I have two schemas with 149 tables in each schema, what I need to do is to prove that the content(data) between the two schemas is identical. I know that all the table names between the two schemas are the same, just need to prove that there is no difference in data.
So the query needs to prove that Schema A content = Schema B content
I know I cant do a simple select from Schema A.tab1 minus select Schema B.tab1 but since there are 159 tables, I am not sure if this is an efficient way of doing it.
I need to export only the data from schemas or tables, how to do that with Oracle Data Pump? when we use schemas parameter this export all schema, not only the data right?
one is "ora" it is a 8i version 2nd is "orcl" it is a 11g version
"Oracle" is the my local database. i wrote following program for comparing the row by row data in both the tables. Q)Is it BEST practice? If not let me know the best practice to compare data in tables? Q) If am not using the order by clause its giving me wrong output even though both the data tables has same data. WHY?
I want to do a comparision for the missing rows between two diffrent tables
TBL1 and TBL2 both with the same structure but with diffrent data some data is identical. though my data is huge i wanted to make sure the technique i am using
Name _____ Smith Street Smith Street John Street Ed Street Ed Street Ed Street
and need to assign sequence numbers only when the record (Name) changes, e.g. :
Name Seq _____ ____ Smith Street 1 Smith Street 1 John Street 2 Ed Street 3 Ed Street 3 Ed Street 3
I have experimented with row_number partition but then i just get the sequence returning to 1 when the name value changes.
If I grouped the records by Name I would like to have unique, sequential numbers: 1, 2, 3 but where there is the same name I would like the sequence to stop and the number to replicate?
I need to find the identical rows in the below table based on ID column and update the previous identical record's end_date with latest record's start_date-1.
We have a 2 database identical ( Say DB1 & DB2). In that, one of the database(DB2) base got corrupted. We cant recover back the database due to hard disk problem. So we did a new installation of database and patched to current level.
Now I want make DB2 up and running. So I though of generating a script from DB1 and run it in DB2 to restore back.
since the orgid 1 has changed the dept from org1 to org2 I do not want this to be appeared in the final count. Results should only include the orgid 2 since it didn't changed any dept.
There could be anything after the 2nd ~ in string 2 is there a easy way of trimming string2 to the first 14 Characters? Or do I have to find the 2nd instance of ~ and then remove everything after (and including) that?
How to select the transactions out of the database that occurred within 70 seconds of each other. The toll_date field is a TIMESTAMP field.
Problem is, I seem to only get transactions that occurred within 70 minutes of each other. On the timestamp field I break the math down into the seconds in a day and I add 70. I then subtract that value and add that value to the timestamp and I should get anything between those values right?
Recently i have started working on PLSQL coding. I have a requirement. Either error or un-processed record count is 90% of to be processed records then the script has to fail. Currently I am having a situation where error count is 1 and total to be processed is also 1.
in the below V_ERR is error count V_UPS is un processed count V_PROCESSED_COUNT is total to be processed.
I am expecting PASS result but it is giving FAIL.
DECLARE V_ERR NUMBER:=0; V_UPS NUMBER:=0; V_PROCESSED_COUNT NUMBER:=0; NIN NUMBER; BEGIN V_PROCESSED_COUNT:=1; [Code] .......
As part of our project, we need to perform table comparisons in two different databases. I am currently looking for various options to accomplish this.
One of them is doing minus operation between these two tables. Also, i have looked at the data compare option in toad utility.
I am working in form 6i, database 9i. I have datablock on table t1.
table t1: name(varchar2), date(varchar2)
datablock: name(varchar2), date(varchar2)[i have insert date with time stamp]
for date column, i am inserting date with time stamp.While querying data, user just enters only date(no time stamp), i should be able to query data. I tried in data block where condition
I want to find difference between the objects(tables(columns,constraints), views, sequences) in two schemas. One schema is staging and one is development . In development lot of changes are made , Is there a script or a opensource tool which will bring out the difference in columns, constraints in each table and sequences , views etc.
I have a SQL query which joins several large tables (so indexes matter here) from Oracle database. In the where condition I use IS NULL with one of the date field values. Query takes 40 sec to run and if I comment this one line...it takes 1 sec to run. This date field is an index on the table and I learn that --
1. IS NOT NULL in where clause uses an index 2. IS NULL in where clause does not use an index
Is there any work around to make the query faster...other than changing all the NULL date values in the table to some string. In other words can I force it to use the index.
SF at oracle.com/technetwork/issue-archive/o53plsql-083350.html states that you can compare two database tables (of the same structure) by defining a nested table type (using %ROWTYPE) and two NT variables of that type, and loading the contents of each table into its respective NT variable, before comparing them using the = operator. Having read the Oracle documentation which states that you can only compare NTs for equality if they don't contain record types, I was surprised to read this, but figured I would try it because I must be misunderstanding SF, but it didn't work.
SCOTT@ORCL> create table empcopy3 as select * from emp;
Table created.
declare type emp_ntt is table of emp%rowtype; emp_nt1 emp_ntt;
[Code]....
But SF goes on to say he timed the execution of his NT equality method, comparing it with a SQL-only equivalent, and so I must be missing something. My understanding is that using %ROWTYPE declares a record type.
