SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Get The Missing Records Using Only One Statement
Jan 1, 2011
Ten thousand (10000) records ,but in the TABLE that has a uniqure sequence of column named seq, find only 9 thousand (9000) records. I want to find out the missing records. The following is my approach, but it is not the best way
1.CREATE TABLE my_public_seq (seq number(10));
2.
DECLARE
vn_seq NUMBER(10);
BEGIN
FOR i IN 1..10000
LOOP
INSERT INTO my_public_seq VALUES(i);
END LOOP;
COMMIT;
END;
3. run sql
SELECT seq FROM my_public_seq
MINUS
SELECT seq FROM my_original_table_that_missing_some_records;
How to get the missing records using only one SQL statement.
I have the following statement dynamic sql statement in a database package.
begin EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'SELECT REPLACE(SUBSTR('||V_WHERE_CLAUSE||',1,3, ''AND'', NULL) INTO V_WHERE_FILTER FROM DUAL'; EXCEPTION NULL; end;
When executed it gives following error.
ORA-20000: ORA-20000: ORA-00936: missing expression ### TRACE ### ORA-06512: at "NDSS.DUP_SRCH_PKG_MOD", line 931 ### END TRACE ### ### TRACE ### ORA-06512: at "NDSS.DUP_SRCH_PKG_MOD", line 935 ORA-06512: at "NDSS.DUP_SRCH_PKG_MOD", line 164 ### END TRACE ### ORA-06512: at "NDSS.DUP_SRCH_PKG_MOD", line 184 ORA-06512: at line 9
I have prepared shell scripts to do the parallel inserts on my DB table (LEGACY_SYSTEM).
There is a trigger (AFTER INSERT ON EACH ROW) associated with the above table. I am calling a package.function inside the trigger to do the required operation and finally it will insert records into my target table (PRICE_CHANGE).
Expectation: ------------ If I insert 10 rows into LEGACY_SYSTEM table, it should do few updates and finally insert 10 rows into PRICE_CHANGE table.
Result: ------- 10 rows got inserted into LEGACY_SYSTEM. All the updates are successful but I could see only 4 rows in PRICE_CHANGE table. If I run it for the second or third time, all the results will be perfect.
Instead of these shell script, if I insert one by one rows manually into LEGACY_SYSTEM table, I am getting all the expected results and the results are consistent. If you look at my scripts below, you will understand the problem better..
I am calling test_global.sh through the UNIX session and all the records got inserted into LEGACY_SYSTEM table and few rows are missing from PRICE_CHANGE table.
If I remove the '&' symbol and execute, the results are perfect. But the requirement is not to remove the '&' symbol. I have been facing this problem for the past 1 month.
I have two tables A with columns a.key, a.location_code, a.status and a.first_name and table B with cols b.key, b.location_code, b.status and b.first_name.
I want to find the missing records between the two tables and as well check whether each column is populated correctly. That is if u take a record with id 1 check if loc_code is same in both the tables and if they are different, insert the key and first record column and second record column into a new table. And similarly if there is no record wiht that particular id in the second table, insert the record.
For missing records in the sense for records which are present in A but not in B, am using
Select a.key_no, a.loc_code, b.loc_code from A,B where a.key_no=b.key_no(+) and b.key_no IS NULL
But the problem is I need to put some constraints on the B table like b.status='Married'and b.loc_code='CA'. When am using this condition in the above query, it's throwing me error saying cannot use outer join operator in and or or.And I could not figure out how to check for the columns being populated correctly between the two tables and at the same time check for missing ones
BANNER -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - ProductionSET DEFINE OFF; [code]....
10 rows selected.I want the output like as follows, all those missing date i need to carry on the last one's number
The date value I have created for this sample is monthly, based on the condition the data value I may need to generate weekly also. That's Monthly or weekly either one.
Can I use CASE statement Inside a Oracle Report Query. I'm using Oracle Reports Builder 10g.
My Report Query looks like this,
select invh_code, invh_number, invh_date, invh_cm_code, im_description from invoice_head, invoice_det, unit_of_measurement, item_master where invd_invh_code = invh_code and im_code = invd_item_code AND (case :p_flag when 1 then (substr(invd_item_number,0,(length(invd_item_number)-4)) BETWEEN :P_V_ITM_FRM AND :P_V_ITM_TO) else 1 end) order by invh_number
:p_flag is a parameter that i pass from oracle form and based on that value (:p_flag=1) i need to include this specific condition else omit that condition.
But the CASE statement is throwing Error
ORA-00907 :Missing Right Paranthesis (case :p_flag when 1 then (substr(invd_item_number,0,(length(invd_item_number)-4)) ==> BETWEEN :P_V_ITM_FRM AND :P_V_ITM_TO)
DELETE FROM sre_t WHERE TO_CHAR(end_dt,'yyyy')<'2000' or TO_CHAR(start_dt)<'yyyy')<'2000';
It's executing for 15 to 20 minutes after that i got the error "session timed out"..The table is having four crore records.The delete statement is deleting 12,00000 records.
