Replication :: ORA-00001 - Unique Constraint Violated
Aug 3, 2008
I got this error message in my replication environment.
ORA-12012: error on auto execute of job 2182370
ORA-12008: error in materialized view refresh path
ORA-00001: unique constraint (TE.S_TE_MTH_DBASE_SALES_INFO_A_U1) violated
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 189
Materialized view and Base table having only one unique index. There are no referable constraints in my base table. Because source table not refer any other tables.
Even; materialized view log created using rowid because there are no primary key constraints in my base table.When I manually refresh materialized view I got the below error message
ORA-00001: unique constraint (TE.S_TE_MTH_DBASE_SALES_INFO_A_U1) violated
How it's possible? Because there is parent/child relationship in my source table and there is no way to enter duplicate records it's unique index.
View 8 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 14, 2010
I have faced an error as below:-
1 : 23000 : java.sql.BatchUpdateException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SDS1.PK_EXP_TXT) violated
1 : 23000 : java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SDS1.PK_EXP_TXT) violated
java.sql.BatchUpdateException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SDS1.PK_EXP_TXT) violated
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwBatchUpdateException(DatabaseError.java:367)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeBatch(OraclePreparedStatement.java:9119)
[Code] ......
After i check data in all_indexes table, i have found some old data which are belongs to 2008 and 2009. The sample as below:-
OWNER INDEX_NAME LAST_ANALYZED
SDS1PK_ACTION 31-OCT-09 07:04:49
SDS1AK_ACTION 31-OCT-09 07:04:49
SDS1PK_COND 31-OCT-09 07:04:50
SDS1AK_COND 31-OCT-09 07:04:50
SDS1COND_FK1 31-OCT-09 07:04:50
SDS1COND_FK2 31-OCT-09 07:04:50
is it the problem due to the old data not remove from the all_indexes table ?.. if YES is it I have to delete the old data manually from the all_indexes table ?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2011
I am trying to import the dump using the impdp utility and followed the below steps I have disabled all the constraints and executed the below command
impdp DIRECTORY=EXPDP_DAILY_BACKUP_DIR DUMPFILE=expdp_QA_full_11102011_214501.dmp
logfile=imp_EXPDP_QA_full_12102011_203254.log remap_schema=prod:prod remap_tablespace=prod:prod
schemas=prod TABLE_EXISTS_ACTION=truncate content=data_only.
but I am getting the below error like this for 1 or 2 tables . and If I import those tables seperately its getting imported successfully. i am not getting the below error always .
ORA-31693: Table data object "PROD"."DAS_ID_GENERATOR" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
ORA-00001: unique constraint (PROD.DAS_ID_GENERATOR_P) violated
ORA-31693: Table data object "PROD"."TKT_DIST_SRV_STAT" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
ORA-00001: unique constraint (PROD.SERVER_STATS_P) violated
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2011
I have disabled the primary key on a table using this...ALTER TABLE C_LOV_BOROUGH DISABLE CONSTRAINT CLOVBOROUGH_PK CASCADE;
but now when I try to insert duplicate value. It gives this error.
ORA-00001: unique constraint (LOT_DBA.CLOVBOROUGH_PK) violated
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2007
From a step by step instructions I'm asked to put the following into sql*plus:
CREATE TABLE Lab2Lecturer
(staffNO VarCHAR2(10) NOT NULL,
title VARCHAR2(3),
fName VARCHAR2(30),
[code]...
