SQL & PL/SQL :: ORDER BY Clause And ROWNUM

Apr 4, 2010

When i try to execute a query, which is organised as the below example, it retrieves data..

select * from (
select col1, col2, col3, col4....coln
from TABLE_ONE left outer join TABLE_TWO
-- some conditions and group by clause
order by 1 asc
)
where rownum <=1000;

Again if I use Column alias in the ORDER BY clause col1, the query won't retrieve data.

Also If I use ORDER BY 4 instead of ORDER BY 1, the query wont return data...

select * from (
select col1, col2, col3, col4....coln
from TABLE_ONE left outer join TABLE_TWO
-- some conditions and group by clause
order by 4 asc
)
where rownum <=1000;

The whole issue revolves around the inner ORDER BY Clause and external ROWNUM condition..If I eliminate any of the two, the query works fine...I am not sure if indexes have some role to play in it...

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Performance Tuning :: How To Overcome Rownum Clause From Select

Dec 27, 2010

high number of executions of specific types of queries which is using only rownum clause. For exam.

select ani, rowid from tbl_smschat_upuor where rownum<=:"SYS_B_0";

DB is having high number of executions of these type of queries and these when I m checking the execution plan for the same type of queries it is accessing the full table scan.

======================execution plan for above query
1000 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 91289622
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Order By Clause?

Mar 12, 2013

I have requirement to create an XML structure through stored procedure. I need to Order some of the columns in ascending order before I format them into the xml structure. I am pretty novice to creating an output into XML format, but attached is the query I came up with (without order by). This works perfect, but now the requirement is to order by - cls_cd, and within cls_cd, again order by - cat_cd. I am not able to do this.

View 2 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: First Clause With Order By

Apr 29, 2013

I have a requirement where I need to display a list of employees, performance rating and manager id. I want to display the employees first whose manager is as manager_id as input parameter. So lets say a manager logs in, he should see his reporters first and then the rest. How can I implement this in SQL? I am trying first clause with order by but not sure how to do that here.

procedure
display_list(manager_id in varchar2)

Output is:
emp_id
manager_id
performance_rating

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Results Different After Using Order By Clause

Mar 18, 2011

Result are different after adding the Order By clause in below query.

Query

select sum(wpsv1.primary_qty) detail_qty,
wpsv1.from_subinventory subinventory,
wdd.revision revision,

[Code]....

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Significance Of Order By Clause?

Nov 4, 2012

I know that order by clause in normal query is used to order the result set based on the key. significance of order by clause in analytical functions.

with data as
(select empno,
sal,
case

[Code]...

In case of min, max analytical functions order by clause have importance. But how it will work for a COUNT function ?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Distinct With Order By Clause?

Mar 13, 2012

I have got the following error while executing below Query.

ORA-01791 'Not a SELECTed expression'

select distinct sgbstdn_levl_code
from sgbstdn,spriden
where spriden_pidm = sgbstdn_pidm
and spriden_id = '200076543'
order by sgbstdn_term_code_eff desc;

The above Query is not working with Distinct & Order By clause are present and by joining two tables. I need the distinct values of levels in Descending order of Terms.

View 14 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Unpivot Using Order By Clause

May 15, 2013

explain the difference in the VALUE column when DESCRIPTION = 'dept' when the query is run with and without the order by clause.

SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT * FROM emp
--ORDER BY job
)UNPIVOT (VALUE FOR DESCRIPTION IN (sal AS 'salary', deptno AS 'dept'));

View 12 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Query Gets Slower By Adding Order By Clause

Apr 14, 2010

I have a query, running the query with order by and without orderby clasue casues big performance difference.

here without order by it takes 5 sec
.
SELECT
audit_number,
formatted_audit_number,
ag.sys_audit_id,
audit_begin_date,
audit_end_date,

[Code]....

here with order by it takes 2 min

SELECT
audit_number,
formatted_audit_number,
ag.sys_audit_id,
audit_begin_date,
audit_end_date,
auditee_name,
ein,

[Code]....

I have like 10,000 records.

View 16 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Order By In Union Clause In Date Column

Nov 3, 2012

Oracle version : 11.2.0.2 Linux EL6 server

I have a query like below:

select col1, col2, col3, col4
from tab1, tab2, tab3
where conditions
union

[Code]...

Now, the col4 is a date column and I have to order by the entire result sets on it. I know I can do it by (order by col4) or by (order by 4) at the end of the entire query.

But the problem is that, the output is coming in dd-Mon-yyyy (i.e 31-Nov-2012).