In the following query which is highlighted ,I need to consider the records which have T.CURRENT_STATE='COMPLETE' AND 'CMPSCSRC' AND 'FINISHED' when M.MAINTAINED_FLAG = 'Y' AND S.SALE_LOCATION_ID = 118443 .So when i tried to write by using case stmt as follows it is giving me records only with T.CURRENT_STATE='COMPLETE'.But i want the records that satisfies all three current_states .
SELECT INI.UPC_ID,S.SALE_LOCATION_NAME,S.SALE_LOCATION_ID,I.KEYCAT_ID AS INITIAL_KEYCAT_ID,M.XLONG_NAME AS INITIAL_KEYCAT_NAME, CASE WHEN M.MAINTAINED_FLAG = 'Y' THEN 'MAINTAINED' ELSE 'NON MAINTAINED' END AS INITIAL_MAINTAIN_DESC, I.APPROVAL_USER_ID AS INITIAL_APPROVED_USER_ID,I.APPROVAL_DATE AS INITIAL_APPROVAL_DATE
I have two tables with 113M records in DWH_BILL_DET & 103M in prd_rerate_chg_que and Im running following merge query, which is running for 13 hrs to update records, which is quiet longer time.
SQL> explain plan for MERGE /*+ parallel (rq, 16) */ INTO DWH_BILL_DET rq USING (SELECT rated_que_rowid, detail_rerate_flag_code, rerate_sel_key,
HOW to use variable P_TMPLID in following statement
TYPE typ_unrecon IS TABLE OF REC_' || P_TMPLID ||'_UNRECON%ROWTYPE index by binary_integer;
because its throwing error while compiling
and also in statement FORALL i IN unrecondata.FIRST .. unrecondata.LAST SAVE EXCEPTIONS --STRSQL := ''; --STRSQL := ' INSERT INTO REC_' || P_TMPLID ||'_UNRECON VALUES ' || unrecondata(i); -- EXECUTE IMMEDIATE STRSQL; INSERT INTO REC_' || P_TMPLID ||'_UNRECON VALUES unrecondata(i);---throwing error on this statement commit; --dbms_output.put_line(unrecondata(2).TRANSID); EXCEPTION
In the following merge statement in the USINg clause...I am using a select stament of one schema WEDB.But that same select statement should take data from 30 schemeas and then check the condition below condition
ON(source.DNO = target.DNO AND source.BNO=target.BNO);
I thought that using UNIONALL for select statement of the schemas as below.
I am using JDBC to run a few queries from my Java program (multi-threaded one).I am facing an issue where a select statement is blocking a delete statement. From the java code point of view, there are 2 different threads accessing the same tables (whith different DB connection objects).
When the block occurs (which i was able to find out from the java thread dump that there is a lock on oracle), the below is the output:
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(sysdate, 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') 2 || ' User '||s1.username || '@' || s1.machine 3 || ' ( SID= ' || s1.sid || ' ) with the statement: ' || sqlt2.sql_text ||' is blocking the SQL statement on '|| s2.username || '@' 4 5 || s2.machine || ' ( SID=' || s2.sid || ' ) blocked SQL -> ' 6 ||sqlt1.sql_text AS blocking_status FROM v$lock l1, v$session s1, v$lock l2 , 7 v$session s2,v$sql sqlt1, v$sql sqlt2 8 WHERE s1.sid =l1.sid 9 AND s2.sid =l2.sid AND sqlt1.sql_id= s2.sql_id AND sqlt2.sql_id= s1.prev_sql_id AND l1.BLOCK =1 10 AND l2.request > 0 AND l1.id1 = l2.id1 AND l2.id2 = l2.id2; [code]...
From the above it can be seen that a select statement is blocking a delete. Unless the select is select for Update, it should not block other statements is not it ?
I am trying to update records in the target table based on the records coming in from source. For instance, if the incoming record is present in the target table I would update them in the target else I would simply insert. I have over one million records in my source while my target has 46 million records. The target table is partitioned based on calendar key. I implement this whole logic using Informatica. Looking at the informatica session log I find that the informatica code is perfectly fine but its in the update part it takes long time (more than 5 days to update one million records). find the TARGET TABLE query and the UPDATE query as below.
TARGET TABLE: CREATE TABLE OPERATIONS.DENIAL_REGRET_FACT ( CALENDAR_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL, DAY_TIME_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL, SITE_KEY NUMBER NOT NULL, RESERVATION_AGENT_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL, LOSS_CODE VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL, PROP_ID VARCHAR2(5) NOT NULL, [code].....
