In the ideal world each subcategory of a single category would have unique sequence so if there are 3 subcategory for the same category then each of them would have 1,2,3 in sequence, if there are 5 subcategories then 1,2,3,4,5 for each of them etc.
Problem I'm facing is that some of the subcategories sequences for the same category has the same values . For instance for 4 subcategories of the same category, each of them has 1 (1,1,1,1) in a sequence.
So ideal world is :
Insert into Category values (123 ,'Category1');
Insert into Category values (234 ,'Category2');
Insert into Category values (345 ,'Category3');
Insert into Category values (456 ,'Category4');
Insert into Category values (567 ,'Category5');
Insert into Sub_Category values (1,123,1);
Insert into Sub_Category values (2,123,2);
Insert into Sub_Category values (3,123,3);
But I've also bad rows like this:
Insert into Sub_Category values (4,234,1);
Insert into Sub_Category values (5,234,1);
Insert into Sub_Category values (6,234,1);
Insert into Sub_Category values (7,345,1);
Insert into Sub_Category values (8,345,1);
[code].....
Fix for this and my goal is to select all such cases where subcases have mixed up sequences as above and give them randomly numbers starting from 1. So if there are 3 subcategories like for CATEGORY 2 then just apply random number to the sequence of the subCATEGORIES like 1,2,3. For CATEGORY 3 : 1,2,3 to 7.
I was thinking to write two procedures one selecting all the categories and passing category ID to the other procedure that would actually update sequence, like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE SCHEMA.SELECT_CATEGORY
IS
CURSOR c1
IS
select category_ID from category where ...;
BEGIN
FOR a IN c1 LOOP
UPDATE_SUBCATEGORY(a.Category_id);
COMMIT;
END LOOP;
END;
/
And the actual procedure updating subcategory:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE SCHEMA.UPDATE_SUBCATEGORY
BEGIN
............
END;
/
write PROCEDURE SCHEMA.SELECT_CATEGORY cursor to not miss any of the categories ID having mixed up subcategory. There can be any of the doubled sequences like doubled 1 value (this is majority) but there can be any other doubles (or at least I need to make sure that there aren't any other doubles 2 values or 3 values in sequence etc.)
And how to write SCHEMA.UPDATE_SUBCATEGORY to loop through rows of subcategory and update sequence with values starting from 1 ?
, im having this trouble to update some records, the problem is i have I have this table with some transactions and each row have a cd_cli (client code), dt_ven (date of the transaction) and a product id (cd_prod) the trouble is, i insert a row for each product in this table, then i have like this
110001YURI AGUIRREWALLMA400V44-B469,0019/9/2013210001YURI AGUIRRESU-7N-B78,0019/9/2013310001YURI AGUIRREWALLSF35V22-S78,5719/9/2013410003WILLIANWALLSA470V22-BS449,002/9/2013 but i need to update the CD_TRANS for each row with the same number like all the YURI AGUIRRE recode must have like CD_TRANS 1, and the WILLIANs CD_TRANS must be 2 and the next must be cd_trans 3, but I've tried to update the table for a lot of ways but i don't have success trying to do this, the last thing i had tried was
MERGE INTO TVEN_TEMP a USING (SELECT CD_CLI, DENSE_RANK () OVER (ORDER BY DT_VEN) new_seq_num FROM TVEN_TEMP WHERE CD_TRANS IS NULL) b ON (a.CD_CLI = b.CD_CLI)
I'm currently facing a non-critical situacion while trying to update a table. Here's the PL/SQL Code. It's a pretty straight-forward script, It just update one single column of the table. The only problem is that I have to update over 15 milions records. When I use the for update cursor, I put inside the loop a counter, when it reaches 1000 records, then commit, else keep counting.
The block throws the exception ORA-01002: fetch out of sequence.
I've tried to do some reserch on Google, buy it only says it is an out of secuence fetch caused by a commit inside a for update cursor.
My question is. Is there any risk by putting the commit under the end loop, I mean by doing this I'd be updating over 15.000.000 records at the same time. Will I have any issue with the rollback segment ?
Here's the code as along with the Create Table and Insert statements.
CREATE TABLE TEST_1 ( TEST_ID NUMBER PRIMARY KEY, IS_LOCKED NUMBER NOT NULL );
INSERT INTO TEST_1 (TEST_ID, IS_LOCKED) VALUES (1, 0);
My table have duplicate records. I want to impose a primary key on that table. For that I have to replace duplicate values of a column with next value of a sequence.
I have a sequence my_seq in schema schema1. I have granted select on this sequence to schema2. Doing :
select schema1.my_seq.nextval from dual
in schema2 work as expected. However when I try to compile a package body in schema2 using my_seq in an insert statement, it fails with:
PLS-00302: component 'MY_SEQ' must be declared
What's even stranger is that I have stored procedures that are using the exact same code that are currently compiled and working. Recompiling them yields this error. How is this possible?
When I try to compile a procedure with this command:
alter sequence myschema.seqmessages increment by 100;
The error says "encountered symbol "ALTER" when expecting...
Is there another way to alter a sequence from a procedure? In this case, I am altering a sequence in another schema that has granted the alter and select privileges for the sequence.
I have a base table by name EMP_MASTER.The Create Statement goes something like this....
CREATE TABLE EMP_MASTER(ST_CODE NUMBER,EMP_CODE NUMBER);We would like to insert records in such a way that there are 10 st_codes and for each st_code we need to insert 100 records.