Then the following:
INSERT INTO Lab2Lecturer
(staffNO, title, fName, lName, streetAddress, suburb, city, postCode, country, lecturerLevel, bankNO, bankName, salary, workLoad, researchArea)
VALUES
('1000', 'Dr', 'Johanna','Santoso',
'3 Robinson Av', 'Kew', 'Melbourne', '3080', 'Australia', 'C', '1000567237', 'CommBank', 65000.00,1.0, 'O-R DB');
and finally,
INSERT INTO Lab2Lecturer
(staffNO, title, fName, lName, streetAddress, suburb, city, postCode,country, lecturerLevel, BankNO,bankName, salary, workLoad, researchArea)
VALUES
('1000', 'Dr', 'Justine', 'Martin', '6 Algorithm AV', 'Montmorency', 'Melbourne', '3089', 'Australia', 'D', '1000123456', 'CommBank', 89000.00, 1.0, 'CBR');
when I try entering in the second one I get an error 'unique constraint violated'.So whats wrong exactly?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2013
My DB version is
BANNER
----------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
These error codes I'm getting in production.First of all, I've no duplicates present in that table for which this error has been raised.I've checked the index and related columns as well. NO DATA is there.So NO CHANCE for unique constraint violation.
SELECT * FROM ORDER_OCC_REQUISITION_X_REF WHERE LAB_ORDER_OCC_TEST_ID IN(SELECT LAB_ORDER_OCC_TEST_ID FROM LAB_ORDER_OCC_TEST WHERE LAB_ORDER_OCC_ID = 7944858);
no rows selected
Now when I'm trying to insert one row inside this table I'm getting this error, as you are seeing no records for this occurrence_id.
SELECT * FROM USER_INDEXES WHERE INDEX_NAME = 'ORD_OCC_REQ_UQ_TEST_IX_04';
--ORDER_OCC_REQUISITION_X_REF (Table name)
--MERGE_DT, LAB_ORDER_OCC_TEST_ID, TEST_ID, ACTIVE_YN (columns for the index 'ORD_OCC_REQ_UQ_TEST_IX_04')
As you can see there is no data then this error should not be raised. Update procedure.
/*******************************************************************************************************************
* Name : UPDATE_REQUISITION_X_REF
* Description : This Procedure update ORDER_OCC_REQUISITION_X_REF table with requisition_id
* that was generated due to merge process.
* In parameters : IN_merge_id NUMBER The order_ref_no of the orders to be merged (comma seperated)
***********************************************************************************************************************/
PROCEDURE UPDATE_REQUISITION_X_REF ( IN_merge_id IN TT_ORD_REQUISITION_WORK_AREA.merge_id%TYPE)
IS
[Code]....
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2012
I have in a plsql block somewhere a statement like
INSERT INTO TABLE1( id , col)
SELECT id, col
FROM TABLE2;
This statement returns an error ORA-00001: unique constraint because id is a primary key on TABLE1. I would like to know what is the value of id that raised the exception.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2012
I also put in the relevant code in case it's needed.
SQL> @lab_05_01.sql
SQL> -- Oracle Database 10g: Administration Workshop II
SQL> -- Oracle Server Technologies - Curriculum Development
SQL> --
SQL> -- ***Training purposes only***
SQL> -- ***Not appropriate for production use***
SQL> --
SQL> -- This script performs a batch promotion update.
SQL> -- The logic of the updates is not important -
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2012
i have a table for example :
CREATE TABLE RMD_2
(
"RMD_ID" NUMBER(10,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"ABB" VARCHAR2(16 BYTE),
"ACT_IND" VARCHAR2(1 BYTE) NOT NULL DISABLE,
CONSTRAINT "RMD_2_C1" CHECK (act_ind IN ('Y', 'N')) ENABLE
)
for column ACT_IND their is a check constraint RMD_2_C1 it should only accept either Y or N.
but, when ever i am inserting other values other than Y or N it is accepting it should not accept and it should have to give error message ORA-02293- : check constraint violated.
but it is not happening,it is accepting all other values even NULL value also.my requirement is this column should only accept either Y or N and it should not accept other values.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2013
i am running the query from which i am getting below mentioned error how can i find the record which is not there in parent table ora02291 integrety constrain violated and parent key not found.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 2010
I have Oracle 9i and yesterday I wanted to create new DB(datebase) but I couldn't did it.
