I created the 32 hash partition on a fact table. Based on hash parititon technique it should evenly distribute data accross the different partition.But when i analyze the table and check the distribution its not at all even.
P_Name Tabspace num_Rows
SYS_P21TBS_TBS0
SYS_P22TBS_TBS0
SYS_P23TBS_TBS0
[Code]....
I have to create a hash partition on fact tables.. we can use temp tablespace or permanent tablespace.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have two fact table and both are partitioned on same key and have same columns. Is it possible to move the partition of one fact table to another.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCan I add range sub partition to a hash partition table. Example like this.
CREATE TABLE test
(
test_id VARCHAR2(10 ) ,
test_TYPE VARCHAR2(5) ,
CREATE_DATE date
)
partition by hash (test_id, test_type)
Partitions 3
SUBPARTITION BY RANGE (CREATE_DATE);
When Tried, I am getting syntax error as invalid option.
I am facing a problem in fetching / updating records from a customer details table having around 20 million records. The table contains around 30 fields with 'MOBILE_NO' as primary key. most of the queries are having 'mobile_no' in where clause .I am planning to hash partition that table using mobile_no column as there is no other column available which can be used for partition.
clarify whether creating hash partition on such key would increase performance of data extraction as I have read on net that hash partitioning is not effective for performance tuning.
While trying partition exchange feature of Oracle with 2 hash partitioned tables, I come to know that I can't directly exchange partitions between 2 partitioned tables
I have two hash partitioned tables , so to move partition data from one table to another will include-
1) Exchange from partitioned table to non-partitioned table.
2) exchange from non-partitioned table to new partitioned table.
But I am not sure in which hash partition my data will go in new partitioned table (data need to be moved has single key value on basis of which tables are partitioned),
At present we have a non partitioned table.
Can we apply redefinition and create range partition and hash sub partition on it?
I have a existing non partition table with more than 100 million records,planning to re design using Hash partition.This table doesn't has any range column to do range partitioning.
Table has 40 columns with a Primary Key on two columns (guest_sales_Id ,Version Flag). guest_sales_Id is unique for entire table but with anopther column version Flag declared as Primary key.(Version Falg will have only two distinct values in entire table)
If i do hash partition,do i need to declare on two columns which are declared ad Primary key ?If i use only guest_sales_id to declare hash prtition any issues ?
I need to transfer 6 million records from fact tables to history table .. What is the better and fast process to do that.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have two tables with below structures.
desc Fault_Dim
Name Null Type
------------------- -------- ------------------
KEY NOT NULL NUMBER(38)
SYSTEM_NAME VARCHAR2(3 CHAR)
PRIORITY VARCHAR2(40 CHAR)
SEVERITY VARCHAR2(40 CHAR)
TYPE VARCHAR2(40 CHAR)
STATUS VARCHAR2(40 CHAR)
CREATE_DT DATE
SUBTYPE VARCHAR2(255 CHAR)
[code]...
The Severity column has values as below 1,2,3, My requirement is to show results as in the attatched image.Where the count values are values from TOTAL_fault column from the fact table.
I believe this is possible in hierarchial queries and pivorting
im trying to insert these results to my fact table (fact_apartments) with the following:
INSERT INTO fact_apartments(avg_price, segmentid, projectid)
SELECT (avg(price), segmentid, projectid)
FROM projectdetails
WHERE projectid = '1';
but it return with the missing right parenthesis.
I think that performance better partition table than non-partition table. How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table at SELECT operation?
I have compare a specific query EXPLAIN PLAN at partition table and non-partition table. both tables data is same. Is it true way or not?
I have a table that partitioned into six partitions. each partitions placed in different table space and every two table space placed it on a different hardisk
when I will do query select with the non-partition keys condition, how the search process ? whether the sequence (scan sequentially from partition 1 to partition 6) or partition in a hardisk is accessed at the same time with other partition in other hardisk. ( in the image, partition 1,4 accessed at the same time with partition 2,5 and 3,6)
I created a single table hash cluster like this :
create tablespace mssm datafile 'c:appmssm01.dbf' size 100m
segment space management manual;
create cluster hash_cluster_4k
( id number(2) )
size 8192 single table hash is id hashkeys 4 tablespace mssm;
-- Created a table in cluster with row size such that only one record fits one block and inserted 5 records each with a distinct key value
CREATE TABLE hash_cluster_tab_8k
( id number(2) ,
txt1 char(2000),
txt2 char(2000),
txt3 char(2000)
)
CLUSTER hash_cluster_8k( id );
[code]....