I want every output in dd/mm/yyyy format so I need to use to_char function.

But in that case, I cant use the order by clause, because in that case it is getting arranged by character i.e by 1,2,3,4,5 like this.

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: View Not Having ORDER BY Clause In SELECT Statement?

Jun 13, 2010

currently i m going through some dumps for my OCA-11g prep.I came across one sentence :A view cannot have an ORDER BY clause in the SELECT statement.well this statement is false and the explanation given was :

Query operations containing ORDER BY clause are also permitted, so long as the ORDER BY clause appears outside the parentheses.

The following is an example of what I mean: CREATE VIEW my_view AS (SELECT*FROM emp) ORDER BYempno.

but when i tried running the query like this :CREATE VIEW my_view AS SELECT*FROM emp ORDER BYempno ,it worked w/o giving parentheses.

View 5 Replies View Related

Forms :: Data Block Ignoring Order By Clause?

Mar 6, 2012

I have a real problem with form, specifically one of its data blocks. In the order by property of the block i specify it to sort on a branch in ascending order(i tried descending as well) but for some reason the form ignores that and sorts it on the ROWNUM. I even removed the where clause, the order by clause and changed the query data source type to FROM clause and changed the data source name to pre-query. I then created the query string in the block's pre-query trigger and set query_data_source_name property to that query string and still the data in the block is not being sorted on the branch number but instead on the ROWNUM.

View 6 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How To Tune Order By Clause Without Changing Sort Area

May 1, 2008

How to avoid sort operation by an order by clause without changing the sort area size.what hints or changes should be done in query so that order by clause work faster.

View 10 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Index Usage In Order By Clause On Nullable Column

Jan 28, 2011

I came across situation where a Nullable column is not using index for 'order by' clause. I added Not Null condition in the 'where' condition but it wasn't useful. I don't wanted to make composite index with not nullable column or with constant or modify column to 'Not Null'

So I carried out test cases and during which I found that in one case the sql statement does 'fast full scan' for data access but does not use index for 'order by' sorting

here are the steps

Initially I kept the column Nullable

SQL> create sequence s5;
Sequence created.

SQL> create table t5 as select s5.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a where rownum<1001;
Table created.

SQL> set pages 100
SQL> select column_name,nullable from user_tab_columns where table_name='T5';

SQL> create index i5 on t5(id);
Index created.

SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'T5',cascade=>true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
exit

SQL> alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';

select *
from
t5 where id is not null order by id

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 16 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.01 0.00 0 16 0 1000

Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5

Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT ORDER BY (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=4771 us)
1000 TABLE ACCESS FULL T5 (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=1157 us)

Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 49.49 49.72
********************************************************************************

select /*+ index(t i5) */ *
from
t5 t where id is not null order by id

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000

Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5

Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID T5 (cr=150 pr=0 pw=0 time=5167 us)
1000 INDEX FULL SCAN I5 (cr=71 pr=0 pw=0 time=3141 us)(object id 4673065)

Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 69 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 69 22.89 28.04

Now I modified the 'id' column to Not Null

SQL> alter table t5 modify id not null;

SQL> set pages 100
SQL> select column_name,nullable from user_tab_columns where table_name='T5';

COLUMN_NAME N
------------------------------ -
ID N
OWNER Y
OBJECT_NAME Y
SUBOBJECT_NAME Y
OBJECT_ID Y
DATA_OBJECT_ID Y
OBJECT_TYPE Y
CREATED Y
LAST_DDL_TIME Y
TIMESTAMP Y
STATUS Y
TEMPORARY Y
GENERATED Y
SECONDARY Y

14 rows selected.

select *
from
t5 order by id

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.01 0 29 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 16 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.01 0.01 0 45 0 1000

Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5

Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT ORDER BY (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=2398 us)
1000 TABLE ACCESS FULL T5 (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=1152 us)

Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 37.74 37.91
********************************************************************************

select /*+ index(t i5) */ *
from
t5 t order by id

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000

Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5

Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID T5 (cr=150 pr=0 pw=0 time=4166 us)
1000 INDEX FULL SCAN I5 (cr=71 pr=0 pw=0 time=3142 us)(object id 4673065)

Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 8.28 8.45

select id
from
t5 order by id

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 6 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.00 0.00 0 6 0 1000

Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5

Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT ORDER BY (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=1342 us)
1000 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN I5 (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=1093 us)(object id 4673065)

Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 1.88 1.89

Questions are

1) Why adding 'where id is not null wasn't enough for the index to get used in 'order by'?
2) While we got 'fast full scan' why index wasn't used for 'order by' clause?
3) Do we need the indexed column in where clause for being used in 'order by clause' too?
4) Do we need 'order by' clause if we are selecting only the indexed column with sequence generated values?