In Database Configuration Assistant chose Create database then New database. Used configuration by default. On 92% I got this error
Quote:ORA-02291: integrity constraint (SH. COSTS_PRODUCT_FK) violated - parent key not found
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2013
Each time when I import an application into my workspace in local 10g XE using the APEX 4.2 Application Builder, I get the "ORA-02291, constraint wwv_flows_fk violated..". The application I whant to import was originally exported from [URL]. I found out, that it has to to with wwv_flow_application_install.get_workspace_id in the installation script, which obviously returns NULL and not my current workspace id as I suppose it should. I replaced wwv_flow_application_install.get_workspace_id by '<my worskspace id>' and then the import does work.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2011
Our RMAN backup failed because of the error:
starting full resync of recovery catalog
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of backup command at 08/22/2011 22:19:07
RMAN-03014: implicit resync of recovery catalog failed
RMAN-03009: failure of full resync command on default channel at 08/22/2011 22:19:07
ORA-00001: unique constraint (ODBA.DF_U2) violated
Searching metalink, its related to bug 6014994 and the proposed workaround is to delete the constraint:
Cause:
Dropping a datafile from a tablespace followed immediately by adding
another datafile to the same tablespace will cause this Unique Key violation.
Taking a RMAN debug trace will show the file# related to the error
This is reported as bug <<6014994>> Unpublished on Metalink and fixed in 11g
RMAN RESYNC catalog signals DF_U2 violated constraint when a file# is reused in
the same tablespace
Solution
WORKAROUND: Drop df_u2 constraint
where can I delete the constraint, is it possible to do in RMAN or in the target instance?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
I've set up Oracle Streams replication between multiple N-way zones like this:
CODE------------------------------
Nway1 |Intersect| Nway2
DB1 --|-- DB3 --|-- DB5 DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4 - N-way1
| | | | | DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6 - N-way2
DB2 --|-- DB4 --|-- DB6 DB3, DB4 - intersection zone
| |
-------------------------------
Physically DB1 .... DBN connected sequentially, so I want to prevent segmentation if some DB is unaccessible, but at the same time fight unneeded redundancy which uses too much link bandwidth to send N-1 LCR-s to all members of a single N-way group (so I want to split one big N-way zone into smaller ones and sequentially connect them into chain - it significantly reduces load on link if N is big enough (>10)). Also I want to have 2 DB in intersection zone to prevent single point of failure.
This scheme has one drawback - if change originated on DB3 or DB4, then it will be propagated (more correctly - applied and captured again) to DB5 and DB6 by both DB1 and DB2 (and, as far as I know, I have no means in capture rules to detect state of DB2 from DB1 and vise versa), so on DB5 and DB6 I get:
CODEORA-00001: unique constraint (DUMMYUSR.UNIQUE_RECORDS) violated error
I've set up standard conflict handler for apply process:
CODE
declare
cols DBMS_UTILITY.NAME_ARRAY;
begin
cols(1) := 'no';
cols(2) := 'name';
cols(3) := 'ddate';
dbms_apply_adm.set_update_conflict_handler(
object_name => 'DUMMYUSR.DUMMYTBL',
method_name => 'DISCARD',
resolution_column => 'no',
column_list => cols
);
end;
but it seems that it does not handle uniqueness conflicts. What is the best way to handle uniqueness conflict (is there a better way than to write custom error handler) and how serious is the impact on insert performance of having unique constraint and corresponding error handler. (In real world I will have to deal with tables with metainformation and without any keys).
Also, how to proceed with no error or raise exception from apply error handler with error that caused this handler to run? In oracle docs I can find only example that modifies LCR and runs lcr.EXECUTE(TRUE), but what to do if I don't want to reexecute LCR, but merely check error code and propagate error if it is not ORA-00001?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2012
I have 3 columns in a table: colX, colY, colZ.
Trying to find a way to prevent duplicates with these, but only if colX is not null.