If I issue the same query after creating unique index on hash_cluster_tab(id), the execution plan shows hash access and single I/O (cr = 1).Does it mean that to have single I/o in a single table hash cluster, we have to create unique index? Won't it create additional overhead of maintaining an index?
What is the second I/O needed for in case unique index is absent?
Can i alter the table to create partition on non partition table, i have tried and could not create it. Do we have some other means to do it as this is the live table and cannot drop them else will lose the data.
View 1 Replies View RelatedAt moment we use range-hash partitioning of a large dimension table (dimension model warehouse) table with 2 levels - range partitioned on columns only available at bottom level of hierarchy - date and issue_id.
Result is a partition with null value - assume would get a null partition in large fact table if was partitioned with reference to the large dimension.Large fact table similarly partitioned date range-hash local bitmap indexes
Suggested to use would get automatic partition-wise joins if used reference partitioningWould have thought would get that with range-hash on both dimension.
i want to create a new partition for version 2
existing table is as below
create table test
(
name varchar2(100),
version NUMBER(12)
)
[Code]....
I have two tables in which one is partitioned table with the following details.
CREATE TABLE "SCOTT"."TBL_MITTAL"
("ACCOUNT_NAME" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
"BILL_NO" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
"BILL_DATE" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
"CLI" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
"ANI" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
[code].....
When I am trying to insert record from tbl_mittal into tbl_temp table. I am facing "ORA-14400: inserted partition key does not map to any partition" error
SQL> insert into tbl_temp select * from tbl_mittal;
insert into tbl_temp select * from tbl_mittal
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14400: inserted partition key does not map to any partition
AS tbl_mittal is having hugh number of records so I am providing only few rows from tbl_mittal table as test data.
ACCOUNT_NAMEBILL_NOBILL_DATECLIANICHARGE_START_DATEDURFROM_LOCATIONTO_LOCATIONINVOICE_IDCIRCLE
10000010357423128271095119301-Feb-111723006000931488182328-JAN-11 11.30.54.000000000 AM59.04CHANDIGARHJAIPUR271095119
10000011844187128348720198715-Jun-121409470011825531896615-MAY-12 09.10.36.000000000 AM28.03CHANDIGARHBANTWAL348720198
10000011844187128348720198715-Jun-121409470011825531927115-MAY-12 09.10.41.000000000 AM38.32CHANDIGARHBANTWAL348720198
10000011844187128348720198715-Jun-121409470011825531933015-MAY-12 09.10.46.000000000 AM28.81CHANDIGARHBANTWAL348720198
10000011844187128348720198715-Jun-121409470011825531930215-MAY-12 09.10.53.000000000 AM28.96CHANDIGARHBANTWAL348720198
[code].....
I also tried to upload the same data using sqlldr.
sqlldr log file contents is as follows:
Total logical records skipped: 0
Total logical records read: 1857532
Total logical records rejected: 801092
Total logical records discarded: 37
[code].....
So some sqlldr bad file contents is as follows.
100000118441871,283487201987,15-JUN-12,1723958000,9355115251,10-JUN-12 05.56.05.000000 PM,36.99,CHANDIGARH,AMBALA,348720198,,
100000118441871,283487201987,15-JUN-12,1723958000,7520533825,10-JUN-12 05.56.14.000000 PM,44.12,CHANDIGARH,AGRA,348720198,,
100000118441871,283487201987,15-JUN-12,1723958000,9356452151,10-JUN-12 05.56.17.000000 PM,116.83,CHANDIGARH,JALANDHAR,348720198,,
100000118441871,283487201987,15-JUN-12,1723958000,9331223048,10-JUN-12 05.56.21.000000 PM,28.33,CHANDIGARH,KOLKATA,348720198,,
100000118441871,283487201987,15-JUN-12,1723958000,7827927893,10-JUN-12 05.56.24.000000 PM,3384.33,CHANDIGARH,DELHI,348720198,,
[code].....
How to find the size pf a partition in a partition table?I guess we need to query views like dba_tab_partitions but I am not very sure. will running dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('schema_name,'table_name,'partition_name')
View 3 Replies View RelatedI think that performance better partition table than non-partition table. How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table at SELECT operation?
I have compare a specific query EXPLAIN PLAN at partition table and non-partition table. both tables data is same. Is it true way or not?