View 5 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Order Of Steps In Execution Path And Order Of Predicates In The Plan

Mar 20, 2012

Which step in the following plan is the first step of execution

I reckon it is "TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE"

Is that correct?

In the "Predicate Information (identified by operation id):"

section the predicates - access and filter for the step "TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES" are displayed first

Isn't there any relation between the order of execution steps and the order in which predicates are displayed?

Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 538700484
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2364 | 14 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2313 | 13 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2281 | 12 (9)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 2255 | 11 (10)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 175 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 12 | 612 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES | 43 | 5332 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | VIEW PUSHED PREDICATE | | 1 | 2080 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 154 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 103 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE | 1 | 32 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_BBS_1 | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DAILY_CHECK | 1 | 71 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_SEARCH | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_IAM_SR_NO | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 32 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Result Order In 2 Table Joins Without Order By

Sep 6, 2011

I have below tables,

describe rpthead

Name Null Type
--------------------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
RPTDATE NOT NULL DATE
RPTD_BY NOT NULL VARCHAR2(25)
PRODUCT_ID NOT NULL NUMBER

describe rptbody

Name Null Type
------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
LINENO NOT NULL NUMBER
COMMENTS VARCHAR2(240)
UPD_DATE DATE

The fact is that we store some header in RPTHEAD and store real data in RPTBODY, the question is that if I use below SQL to query all data for a 'PRODUCT_ID'.

SELECT t0.LINENO, t0.COMMENTS, t0.RPTNO, t0.UPD_DATE
FROM RPTBODY t0 , RPTHEAD rpthead
WHERE
(
t0.RPTNO = rpthead.RPTNO
AND
t0.UPD_DATE>=to_date('1970/01/01 00:00:00','YYYY/MM/DD hh24:mi:ss')
AND
rpthead.PRODUCT_ID IN ('4647')
)

I do not want to have 'ORDER by' clause since data set is too large, the sorting takes long time, is there any way to get the result rows in the order sorted by RPTNO? We have the index for RPTNO on RPTBODY.

View 5 Replies View Related

Using Both OrderBy And RowNum In Query

Nov 22, 2012

I tried to make my Query as simple as possible but also it contains the problem:

SELECT A.Id,A.Attachment,A.CreateDateTime,A.No
,rownum as RowNumber
FROM (
SELECT A.Id,A.Attachment,A.CreateDateTime,A.No FROM GOutgoingLetter A ,
(
SELECT B.Id, B.createdatetime as of0 FROM GOutgoingLetter B
WHERE
Exists
[code]...

when I use Both Order By And RowNum in my Query, Two columns of final Select Are Null: NO & Attachment. whereas this Columns aren't empty.when I comment each one of "ORDER BY B.of0" or ",rownum as RowNumber " everything is correct!!

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Using Rownum To Retrieve Few Records?

Mar 29, 2010

select rownum, CATR_ID, CAT_ID, CATR_REG_COPY, CATR_REG_LABEL, CATR_ACQUIRED_DATE, CATR_REG_DATE, CATR_MEDIA_COMMENTS, CATR_WITH_DIGITAL,
CATR_ORIGINAL, CATR_LINK, CATR_CREATED_BY, CATR_CREATED_DATE, CATR_MODIFIED_BY, CATR_MODIFIED_DATE, CATR_CHECKOUT, Available,
CATR_RETURN_DATE, LOCN_ID, LOCN_SITE, LOCN_LOCATION, MTYPE_GROUP, MTYPE_NAME, ACCESS_LEVEL, DESCRIPTION, CAT_TITLE, CAT_DESCRIPTION,
CATEGORY_ID, CAT_AUTHOR, CAT_PUBLISHED_DATE, CAT_PUBLISHER, CAT_EVAL_RELEVANT_KEYWORDS, CAT_REG_NUMBER, CAT_REG_SUBNUMBER, U_NAME

[Code]..

There are over 1500 records, but this query does not return any row. If i change rownum >= 100 to rownum <= 100 it returns first hundred records though... What is wrong here?

View 12 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: How To Fetch A Row With Maximum Rownum

Jan 15, 2013

In my sql query, how can i fetch the row with max row count? the query has around 10 columns.

View 2 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Cast Rownum To Number (10)

Jan 25, 2013

I'm on Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0

I am working on a project where have lots of view on a different schema. For performance reasons, we create tables on those views and index them.