For example, if there are already values for: colX = 1, colY = 1, colZ = 1
then:
Allowed: colX = null, colY = 1, colZ = 1
Not allowed: colX = 1, colY = 1, colZ = 1
I can't create a unique constraint on these columns because there are many null values for column colX, and as mentioned, when colX is null, colY and colZ can be any values.
I also tried using a before insert trigger to find duplicates before posting and raise an error if found, but this causes an ORA-04091 mutating error since the trigger in the table is referencing itself to check for duplicates.
Also, I know there is something called a function based index, but I cannot use those with my code, so I need another solution if possible.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2013
about the functionalty w.r.t. unique constraint and Distinct clause. Below is the example which is confusing me lot.
--Below statement will create table and unique constraint
Create Table A (A Varchar2 (10) Unique);
Insert Into A Values (Null);
Insert Into A Values (1);
Insert Into A Values (2);
[code]...
If we are saying each null value is having a unique value, then why oracle distinct showing records.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2013
I have a table where I want user to fill in unique values for a field which is easy to do.
Problem is sometimes the values can be null so an ordinary unique constraint does not work because multiple null records. Is there a way of validating only non null values to ensure all data entered that is non null is unique?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2011
I have created a table below, my TL asked me to create a local unique constraint for the below table.
I went through all sites and could not find the correct solution, how to create LOCAL UNIQUE CONSTRAINT ON SUB PARTITION TABLE and LOCAL UNIQUE INDEX ON PARTITION TABLE. Creating Local Unique constraint should take care of creating local unique index creation.
Unique key columns are DET,GDS,ARRIVE_DT
CREATE TABLE SUB_PAR_TAB
(
ID VARCHAR2(100) NOT NULL,
REGION VARCHAR2(40) NOT NULL,
SOURCE VARCHAR2(80) NOT NULL,
DET VARCHAR2(80) NOT NULL,
GDS VARCHAR2(40) NOT NULL,
ARRIVE_DTDATE,
SYS_SOURCE VARCHAR2(25) ,
[code]........
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2010
I have two different java process trying to insert in the same time in the same table for the same trade. The structure of the table Report is
create table report
( TRADE_ID NUMBER,
VERSION NUMBER,
MESSAGE_TIME TIMESTAMP)
There is a unique key on (TRADE_ID and VERSION) So if a new trade_id is inserted, the version is set to 1 and the second becomes 2 and so on. The version is calculated as last version of the trade_id ie. version + 1. It was woking fine till a new Java process was build that fired inserts through ten different java instances at the same time resulting in unique key error. So in detail what is hapenning is if three records of trade_id's comes in at the same time it should allocate versions in a first come first serve basis and there should be three versions of trade id 1,2 and 3. Now due to the multiple instances they all seems to get fired at once and all ending up with version one and thus resulting in unique key constrain error while trying to insert into the table.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2013
Let's say we have Table - A and we would like to replicate specific row transaction to Table B.
Here are the rows in *Table A*
Time: Lets say 15:00
A1 Just Updated @15:00
A2 Just inserted @15:01
A3
B1 - Daily Delete Row -i.e just deleted a while back - Non scheduled process --executed by application @15:02
B2 -
B3 - Daily Delete Row - i.e just deleted a while back -- Non Schduled process --executed by application @15:05
B4 - Just recently purged (As part of 180 Day purge ) - Scheduled process executed by operations team @15:10
B5 - Just recently purged (As part of 180 Day purge ) - Scheduled process executed by operations team @15:10
B6 -Just recently purged (As part of 180 Day purge ) - Scheduled process executed by operations team @15:10
Current Data in Table B (Before Replication)
@15:00
A1 (without updates)
A3
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
Expected rows in Table B (via replication/snapshot/materialized view / or any other method)
*Replication at 15:30*
Table B - Read Only
Expected rows after replication-
A1 -- Newly updated details
A2 -- Newly inserted row
A3
B1 - Daily delete row is expected to be replicated
B2
B3 - Daily delete row is expected to be replicated
***Note row B4 is not expected to be replicated to table B.
Questions:
1) How can we get updates, inserts and daily deletes replicated while ignore large purges?