I am trying to add partition to table without partition
with following code
ALTER TABLE ACC_LOC1_TAB
ADD PARTITION testpart BY RANGE (ALT_AUTHDT)
(PARTITION UPTO_2010 values less than (31-mar-2010),
PARTITION APR_JUN_10 VALUES less than (30-JUN-2010),
PARTITION JUL_SEP_10 VALUES less than (30-SEP-2010),
PARTITION OCT_DEC_10 VALUES less than (31-DEC-2010),
PARTITION JAN_MAR_11 VALUES less than (31-MAR-2011))
it will raise error ora-14020
I am using Oracle 11.2.0.1 Oracle Database.I have a table with 10 Million records and it's a Non Partitioned Table.
1) I would like to partition the table (with partition by range ) without creating new table . I should do it in the existing table itself (not sure DBMS_ REDEFINITION is the only option ) (or) can i use alter table ...?
2) Add one partition which will have data for the unspecified range.
i have table with range partition and list sub-partition..can i add one more list sub-partition if it is not possible , i have to drop first sub-partition.
View 6 Replies View Relatedhow to partition and index my table for a special problem.
The table:
CREATE TABLE TEST (
ID NUMBER PRIMARY KEY,
U_VALUE NUMBER NOT NULL, -- Ranges from 0 - 30.000.000
O_VALUE NUMBER NOT NULL, -- Ranges from U_VALUE - 30.000.000
CREATE_TS TIMESTAMP DEFAULT SYSTIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
UPDATE_TS TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
ITEM_TYPE NUMBER NOT NULL --<< Only 4 different values >>
);
As you can see, U_VALUE is ALWAYS lower than O_VALUE.I need to have the CREATE_TS in either main- or subpartition do drop the partitions after some time so i don,t have to use DELETE statements. The table has 360 millions rows.
The application has only 8 query which will always use a WHERE clause like this:
SELECT * FROM TEST
WHERE U_VALUE <= :1 AND O_VALUE => :2 AND ITEM_TYPE = :3
1. Is there any good technique how to create a good index for the queries (application will execute 120 queries per second)?
2. how to partition this table?
I am trying to delete the partition, but I am getting error "ORA-01426: numeric overflow"
The original partitioning was:
TABLE_NAME PARTITION_NAME NUM_ROWS
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201108 0
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201201 (NULL)
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201202 (NULL)
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_99999999 (NULL)
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201106 1159130358
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201105 0
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201104 1212566971
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201103 1002557990
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201102 0
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201101 0
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201012 0
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201011 0
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201010 0
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201009 0
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201112 (NULL)
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201111 (NULL)
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201110 (NULL)
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201109 (NULL)
F_TFP_CP_MONTH P_201107 1627218307
All partitions were dropped, but three; these three returned the same error when trying to drop them:
SQL> alter table dw.F_TFP_CP_MONTH drop partition P_201112;
alter table dw.F_TFP_CP_MONTH drop partition P_201112
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01426: numeric overflow
SQL> alter table dw.F_TFP_CP_MONTH drop partition P_201111;
alter table dw.F_TFP_CP_MONTH drop partition P_201111
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01426: numeric overflow
SQL> alter table dw.F_TFP_CP_MONTH drop partition P_201110;
alter table dw.F_TFP_CP_MONTH drop partition P_201110
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01426: numeric overflow
So, the situation now is that the table only has these three partitions, and we are not able to empty the table, so that we can later purge it and recover the
space.
free that space and empty the contents of the table?
I have the below questions on the locking mechanism in a partition table. Example I execute the below query,
delete from table_name subpartition (subpartition_name);
In that case,
1. If we perform above query, then which level of lock is happened to the table/partition & sub-partitions?
2. If we perform above query on same sub-partition of the same table with different where clause, what will happen?
3. If we perform above query for same table but different sub partition at same time, what will happen?
i want to ask about indexing in partition table. i have table that indexed by local index. when i want to select all data. I execute this query
select * from Book_Issue_Part where status='Pinjam';
but it does not select all data, only partly data have selected. is it a wrong query to select all data in indexing partition table? so what query should i execute to get all data.
can i able to partition the table based on the column which is in another table ??
For example Table X need to be partitioned based on the column in The Table Y . and Table X and table Y has some relation.
We have a transaction table and has 30 million rows. The table is not partitioned till date. We need to create partition on this table. We had an idea of moving this data to a temporary table and create partition[range]on the original table and move the data back.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCurrently we are deleting the partition daily. Table structure is Interval partitioning. After deleting partition how to analyze the partition table.
View 12 Replies View Related