SQL & PL/SQL :: Sum And Create New Columns For Output?
Dec 4, 2011
How do I modify SQL to sum and also add 2 columns to hold calculation results?
In functional terms, we need to sum two pay periods' retirement deduction amounts for a BDCA deduction code R03 to arrive at the monthly total for those deduction amounts.
In other words, to sum payroll deduction data for 2 pay periods PAYNO = 21 & 22 for (EMPLOYEE_AMT and EMPLOYER_AMT) and have the totals in new columns named EENOVR03 and ERNOVR03. Column names representing EE for employee, ER for employer, NOV for November, and R03 for deduction code.
Here's the basic SQL without calculations. I need to modify SQL to produce both EENOVR03 and ERNOVR03.
I want to create a report by using one field and one text as columns name in layout but display the all the columns. I mention the 5 column names in query.how can I write function in summary column.
I am essentially trying to reproduce an extremely complex spread-sheet with an engineering mathematical model in it and that has been in use for 5 years now. The Excel spreadsheet was a good environment for tuning the model, but now I have been asked to design an Oracle Form that incorporates their mathematical model and shows their final and intermediate data so they can validate my app against their proven spreadsheet.
To do that I have to create a matrix style table for use as a child data-block in my Oracle Form.
I am new to the Toad World � ---- SELECT TABLE1.PRODUCTID, TABLE1.TYPE , TABLE1.PRODUCT, TABLE2.#SOLD FROM TR.TABLE1 INNER JOIN PR.TABLE2 ON (TR. PRODUCTID = PRODUCTID )
When we merge the above two table..The query result will look like this:Product IDProductType#Sold 1FruitBanana2 2FoodRice2 3FoodSugar6 4FruitOrange8
[code]...
Now I want manipulate the query further and create three new columns from �#Sold�
Is it Possible to twist the below code to produce the above SELECT TABLE1.PRODUCTID, TABLE1.TYPE , TABLE1.PRODUCT, TABLE2.#SOLD FROM TR.TABLE1 INNER JOIN PR.TABLE2 ON (TR. PRODUCTID = PRODUCTID )
Productcode Productname Quantity AF Ade Fgh 100 LO Ldo Ope 50 SK Ske Kro 47 ....
There may be any number of records in the table. Now I need to print distinct products in different columns such as.
AF LO SK 100 50 47
There may be any number of products...I need to print all those products as different columns as shown above. How to write the Stored procedure for this?
creating a stored procedure that updates the points column in the teams_tbl , the value that is updated in to the points column will be retrieved from the fixture_team table. so if team a has more goals than team b then the points column for team a will be increased by 6 else if the scores are equal they get 4 points each.
DECLARE JOBSFILE UTL_FILE.FILE_TYPE; -- TAKE ALL JOB TITLES FROM JOBS CURSOR JOBSCUR IS SELECT * -- DDOCNAME,DDOCTITLE,DSECURITYGROUP,DDOCAUTHOR,DDOCTYPE,DINDATE,PRIMARYFILE,EXTRACTIONDATE,BATCH_ID FROM TARGET_UCM ; [code].......
this is my plsql here to print table values i am using many utl_file.put_line statements is there any way to print all table values in a single utl_file.put_line.
We have a table in the client database that has two columns - column parent and column child. The whole hierarchy of DB table dependencies is held in this table.If Report 1 is dependent on Table A and Table A in turn is dependent on two tables Table M and Table N. Table N is dependent on table Z it will appear in the db table as,
Hierarchy Table Parent Child Report1Table A Table ATable M Table ATable N Table NTable Z
Requirement :
From the above structure, we need to build a table which will hold the complete hierarchy by breaking it into multiple columns.The o/p should look like this
-ParentChild 1Child 2 Child 3 -Report1Table ATable M -Report1Table ATable N Table Z
Child 1, Child 2, Child 3 ....and so on are columns.The number of tables and the no of hierarchical relationships are dynamic.
SQL Statements to create hierarchy table:
create table hierarchy (parent varchar2(20), child varchar2(20)); insert into hierarchy values ('Report1','Table A'); insert into hierarchy values ('Report1','Table B'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table A','Table M'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table B','Table N'); insert into hierarchy values ('Report2','Table P'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table M','Table X'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table N','Table Y'); insert into hierarchy values ('Report X','Table Z');
Approached already tried :
1) Using indentation : select lpad(' ',20*(level-1)) || to_char(child) P from hierarchy connect_by start with parent='Report1' connect by prior child=parent;
2)Using connect by path function : select * from (select parent,child,level,connect_by_isleaf as leaf, sys_connect_by_path(child,'/') as path from hierarchy start with parent='Report1' connect by prior child =parent) a where Leaf not in (0);
Both the approaches give the information but the hierarchy data appears in a single column.Ideally we would like data at each level to appear in a different column.
