
SELECT id, sum(cost)cost, year, CASE WHEN cost > ((SELECT amount [code]....... ORDER BY id;
This returns
ID COST YEAR YN --------- ---------- ---- - 1 1000 2011 Y 1 2000 2011 Y 2 100 2011 N 3 50 2011 N
The YN is correct, but it needs to sum the amounts. So there should only be one row for id1 = 3000.e.g.
ID COST YEAR YN --------- ---------- ---- - 1 3000 2011 Y 2 100 2011 N 3 50 2011 N
I am not sure how to do this. Or is there a better way of doing this than using CASE.
Table X includes multiple transactional records per household.I need to create a mailing list pulling only one record per household, choosing the one with the most recent date.
Each record within this table will have a Household_ID and a Date, so as an example, the table could have
I'm working on a nested case statement, can't seem to get it right.We have a table that has injury_codes. What I'm trying to do is come with a nested case statement that will put the codes in a specific_cat, and based on the specific_Cat, assign a Generic_cat.
Example. I have codes 11,12,13,14,15, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 Codes 11, 12, 13 have a specific_cat "Head Injury" Codes 14, 15, 16 have a specific_cat "Spinal Injury" Codes 17, 18 have a specific_cat "Burns".
All 3 of these specific_cat come under the generic_cat "Trauma"
Codes 19, 20 have a specific_Cat "High Risk Pregancy" Codes 21, 22 have a specific_cat "Premature Birth".
All 2 of these specific_cat come under the generic cat "OBGYN"...So my case stement should return :
When I tried to have a Cursor with SELECT CASE statement in Forms 6i , it is not working. But the same query is working in SQL PLUS . We cannot use case in Forms 6i ?
select iloan_code,inst_due_date,paid_flag,late_fee,case late_fee when sysdate-inst_due_date between 1 and 10 then 10 when sysdate-inst_due_date > 10 and late_fee <>10 then 5 when sysdate-inst_due_date > 10 and late_fee = 10 then 15 else 0 end as new_late_fee from st_il_schedule where paid_flag='N'; i am getting error
The line highlighted in Bold is where I have the issue. I want it to pick up NULL or Blanks in the method type has well as types E,G,T. I've tried NULL is the statement, "", and '' put none of these work. What am I doing wrong? I'm using 11g by the way
select specialty, member_id, sp_id, service_date, sum(case when method_type = 'C' then (payment_total) end) "CONSULTATION", sum(case when method_type = 'M' then (payment_total) end) "MOT", sum(case when method_type = 'D' then (payment_total) end) "TESTS",
I am very new to Oracle APEX and having difficult with a SQL statement in a report page. I have the following sql code in the page region source.
Essentially, there are two drop down lists connected with the report. I want the first one (:P2_Retailer_ID) to be mandatory, i.e., the user has to select a value from the list, but the second one (:P2_JOBTYPES) to be optional.
So, if the user leaves :P2_JOBTYPES as "No Job Type Chosen" then the SQL returns all records where the retailer ID = P2_RETAILER_ID whereas, if the user also selects a value for P2_JOBTYPES then the SQL returns all records matching both on Retailer ID and Job Type.
However, for some reason, if the user leaves P2_JOBTYPES as "No Job Type Chosen" then no records are returned as it appears to be taking the '%' as a literal value rather than a wildcard.
SELECT * FROM RETPERFFW Where "Retailer_No"= :P2_RETAILER_ID AND (CASE WHEN :P2_JOBTYPES <> 'No Job Type Chosen' THEN :P2_JOBTYPES ELSE '%' END )LIKE "Job_Type_Schema"
The code written in PL SQL.I am using '&' operator to enter the values at run time in nested case statements.But when I chosen a value for case statement even though it is asking all the values which are not part of the selected case statement.I need only the values related to my choice in case statement.
choice1:= &CHOICE_NO1; CASE(choice1) WHEN 1 THEN DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('** ENTER YOUR CHOICE TO PERFORM THE OPERATION: **'); DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('** (1)INSERTION (2)DELETION (3) UPDATION **'); [code]....
that is my exact code.when I enter value 1 for choice1 and 2 for choice2 It should ask the values only for student_ scorecard. delete_ record (& STUDENTID); &studentid. But it is asking all the functions (student_scorecard.existing_marks(&ID,&SUBJECTNAME));(student_ scorecard. std_ major_ name (&STD_ID)) and procedures.I dont want that.
I am trying to put transactions into 3 different "buckets" for each month of the year.
I am trying to figure out if the syntax for the "else" part of this code is correct... this will basically appear 12 times for each month of the year changing the value for month:
case when floor(sum(total_adjusted_net_amount)/100) < 0 and month in (01) then 0 when floor(sum(total_adjusted_net_amount)/100) > 29 and month in (01) and then 30 else when floor(sum(total_adjusted_net_amount)/100) and month in (01) end Groupin_01
CASE WHEN (EP.ORDER_NUMBER IS NOT NULL AND ATD.IS_DISCONNECT_CREDIT = 1 ) THEN ......... ...... END
In my case when I club two conditions after WHEN in case statement , everytime the first condtion is satisfied (i.e EP.ORDER_NUMBER IS NOT NULL) it is entering into the loop.