I have written the following PL/SQL procedure to delete the records and count the number of records has been deleted.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE Del_emp IS del_records NUMBER:=0; BEGIN DELETE FROM candidate c WHERE empid in (select c.empid from employee e, candidate c where e.empid = c.empid and e.emp_stat = 'TERMINATED' ); [code]....
I am running a query in our Clarity PPM database to return a list of all Support projects. This returns a simple list of project code and project name:
The query has the project resource tables associated with it, so I am able to list all resources allocated to the project. But for now i am only selecting a DISTINCT list of projects.
I have a separate query which returns a list of support resources.
select res.full_name, res.unique_name , dep.description from niku.srm_resources res, niku.pac_mnt_resources pac, niku.departments dep where res.unique_name = pac.resource_code and pac.departcode = dep.departcode and res.is_active = 1 and description like 'IMS%' and UPPER(dep.description) like '%SUP%'
What I need to be able to do in the first query, is return only projects that do NOT have a resource that appears in the resource list in the second query.
(the res.unique_name field in the second query can be linked to the same in the first query)
Logically, the process would be: 1. Identify Support Project 2. Identify Resources allocated to the project team 3. Compare with List of Support Resources 4. If any Resources in that list do NOT appear on the project, then return project.
SELECT node_nme, os_nme, os_vrsn_nme, CPU_QTY, mch_id_nme FROM node_t WHERE node_nme IN ( SELECT DISTINCT upper(node_nme) as node_nme FROM node_t WHERE row_status_cde IN (1,4)
[code]...
Now, when I run this i get the missing parenthesis error, though I don't konw why.The subselect in the IN works fine and returns exactly what it should.
I have been looking at this now for a good 2 hours. It seems like a simple error but I just cant see it. I must of counted the brackets 20 times. I have run this code in SQL developer using actual values and it works fine.
If your wondering about the esig class it just runs the sql with a few other SQL statements. I have changed the code below to a SELECT * statement just so see if it was actually that statement that was the problem. The select worked so it must be this.
Original - oracle Code
$esig->setSQL("INSERT INTO document_ecopy (DOCUMENT_ECOPY_ID ,DOCUMENT_UUID
i´ve got a table with colomns (time, value) ... for example:
time value 10:00 10 11:00 20 12:00 25 13:00 28 15:00 31 17:00 38
you can see, that the row 14:00 and 17:00 are missing. How i can create the missing values? The value should be the value from the last point. The result should be this:
time value 10:00 10 11:00 20 12:00 25 13:00 28 14:00 28 15:00 31 16:00 31 17:00 38
I have following query. I checked manytime but I am unable to find the reason of error Ora-00907
SELECT Working_Days(sdate,edate), Ddecode(Physical_files Between 1 And 500 And Working_Days(sdate,edate) Between 1 And 30,-1, decode(Physical_files Between 501 And 3000 And Working_Days(sdate,edate) Between 1 And 180,-1,0)) col2 FROM table1 INNER JOIN table2 ON table1_Sno=table2_Sno
In this query, working_days is function that return working days.
If I remove this line then the SQL runs without problems. I think it's the first part FAF_CALC_CCONTRIB (FA_ASSESSMENT.IDENTIFIER,'C'thats causing the problems because I am using near identical code in another script which works perfectly.
im trying to take a query that pulls all the info in the current tables, and narrow it down to one day plus current. here is the error i am getting.
(SELECT OH.ORD_CNTRL_NO, OH.ORD_NO, OH.ASSGN_SHIP_DATE, oh.account_no, sum(OL.ORD_QTY) AS ORD_QTY * ERROR at line 5: ORA-00936: missing expression
old query:
select a.assign_no, a.assign_type, a.act_end, X.ord_no, x.account_no, X.ASSGN_SHIP_DATE, X.ORD_QTY, td.from_loc, sum(td.act_qty) AS ACTQTY, sum(td.exp_qty) AS EXPQTY from clsd_assign a, clsd_task t, clsd_task_detail td, sku s, (SELECT OH.ORD_CNTRL_NO, OH.ORD_NO, OH.ASSGN_SHIP_DATE, oh.account_no, sum(OL.ORD_QTY) AS ORD_QTY
[code]...
new query
select a.assign_no, a.assign_type, TRUNC(A.ACT_END), to_char(a.act_end), X.ord_no, x.account_no, X.ASSGN_SHIP_DATE, X.ORD_QTY, td.from_loc, sum(td.act_qty) AS ACTQTY, sum(td.exp_qty) AS EXPQTY from clsd_assign a, clsd_task t, clsd_task_detail td, sku s where a.act_end between to_char(sysdate -1, 'dd-mon-yyyy') and to_char(sysdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy')