1) Split values from "INST" Column : suppose 23 2) Find all values from "NUM" column for above splitted value i.e 23 ,
Eg:
For Inst : 23 , It's corresponding "NUM" values are : 1234,1298
3) Save these values into
A table Y : INST, NUM are column names.
INST NUM 23 1234,1298
1) I have a thousand records in Table X , and for all of those records i need to split and save data into Table Y.Hence, I need to do this task with best possible performance.
2) After this whenever a new data comes in Table X, above 'split & save' operation should automatically be called and append corresponding data wherever possible..
Currently I have a requirement where I need to create 2 more output rows using each result row.
In my requirement I am populating charges table with types of charges, on each line item of charges, I need to apply 2 types of taxes and populate it along with the charge line item. I will be storing charges in table charges and the 2 taxes to be applied in taxes table respectively. For each row of charges, i need to apply these 2 taxes present in taxes table resulting in 3 rows output.
I am running a fairly busy Oracle 10gR2 DB, one of the tables has about 120 columns and this table receives on average 1500 insertions per second. The table is partitioned and the partitioning is based on the most important of the two timestamp columns. There are two timestamps, they hold different times.
Out of these 120 columns, about 15 need to be indexed. Out of the 15 two of them are timestamp, at least one of these two timestamp columns is always in the where clause the queries.
Now the challenge is, the queries we run can have any combination of the 13 other columns + one timestamp. In reality the queries never have more than 7 or 8 columns in the where clause but even if we had only 4 columns in the where clause we would still have the same problem.
So if I create one concatenated index for all these columns it will not be very efficient because after the 4th or 5th column the sorting would no longer be very useful and I believe the optimiser would simply not use the rest of the index. So queries that use the leading columns of the index in sequence work well, but if I need to query the 10th column the I have performance issues.
Now, if I create multiple single column indexes oracle will have to work a lot harder to maintain all these indexes and it will create performance issues (I have tried that). Besides, if I have multiple single column indexes the optimiser will do nested loops twice or three times and will hit only the first few columns of the where clause so I think it will kind of be the same as the long concatenated index.
What I am trying to do is exactly what the Bitmap index would do, it would be very good if I could use the AND condition that a Bitmap index uses. This way I could have N number of single column indexes which the optimiser could pick from and serve the query with exactly the ones it needs. But unfortunately using the Bitmap index here is not an option given the large amount of inserts that I get on this table.
I have been looking for alternatives, I have considered creating multiple shorter concatenated indexes but this still would not address the issue since many queries would still not be served properly and therefore would take a very long time to complete.
What I had in mind would be some sort of multidimensional index, I am not even sure if such thing exists. But essentially it would be some sort of index that could serve a query efficiently regardless of the fact that the where clause has the 1st, 3rd and last columns of the index.
So considering how widely used Oracle is and how many super large databases there are out there, this problem must be common.
I have 8 columns. Some of them might be null.I want to display all 8 columns in my result. Not null columns will be first and null at the end.Here is a sample data :
I need to create PROCEDURE to create user in oracle
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE "CREATE_USER_ORACLE8" ( USER_ID in VARCHAR2, PASSWORD in VARCHAR2, ROLES in VARCHAR2, nReturnCode OUT NUMBER ) BEGIN [code].......
Compilation errors for PROCEDURE NOG.CREATE_USER_ORACLE8
Error: PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "BEGIN" when expecting one of the following:
; is with authid deterministic parallel_enable as Line: 9 Text: BEGIN
i want that the customer execute PROCEDURE (user_id,password,PROCEDURE )
Here i have one PL/SQL block which will returns the age of an employee using his id.
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON; DECLARE v_num NUMBER; v_days NUMBER; [code]...
It will returns an output of 27..I tried the same in Forms 6i using a text field and a button with a trigger "when_button_pressed". when i am entering the same id of employee i am getting a totally different answer
DECLARE v_num NUMBER; v_days NUMBER; BEGIN SELECT to_date(sysdate)-to_date(dob) INTO v_num FROM customer_details WHERE application_id=:block3.day; v_days :=floor(v_num/366); MESSAGE(v_days); MESSAGE(v_days); END;
It is giving me a result of -73...i cleared my problem. but i cound not understand the internal work happening inside the forms and pl sql machine.
percentage_pointsmarksage95336.590346.575376.550496.595347903777549750337 if i fired the statementselect percentage_points from table1 where marks=33 and age=6.5 then output should beuser has score percentage between 90 and 95i can write case condition between 1 to 100 percentages but any other condition which easy