2) How can large purge changes be reflected in replicated tables as well without deleting daily deletes?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2012
I am facing this error in my application page
OraOLEDB(0x80040E14)
ROW-00001
Cannot allocate memory
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2006
We are using Oarcle 10G release and IIS-6 in our web application.
After moving to oracle 10G we started getting this error
ROW-00001: Cannot allocate memory
now and then. If we restart, the problem gets resolved.
Applications stability is broken because of this.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2013
Using Oracle 11g, below is the table, partitions, unique and non-unique local index:
CREATE TABLE DOCA( DOCA_ID NUMBER NOT NULL , DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID NUMBER NULL , ROW_PURGE_DATE DATE NULL ,)PARTITION BY RANGE(ROW_PURGE_DATE)INTERVAL(NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'))( PARTITION P2007 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/01/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')), PARTITION P200801 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/02/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')),) TABLESPACE T0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX XPKDOCA ON DOCA( DOCA_ID ASC, ROW_PURGE_DATE ASC)LOCALREVERSE TABLESPACE I0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ADD CONSTRAINT XPKDOCA PRIMARY KEY (DOCA_ID); CREATE INDEX XFKDOCA_DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ON DOCA( DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ASC)LOCALREVERSETABLESPACE I0;
I would like to know the difference between the performance of the unique and non-unique local indexes?.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 25, 2007
i want to get table name, constraint name, constraint type with join processes in string type. this is what i want: alter table tablename add constraint constraintname constrainttype(columnname)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2012
Actually am trying to replicate two db servers from one in hong kong and another in china. when am trying to establish the replication, am getting error 'ORA-04052: error occurred when looking up remote object' like this...
but the same way i have tried in my local network, it is working fine.i have tried schema replication through enterprise manager grid control..
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2010
what are the recommended network requirements for implementing Oracle Multi Master replication.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2009
i need to set up a central server with all the master tables and two other local database which will hold the updatable materialized view of the master table...the databases must be synchronized with central server..and user will work on the materialized view database...
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2008
I want to set up advance replication for 3 master site (multimaster) I created 3 master site named orc1,orc2,orc3 and followed up oracle replication management of API book instruction I created 2 tables(tes1,test2) in hr schema in all 3 master site with the same data. then I created the following steps
1-CONNECT repadmin/repadmin@orc1
2-Create the master group named hr_test_repg
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.CREATE_MASTER_REPGROUP(
gname => 'hr_test_repg');
END;
/
4-add tables test1 and test2 to the group
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT(
gname => 'hr_test_repg',
type => 'TABLE',
oname => 'test1',
[code]....
I could create DBMS_REPCAT.GENERATE_REPLICATION_SUPPORT for test2 but not for test1 and it produces error
RROR at line 1:
RA-23309: object hr.test1 of type TABLE exists
RA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SYS_ERROR", line 105
RA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_REPCAT_MAS", line 2552
RA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_REPCAT", line 562
RA-06512: at line 2
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2009
I have one 10g database in other country. I want part of their db (selected tables or tablespaces) and import that data to my 10g DB and i want keep to date this data.
I know two ways
1. Data Pump Imp/Emp via FTP, but i can't send only data that have changed (incremental), i must pumping whole selected part of database (i want only new data from their DB, but consistanse with my DB)
2. RMAN etc. or other archivisation tool, i can do incremental achivisation, but can i send files to another instances (my db) and load only that data? Can i do that with SQL*Loader?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2010
For using replication in our production, here i am testing golden gate as replication tool. I tested all scenario in Uni direction ( source to destination). Now have to test replication with DDL support in Bi-Direction. Not getting any Doc for doing replication in Bi-direction( Two Way). If any one has done the same, then please share limitation of replication in Bi-direction through Golden Gate.
View 7 Replies
View Related