FOR EX : for st_code 1 we need to have emp_code from 1 to 100 and then we need to insert st_code 2 and the emp_code must be from 101 to 200 and so on...... It must go in this way till we have st_code 10 and hope the emp_code will be in the range of 901 to 1000.
We need some thing similar to proc or PL/SQL block(declare begin..... end)
PROCEDURE split_name ( full_name IN VARCHAR2, name1 OUT VARCHAR2, name2 OUT VARCHAR2, name3 OUT VARCHAR2, name4 OUT VARCHAR2, name5 OUT VARCHAR2 )
the above is the procedure declaration. i want to use this function in updating the records in a table. this procedure is working fine in forms and it is splitting the names perfectly and i dont know how to use this in update statement as it is not returning anything like functions do.
In procedure "update_emp", i am updating a row based on p_empno and if it is not present i.e. SQL%ROWCOUNT = 0, then I am inserting that row into emp table.
where as in procedure "update_emp1" , first I am checking whether any row with that p_empno is present or not,if presentthen update the row, else raise an exception to insert the row.
In both procedure, I am doing the same thing, But I am unable to understand which one is good and why
create or replace procedure update_emp( p_empno int) is begin update emp set ename='raj' where empno=p_empno;
I am reading Section 4-8 (page 42/216) in the Oracle Database 2-day Developer Guide from here:
[Code]....
It reads:
Suppose that you want to select every employee whose last name has a double vowel(two adjacent occurrences of the same vowel).
Example 4.9 shows how you can do this.
The regular expression ([AEIOU]) represents any vowel. The metacharacter 1 represents the first (and in this case, only) regular expression. The third function parameter, 'i', specifies that the match is case-insensitive.
Example 4.9 Selecting All Employees Whose Last Names Have Double Vowels
SELECT FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME FROM EMPLOYEES WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(LAST_NAME, '([AEIOU])1', 'i');
Result is similar to:
FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME -------------------- ------------------------- Harrison Bloom Lex De Haan Kevin Feeney Ki Gee Nancy Greenberg Danielle Greene Alexander Khoo David Lee
8 rows selected.
I don't understand how [AEIOU])1 would find a double vowel(two adjacent occurrences of the same vowel).
i'm trying to read a text file into an oracel table. I'm having issues with this statement FIELDS TERMINATED BY ' ' fields are separated by 2 spaces. How ever Oracle is not recognizing ' ' or " " as double space. It is treating as one space thus shifting all coulmns.
One of the procedures that am working on is failing with ORA-0000: normal, successful completion error.
The procedure has got several update and delete statements and have logging enabled after each step. The problem with that again is, each time the log table gets updated thereby losing the history of until what point the procedure ran successfully.I have this issue only in production environment and unable to simulate it in dev environment which limits my options of troubleshooting the procedure code. I was using SQLERRM in the code.
Is there a way I can identify the bad records/ record causing this issue? Am very new to PL/SQL and do not know how to proceed with this.How do you debug this sort of issues??(where one procedure internally invokes another one which again invokes other one etc)
I got a table table1 with 3 columns: id, name, value
im trying to create a procedure to update the table.
create or replace PROCEDURE TEST1 ( x IN varchar, y IN varchar, z IN varchar ) AS BEGIN update table1 set value=x where name=y and id=z; commit; END TEST1;
I can get it through this query : select PARTY_ID from XXWFS_CUSTOMER_EXT group by PARTY_ID having count (PARTY_ID) > 1;
Now for the records which i got for each duplicate row i want to update the second row with a specific value.. so that duplicate rows does not exist anymore
Ex: I got party id's 12, 14, 16, 18 two times each
Now as 12 is two times.. i want to update the second row of 12 with some x value same is the case for other values like 14,16, etc
The current update store procedure that I have updates a list of input provided, but it there are fields that are left blank, they are being updated as null in the database.
I'm having a trouble creating a store procedure that will just update the provided fields only.
how can i make this script into a function or procedure which instead of user change the crime_id :=4 or 5 directly it actually can grab the id from a update statment like
UPDATE CRIME_STATUS SET CRIME_STATUS = 'open' WHERE CRIME_ID = 9; pick 9 and insert into the above statment so it runs as normal
i want to create as procedure when i issue in issuance table then update + stock in stock table. and when i recieve in recieve table then minus- stock in stock table.
i am trying to update multiple records using store procedure but failed to achieve
for example my source is
emp_name sal abhi 2000 arti 1500 priya 1700
i want to increase salary of emp whose salary is less than 2000 it means rest two salary should get update..using stored procedure only
i have tried following code
create or replace procedure upt_sal(p_sal out emp.sal%type, p_cursor out sys_refcursor) is begin open p_cursor for select sal into p_sal from emp; if sal<2000 then update emp set sal= sal+200; end i;f end;
and i have called the procedure using following codes
set serveroutput on declare p_sal emp.sal%type; v_cursor sys_refcursor; begin upt_sal(p_sal,v_cursor); fetch v_cursor into p_sal; dbms_output.put_line(p_sal); end;
the program is executing but i should get o/p like this after updating
I have oracle 10g database running on Sun Solaris. My database character set is AL32UTF8. Our user wants to store a double byte character and an image, I want to know what the column type should be using for these.
creating a stored procedure that updates the points column in the teams_tbl , the value that is updated in to the points column will be retrieved from the fixture_team table. so if team a has more goals than team b then the points column for team a will be increased by 6 else if the scores are equal they get 4 points each.