Irrespective of using AND or OR after the first condition I am getting the same results.
I want to enter the CASE statement only when both the conditions (1st and 2nd )are satisfied
Want to filter a data using CASE statement in WHERE clause for the following scenario.
Need to Filter tb1.fallback_keyword if the fallback_flag is "Y' or 'N' and pg_number is null.Else no partial search of keyword.
where CASE WHEN (fallback_flg = 'Y' OR fallback_flg = 'N') and (pg_number is NULL ) THEN tb1.fallback_keyword = SUBSTR(key_word,1, INSTR(key_word,'#',-2)) ELSE (tb1.keyword = key_word ) AND (tb1.keyword like regexp_replace(key_word, '[*]+', '%')) END
Is it possible within a CASE statement to put conditions on the date range that I want to pull? IE: am versus pm. The query has to pull specific time ranges for an AM run versus a PM run. ..... FROM table WHERE CASE WHEN TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'AM') = 'AM' THEN table.date BETWEEN TRUNC(SYSDATE) AND SYSDATE ELSE table.date BETWEEN TRUNC(SYSDATE+12/24) AND SYSDATE
In the following query which is highlighted ,I need to consider the records which have T.CURRENT_STATE='COMPLETE' AND 'CMPSCSRC' AND 'FINISHED' when M.MAINTAINED_FLAG = 'Y' AND S.SALE_LOCATION_ID = 118443 .So when i tried to write by using case stmt as follows it is giving me records only with T.CURRENT_STATE='COMPLETE'.But i want the records that satisfies all three current_states .
SELECT INI.UPC_ID,S.SALE_LOCATION_NAME,S.SALE_LOCATION_ID,I.KEYCAT_ID AS INITIAL_KEYCAT_ID,M.XLONG_NAME AS INITIAL_KEYCAT_NAME, CASE WHEN M.MAINTAINED_FLAG = 'Y' THEN 'MAINTAINED' ELSE 'NON MAINTAINED' END AS INITIAL_MAINTAIN_DESC, I.APPROVAL_USER_ID AS INITIAL_APPROVED_USER_ID,I.APPROVAL_DATE AS INITIAL_APPROVAL_DATE
I have been trying to use case statements with oracle table type by really not sure how to go about it. I know it might be simple but it been giving me hard time.
Here is my Cursor:
CURSOR c_chk_style IS SELECT DISTINCT 1 FROM TABLE(CAST(I_message.ExtOfXOrderDesc_TBL(1).ExtOfXOrderSkuDesc_TBL AS "RIB_ExtOfXOrderSkuDesc_TBL")) item_diff,
[code]...
Now i know that the table type "RIB_ExtOfXOrderSkuDesc_TBL" will be always populated but the table type "RIB_ExtOfXOrderPackDesc_TBL" may not be populate and can be null. So i want to run the exists against the "RIB_ExtOfXOrderPackDesc_TBL" aliased pack_diff only if it is populated. If its null i dont want to run the exists clause.
I have a table second_table which has a username and code field. A username (not the primary key) may be entered multiple times with different codes, or a single code 'ALL', in which case, the codes have to be fetched from 'third_table'. I am unable to form a 'case' clause to handle the fact that a list has to returned when the 'code' field from the second_table returns 'ALL'.
e.g.
Second_table username code A ALL B 23 B 56 B 33
Third_Table code 67 78
So, when the user asks the codes for user A, he should get 67 and 78 and when he asks for the user B, he should get 23,56 and 33
I am using Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production version
I am having the data in following table -
drop table stud_fact; create table stud_fact(stud_NM, LVL_CD,ST_DT_DIM_KEY,OVRNK) as select 'ABG Sundal','H','20110630','175' from dual union all select
OK, Now that the syntax has been corrected with "Chanchal Wankhade" I have an entirely new issue. I am sure this issue has to do with my case statement logic. I am getting multiple rows, when I am only looking for one. Here is my code:
SELECT CASE WHEN EP.PHYSICAL_DATE IS NULL THEN CASE WHEN EC.ORIGINAL_CONTRACT_START < ((SYSDATE) - 365) THEN 'NEEDS PHYSICAL' [code].....
However, only one of these rows should be the output, which is "No". How do you get a nested case statement to evaluate to one result, instead of multiple? I'm quite sure it is in the logic. To spell it out, this is what I am trying to accomplish with the above code: If the "EP.PHYSICAL_DATE" is null, then use these sets of formula's to evaluate the output, BUT if the "EP.PHYSICAL_DATE" is not null, then use these set's of formula's to evaluate the output.
As it stands now, it appears as if my nested case statement is doing exactly what I told it to do, which is to evaluate both conditions, and output both.