The application that uses these tables requires a numeric primary key of a specific length, e.g. number(10). Not all tables have a natural key that matches this requirement, so I added a rownum to the query. I had hoped that casting the rownum to a number(10) would result in the same datatype once the table is created.

e.g.
SQL> create or replace view rownum_to_number10_vw as
  2  select cast(rownum as number(10)) objectid, dummy from dual;

View created

SQL> describe rownum_to_number10_vw;
Name     Type             Nullable Default Comments
-------- ---------------- -------- ------- --------
OBJECTID NUMBER(10)       Y                        
DUMMY    VARCHAR2(1 BYTE) Y                        

SQL> perfect! Now create a table based on this view:

SQL> create table rownum_to_number10_tb as 2  select * from rownum_to_number10_vw;

Table created

SQL> describe rownum_to_number10_tb;
Name     Type             Nullable Default Comments
-------- ---------------- -------- ------- --------
OBJECTID NUMBER           Y                        
DUMMY    VARCHAR2(1 BYTE) Y                         Oracle does not pick up on the number(10) cast!

How can I force Oracle to create a column with the same datetype as the underlying query?

ps:I know that the 10 in number(10) is more like a constraint than a datatype, but the application that uses this table will create an additional column if the datatype > 10. I want to prevent that from happening...

View 8 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Rownum In UNION Operator

Feb 18, 2013

I have a requirement in SQL that I have to number each row. Hence I thought of using ROWNUM. But the sql query I'm using uses UNION operator. Hence I used like this

select a,b,rownum as 'field1' from table1
union
select c,d,1 as 'field1' from table2

Will the above query solve my purpose?

View 11 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Select Query With Rownum

Nov 27, 2012

I am using this as a subquery within a large select statement.

(select NAME_LAST from person_name where person_id=enc.person_id and ROWNUM = 1 order by person_name_id desc) as PatFirstName

I am getting issues when i am doing rownum=1 with order by clause, what is teh right way.

when i use rownum < 2 without order y clause it is workign fine.

I would like to use order by clause.

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Number Sequence At Row Level Like ROWNUM

Jun 1, 2010

I have a result set with three columns as 'Product Category', 'Product' & 'QtySales' and 10 rows, sorted in the order Product Category, Product. This means, a product category will have one or more products under it.

Now i want to add a fourth column to my result set, which should display a incremental number sequence from starting from 1, 2, 3.. for each row. Also when the value of the Product Category (1st column) changes, this sequence should be restarted again from 1.

Col1 Col2 Col3 Col4
PC1 P1 10 1
PC1 P2 20 2
PC2 P3 30 1
PC2 P4 10 2
PC2 P5 15 3
PC3 P6 25 1

View 1 Replies View Related

Using Of ROWNUM In Insert Statement Gives Error In Oracle 11g

May 24, 2011

I have a query regarding the use of rownum inside the insert statement.

For example, I have a sample table as: sample1(aa date, bb number);

Insert
INTO sample1
VALUES (SYSDATE, ROWNUM);

this statement is working fine in Oracle 9i but gives error in Oracle 11.2.0.1. The error is ORA-976 ,

Why this error coming in Oracle 11g and how to resolve it?

Our Environment: UNIX AIX 5.3, Oracle 11.2.0.1 database

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Create Rank On Column Without Using Rownum Function

Mar 17, 2013

can we create rank on a particular column without using rownum and rank function.

View 9 Replies View Related

Using Rownum In PL/SQL Can Significantly Reduce Performance And Throughput Of Queries

Nov 27, 2010

Using rownum in PL/SQL can significantly reduce performance and throughput of queries.

For example,

CODEselect *
from (select ...
from ...
join ... on ...
join ... on ...
left join ... on ...
where ...
group by ...)
where rownum < 500

takes much more time on a heavy loaded db than

CODEselect Y.*
from (
select X.*, rank() over(order by ...) rnk
from (select ...
from ...
join ... on ...
join ... on ...
left join ... on ...
where ...
group by ...) X) Y
where rnk < 500

I suspect it's because Oracle optimizer goals all_rows and first_rows.

View 2 Replies View Related

Forms :: ROWNUM Returns NULL Rows When Value Greater Than 1

Dec 9, 2011

I am trying to do a simple query where I need to return the rows from a table and treat each rown according to some rules.The query works fine, and returns all the rows, usually I have 2 rows returned. WHen I add to the query where ROWNUM = 1, I get the first row returned, but when I use when ROWNUM =2 OR ROWNUM >1, I always get null rows retured, even if I have rows in the database. Here is my query:

SELECT on_time
INTO on_time2
FROM work.work_unit
WHERE work_code = 1
AND emp_no = :entry_blk.p_emp_no
AND work_date = :entry_blk.p_work_date
WHERE ROWNUM = 2;
--RETURN NULL

I changed it to the following format, but still I get the same results, only I get data when I say when rownum = 1, i get back the first record in the query

SELECT on_time
INTO on_time2
FROM (SELECT on_time
FROM work.work_unit
WHERE work_code = 1
AND emp_no = :entry_blk.p_emp_no
AND work_date = :entry_blk.p_work_date)
WHERE ROWNUM = 2;

I can't move forward in my form until I figure out why this is not returning records

View 4 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: How Rownum Works For The Column Having Data Type As Varchar2

Jan 29, 2013

bookshelf_test table structure

title     varchar2(100)     y          
publisher     varchar2(20)     y          
categoryname     varchar2(20)     y          
rating     varchar2(2)     y

my query is,
select ROWNUM AS "Rank",title,publisher from (select rating,title,publisher from bookshelf_test order by rating desc ) where ROWNUM <=3

returns result ,

1     1     MY LEDGER     KOCH PRESS
2     2     TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD     HARPERCOLLINS
3     3     THE MISMEASURE OF MAN     W.W. NORTON        

But inner query (select rating,title,publisher from bookshelf_test order by rating desc ) returns,

1     5     WONDERFUL LIFE     W.W.NORTON
2     5     THE MISMEASURE OF MAN     W.W. NORTON
3     5     TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD     HARPERCOLLINS
4     5     MY LEDGER     KOCH PRESS
5     4     TRUMAN     SIMON SCHUSTER
6     4     GOSPEL     PICADOR
7     4     HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE     SCHOLASTIC
8     4     INNUMERACY     VINTAGE BOOKS
9     4     JOHN ADAMS     SIMON SCHUSTER
10     4     JOURNALS OF LEWIS AND CLARK     MARINER
11     4     LETTERS AND PAPERS FROM PRISON     SCRIBNER
12     4     PREACHING TO HEAD AND HEART     ABINGDON PRESS
13     4     THE SHIPPING NEWS     SIMON SCHUSTER
14     4     THE GOOD BOOK     BARD
15     4     THE DISCOVERERS     RANDOM HOUSE
16     3     THE COST OF DISCIPLESHIP     TOUCHSTONE
17     3     SHOELESS JOE     MARINER
18     3     KIERKEGAARD ANTHOLOGY     PRINCETON UNIV PR
19     3     EMMA WHO SAVED MY LIFE     ST MARTIN'S PRESS
20     3     EITHER/OR     PENGUIN
21     3     CHARLOTTE'S WEB     HARPERTROPHY
22     3     BOX SOCIALS     MARINER
23     3     ANNE OF GREEN GABLES     GRAMMERCY
24     3     WEST WITH THE NIGHT     NORTH POINT PRESS
25     3     UNDER THE EYE OF THE CLOCK     ARCADE PUB
26     3     TRUMPET OF THE SWAN     HARPERCOLLINS
27     2     COMPLETE POEMS OF JOHN KEATS     VIKING
28     1     POLAR EXPRESS     HOUGHTON MIFFLIN
29     1     GOOD DOG, CARL     LITTLE SIMON
30     1     MIDNIGHT MAGIC     SCHOLASTIC
31     1     RUNAWAY BUNNY     HARPERFESTIVAL

why final queries top 3 rows r different than inner query ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Forms :: How To Select 1st Record From The Duplicate Values In Table Without Using Rownum And Rowid

Apr 23, 2010

how to select 1st record from duplicate vales in a table.

If we created one table with out primary key column In form in search block have uwi value and top_depth value when i enter uwi and top_depth value then when i click search button then it will display all values in master block.

but here duplicate values r there.

SQL> select rownum,uwi,top_depth,base_depth,test_start_date from well_pre_header;

ROWNUM UWI TOP_DEPTH BASE_DEPTH TEST_STAR
---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------
1 100 453.05 458.08 09-SEP-10
2 100 200 288 23-AUG-00
3 1001 200 289 25-AUG-01
4 1001 200 201 24-MAY-87

if uwi = 1001 and top_depth=200 and i will click search button it should be display 3 record & when i click next button then it will show 4th record.

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: OrderBy Clause Before From Clause?

Apr 23, 2010

can we use something like this

"select ... order by emp from emp"

what is to be done? so that this qurey runs. no co-related subquery to be used.

View 6 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved